Analyze Diet
Equine veterinary journal2018; 51(4); 517-529; doi: 10.1111/evj.13031

Characterisation of the in vivo interactions between detomidine and methadone in horses: Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modelling.

Abstract: Pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic (PD) modelling offers new insights to design protocols for sedation and analgesia in standing horses. Objective: To evaluate the parameters and interactions between detomidine and methadone when given alone or combined in standing horses. Methods: Randomised, placebo-controlled, blinded, crossover. Methods: Eight adult healthy horses were given six treatments intravenously: saline (SAL); detomidine (5 μg/kg bwt; DET); methadone (0.2 mg/kg bwt; MET) alone or combined with detomidine (2.5 [MLD], 5 [MMD] or 10 [MHD] μg/kg bwt). Venous blood samples were obtained at predetermined times between 0 and 360 min after drug administration. Plasma detomidine and methadone were measured using a single, liquid/liquid extraction technique by liquid chromatography coupled with a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (LC-MS/MS). Sequential PK/PD modelling compared rival models, with and without PK and PD interaction between drugs, to fit the PD data including height of the head above the ground (HHAG), a visual analogue scale for sedation (VAS), electrical (ET), thermal (TT) and mechanical (MT) nociceptive thresholds and gastrointestinal motility (GIM) [1]. Results: Two and three compartment models best described the PK of detomidine and methadone, respectively. Detomidine decreased its own clearance as well as the clearance of methadone. The interaction of methadone on the effect of detomidine revealed an infra-additive (partial antagonism) effect for HHAG (α = -1.33), VAS (α = -0.98) and GIM (α = -1.05), a positive potentiation for ET (pot = 0.0041) and TT (pot = 0.133) and a synergistic to additive effect for MT (α = 0.78). Conclusions: This is a small experimental study. Conclusions: Different PK/PD interactions were demonstrated for each PD parameter and could be modelled in vivo. The modelling of our data will allow us to simulate and predict the effect of constant rate infusions of both drugs for future investigations.
Publication Date: 2018-11-17 PubMed ID: 30298682DOI: 10.1111/evj.13031Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Clinical Trial
  • Veterinary
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article focuses on the analysis of the interactions between two drugs, detomidine and methadone, in standing horses. The researchers incorporated pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) modelling methods to evaluate these interactions and explain their influences on various physiological parameters.

Research Methodology

  • The authors adopted a randomized, placebo-controlled, blinded, crossover design for the study.
  • In total, eight adult healthy horses were subjected to six different treatments. The treatment variables comprised of saline (a control treatment), detomidine alone, methadone alone, and a combination of methadone with detomidine at varying concentrations.
  • After the administration of these treatments, blood samples were taken from the horses at predefined times for up to 360 minutes post dose.
  • The researchers employed liquid chromatography coupled with a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (LC-MS/MS) to measure the plasma detomidine and methadone concentration, following a specific extraction technique.
  • Sequential PK/PD modelling was used to compare possible models, which may incorporate or exclude the PK and PD interactions between the two drugs. These models were used to analyze various parameters such as head height above the ground (HHAG), nociceptive thresholds involving electrical, thermal or mechanical stimuli, gastrointestinal motility (GIM), and a visual scale for sedation (VAS).

Key Results

  • The study found that the best descriptions for the pharmacokinetics of detomidine and methadone were provided by two and three compartment models, respectively.
  • A noticeable observation was that detomidine reduced its own clearance as well as that of methadone.
  • In terms of interactions, methadone demonstrated varied effects on the influence of detomidine. For instance, methadone showed a partial antagonistic effect for parameters such as HHAG, VAS, and GIM. On the other hand, it exhibited a synergistic or additive effect in other areas, such as the mentioned thermal and electrical nociceptive thresholds, and mechanical nociceptive thresholds.

Conclusions

  • Despite the study being limited by a small number of samples, it uncovered several distinct PK/PD interactions between detomidine and methadone for each of the analyzed parameters.
  • The generated models from the study outcomes can be utilized for future investigations, notably to simulate and predict the effects of consistent rate infusions of both detomidine and methadone.

