FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 10000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Equine veterinary journal2025; doi: 10.1111/evj.14483

Characterising equine abdominal lipomata: Can histological features improve the understanding of pathogenesis and risk?

Abstract: Strangulating lipomata are the most common cause of small intestinal strangulating obstruction. Evaluation of histological features of pathological and non-pathological lipomata, and the histological properties of omental and retroperitoneal fat have not been described. Objective: To characterise histological features of equine abdominal lipomata, omental and retroperitoneal adipose tissue, and associations between them. Methods: Prospective observational anatomic (gross and histological). Methods: Horses undergoing emergency laparotomy for management of abdominal pain in a single hospital were recruited. Signalment was recorded. Gross features of lipomata that were a cause of strangulating obstruction (pathological lipomata [PAL]), and lipomata that were currently not causing an intestinal obstruction (pedunculated [PEL] or non-pedunculated [NPL]) were recorded. Lipomata that were removed intra-operatively, or following owner-requested euthanasia, as well as omentum or retroperitoneal adipose tissue, where excised routinely as part of routine management (or post-euthanasia) were fixed in 10% neutral-buffered formalin prior to staining (haematoxylin and eosin, picrosirius red). Descriptive statistical analyses were performed. Pearson's chi-square, Fisher's exact or Kruskal-Wallis tests, as appropriate, were used to assess associations. Significance was p < 0.05. Results: Seventy-four horses were enrolled; 71 lipomata, 48 retroperitoneal adipose samples, and 26 omental samples underwent evaluation. Increasing age was predictive of lipomata presence and PAL/PEL. Neither omental nor retroperitoneal adipose tissue histological features were correlated with lipomata presence or type. PAL were more likely to exhibit capsule formation (PAL: 70%, NPL: 42%, p = 0.03), and had a higher vascular density (median 10.6; IQR: 8.8-16.8; p = 0.05), compared with NPL. PEL were more likely to exhibit steatonecrosis (PEL: 92%, NPL: 33%, p = 0.01) and had increased mineralisation (PEL: 67%, NPL: 17%, p = 0.05) compared with NPL. Conclusions: Small sample size. Conclusions: Histological features of omental and retroperitoneal fat do not predict presence of lipomata or type. However, there are histological features of PAL and PEL which may be related to pathological potential.
© 2025 The Author(s). Equine Veterinary Journal published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of EVJ Ltd.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2025-02-20 PubMed ID: 39980244DOI: 10.1111/evj.14483Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research study explores the histological features of equine abdominal lipomata (fatty growths), omental (belly fat), and retroperitoneal (fat found behind the abdominal area) adipose tissue, to understand its pathogenesis and risk to the horses’ health. The study was carried out on horses that had to undergo emergency surgery due to abdominal pain in a single hospital.

Study Design and Methodology

  • The study was a prospective observational anatomic study, meaning observations were made in a forward-looking manner based on the anatomy of the involved tissues.
  • Animals undergoing abdominal surgery at a veterinary hospital due to pain were included in the study.
  • The team collected information about the horses’ breed, sex, and age.
  • The researchers recorded the appearance of the lipomata that caused the obstruction (pathological lipomata) and those that didn’t (either pedunculated or non-pedunculated).
  • Lipomata, omental or retroperitoneal adipose tissues that were removed during surgery or after euthanasia, were preserved in formalin and stained for examination.

Results

  • The studies involved 74 horses, and scientists evaluated 71 lipomata, 48 retroperitoneal adipose samples, and 26 omental samples.
  • Older horses were found more likely to have lipomata.
  • Pathological lipomata were more likely to form a capsule, and they also showed a higher vascular density, compared to non-pedunculated lipomata.
  • Pedunculated lipomata were more likely to show a certain type of fat tissue death (steatonecrosis), and had increased mineralization compared to non-pedunculated lipomata.
  • The histological features of omental and retroperitoneal fat tissues did not predict the presence of lipomata or its type.

Conclusions

  • Despite the small sample size, there were certain characteristics associated with pathological and pedunculated lipomata that may point to an apparent pathological potential.
  • The findings imply that the examination of equine abdominal lipomata may generate insights with regard to their pathogenesis, therefore, it could help to manage the health of horses better in the future.

Cite This Article

APA
Gillen A, Archer D, Ireland J, Rocchigiani G. (2025). Characterising equine abdominal lipomata: Can histological features improve the understanding of pathogenesis and risk? Equine Vet J. https://doi.org/10.1111/evj.14483

Publication

Equine veterinary journal
ISSN: 2042-3306
NlmUniqueID: 0173320
Country: United States
Language: English

Researcher Affiliations

Gillen, Alexandra
  • Department of Equine Clinical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Neston, UK.
Archer, Debra
  • Department of Equine Clinical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Neston, UK.
Ireland, Joanne
  • Department of Equine Clinical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Neston, UK.
Rocchigiani, Guido
  • Department of Vet Anatomy Physiology and Pathology, University of Liverpool, Neston, UK.

