Analyze Diet

Clinical and pathological effects of flunixin meglumine administration to neonatal foals.

Abstract: The effects of daily intravenous administration of flunixin meglumine at dosages of 0.55, 1.1, 2.2 and 6.6 mg/kg for five days were examined in neonatal foals. Six two day old foals were used to evaluate the effect of each dosage. Foals were examined every day and blood samples collected on days 1, 3 and 6. All foals were euthanized after six days, necropsied and examined for lesions. The major clinical abnormality was diarrhea, but the incidence was not related to the dosage of flunixin meglumine administered. The foals receiving 6.6 mg/kg of flunixin meglumine had significantly more gastrointestinal ulceration and greater cecal pathology and cecal petechiation scores than those foals treated with saline. The foals in the 6.6 mg/kg treatment group had a greater loss of total protein during the study, but the difference was not significant. There were no statistically significant blood cellular or biochemical alterations associated with the administration of flunixin meglumine. There were no significant clinicopathological differences between healthy foals treated with the recommended dosage of flunixin meglumine and those treated with physiological saline.
Publication Date: 1989-04-01 PubMed ID: 2713784PubMed Central: PMC1255547
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research article studies the effects of different levels of flunixin meglumine dosage, a pain reliever, administered to neonatal foals. It found that higher doses increase gastrointestinal problems without substantial changes in blood chemistry and cellular changes.

Experimental Procedure

  • Six two-day-old foals were administered the drug flunixin meglumine at various dosages (0.55, 1.1, 2.2, and 6.6 mg/kg) intravenously for five days.
  • Observations were made on the foals health daily and blood samples were collected on days 1, 3 and 6.
  • After the sixth day, all the foals were euthanized and their bodies necropsied to check for any lesions resulting from the experiment.

Findings

  • The most common clinical abnormality among the foals was diarrhea, but it was not related to the dosage of flunixin meglumine given to them.
  • Foals that received the highest dosage of 6.6 mg/kg showed significantly more gastrointestinal ulceration along with greater cecal pathology and scores for cecal petechiation than those given saline.
  • Even though the foals from the 6.6 mg/kg group also had greater loss of total protein during the study, this difference was not statistically significant.
  • The study did not observe any statistically significant alterations in blood or cellular chemistry because of the administration of flunixin meglumine.
  • There were no notable clinicopathological differences spotted between healthy foals treated with the recommended dosage of flunixin meglumine or physiological saline.

Implication

  • The study highlights that a higher dosage of flunixin meglumine can potentially lead to gastrointestinal complications in neonatal foals without resulting in significant blood and cellular changes.
  • This could imply that while pain management using flunixin meglumine is effective, dosage needs to be carefully managed to avoid causing harm to the gastrointestinal system, especially in neonatal animals.
  • Given the lack of significant changes in blood cell count and biochemistry, it implies the major impact of flunixin meglumine is localized to the gastrointestinal system and does not seem to alter the blood constituent factors much.

Cite This Article

APA
Carrick JB, Papich MG, Middleton DM, Naylor JM, Townsend HG. (1989). Clinical and pathological effects of flunixin meglumine administration to neonatal foals. Can J Vet Res, 53(2), 195-201.

Publication

ISSN: 0830-9000
NlmUniqueID: 8607793
Country: Canada
Language: English
Volume: 53
Issue: 2
Pages: 195-201

Researcher Affiliations

Carrick, J B
  • Department of Veterinary Internal Medicine, Western College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon.
Papich, M G
    Middleton, D M
      Naylor, J M
        Townsend, H G

          MeSH Terms

          • Animals
          • Animals, Newborn
          • Cecum / pathology
          • Clonixin / administration & dosage
          • Clonixin / analogs & derivatives
          • Clonixin / toxicity
          • Diarrhea / chemically induced
          • Diarrhea / veterinary
          • Gastrointestinal Diseases / chemically induced
          • Gastrointestinal Diseases / pathology
          • Gastrointestinal Diseases / veterinary
          • Horse Diseases / chemically induced
          • Horse Diseases / pathology
          • Horses
          • Injections, Intravenous / veterinary
          • Intestines / pathology
          • Nicotinic Acids / toxicity
          • Stomach / pathology
          • Stomach Ulcer / chemically induced
          • Stomach Ulcer / pathology
          • Stomach Ulcer / veterinary
          • Time Factors

          References

          This article includes 27 references
          1. Am J Vet Res. 1983 May;44(5):774-80
            pubmed: 6869982
          2. J Reprod Fertil Suppl. 1982;32:545-53
            pubmed: 6300391
          3. Vet Pathol. 1983 Sep;20(5):603-10
            pubmed: 6636467
          4. Vet Pathol. 1983 Nov;20(6):653-61
            pubmed: 6649336
          5. Am J Vet Res. 1983 Dec;44(12):2277-9
            pubmed: 6660616
          6. Am J Vet Res. 1984 Feb;45(2):354-6
            pubmed: 6143523
          7. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1984 Mar 15;184(6):699-703
            pubmed: 6725103
          8. Equine Vet J. 1984 May;16(3):163-75
            pubmed: 6428879
          9. Vet Rec. 1984 Jul 14;115(2):45
            pubmed: 6474767
          10. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1985 Jan 1;186(1):86-8
            pubmed: 3880733
          11. Res Vet Sci. 1984 Nov;37(3):347-9
            pubmed: 6596664
          12. Am J Vet Res. 1985 Jul;46(7):1540-4
            pubmed: 3896072
          13. Am J Vet Res. 1985 Aug;46(8):1605-15
            pubmed: 3862357
          14. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract. 1985 Apr;1(1):151-68
            pubmed: 3907766
          15. Equine Vet J. 1986 Jul;18(4):307-12
            pubmed: 3758011
          16. N Engl J Med. 1987 Feb 12;316(7):374-9
            pubmed: 3807974
          17. Equine Vet J. 1982 Oct;14(4):293-8
            pubmed: 7173139
          18. Br J Exp Pathol. 1980 Oct;61(5):497-504
            pubmed: 7448118
          19. Vet Rec. 1979 Jul 14;105(2):26-30
            pubmed: 555115
          20. Equine Vet J. 1981 Apr;13(2):95-8
            pubmed: 7018898
          21. Am J Vet Res. 1981 Oct;42(10):1754-9
            pubmed: 7325437
          22. Am J Vet Res. 1981 Sep;42(9):1514-8
            pubmed: 7034603
          23. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1982 Feb 15;180(4):404-7
            pubmed: 7061324
          24. Am J Vet Res. 1982 Jan;43(1):140-4
            pubmed: 7046529
          25. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1983 Feb 1;182(3):263-6
            pubmed: 6600740
          26. J Reprod Fertil Suppl. 1982;32:537-44
            pubmed: 6962894
          27. Am J Vet Res. 1983 Aug;44(8):1410-8
            pubmed: 6625291