Analyze Diet
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI2022; 12(18); 2331; doi: 10.3390/ani12182331

Can Ponies (Equus Caballus) Distinguish Human Facial Expressions?

Abstract: Communication within a species is essential for access to resources, alerting to dangers, group facilitation and social bonding; human facial expressions are considered to be an important factor in one’s ability to communicate with others. Evidence has shown that dogs and horses are able to distinguish positive and negative facial expressions by observing photographs of humans, however there is currently no research on how facial expressions from a live human are perceived by horses. This study investigated how ponies distinguish facial expressions presented by live actors. Trained actors (n = 2), using the human Facial Action Coding System, displayed four facial expressions (anger, sadness, joy and neutral) individually to twenty ponies. Heart rate and behaviors of the ponies including first monocular eye look, eye look duration (right and left side bias) and latency to approach were observed. A generalized linear mixed model (GLIMMIX) using Sidak’s multiple comparisons of least squared means determined that when exposed to anger expressions ponies looked more often with their left eye first and when exposed to joy, looked more often with their right eye first (p = 0.011). The ponies spent more time looking at angry expressions (p = 0.0003) in comparison to other expressions. There was no variation in heart rate across expressions (p > 0.89). Regardless of human facial expression, ponies looked longer (p = 0.0035), took longer to approach (p = 0.0297) and displayed more oral behaviours (p < 0.0001) with one actor than the other indicating increased arousal or negative valence. Ponies with more experience as a lesson mount had lower heart rates (p < 0.0001) carried their head lower (p < 0.0001), kept their left ear on the actor (p < 0.03) and exhibited more oral behaviours (p < 0.0001) than ponies with less experience. This study demonstrates that ponies are able to distinguish facial expressions presented by a live human, but other factors also contribute to their responses to humans.
Publication Date: 2022-09-07 PubMed ID: 36139191PubMed Central: PMC9495040DOI: 10.3390/ani12182331Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research investigated how ponies interpret facial expressions displayed by human beings in a live setting, demonstrating that ponies can discern different expressions, and their reactions are dictated by additional factors as well.

Objectives of the Study

  • The primary goal of the study was to comprehend how ponies translate facial expressions when the expressions are demonstrated by human beings in real-time scenarios.
  • This study fills a knowledge gap, as earlier research on horses and dogs distinguishing human facial expressions relied on photographs rather than live actors.

Methodology

  • Twenty ponies were part of this study, which were exposed to four distinctive facial expressions – anger, sadness, joy, and neutral presented by two trained actors.
  • The actors used the human Facial Action Coding System to depict these expressions.
  • The pony reactions were tracked in terms of heart rate, first monocular eye look, eye look duration, latency to approach, and side bias.
  • The reactions were assessed using a generalized linear mixed model (GLIMMIX) and Sidak’s multiple comparisons of least squared methods.

Observations and Findings

  • The results suggest that ponies tend to use their left eye more often when exposed to human anger expressions and their right eye to pick up joy expressions.
  • The ponies devoted more time observing angry expressions compared to other expressions.
  • Interestingly, the study discovered that heart rates of the ponies did not significantly differ across various expressions.
  • However, ponies exhibited longer gaze duration, took longer time to approach, and demonstrated more oral behaviors towards one actor than the other, hinting at increased arousal or negative valence, despite the expression being the same.
  • In addition, ponies with prior experience working as a lesson mount exhibited a lower heart rate, held their heads lower, kept their left ear on the actor more often and displayed more oral behaviors compared to less experienced ponies.

Conclusion

  • The research significantly shows that ponies can distinguish between different human facial expressions when presented by a live individual.
  • However, it also brings to light that the ponies’ responses to humans are influenced by other factors beyond just facial expressions.

Cite This Article

APA
Merkies K, Sudarenko Y, Hodder AJ. (2022). Can Ponies (Equus Caballus) Distinguish Human Facial Expressions? Animals (Basel), 12(18), 2331. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12182331

Publication

ISSN: 2076-2615
NlmUniqueID: 101635614
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 12
Issue: 18
PII: 2331

Researcher Affiliations

Merkies, Katrina
  • Department of Animal Bioscience, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada.
  • Campbell Centre for the Study of Animal Reproduction, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada.
Sudarenko, Yuliia
  • Department of Animal Bioscience, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada.
Hodder, Abigail J
  • Department of Animal Bioscience, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada.
  • Campbell Centre for the Study of Animal Reproduction, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

