Characterization of the pharmacokinetics, behavioral effects and effects on thermal nociception of morphine 6-glucuronide and morphine 3-glucuronide in horses.
- Journal Article
Summary
This study examines the effects and behavior of different forms of morphine on horses, including physiological influences and impact on heat-related pain. The research suggests that both morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G) and morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G) could be useful alternatives to traditional morphine treatment due to their less damaging side effects.
Details about the Research:
In this study, the researchers used a total of seven horses, including five mares and two geldings between the ages of 3-6 years. These horses were subjected to the following treatments for data collection:
- The animals were administered with a single intravenous dosage of saline, morphine, M6G, and M3G.
- Behavioral observations and physiological variables (like heart rate, step counts, packed cell volume, total plasma protein, and gastrointestinal sounds) were recorded at baseline (before the drug administration) and every few hours up to 6 hours after the treatment.
- Blood samples were collected at different points in time post-administration to track drug and metabolite concentrations via liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. This helped in understanding the drug’s effect on the horses’ systems over time.
Outcome and Results:
Through systematic and critical evaluation, major results of the study were gathered.
- The distribution volumes for morphine, M6G, and M3G were calculated, which helped understand how these drugs were dispersed across the body post-administration.
- Upon morphine administration, the horses exhibited signs of excitation, visible through an increase in step counts and subjective behavioral changes. In contrast, M6G and M3G seemed to induce a sedative-like behavior based on similar evaluation criteria.
- Significant effects were noted on thermal nociception (the horses’ response to pain caused by heat). These changes were observed until 4 hours post morphine treatment and at various times after M6G and M3G administration.
Conclusions and Implications:
Given the detailed results, the researchers concluded that both M6G and M3G could be more viable alternatives to administer to horses compared to morphine. The less-adverse side effects, coupled with positive effects on thermal nociception, suggest that these forms could be more effective and safe. However, these findings create a need for additional research to understand the pharmacodynamics of M6G and M3G fully.
Cite This Article
Publication
Researcher Affiliations
- K L Maddy Equine Analytical Pharmacology Laboratory, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, USA; Department of Molecular Biosciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA, USA. Electronic address: hkknych@ucdavis.edu.
- K L Maddy Equine Analytical Pharmacology Laboratory, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, USA.
- K L Maddy Equine Analytical Pharmacology Laboratory, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, USA.
- K L Maddy Equine Analytical Pharmacology Laboratory, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, USA.
- Department of Population Health and Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, USA.
MeSH Terms
- Horses
- Animals
- Male
- Female
- Glucuronides
- Cross-Over Studies
- Nociception
- Morphine Derivatives / pharmacokinetics
- Morphine
Citations
This article has been cited 1 times.- Knych HK, Steinmetz SJ, Traynham ML, McKemie DS, Kass PH. Pharmacokinetics and thermal anti-nociceptive effects of oral morphine in horses. Front Vet Sci 2024;11:1461648.