Grant Funding

  • Arden and Claudia Sims Lipoma Foundation

References

This article includes 43 references
  1. Garcia‐Seco E, Wilson DA, Kramer J, Keegan KG, Branson KR, Johnson PJ. Prevalence and risk factors associated with outcome of surgical removal of pedunculated lipomas in horses: 102 cases (1987–2002). J Am Vet Med Assoc 2005;226(9):1529–1537.
  2. Munday J, Löhr C, Kiupel M. Tumours of the alimentary tract. In: Meuten, D.Tumours in domestic animals. Iowa: Wiley; 2016. p. 595.
  3. Gandini M, Freeman DE, Giusto G. Hypothesis on the pathophysiology of small intestinal strangulation by a pedunculated lipoma. Equine Vet Educ 2021;34(4):207–213.
  4. Durket E, Albanese V, Steward SK, Freeman DE. A standing pararectal approach to treat small colon obstruction by a pedunculated lipoma. Equine Vet Educ 2019;31(11):594–598.
  5. de Bont MP, Proudman CJ, Archer DC. Surgical lesions of the small colon and post operative survival in a UK hospital population. Equine Vet J 2013;45:460–464.
  6. de Bont MP, Malbon AJ, Sardon D, Archer DC. Caecal lipomatosis as a cause of colic in a 9‐year‐old gelding. Equine Vet Educ 2013;25(5):241–244.
  7. Farkas N, Wong J, Bethel J, Monib S, Frampton A, Thomson S. A systematic review of symptomatic small bowel lipomas of the jejunum and ileum. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 2020;58:52–67.
  8. Strafuss AC, Smith JE, Kennedy GA, Dennis SM. Lipomas in dogs. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1973;9:555–561.
  9. Mayhew PD, Brockman DJ. Body cavity lipomas in six dogs. J Small Anim Pract 2002;43:177–181.
  10. Song D‐WG‐WL, Kang M‐H, Kim H‐Y, Eom K‐D, Park H‐M. Clinical features and outcomes of primary omental lipoma in a dog. J Vet Clin 2019;36(5):271–273.
  11. Menegon Tasselli F, Urraro F, Sciaudone G, Bagaglini G, Pagliuca F, Reginelli A. Colonic lipoma causing bowel intussusception: an up‐to‐date systematic review. J Clin Med 2021;10(21):5149.
  12. O'Neill DG, Corah CH, Church DB, Brodbelt DC, Rutherford L. Lipoma in dogs under primary veterinary care in the UK: prevalence and breed associations. Canine Genet Epidemiol 2018;5:9.
  13. Hsin‐Hung Huang W‐YC, Chang S‐C. No access obese and senior factors increase the incidence of lipoma in dogs with non‐malignant skin mass. Taiwan Vet J 2018;44:197–204.
  14. Shanks JA, Paranchych W, Tuba J. Familial multiple lipomatosis. Can Med Assoc J 1957;77:881–884.
  15. Charifa A, Azmat CE, Badri T. Lipoma pathology. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls; 2023.
  16. Ersek RA, Lele E, Surak GS, Denton DR, McCue K. Hereditary progressive nodular lipomatosis: a report and selective review of a new syndrome. Ann Plast Surg 1989;23(5):450–455.
  17. Lemaitre M, Chevalier B, Jannin A, Bourry J, Espiard S, Vantyghem M‐C. Multiple symmetric and multiple familial lipomatosis. Presse Med 2021;50(3):104077.
  18. Hameed M. Pathology and genetics of adipocytic tumors. Cytogenet Genome Res 2007;118:138–147.
  19. Edwards GB, Proudman CJ. An analysis of 75 cases of intestinal obstruction caused by pedunculated lipomas. Equine Vet J 1994;26(1):18–21.
  20. Freeman DE, Schaeffer DJ. Age distributions of horses with strangulation of the small intestine by a lipoma or in the epiploic foramen: 46 cases (1994–2000). J Am Vet Med Assoc 2001;219(1):87–89.
  21. Morrison PK, Harris PA, Maltin CA, Grove‐White D, McG Argo C. EQUIFAT: a novel scoring system for the semi‐quantitative evaluation of regional adipose tissues in Equidae. PLoS One 2017;12(3):e0173753.
  22. Sammons SC, Norman TE, Chaffin MK, Cohen ND. Ultrasonographic visualization of the liver in sites recommended for blind percutaneous liver biopsy in horses. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2014;245(8):939–943.
