Analyze Diet
Archives of virology1979; 60(3-4); 279-289; doi: 10.1007/BF01317499

Characterization of the infection of equine fibroblasts by equine infectious anemia virus.

Abstract: Equine dermal fibroblasts persistently infected with equine infectious anemia virus (EIAV) show no alterations in cell morphology or growth kinetics when compared to uninfected cells. The percentage of cells immunofluorescent positive for viral proteins fluctuated, depending upon the stage of the cell cycle, while production of extracellular virus was uniform throughout the cell cycle, increasing only as the cell number increased. This was shown in log versus stationary phase cultures as well as in cultures synchronized by sterum starvation. The establishment of productive infection did not require host cell DNA synthesis. Normal levels of progeny virus were produced in cultures pretreated with mitomycin C and placed in serum-containing medium. Serum-starved cultures, however, did not support EIAV replication as well as other cultures, presumably because synthesis of provirus was inhibited.
Publication Date: 1979-01-01 PubMed ID: 228638DOI: 10.1007/BF01317499Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • U.S. Gov't
  • Non-P.H.S.
  • Research Support
  • U.S. Gov't
  • P.H.S.

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research shows that equine dermal fibroblasts (cells in horse skin) infected with equine infectious anemia virus (EIAV) behave similarly to uninfected cells in terms of growth and appearance. The production of the virus by the infected cells is steady, regardless of the cell’s stage of growth, but the presence of the viral proteins varies. This study also found that the virus doesn’t need the host cell’s DNA synthesis to establish an infection and can still grow in cultures treated to inhibit cell division.

Virus Effect on Fibroblasts

  • The infected equine dermal fibroblasts, fibroblasts being a type of cell found in connective tissue, do not show any noticeable changes either in their physical appearance or their rate of growth when compared to non-infected cells.
  • The researchers found that the virus can establish a productive infection without a need for cellular DNA synthesis, that means it can multiply and spread without needing the cells to divide and replicate their DNA.

Fluctuation in Viral Protein Presence

  • The research showed a fluctuation in the amount of cells that tested positive for the virus’s proteins based on the cell’s stage in the cell cycle, a series of events that lead to cell division and replication. In other words, whether or not a cell showed signs of the virus was dependent on if the cell was dividing or preparing to divide.

Influence of Cell Growth Stage on Virus Production

  • The researchers found that the production of the virus was constant throughout all the stages of the host cells’ cycles. This means that the cells were releasing the virus consistently, regardless of the cell’s stage of growth.
  • However, the volume of virus production increased as the number of cells increased. This was seen both in cultures with increasing cell numbers and stationary cell numbers, showing that virus production increased with cell density rather than cell division.

Effect of Serum Starvation

  • The study also discovered that EIAV replication was less effective in serum-starved cultures, suggesting that the virus’s synthesis of its own DNA substitute (provirus) was hindered under these conditions.
  • Serum starvation is a method used to synchronize the cells’ growth and observe cellular behavior during different stages of the cell cycle. Essentially, researchers limit the nutrients available to keep the cells in a controlled state of non-division.
  • However, even after treating these cultures with mitomycin C, a drug used to inhibit cell division, the infected cells didn’t show a serious decrease in virus production once returned to normal, nutrient-rich conditions. This indicates that the virus can continue its lifecycle even under conditions detrimental to cell division.

Cite This Article

APA
Klevjer-Anderson P, Cheevers WP, Crawford TB. (1979). Characterization of the infection of equine fibroblasts by equine infectious anemia virus. Arch Virol, 60(3-4), 279-289. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01317499

Publication

ISSN: 0304-8608
NlmUniqueID: 7506870
Country: Austria
Language: English
Volume: 60
Issue: 3-4
Pages: 279-289

Researcher Affiliations

Klevjer-Anderson, P
    Cheevers, W P
      Crawford, T B

        MeSH Terms

        • Antigens, Viral / analysis
        • Cell Cycle
        • Cell Line
        • DNA / biosynthesis
        • Fibroblasts
        • Infectious Anemia Virus, Equine / growth & development
        • Infectious Anemia Virus, Equine / immunology
        • Mitomycins / pharmacology
        • Skin
        • Virus Replication

