Analyze Diet
Research in veterinary science2024; 176; 105346; doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2024.105346

Changes in saliva analytes in equine gastric ulcer syndrome (EGUS) after treatment: a pilot study.

Abstract: Equine gastric ulcer syndrome (EGUS) is a prevalent condition in horses, affecting up to 93% of racehorses. Comprising the equine squamous gastric disease (ESGD) and the equine glandular gastric disease (EGGD), EGUS poses significant health challenges. Saliva, a non-invasive and easily obtainable sample, is increasingly recognized for its potential as a source of biomarkers in horses. This study investigates changes in saliva analytes using automated assays before and after EGUS treatment, aiming to identify biomarkers indicative of treatment success or failure. A total of 28 horses diagnosed with EGUS were treatment with omeprazole for six weeks and further divided into successful (n = 15) or unsuccessful (n = 13) treatment group. Saliva samples were collected before and after treatment, and analytes related to enzymes, metabolites, proteins, redox biomarkers, and minerals were measured using an automated chemistry analyzer. Results revealed that horses with successful treatment, indicated by reduced EGGD and ESGD scores, showed significant increases in bicarbonate and urea, and decreases in adenosine deaminase (ADA), and creatine kinase (CK). Conversely, horses with non-successful treatment showed no significant changes in salivary analytes. These analytes have the advantages of an easy and fast measurement and the possibility of being applied in routine. Further studies with larger populations should be performed to establish the possible practical application of these analytes as biomarkers of treatment.
Publication Date: 2024-07-02 PubMed ID: 38968646DOI: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2024.105346Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research article covers a study on how the levels of particular components in horse saliva change before and after treatment for equine gastric ulcer syndrome (EGUS). The study found that successful treatment led to increases in some substances and decreases in others, while unsuccessful treatment revealed no significant changes.

Background

  • This research focuses on Equine Gastric Ulcer Syndrome (EGUS), a condition prevalent in up to 93% of racehorses. EGUS is divided into equine squamous gastric disease (ESGD) and the equine glandular gastric disease (EGGD), both of which pose significant health challenges to horses.
  • The study makes use of saliva, which is a non-invasive and easily obtainable sample, for identifying potential biomarkers in horses. Biomarkers are measurable substances whose presence indicates a biological state or condition.

Methodology

  • The research involved a total of 28 horses diagnosed with EGUS. They underwent treatment with omeprazole for six weeks.
  • The horses were then divided according to treatment outcome – successful (15) or unsuccessful (13).
  • Saliva samples were collected before and after treatment. These samples were then measured using an automated chemistry analyzer for analytes related to enzymes, metabolites, proteins, redox biomarkers, and minerals.

Results and Conclusions

  • The results of the study showed a correlation between successful treatment and significant increases in bicarbonate and urea, as well as decreases in adenosine deaminase (ADA), and creatine kinase (CK) in the saliva of horses.
  • The horses corresponding to the unsuccessful treatment group didn’t exhibit any significant changes in these salivary analytes.
  • The study suggests that these analytes could quickly and easily be measured, making them potentially useful in routine treatments.
  • The researchers propose that further studies with larger populations are needed to confirm the practical application of these analytes as biomarkers for EGUS treatment.

Cite This Article

APA
Muñoz-Prieto A, Llamas-Amor E, Cerón JJ, Hansen S. (2024). Changes in saliva analytes in equine gastric ulcer syndrome (EGUS) after treatment: a pilot study. Res Vet Sci, 176, 105346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2024.105346

Publication

ISSN: 1532-2661
NlmUniqueID: 0401300
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 176
Pages: 105346

Researcher Affiliations

Muñoz-Prieto, Alberto
  • Interdisciplinary Laboratory of Clinical Analysis (Interlab-UMU), Regional Campus of International Excellence 'Campus Mare Nostrum', University of Murcia, Campus de Espinardo s/n, 30100 Murcia, Spain. Electronic address: alberto.munoz@um.es.
Llamas-Amor, Eva
  • Interdisciplinary Laboratory of Clinical Analysis (Interlab-UMU), Regional Campus of International Excellence 'Campus Mare Nostrum', University of Murcia, Campus de Espinardo s/n, 30100 Murcia, Spain. Electronic address: eva.llamasa@um.es.
Cerón, José Joaquín
  • Interdisciplinary Laboratory of Clinical Analysis (Interlab-UMU), Regional Campus of International Excellence 'Campus Mare Nostrum', University of Murcia, Campus de Espinardo s/n, 30100 Murcia, Spain. Electronic address: jjceron@um.es.
Hansen, Sanni
  • Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Section Medicine and Surgery, University of Copenhagen, Agrovej 8, 2630 Taastrup, Denmark. Electronic address: sannih@sund.ku.dk.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Horses
  • Horse Diseases / metabolism
  • Saliva / chemistry
  • Stomach Ulcer / veterinary
  • Stomach Ulcer / drug therapy
  • Stomach Ulcer / metabolism
  • Pilot Projects
  • Omeprazole / therapeutic use
  • Female
  • Biomarkers / analysis
  • Biomarkers / metabolism
  • Male
  • Anti-Ulcer Agents / therapeutic use

Conflict of Interest Statement

Declaration of competing interest None of the authors has any financial or personal relationships that could inappropriately influence or bias the content of the paper.