Cite This Article

APA
Gozalo-Marcilla M, Luna SPL, Moreira da Silva R, Crosignani N, Lopes NP, Taylor PM, Pelligand L. (2018). Characterisation of the in vivo interactions between detomidine and methadone in horses: Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modelling. Equine Vet J, 51(4), 517-529. https://doi.org/10.1111/evj.13031

Publication

ISSN: 2042-3306
NlmUniqueID: 0173320
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 51
Issue: 4
Pages: 517-529

Researcher Affiliations

Gozalo-Marcilla, M
  • Department of Veterinary Surgery and Anaesthesiology, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil.
Luna, S P L
  • Department of Veterinary Surgery and Anaesthesiology, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil.
Moreira da Silva, R
  • Núcleo de Pesquisas em Produtos Naturais e Sintéticos (NPPNS), School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of São Paulo (USP), Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.
Crosignani, N
  • Department of Veterinary Surgery and Anaesthesiology, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil.
Lopes, N P
  • Núcleo de Pesquisas em Produtos Naturais e Sintéticos (NPPNS), School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of São Paulo (USP), Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.
Taylor, P M
  • Taylor Monroe, Ely, Cambridgeshire, UK.
Pelligand, L
  • Department of Clinical Services and Sciences and Comparative Biomedical Sciences, Royal Veterinary College, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, UK.

MeSH Terms

  • Analgesics, Opioid / administration & dosage
  • Analgesics, Opioid / pharmacology
  • Animals
  • Cross-Over Studies
  • Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
  • Drug Therapy, Combination
  • Horses
  • Hypnotics and Sedatives / administration & dosage
  • Hypnotics and Sedatives / pharmacology
  • Imidazoles / administration & dosage
  • Imidazoles / blood
  • Imidazoles / pharmacokinetics
  • Imidazoles / pharmacology
  • Methadone / administration & dosage
  • Methadone / blood
  • Methadone / pharmacokinetics
  • Methadone / pharmacology
  • Random Allocation

Grant Funding

  • 2010/08967-0 / Fundau00e7u00e3o de Amparo u00e0 Pesquisa do Estado de Su00e3o Paulo
  • 2014/00474-5 / Fundau00e7u00e3o de Amparo u00e0 Pesquisa do Estado de Su00e3o Paulo
  • 2014/50265-3 / Fundau00e7u00e3o de Amparo u00e0 Pesquisa do Estado de Su00e3o Paulo
  • 2017/01425-6 / Fundau00e7u00e3o de Amparo u00e0 Pesquisa do Estado de Su00e3o Paulo

Citations

This article has been cited 4 times.
  1. Haunhorst FR, Hopster K, Schmicke M, Bienert-Zeit A, Kästner S. Clinical effect of buprenorphine or butorphanol, in combination with detomidine and diazepam, on sedation and postoperative pain after cheek tooth extraction in horses. Can Vet J 2022 Jan;63(1):39-46.
    pubmed: 34975166
  2. de Oliveira AR, Gozalo-Marcilla M, Ringer SK, Schauvliege S, Fonseca MW, Esteves Trindade PH, Prospero Puoli Filho JN, Luna SPL. Development and validation of the facial scale (FaceSed) to evaluate sedation in horses. PLoS One 2021;16(6):e0251909.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251909pubmed: 34061878google scholar: lookup
  3. de Oliveira AR, Gozalo-Marcilla M, Ringer SK, Schauvliege S, Fonseca MW, Trindade PHE, Puoli Filho JNP, Luna SPL. Development, Validation, and Reliability of a Sedation Scale in Horses (EquiSed). Front Vet Sci 2021;8:611729.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.611729pubmed: 33665216google scholar: lookup
  4. Maldonado Moreno N, Alves Moreira J, Araujo De Oliveira L, Sanches Gontijo A, Castilho Baldi ML, Rocha Wenceslau R, Beier SL. Analgesic and Gastrointestinal Effects of Methadone in Horses Undergoing Orchiectomy. Animals (Basel) 2025 Aug 11;15(16).
    doi: 10.3390/ani15162358pubmed: 40867687google scholar: lookup