Analyze Diet
Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia2022; 49(6); 634-644; doi: 10.1016/j.vaa.2022.07.006

Characterization of the pharmacokinetics, behavioral effects and effects on thermal nociception of morphine 6-glucuronide and morphine 3-glucuronide in horses.

Abstract: To describe the pharmacokinetics, behavioral and physiologic effects and effects on thermal thresholds of morphine, morphine 6-glucuronide (M6G) and morphine 3-glucuronide (M3G) following administration to horses. Methods: Randomized balanced crossover study. Methods: A total of seven University-owned horses, five mares and two geldings, aged 3-6 years. Methods: Horses were treated with a single intravenous dosage of saline, morphine (0.2 mg kg), M6G (0.01 mg kg) and M3G (0.03 mg kg). Blood was collected prior to (baseline) and at several times post administration. Drug and metabolite concentrations were determined by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry, and plasma pharmacokinetics were calculated. Behavioral observations and physiologic variables (heart rate, step counts, packed cell volume, total plasma protein and gastrointestinal sounds) were determined at baseline and for up to 6 hours. The effects on thermal nociception were determined and thermal excursion was calculated. Results: The volumes of distribution were 4.75-10.5, 0.244-0.295 and 0.215-0.356 L kg for morphine, M6G and M3G, respectively. Systemic clearances were 26.8-39.6, 3.16-3.88 and 1.46-2.13 mL minute kg for morphine, M6G and M3G, respectively. Morphine administration resulted in signs of excitation as evidenced by an increase in step counts and subjective behavioral observations, whereas M6G and M3G, based on the same criteria, appeared to cause sedative-like effects. Significant effects on thermal nociception were observed until 4 hours post morphine administration, 1 hour post M6G administration and at various times post M3G administration. Conclusions: Results of this study provide additional information regarding the use of morphine in horses. Less locomotor excitation and gastrointestinal adverse effects, compared with morphine, coupled with favorable effects on thermal nociception are encouraging for further study of the pharmacodynamics of both M6G and M3G in horses.
Publication Date: 2022-07-31 PubMed ID: 35999165DOI: 10.1016/j.vaa.2022.07.006Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This study examines the effects and behavior of different forms of morphine on horses, including physiological influences and impact on heat-related pain. The research suggests that both morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G) and morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G) could be useful alternatives to traditional morphine treatment due to their less damaging side effects.

Details about the Research:

In this study, the researchers used a total of seven horses, including five mares and two geldings between the ages of 3-6 years. These horses were subjected to the following treatments for data collection:

  • The animals were administered with a single intravenous dosage of saline, morphine, M6G, and M3G.
  • Behavioral observations and physiological variables (like heart rate, step counts, packed cell volume, total plasma protein, and gastrointestinal sounds) were recorded at baseline (before the drug administration) and every few hours up to 6 hours after the treatment.
  • Blood samples were collected at different points in time post-administration to track drug and metabolite concentrations via liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. This helped in understanding the drug’s effect on the horses’ systems over time.

Outcome and Results:

Through systematic and critical evaluation, major results of the study were gathered.

  • The distribution volumes for morphine, M6G, and M3G were calculated, which helped understand how these drugs were dispersed across the body post-administration.
  • Upon morphine administration, the horses exhibited signs of excitation, visible through an increase in step counts and subjective behavioral changes. In contrast, M6G and M3G seemed to induce a sedative-like behavior based on similar evaluation criteria.
  • Significant effects were noted on thermal nociception (the horses’ response to pain caused by heat). These changes were observed until 4 hours post morphine treatment and at various times after M6G and M3G administration.

Conclusions and Implications:

Given the detailed results, the researchers concluded that both M6G and M3G could be more viable alternatives to administer to horses compared to morphine. The less-adverse side effects, coupled with positive effects on thermal nociception, suggest that these forms could be more effective and safe. However, these findings create a need for additional research to understand the pharmacodynamics of M6G and M3G fully.

Cite This Article

APA
Knych HK, Kanarr K, Fang Y, McKemie DS, Kass PH. (2022). Characterization of the pharmacokinetics, behavioral effects and effects on thermal nociception of morphine 6-glucuronide and morphine 3-glucuronide in horses. Vet Anaesth Analg, 49(6), 634-644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaa.2022.07.006

Publication

ISSN: 1467-2995
NlmUniqueID: 100956422
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 49
Issue: 6
Pages: 634-644
PII: S1467-2987(22)00109-X

Researcher Affiliations

Knych, Heather K
  • K L Maddy Equine Analytical Pharmacology Laboratory, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, USA; Department of Molecular Biosciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA, USA. Electronic address: hkknych@ucdavis.edu.
Kanarr, Kirsten
  • K L Maddy Equine Analytical Pharmacology Laboratory, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, USA.
Fang, Yanbin
  • K L Maddy Equine Analytical Pharmacology Laboratory, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, USA.
McKemie, Daniel S
  • K L Maddy Equine Analytical Pharmacology Laboratory, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, USA.
Kass, Philip H
  • Department of Population Health and Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, USA.

MeSH Terms

  • Horses
  • Animals
  • Male
  • Female
  • Glucuronides
  • Cross-Over Studies
  • Nociception
  • Morphine Derivatives / pharmacokinetics
  • Morphine

Citations

This article has been cited 1 times.
  1. Knych HK, Steinmetz SJ, Traynham ML, McKemie DS, Kass PH. Pharmacokinetics and thermal anti-nociceptive effects of oral morphine in horses. Front Vet Sci 2024;11:1461648.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1461648pubmed: 39355143google scholar: lookup