        References

        This article includes 24 references
        1. Kono Y, Yoshino T. Propagation of equine infectious anemia virus in horse kidney cell cultures.. Natl Inst Anim Health Q (Tokyo) 1974 Winter;14(4):155-62.
          pubmed: 4375791
        2. Varmus HE, Padgett T, Heasley S, Simon G, Bishop JM. Cellular functions are required for the synthesis and integration of avian sarcoma virus-specific DNA.. Cell 1977 Jun;11(2):307-19.
          pubmed: 196759doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(77)90047-2google scholar: lookup
        3. Levin JG, Rosenak MJ. Synthesis of murine leukemia virus proteins associated with virions assembled in actinomycin D-treated cells: evidence for persistence of viral messenger RNA.. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1976 Apr;73(4):1154-8.
          pubmed: 57617doi: 10.1073/pnas.73.4.1154google scholar: lookup
        4. Kowalski J, Cheevers WP. Synthesis of high molecular weight DNA strands during S phase.. J Mol Biol 1976 Jul 5;104(3):603-15.
          pubmed: 950670doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(76)90123-6google scholar: lookup
        5. Gonda MA, Charman HP, Walker JL, Coggins L. Scanning and transmission electron microscopic study of equine infectious anemia virus.. Am J Vet Res 1978 May;39(5):731-40.
          pubmed: 215061
        6. Malmquist WA, Barnett D, Becvar CS. Production of equine infectious anemia antigen in a persistently infected cell line.. Arch Gesamte Virusforsch 1973;42(4):361-70.
          pubmed: 4358259doi: 10.1007/BF01250717google scholar: lookup
        7. Rice NR, Simek S, Ryder OA, Coggins L. Detection of proviral DNA in horse cells infected with equine infectious anemia virus.. J Virol 1978 Jun;26(3):577-83.
          pubmed: 209211doi: 10.1128/JVI.26.3.577-583.1978google scholar: lookup
        8. Fischinger PF, Tuttle-Fuller N, Hüper G, Bolognesi DP. Mitosis is required for production of murine leukemia virus and structural proteins during de novo infection.. J Virol 1975 Aug;16(2):267-74.
          pubmed: 50465doi: 10.1128/JVI.16.2.267-274.1975google scholar: lookup
        9. Schauf V, Panem S. Expression of murine oncornavirus proteins in synchronized cells.. Virology 1976 Jun;71(2):619-23.
          pubmed: 59457doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(76)90390-1google scholar: lookup
        10. Ito Y, Kono Y, Kobayashi K. Electron microscopic observations of equine infectious anemia (EIA) virus in cultivated horse leukocytes. (Brief report).. Arch Gesamte Virusforsch 1969;28(3):411-6.
          pubmed: 4195626doi: 10.1007/BF01240954google scholar: lookup
        11. Kono Y, Kobayashi K, Fukunaga Y. Antigenic drift of equine infectious anemia virus in chronically infected horses.. Arch Gesamte Virusforsch 1973;41(1):1-10.
          pubmed: 4123810doi: 10.1007/BF01249923google scholar: lookup
        12. Shen DT, Crawford TB, Gorham JR, McGuire TC. Inactivation of equine infectious anemia virus by chemical disinfectants.. Am J Vet Res 1977 Aug;38(8):1217-9.
          pubmed: 199094
        13. McGuire TC, Crawford TB, Henson JB. Immunofluorescent localization of equine infectious anemia virus in tissue.. Am J Pathol 1971 Feb;62(2):283-94.
          pubmed: 4322275
        14. Cheevers WP, Ackley CM, Crawford TB. Structural proteins of equine infectious anemia virus.. J Virol 1978 Dec;28(3):997-1001.
          pubmed: 215790doi: 10.1128/JVI.28.3.997-1001.1978google scholar: lookup
        15. Archer BG, Crawford TB, McGuire TC, Frazier ME. RNA-dependent DNA polymerase associated with equine infectious anemia virus.. J Virol 1977 Apr;22(1):16-22.
          pubmed: 67219doi: 10.1128/JVI.22.1.16-22.1977google scholar: lookup
        16. Kobayashi K, Kono Y. Propagation and titration of equine infectious anemia virus in horse leukocyte culture.. Natl Inst Anim Health Q (Tokyo) 1967 Spring;7(1):8-20.
          pubmed: 4293214
        17. Ishizaki R, Green RW, Bolognesi DP. The structural polypeptides of equine infections anemia virus.. Intervirology 1978;9(5):286-94.
          pubmed: 202575doi: 10.1159/000148946google scholar: lookup
        18. Thormar H. Visna-maedi virus infection in cell cultures and in laboratory animals.. Front Biol 1976;44:97-114.
          pubmed: 182563
        19. Henson JB, McGuire TC. Equine infectious anemia.. Prog Med Virol 1974;18(0):143-59.
          pubmed: 4371283
        20. Paskind MP, Weinberg RA, Baltimore D. Dependence of Moloney murine leukemia virus production on cell growth.. Virology 1975 Sep;67(1):242-8.
          pubmed: 1172324doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(75)90421-3google scholar: lookup
        21. Charman HP, Bladen S, Gilden RV, Coggins L. Equine infectious anemia virus: evidence favoring classification as a retravirus.. J Virol 1976 Sep;19(3):1073-9.
          pubmed: 61283doi: 10.1128/JVI.19.3.1073-1079.1976google scholar: lookup
        22. Crawford TB, McGuire TC, Henson JB. Detection of equine infectious anemia virus in vitro by immunofluorescence.. Arch Gesamte Virusforsch 1971;34(4):332-9.
          pubmed: 4330258doi: 10.1007/BF01242979google scholar: lookup
        23. Naso RB, Brown RL. Synthesis and cleavage of Rauscher leukemia virus precursor proteins in synchronized cells.. Virology 1977 Oct 1;82(1):247-51.
          pubmed: 898677doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(77)90049-6google scholar: lookup
        24. Cheevers WP, Archer BG, Crawford TB. Characterization of RNA from equine infectious anemia virus.. J Virol 1977 Nov;24(2):489-97.
          pubmed: 199735doi: 10.1128/JVI.24.2.489-497.1977google scholar: lookup