  23. Segnani C, Ippolito C, Antonioli L, Pellegrini C, Blandizzi C, Dolfi A. Histochemical detection of collagen fibers by Sirius red/fast Green is more sensitive than van Gieson or Sirius red alone in Normal and inflamed rat colon. PLoS One 2015;10(12):e0144630.
  24. Hennrick K, Yang D. Hematoidin. Blood 2014;124:2158.
  25. Stritt M, Stalder AK, Vezzali E. Orbit image analysis: an open‐source whole slide image analysis tool. PLoS Comput Biol 2020;16:e1007313.
  26. Freeman DE, Schaeffer DJ. Short‐term survival after surgery for epiploic foramen entrapment compared with other strangulating diseases of the small intestine in horses. Equine Vet J 2005;37(4):292–295.
  27. Blikslager AT, Bowman KF, Haven ML, Tate LP Jr, Bristol DG. Pedunculated lipomas as a cause of intestinal obstruction in horses: 17 cases (1983–1990). J Am Vet Med Assoc 1992;201(8):1249–1252.
  28. Requena L. Normal subcutaneous fat, necrosis of adipocytes and classification of the panniculitides. Semin Cutan Med Surg 2007;26:66–70.
  29. Marques P, Santos A, Germano A. Ulcerated gastric lipoma presenting with gastrointestinal bleeding and hypovolemic shock. J Belg Soc Radiol 2022;106:2.
  30. Elia S, Cerioli A, Fiaschetti V, Granai AV. Infraclavicular subpectoral lipoma causing thoracic outlet syndrome. Int J Surg Case Rep 2015;9:101–104.
  31. John M 2nd, Patel S, Joseph G. Exceptionally large, atypically located spindle cell lipoma. BMJ Case Rep 2019;12(10):e232209.
  32. Green RA, Cannon SR, Flanagan AM. Chondroid lipoma: correlation of imaging findings and histopathology of an unusual benign lesion. Skeletal Radiol 2004;33:670–673.
  33. Schwarz T, Morandi F, Gnudi G, Wisner E, Paterson C, Sullivan M. Nodular fat necrosis in the feline and canine abdomen. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2000;41(4):335–339.
  34. Marshall‐Taylor C, Fanburg‐Smith JC. Hemosiderotic fibrohistiocytic lipomatous lesion: ten cases of a previously undescribed fatty lesion of the foot/ankle. Mod Pathol 2000;13:1192–1199.
  35. Do WHCY. Complications of the surgical excision of encapsulated versus nonencapsulated lipomas: a retrospective analysis. Arch Aesthet Plast Surg 2019;25:142–146.
  36. Yatagai N, Ueyama H, Shibuya T, Haga K, Takahashi M, Nomura O. Obscure gastrointestinal bleeding caused by small intestinal lipoma: a case report. J Med Case Rep 2016;10:226.
  37. Ghanem OM, Slater J, Singh P, Heitmiller RF, DiRocco JD. Pedunculated colonic lipoma prolapsing through the anus. World J Clin Cases 2015;3(5):457–461.
  38. Taboada JL, Stephens TW, Krishnamurthy S, Brandt KR, Whitman GJ. The many faces of fat necrosis in the breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009;192(3):815–825.
  39. Suga H, Eto H, Inoue K, Aoi N, Kato H, Araki J. Cellular and molecular features of lipoma tissue: comparison with normal adipose tissue. Br J Dermatol 2009;161(4):819–825.
  40. Deacu M, Bosoteanu M, Enciu M, Cozaru GC, Cojocaru O, Baltatescu GI. The predictive role of the histopathological scoring system in adipose tumors‐lipoma, atypical lipomatous tumor, and liposarcoma. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023;13(24):3606.
  41. Nagano S, Yokouchi M, Setoguchi T, Ishidou Y, Sasaki H, Shimada H. Differentiation of lipoma and atypical lipomatous tumor by a scoring system: implication of increased vascularity on pathogenesis of liposarcoma. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2015;16:36.
  42. Devos H, Goethals L, Belsack D, De Brucker Y, Allemeersch G‐J, Ilsen B. Fat misbehaving in the abdominal cavity: a pictorial essay. Pol J Radiol 2020;85:e32–e38.
  43. Newkirk K, Chameroy KM, Tadros EM, Rohrbach BW, Frank N. Pituitary lesions, obesity, and mesenteric lipomas in insulin‐resistant horses. Open J Vet Med 2016;4(9):190–196.
    doi: 10.4236/ojvm.2014.49022google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,727 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.