Analyze Diet
Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia2016; 43(6); 623-634; doi: 10.1111/vaa.12359

Cardiopulmonary effects and anaesthesia recovery quality in horses anaesthetized with isoflurane and low-dose S-ketamine or medetomidine infusions.

Abstract: To evaluate cardiopulmonary effects and anaesthesia recovery quality in horses anaesthetized with isoflurane receiving medetomidine or S-ketamine infusions. Methods: Randomized, blinded, prospective clinical trial. Methods: Fifty horses undergoing elective surgery. Methods: After acepromazine and flunixin meglumine premedication, horses received medetomidine (7 μg kg-1 ) intravenously (IV). Anaesthesia was induced with midazolam and racemic ketamine (Med treatment group; 2.2 mg kg-1 ; n = 25) or S-ketamine (S-ket treatment group; 1.1 mg kg-1 ; n = 25) IV and maintained with isoflurane in oxygen/air and medetomidine (Med; 3.5 μg kg-1 hour-1 ) or S-ketamine (S-ket; 0.5 mg kg-1 hour-1 ). All horses were mechanically ventilated. Cardiopulmonary variables were evaluated. Isoflurane end-tidal concentrations (Fe'Iso), dobutamine requirements and thiopental boli were recorded. Plasma samples were collected in six horses to evaluate S-ketamine and S-norketamine concentrations. After surgery, medetomidine 2 μg kg-1 was administered IV. Four independent observers scored recovery using a visual analogue scale and a numerical rating scale. Results: Both groups required similar mean Fe'Iso (1%). However, S-ket horses needed more thiopental boli. Median intraoperative cardiac index values were higher with S-ket (4.5 L minute-1  m-2 ) than Med (3.9 L minute-1  m-2 ). Overall, there were no differences in heart rate, blood pressure or dobutamine requirements; however, horses in S-ket showed higher heart rate values at 30 minutes after anaesthesia induction. Compared with Med horses, S-ket horses showed decreased PaO2 and increased pulmonary venous admixture values estimated with the Fshunt calculation. Recoveries were shorter and of poorer quality with S-ket. During infusion, S-ketamine and S-norketamine plasma concentrations lay in the ranges of 0.209-0.917 μg mL-1 and 0.250-0.723 μg mL-1 , respectively. Conclusions: Despite the higher intraoperative cardiac index with S-ket, both protocols were considered to provide acceptable cardiovascular function. However, recovery quality was significantly better in the Med group.
Publication Date: 2016-02-25 PubMed ID: 26915545DOI: 10.1111/vaa.12359Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research investigates the effects of using isoflurane with either low-dose S-ketamine or medetomidine infusions on the cardiopulmonary response and quality of anaesthesia recovery in horses. They carried out a clinical trial involving 50 horses and found that using S-ketamine resulted in higher cardiac index, however, the quality of anaesthesia recovery was significantly better with medetomidine.

Methods

The study was a randomized, blinded, prospective clinical trial involving 50 horses that were slated for elective surgery. The horses were premedicated with acepromazine and flunixin meglumine, after which they were given medetomidine. Anaesthesia was induced using midazolam and either racemic ketamine (for the Med group) or S-ketamine (for the S-ket group). The horses’ anaesthesia was then maintained with isoflurane in an oxygen/air mix plus either medetomidine or S-ketamine.

  • The researchers measured cardiopulmonary variables such as isoflurane end-tidal concentrations, heart rate, and blood pressure. They also recorded the dobutamine requirements and use of thiopental boli.
  • To estimate S-ketamine and S-norketamine concentrations, plasma samples were taken from six horses.

Results

The research found that whilst the mean Fe’Iso (isoflurane end-tidal concentrations) required by both groups was similar, the horses in the S-ket group required more thiopental boli.

  • The median intraoperative cardiac index values were higher with S-ket compared to Med.
  • Though there were no major differences in heart rate, blood pressure, or dobutamine requirements across the two groups, the S-ket group showed a higher heart rate 30 minutes after the anaesthesia was induced.
  • Horses in the S-ket group had decreased PaO and increased pulmonary venous admixture values as estimated by the Fshunt calculation.
  • Recovery times were shorter and of lesser quality with S-ket compared to Med, where recoveries were of better quality.
  • During the infusion, S-ketamine and S-norketamine plasma concentrations were found to be in the ranges of 0.209-0.917 μg mL and 0.250-0.723 μg mL, respectively.

Conclusions

Despite the higher intraoperative cardiac index associated with S-ket, both protocols were deemed to provide acceptable cardiovascular function. However, the quality of anaesthesia recovery was significantly better in the Med group. This research suggests that for horses undergoing elective surgery, using medetomidine with isoflurane might lead to better anaesthesia recovery compared to using S-ketamine with isoflurane.

Cite This Article

APA
Menzies MP, Ringer SK, Conrot A, Theurillat R, Kluge K, Kutter AP, Jackson M, Thormann W, Bettschart-Wolfensberger R. (2016). Cardiopulmonary effects and anaesthesia recovery quality in horses anaesthetized with isoflurane and low-dose S-ketamine or medetomidine infusions. Vet Anaesth Analg, 43(6), 623-634. https://doi.org/10.1111/vaa.12359

Publication

ISSN: 1467-2995
NlmUniqueID: 100956422
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 43
Issue: 6
Pages: 623-634

Researcher Affiliations

Menzies, M Paula Larenza
  • Section of Anaesthesiology, Equine Department, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Ringer, Simone K
  • Section of Anaesthesiology, Equine Department, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Conrot, Aude
  • Section of Anaesthesiology, Equine Department, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Theurillat, Regula
  • Clinical Pharmacology Laboratory, Institute for Infectious Diseases, University of Berne, Berne, Switzerland.
Kluge, Katharina
  • Section of Anaesthesiology, Equine Department, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Kutter, Annette Pn
  • Section of Anaesthesiology, Equine Department, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Jackson, Michelle
  • Clinic for Equine Surgery, Equine Department, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Thormann, Wolfgang
  • Clinical Pharmacology Laboratory, Institute for Infectious Diseases, University of Berne, Berne, Switzerland.
Bettschart-Wolfensberger, Regula
  • Section of Anaesthesiology, Equine Department, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. regula.bettschart-wolfensberger@uzh.ch.

MeSH Terms

  • Anesthesia Recovery Period
  • Anesthesia, Intravenous / veterinary
  • Anesthetics, Combined
  • Animals
  • Cardiovascular System / drug effects
  • Female
  • Horses / surgery
  • Isoflurane / administration & dosage
  • Ketamine / administration & dosage
  • Male
  • Medetomidine / administration & dosage
  • Prospective Studies
  • Respiration / drug effects
  • Single-Blind Method