        Citations

        This article has been cited 7 times.
        1. Wardle R, Pullman JA, Haldenby S, Ressel L, Pope M, Clegg PD, Radford A, Stewart JP, Al-Saadi M, Dyer P, Peffers MJ. Identification of Equid herpesvirus 2 in tissue-engineered equine tendon. Wellcome Open Res 2017;2:60.
        2. Maury W, Thompson RJ, Jones Q, Bradley S, Denke T, Baccam P, Smazik M, Oaks JL. Evolution of the equine infectious anemia virus long terminal repeat during the alteration of cell tropism. J Virol 2005 May;79(9):5653-64.
        3. Maury W, Wright PJ, Bradley S. Characterization of a cytolytic strain of equine infectious anemia virus. J Virol 2003 Feb;77(4):2385-99.
        4. Maury W, Oaks JL, Bradley S. Equine endothelial cells support productive infection of equine infectious anemia virus. J Virol 1998 Nov;72(11):9291-7.
        5. McGuire TC, Tumas DB, Byrne KM, Hines MT, Leib SR, Brassfield AL, O'Rourke KI, Perryman LE. Major histocompatibility complex-restricted CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes from horses with equine infectious anemia virus recognize Env and Gag/PR proteins. J Virol 1994 Mar;68(3):1459-67.
        6. Sellon DC, Fuller FJ, McGuire TC. The immunopathogenesis of equine infectious anemia virus. Virus Res 1994 May;32(2):111-38.
          doi: 10.1016/0168-1702(94)90038-8pubmed: 8067050google scholar: lookup
        7. Shively MA, Banks KL, Greenlee A, Klevjer-Anderson P. Antigenic stimulation of T lymphocytes in chronic nononcogenic retrovirus infection: equine infectious anemia. Infect Immun 1982 Apr;36(1):38-46.
          doi: 10.1128/iai.36.1.38-46.1982pubmed: 6281191google scholar: lookup