Analyze Diet
Frontiers in veterinary science2024; 11; 1450395; doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1450395

Case report: Incomplete bypass ileocolostomy without partial typhlectomy in five horses with acute, non-reducible cecocolic intussusceptions and review of literature.

Abstract: Cecocolic intussusceptions are a rare condition of acute colic in horses requiring immediate surgical intervention due to persistent uncontrollable pain and ongoing ischemic cecal necrosis. Particularly in cases where reduction of the intussusception is surgically not feasible surgical interventions such as partial typhlectomy through colotomy (partial cecal amputation) combined with or without cecal bypass techniques are described. Alternatively, surgical interventions can also be performed without partial typhlectomy via incomplete bypass ileocolostomy. Information regarding applicable techniques and outcomes base on sparse literature of single case reports or small case series. Therefore, this case series aims to add more cases treated with incomplete bypass ileocolostomy without typhlectomy to existing literature and to compare the outcome by reviewing medical records from January 2009 to March 2024 in context to literature. Five horses were surgically treated and were followed-up between 1 and 9 years. Minor short-term complications were recorded during hospitalization such as transient mild colic and febrile episodes. Long-term outcome revealed that horses received or exceed their previous level of use. By adding the hereby presented cases to published data horses treated with ileocolostomy without partial typhlectomy had a long-term survival rate of 100%. However, numbers of published cases are still low with 49 horses being included in the literature review whereof 42 recovered from surgery. The overall long-term survival rate was 53%. The added value of this study is based on the comprehensive documentation of a cohort of five horses successfully treated with an incomplete bypass procedure, demonstrating favorable long-term outcomes. Furthermore, the study advances the surgical technique by implementing the closure of mesenteric gap. The evidence for the application of the surgical technique has been strengthened.
Publication Date: 2024-11-27 PubMed ID: 39664891PubMed Central: PMC11631880DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1450395Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Case Reports
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article studies the use of an incomplete bypass ileocolostomy treatment for horses suffering from acute, non-reducible cecocolic intussusceptions, a serious equine health condition. It provides valuable data supporting this surgery’s safety and effectiveness, compared to other interventions like partial typhlectomy.

Background to Research

  • Acute cecocolic intussusceptions are a serious equine condition causing severe colic (abdominal pain) in horses. They typically require immediate surgical intervention.
  • There are different surgical techniques to treat this condition which include partial typhlectomy (partial amputation of cecum) that can be combined with or without cecal bypass techniques.
  • The incomplete bypass ileocolostomy is an alternative surgical intervention that does not involve partial typhlectomy.

Objective of Research

  • The main aim of this study was to look into the outcomes of incomplete bypass ileocolostomy without partial typhlectomy and to compare these results with established surgical techniques, via a literature review.
  • The study further aimed to add to the existing literature so as to strengthen the evidence supporting this non-partial typhlectomy surgery.

Methodology and Results

  • The researchers used medical records of horses from January 2009 to March 2024 to gather data. They found five instances where horses were treated with incomplete bypass ileocolostomy without typhlectomy.
  • These horses were followed up between 1 and 9 years post-surgery. Minor short-term complications including transient mild colic and febrile episodes found during hospitalization.
  • In terms of long-term results, all horses recuperated to or surpassed their previous level of use. Those treated with ileocolostomy without partial typhlectomy had a 100% long-term survival rate.

Literature Review Outcome

  • A review of previously published cases (49 horses included) revealed that 42 recovered which gave an overall long-term survival rate of 53%.
  • Even though the number of published cases was low, the case series strongly suggested that horses treated with ileocolostomy without partial typhlectomy had a higher survival rate.

Significance of the Study

  • The study successfully demonstrated that the incomplete bypass method can treat cecocolic intussusceptions effectively in horses, with long-term positive outcomes.
  • The findings also added valuable data to the existing literature about this surgical technique and bolstered its application, thereby potentially informing veterinary surgical decision-making.

