Analyze Diet

Cervicothoracic (stellate) ganglion block in conscious horses.

Abstract: Seven adult horses were used to compare the cardiovascular and respiratory effects of unilateral (right side) and bilateral cervicothoracic ganglion (CTG) blockade. An 18-gauge, 25-cm needle was placed midventrally between articulations of the 1st and 2nd ribs from a cranial and paratracheal site. One gram of lidocaine HCl in aqueous solution (100 ml) was used to infiltrate the CTG. Cervicothoracic sympathetic blockade was characterized by Horner's syndrome, increased skin temperature and profuse sweating over the face, neck, and thoracic limb. Comparison of base-line data with data obtained during unilateral and bilateral CTG blockades indicated a significant (P less than 0.05) decrease in respiratory rate, significant (P less than 0.05) increases in arterial oxygen, and carbon dioxide tensions, and a significant increase in subcutaneous temperature at the neck and shoulder. Systolic, diastolic, and mean aortic blood pressures, pulse pressure, rectal temperature, arterial pH, bicarbonate, PVC, and total solid concentration did not change significantly from base-line values. Arterial O2 tension was significantly (P less than 0.05) less in horses with bilateral CTG blockade than in horses with unilateral CTG blockade. In 4 horses without cervicothoracic sympathetic blockade that were given lidocaine (1 g in 100 ml) in the right cervicothoracic region, cardiovascular and respiratory values did not change significantly from base-line values. The nonsedated healthy horse tolerated unilateral CTG blockade well. Bilateral and unilateral injections of 100 ml of 1% lidocaine into the CTG at intervals of less than 2 hours induced bilateral recurrent nerve paralysis and airway obstruction.
Publication Date: 1986-01-01 PubMed ID: 3946904
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Comparative Study
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This study examines the impact of performing a cervicothoracic ganglion block, which is a type of local anesthetic, on the cardiovascular and respiratory systems of seven adult horses, comparing the effects of the anesthetic being applied on one side (unilateral) versus both sides (bilateral).

Research Method

  • The researchers used seven healthy adult horses for the study
  • They applied an injection of lidocaine HCl, a local anesthetic, between the first and second ribs of the horse, in order to target the cervicothoracic ganglion (CTG)
  • They then monitored and compared how the horse’s body responded under three different conditions: before the injection (baseline), after a unilateral CTG block, and after a bilateral CTG block

Findings

  • After the CTG block, the horses demonstrated features of Horner’s syndrome (a nerve disorder affecting the face and eyes), increased skin temperature, and extensive sweating across the face, neck, and upper body
  • There was a notable decrease in respiratory rate after the CTG block compared to the baseline data
  • There was also a significant increase in both arterial oxygen and carbon dioxide levels, as well as an increased temperature under the skin at the neck and shoulder area
  • No significant changes were observed in blood pressure, rectal temperature, arterial pH, bicarbonate, PVC, and total solid concentration, suggesting that these body functions remained stable
  • Arterial oxygen tension was notably lower in horses that underwent bilateral CTG blockade compared to those that underwent unilateral CTG blockade
  • The horses tolerated the unilateral CTG blockade well without any sedation

Potential Drawbacks

  • The researchers found that if injections of the anesthetic into the CTG were performed too frequently (less than 2 hours apart), this could cause bilateral recurrent nerve paralysis and airway obstruction in the horses
  • The test didn’t significantly change cardiovascular and respiratory values in four horses without cervicothoracic sympathetic blockade given the lidocaine in the right cervicothoracic region

Overall, these findings suggest that CTG blockade could have potential use in anesthetic procedures in horses but caution is required to prevent potential complications.

Cite This Article

APA
Skarda RT, Muir WW, Swanson CR, Hubbell JA. (1986). Cervicothoracic (stellate) ganglion block in conscious horses. Am J Vet Res, 47(1), 21-26.

Publication

ISSN: 0002-9645
NlmUniqueID: 0375011
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 47
Issue: 1
Pages: 21-26

Researcher Affiliations

Skarda, R T
    Muir, W W
      Swanson, C R
        Hubbell, J A

          MeSH Terms

          • Animals
          • Autonomic Nerve Block / veterinary
          • Blood Circulation / drug effects
          • Horses / physiology
          • Lidocaine / pharmacology
          • Respiration / drug effects
          • Stellate Ganglion

          Citations

          This article has been cited 3 times.
          1. Dai D, Zheng B, Yu Z, Lin S, Tang Y, Chen M, Ke P, Zheng C, Chen Y, Wu X. Right stellate ganglion block improves learning and memory dysfunction and hippocampal injury in rats with sleep deprivation. BMC Anesthesiol 2021 Nov 8;21(1):272.
            doi: 10.1186/s12871-021-01486-4pubmed: 34749669google scholar: lookup
          2. Holmes LC, Gaughan EM, Gorondy DA, Hogge S, Spire MF. The effect of perineural anesthesia on infrared thermographic images of the forelimb digits of normal horses. Can Vet J 2003 May;44(5):392-6.
            pubmed: 12757130
          3. Wang Y, Wang L, Jin Z, Wen C, Wei L, Yang D, Deng X. The effect of ultrasound-guided single right stellate ganglion block on postoperative first night sleep in maxillofacial surgery patients: a single center randomized controlled study. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 2025 Oct;87(10):6425-6434.
            doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000003732pubmed: 41181513google scholar: lookup