Analyze Diet
Frontiers in veterinary science2026; 13; 1771745; doi: 10.3389/fvets.2026.1771745

Client-specific outcome measure for chronic osteoarthritis pain assessment in horses.

Abstract: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a prevalent cause of chronic pain and lameness in horses. Whereas lameness can be quantified using objective measures, the assessment of OA-associated pain remains challenging. This study aimed to evaluate the applicability of the Client-Specific Outcome Measure (CSOM), a tool widely used in small animals, for the assessment of chronic OA pain in horses through caretaker evaluation. Unassigned: Seventeen privately owned horses with confirmed OA were enrolled in a 20-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. For each horse, three individual pain-related indicators (CSOM items) were identified through a veterinarian-caretaker consultation. The selected items were regularly scored (0-4), and the scores were summed to obtain a total CSOM score (CSOM-sum). The CSOM-sum was compared with other pain assessment measures, including a caretaker-assigned visual analogue scale (VAS-own), a veterinarian-assigned visual analogue scale (VAS-exp), subjective lameness scores, and a gait asymmetry index. Unassigned: The CSOM-sum showed moderate but significant correlations with all other pain and lameness measures ( = 0.49-0.60,  < 0.05). In particular, CSOM-sum correlated with gait asymmetry (rₛ = 0.434,  < 0.0001); subgroup analysis revealed a moderate correlation in treated horses ( = 0.4539,  = 0.0025) and a higher correlation in controls ( = 0.5536,  = 0.0006). The VAS-own and VAS-exp scores showed good overall agreement (bias = -4.76 mm; ICC = 0.727; ICC_T = 0.625; ICC_C = 0.838), although with relatively wide limits of agreement. The internal consistency of the CSOM items was high (Cronbach's  = 0.81 overall; α_T = 0.787; α_C = 0.890). Unassigned: These findings indicate that, provided relevant items are carefully identified, the CSOM may represent a valuable complementary tool for assessing and monitoring pain severity in horses under field conditions.
Publication Date: 2026-03-23 PubMed ID: 41948529PubMed Central: PMC13051653DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2026.1771745Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Overview

  • This study investigated the use of the Client-Specific Outcome Measure (CSOM), a tool commonly used in small animals, to assess chronic osteoarthritis (OA) pain in horses based on caretaker evaluations.
  • The aim was to determine whether CSOM scores correlate with other pain and lameness assessments, supporting its validity as a complementary pain measurement in horses.

Background

  • Osteoarthritis (OA) is a common cause of chronic pain and lameness in horses.
  • While lameness can be objectively measured (e.g., through gait analysis), directly assessing OA-related pain is challenging in horses.
  • The Client-Specific Outcome Measure (CSOM) is a pain assessment tool used in small animals that involves owners/caretakers identifying specific behaviors or activities affected by pain, which are then scored.
  • The study explores if CSOM could be adapted for horses by involving caretakers to select and score individual horse-specific pain indicators.

Study Design and Methods

  • Seventeen horses with veterinarian-confirmed OA participated in a 20-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
  • For each horse, a veterinarian consulted with the caretaker to identify three individual pain-related indicators (CSOM items) relevant to that animal.
  • Caretakers regularly scored these three items on a scale from 0 (no problem) to 4 (severe problem).
  • The scores for the three items were summed to create a total CSOM score (CSOM-sum).
  • The study compared CSOM-sum scores against other assessments:
    • Caretaker-assigned visual analogue scale (VAS-own) for pain
    • Veterinarian-assigned visual analogue scale (VAS-exp)
    • Subjective lameness scores assigned by veterinarian
    • Objective gait asymmetry index based on movement analysis

Results

  • The CSOM-sum demonstrated moderate but statistically significant correlations with all other pain and lameness measures (correlation coefficients rₛ approximately 0.49 to 0.60, p-values less than 0.05).
  • CSOM scores correlated specifically with gait asymmetry (rₛ = 0.434, p < 0.0001):
    • Among horses treated for OA, correlation was moderate (r ≈ 0.45, p = 0.0025).
    • In control horses (placebo group), correlation was higher (r ≈ 0.55, p = 0.0006).
  • Comparison between caretaker and veterinarian visual analogue scales showed good agreement:
    • Bias was low (-4.76 mm on the scale).
    • Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) indicated good consistency (overall ICC = 0.727).
    • However, the limits of agreement were broad, showing some variability.
  • The CSOM items had high internal consistency, with Cronbach’s alpha > 0.8 overall (0.81), indicating that the selected indicators reliably measured a common construct (pain severity).

Interpretation and Implications

  • The study found that the CSOM approach could effectively capture individual pain-related behaviors in horses with OA when items are carefully selected with the caretaker.
  • The moderate correlations with objective measures like gait asymmetry suggest that CSOM scores reflect meaningful changes in pain and function.
  • The good internal consistency supports reliability in the measurement process.
  • Comparison between caretaker and veterinarian ratings highlighted that while they generally agree, caretaker assessments provide valuable complementary insights particularly in field (non-clinical) conditions.
  • CSOM may thus serve as a practical tool for monitoring chronic OA pain in horses over time, especially in real-world settings where constant veterinary assessment is not feasible.
  • Using client-specific indicators helps tailor pain evaluation to each horse’s unique presentation of OA-related discomfort.

Limitations and Future Directions

  • The relatively small sample size (17 horses) limits broad generalization; future studies with larger populations are needed.
  • The necessity of careful item selection by veterinarians and caretakers implies the method requires trained collaboration.
  • Further research could explore refinement of the CSOM for horses and investigate responsiveness to treatment changes over longer periods.

Cite This Article

APA
Benetti E, Tambella AM, Andreis SN, Witte S, Di Bella C, Spadavecchia C. (2026). Client-specific outcome measure for chronic osteoarthritis pain assessment in horses. Front Vet Sci, 13, 1771745. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2026.1771745

Publication

ISSN: 2297-1769
NlmUniqueID: 101666658
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 13
Pages: 1771745
PII: 1771745

Researcher Affiliations

Benetti, Eleonora
  • Vetsuisse Faculty, Department of Clinical Veterinary Medicine, Section of Anesthesiology and Pain Therapy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Tambella, Adolfo Maria
  • School of Biosciences and Veterinary Medicine, University of Camerino, Camerino, Matelica, Italy.
Andreis, Sabrina Nathalie
  • Amt für Veterinärwesen, Bern, Switzerland.
Witte, Stefan
  • Tierklinik Schönbühl AG, Schönbühl, Switzerland.
Di Bella, Caterina
  • School of Biosciences and Veterinary Medicine, University of Camerino, Camerino, Matelica, Italy.
Spadavecchia, Claudia
  • Vetsuisse Faculty, Department of Clinical Veterinary Medicine, Section of Anesthesiology and Pain Therapy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

This article includes 33 references

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.