This article includes 44 references
  1. Buck RW, Savin VJ, Miller RE, Caul WF. Communication of affect through facial expressions in humans.. J Pers Soc Psychol 1972 Sep;23(3):362-71.
    doi: 10.1037/h0033171pubmed: 5070318google scholar: lookup
  2. Witham C, Foo YZ, Jeffery L, Burton NS, Rhodes G. Anger and fearful expressions influence perceptions of physical strength: Testing the signalling functions of emotional facial expressions with a visual aftereffects paradigm. Evol. Hum. Behav. 2021;42:547–555.
  3. Wathan J, Proops L, Grounds K, McComb K. Horses discriminate between facial expressions of conspecifics.. Sci Rep 2016 Dec 20;6:38322.
    doi: 10.1038/srep38322pmc: PMC5171796pubmed: 27995958google scholar: lookup
  4. Purugganan MD. What is domestication?. Trends Ecol Evol 2022 Aug;37(8):663-671.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2022.04.006pubmed: 35534288google scholar: lookup
  5. Zych AD, Gogolla N. Expressions of emotions across species.. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2021 Jun;68:57-66.
    doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2021.01.003pmc: PMC8259711pubmed: 33548631google scholar: lookup
  6. Nawroth C, Albuquerque N, Savalli C, Single MS, McElligott AG. Goats prefer positive human emotional facial expressions.. R Soc Open Sci 2018 Aug;5(8):180491.
    doi: 10.1098/rsos.180491pmc: PMC6124102pubmed: 30225038google scholar: lookup
  7. Trösch M, Pellon S, Cuzol F, Parias C, Nowak R, Calandreau L, Lansade L. Horses feel emotions when they watch positive and negative horse-human interactions in a video and transpose what they saw to real life.. Anim Cogn 2020 Jul;23(4):643-653.
    doi: 10.1007/s10071-020-01369-0pubmed: 32162112google scholar: lookup
  8. Proops L, Grounds K, Smith AV, McComb K. Animals Remember Previous Facial Expressions that Specific Humans Have Exhibited.. Curr Biol 2018 May 7;28(9):1428-1432.e4.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.03.035pubmed: 29706519google scholar: lookup
  9. Lindell A. Lateralization of the expression of facial emotion in humans.. Prog Brain Res 2018;238:249-270.
    doi: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2018.06.005pubmed: 30097194google scholar: lookup
  10. Bartolomeo P, Seidel Malkinson T. Hemispheric lateralization of attention processes in the human brain.. Curr Opin Psychol 2019 Oct;29:90-96.
    doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.12.023pubmed: 30711910google scholar: lookup
  11. Rogers LJ. Relevance of brain and behavioural lateralization to animal welfare. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2010;127:1–11.
  12. Farmer K, Krüger K, Byrne RW, Marr I. Sensory laterality in affiliative interactions in domestic horses and ponies (Equus caballus).. Anim Cogn 2018 Sep;21(5):631-637.
    doi: 10.1007/s10071-018-1196-9pmc: PMC6097077pubmed: 29948296google scholar: lookup
  13. Racca A, Guo K, Meints K, Mills DS. Reading faces: differential lateral gaze bias in processing canine and human facial expressions in dogs and 4-year-old children.. PLoS One 2012;7(4):e36076.
  14. Siniscalchi M, D’Ingeo S, Quaranta A. Lateralized emotional functioning in domestic animals. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2021;237:105282.
  15. Rørvang MV, Nielsen BL, McLean AN. Sensory Abilities of Horses and Their Importance for Equitation Science.. Front Vet Sci 2020;7:633.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00633pmc: PMC7509108pubmed: 33033724google scholar: lookup
  16. Smith AV, Proops L, Grounds K, Wathan J, McComb K. Functionally relevant responses to human facial expressions of emotion in the domestic horse (Equus caballus).. Biol Lett 2016 Feb;12(2):20150907.
    doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2015.0907pmc: PMC4780548pubmed: 26864784google scholar: lookup
  17. Thompson K, Clarkson L. How owners determine if the social and behavioral needs of their horses are being met: Findings from an Australian online survey. J. Vet. Behav. 2018;29:128–133.
  18. Farnsworth B. Facial Action Coding System (FACS)—A Visual Guidebook. .
  19. Waller BM, Julle-Daniere E, Micheletta J. Measuring the evolution of facial 'expression' using multi-species FACS.. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2020 Jun;113:1-11.
  20. Nakamura K, Takimoto-Inose A, Hasegawa T. Cross-modal perception of human emotion in domestic horses (Equus caballus).. Sci Rep 2018 Jun 21;8(1):8660.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-26892-6pmc: PMC6013457pubmed: 29930289google scholar: lookup
  21. Friard O, Gamba M. BORIS: A free, versatile open-source event-logging software for video/audio coding and live observations. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2016;7:1325–1330.
    doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.12584google scholar: lookup
  22. McDonnell S, Haviland J. Agonistic ethogram of the equid bachelor band. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1995;43:147–188.