Cite This Article

APA
Troillet A, Scharner D. (2024). Case report: Incomplete bypass ileocolostomy without partial typhlectomy in five horses with acute, non-reducible cecocolic intussusceptions and review of literature. Front Vet Sci, 11, 1450395. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2024.1450395

Publication

ISSN: 2297-1769
NlmUniqueID: 101666658
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 11
Pages: 1450395

Researcher Affiliations

Troillet, Antonia
  • Department for Horses, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Scharner, Doreen
  • Department for Horses, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

This article includes 18 references
  1. Dart AJ, Hodgson DR, Snyder JR. Caecal disease in equids. Aust Vet J (1997) 75:552–7.
  2. Johnson PJ, Wilson DA, Keegan KG, Purcell KL, Moore LA, Kreeger JM. Retrospective study of cecocolic intussusception (cecal inversion) in nine horses (1982-1998). J Equine Vet Sci (1999) 19:190–5.
  3. Owen RH, Jagger DW, Quan-Taylor R. Caecal intussusceptions in horses and the significance of Anoplocephala perfoliata. Vet Rec (1989) 124:34–7.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.124.2.34pubmed: 2644733google scholar: lookup
  4. Edwards GB. Surgical management of intussusception in the horse. Equine Vet J (1986) 18:313–21.
  5. Gaughan EM, Hackett RP. Cecocolic intussusception in horses: 11 cases (1979-1989). JAVMA (1990) 197:1373–5.
    doi: 10.2460/javma.1990.197.10.1373pubmed: 2266059google scholar: lookup
  6. Boussauw BHS, Domingo R, Wilderjans H, Picavet T. Treatment of irreducible caecocolic intussusception in horses by jejuno(ileo)colostomy. Vet Rec (2001) 149:16–8.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.149.1.16pubmed: 11486767google scholar: lookup
  7. Bell RJW, Textor JA. Caecal intussusceptions in horses: a New Zealand perspective. Aust Vet J (2010) 88:272–6.
  8. Smith KM. Vet med today: what is your diagnosis?. JAVMA (2013) 243:623–5.
    doi: 10.2460/javma.243.5.623pubmed: 23971838google scholar: lookup
  9. Hubert JD, Hardy J, Holcombe SJ, Moore RM. Cecal amputation within the right ventral colon for surgical treatment of nonreducible cecocolic intussusception in 8 horses. Vet Surg (2000) 29:317–25.
    doi: 10.1053/jvet.2000.5598pubmed: 10917281google scholar: lookup
  10. Martin BB, Freeman MVB, Ross MW, Richardson DW, Johnston JK, Orsini JA. Cecocolic and cecocecal intussusception in horses: 30 cases (1976-1996). JAVMA (1999) 214:80–4.
    doi: 10.2460/javma.1999.214.01.80pubmed: 9887945google scholar: lookup
  11. Ward JL, Fubini SL. Partial typhlectomy and ileocolostomy for treatment of non-reducible cecocolic intussusception in a horse. JAVMA (1994) 205:325–8.
    doi: 10.2460/javma.1994.205.02.325pubmed: 7928613google scholar: lookup
  12. Wiemer P, van der Veen H. Nonreducible caecocolic intussusception. Equine Vet Educ (1999) 11:179–81.
  13. Robertson JT, Johnson FM. Surgical correction of cecocolic intussusception in a horse. JAVMA (1980) 176:223–4.
    pubmed: 7364630
  14. Tyler R. Caecocolic intussusception in a yearling Thoroughbred filly and its surgical management by ileocolostomy. Equine Vet Educ (1992) 4:229–32.
  15. Lores M, Ortenburger AI. Use of cecal bypass via side-to-side ileocolic anastomosis without ileal transection for treatment of cecocolic intussusception in three horses. JAVMA (2008) 232:574–7.
    doi: 10.2460/javma.232.4.574pubmed: 18279096google scholar: lookup
  16. Freeman DE. Options for treatment of cecocolic intussusception in horses. JAVMA (2008) 232:1134.
    pubmed: 18441616
  17. Huskamp B. Some surgical managements of the caecum in the horse. Pferdeheilkunde (1988) 4:185–8.
    doi: 10.21836/PEM19880501google scholar: lookup
  18. Andersen UV, Howe DK, Olsen SN, Nielsen MK. Recent advances in diagnosing pathogenic equine gastrointestinal helminths: the challenge of prepatent detection. Vet Parasitol (2013) 192:1–9.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2012.11.003pubmed: 23199789google scholar: lookup