  23. Forkman B, Boissy A, Meunier-Salaün MC, Canali E, Jones RB. A critical review of fear tests used on cattle, pigs, sheep, poultry and horses.. Physiol Behav 2007 Oct 22;92(3):340-74.
    doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2007.03.016pubmed: 18046784google scholar: lookup
  24. Hall C, Randle H, Pearson G, Preshaw L, Waran N. Assessing equine emotional state. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2018;205:183–193.
  25. Klose R, Berg E. Stress-related behavior of horses in adapted therapeutic riding lessons and hippotherapy sessions. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2019;76:95.
  26. Anderson DJ, Adolphs R. A framework for studying emotions across species.. Cell 2014 Mar 27;157(1):187-200.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.03.003pmc: PMC4098837pubmed: 24679535google scholar: lookup
  27. Schuurman N. Blogging situated emotions in human–horse relationships. Emot. Space Soc. 2014;13:1–8.
  28. Wathan J, Burrows AM, Waller BM, McComb K. EquiFACS: The Equine Facial Action Coding System.. PLoS One 2015;10(8):e0131738.
  29. Schrimpf A, Single MS, Nawroth C. Social Referencing in the Domestic Horse.. Animals (Basel) 2020 Jan 18;10(1).
    doi: 10.3390/ani10010164pmc: PMC7022515pubmed: 31963699google scholar: lookup
  30. Baba C, Kawai M, Takimoto-Inose A. Are Horses (Equus caballus) Sensitive to Human Emotional Cues?. Animals (Basel) 2019 Aug 29;9(9).
    doi: 10.3390/ani9090630pmc: PMC6770165pubmed: 31470656google scholar: lookup
  31. Heffner HE, Heffner RS. Sound localization in large mammals: localization of complex sounds by horses.. Behav Neurosci 1984 Jun;98(3):541-55.
    doi: 10.1037/0735-7044.98.3.541pubmed: 6732928google scholar: lookup
  32. Merkies K, Franzin O. Enhanced Understanding of Horse-Human Interactions to Optimize Welfare.. Animals (Basel) 2021 May 9;11(5).
    doi: 10.3390/ani11051347pmc: PMC8151687pubmed: 34065156google scholar: lookup
  33. De Boyer Des Roches A, Richard-Yris MA, Henry S, Ezzaouïa M, Hausberger M. Laterality and emotions: visual laterality in the domestic horse (Equus caballus) differs with objects' emotional value.. Physiol Behav 2008 Jun 9;94(3):487-90.
    doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2008.03.002pubmed: 18455205google scholar: lookup
  34. Larose C, Richard-Yris MA, Hausberger M, Rogers LJ. Laterality of horses associated with emotionality in novel situations.. Laterality 2006 Jul;11(4):355-67.
    doi: 10.1080/13576500600624221pubmed: 16754236google scholar: lookup
  35. Huber L, Racca A, Scaf B, Virányi Z, Range F. Discrimination of familiar human faces in dogs (Canis familiaris).. Learn Motiv 2013 Nov;44(4):258-269.
    doi: 10.1016/j.lmot.2013.04.005pmc: PMC3807667pubmed: 24187385google scholar: lookup
  36. Schmoll T. Can horses read emotional cues from human faces? Re-analysis of Smith et al. (2016).. Biol Lett 2016 Sep;12(9).
    doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2016.0201pmc: PMC5046913pubmed: 27624794google scholar: lookup
  37. Scopa C, Palagi E, Sighieri C, Baragli P. Physiological outcomes of calming behaviors support the resilience hypothesis in horses.. Sci Rep 2018 Nov 30;8(1):17501.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-35561-7pmc: PMC6269543pubmed: 30504840google scholar: lookup
  38. Rankin CH, Abrams T, Barry RJ, Bhatnagar S, Clayton DF, Colombo J, Coppola G, Geyer MA, Glanzman DL, Marsland S, McSweeney FK, Wilson DA, Wu CF, Thompson RF. Habituation revisited: an updated and revised description of the behavioral characteristics of habituation.. Neurobiol Learn Mem 2009 Sep;92(2):135-8.
    doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2008.09.012pmc: PMC2754195pubmed: 18854219google scholar: lookup
  39. Baragli P, Vitale V, Banti L, Bergero D, Sighieri C. Life experience and object-directed emotions in horses. J. Vet. Behav. 2013;8:e2.
  40. Larssen R, Roth LS. Regular positive reinforcement training increases contact-seeking behaviour in horses. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2022;252:105651.
  41. Stone SM. Human facial discrimination in horses: can they tell us apart?. Anim Cogn 2010 Jan;13(1):51-61.
    doi: 10.1007/s10071-009-0244-xpubmed: 19533185google scholar: lookup
  42. Merkies K, McKechnie MJ, Zakrajsek E. Behavioural and physiological responses of therapy horses to mentally traumatized humans. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2018;205:61–67.
  43. Widen SC, Christy AM, Hewett K, Russell JA. Do proposed facial expressions of contempt, shame, embarrassment, and compassion communicate the predicted emotion?. Cogn Emot 2011 Aug;25(5):898-906.
    doi: 10.1080/02699931.2010.508270pubmed: 21824027google scholar: lookup
  44. Leith KP, Baumeister RF. Why do bad moods increase self-defeating behavior? Emotion, risk taking, and self-regulation.. J Pers Soc Psychol 1996 Dec;71(6):1250-67.
    doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.71.6.1250pubmed: 8979390google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.