FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 10000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Veterinary journal (London, England : 1997)2010; 188(2); 178-183; doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2010.04.029

Clinical application and reliability of a post abdominal surgery pain assessment scale (PASPAS) in horses.

Abstract: The aim of this study was to refine a multi-dimensional scale based on physiological and behavioural parameters, known as the post abdominal surgery pain assessment scale (PASPAS), to quantify pain after laparotomy in horses. After a short introduction, eight observers used the scale to assess eight horses at multiple time points after laparotomy. In addition, a single observer was used to test the correlation of each parameter with the total pain index in 34 patients, and the effect of general anaesthesia on PASPAS was investigated in a control group of eight horses. Inter-observer variability was low (coefficient of variation 0.3), which indicated good reliability of PASPAS. The correlation of individual parameters with the total pain index differed between parameters. PASPAS, which was not influenced by general anaesthesia, was a useful tool to evaluate pain in horses after abdominal surgery and may also be useful to investigate analgesic protocols or for teaching purposes.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2010-07-16 PubMed ID: 20627635DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2010.04.029Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research is about enhancing a multi-dimensional measurement tool, known as the post abdominal surgery pain assessment scale (PASPAS), that is used to evaluate post-laparotomy pain in horses. The study assesses the reliability and usefulness of the PASPAS, finding that it is a reliable tool that doesn’t get affected by general anaesthesia, making it helpful for assessing post-surgery pain and possibly for examining pain relief methods.

Research Methodology

  • The study was initiated with an introductory phase to familiarise eight observers with the PASPAS tool.
  • These observers were then given the task to evaluate the pain levels of eight horses after laparotomy at multiple time intervals using the PASPAS scale.
  • In order to test the correlation between each parameter and the total pain index, a single observer closely examined the pain levels of 34 patients.
  • To find out PASPAS’s susceptibility to general anaesthesia, its effect was examined on a control group comprising eight horses.

Findings

  • The study found minimal variation among the eight observers (coefficient of variation 0.3), suggesting that the PASPAS tool provided reliable outputs.
  • However, the correlation between individual parameters of the PASPAS scale and the total pain index varied across parameters.
  • Findings confirmed that the PASPAS scale was not affected by general anaesthesia, leading to its efficacy in accurately measuring horses’ pain levels after undergoing a laparotomy procedure.

Implications

  • Because of its reliability and resistance to general anaesthesia, PASPAS can prove to be a significant tool in assessing pain in horses after their abdominal surgery.
  • It can potentially be utilized in the investigation of various pain management protocols for horses.
  • PASPAS may also serve an educational purpose, offering hands-on experience to students in the facets of pain diagnosis and management in animals, particularly horses.

Cite This Article

APA
Graubner C, Gerber V, Doherr M, Spadavecchia C. (2010). Clinical application and reliability of a post abdominal surgery pain assessment scale (PASPAS) in horses. Vet J, 188(2), 178-183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2010.04.029

Publication

Veterinary journal (London, England : 1997)
ISSN: 1532-2971
NlmUniqueID: 9706281
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 188
Issue: 2
Pages: 178-183

Researcher Affiliations

Graubner, C
  • Equine Clinic, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Berne, Switzerland. claudia.graubner@knp.unibe.ch
Gerber, V
    Doherr, M
      Spadavecchia, C

        MeSH Terms

        • Abdomen / surgery
        • Animals
        • Behavior, Animal
        • Female
        • Horse Diseases / pathology
        • Horse Diseases / surgery
        • Horses
        • Laparotomy / veterinary
        • Male
        • Observer Variation
        • Pain Measurement / veterinary
        • Pain, Postoperative / diagnosis
        • Pain, Postoperative / veterinary

        Citations

        This article has been cited 24 times.
        1. Harvey AM, Beausoleil NJ, Ramp D, Mellor DJ. Mental Experiences in Wild Animals: Scientifically Validating Measurable Welfare Indicators in Free-Roaming Horses. Animals (Basel) 2023 Apr 28;13(9).
          doi: 10.3390/ani13091507pubmed: 37174544google scholar: lookup
        2. Kim SM, Cho GJ. Analysis of Various Facial Expressions of Horses as a Welfare Indicator Using Deep Learning. Vet Sci 2023 Apr 10;10(4).
          doi: 10.3390/vetsci10040283pubmed: 37104439google scholar: lookup
        3. Maśko M, Wierzbicka M, Zdrojkowski Ł, Jasiński T, Sikorska U, Pawliński B, Domino M. Comparison of Donkey, Pony, and Horse Dorsal Profiles and Head Shapes Using Geometric Morphometrics. Animals (Basel) 2022 Apr 5;12(7).
          doi: 10.3390/ani12070931pubmed: 35405919google scholar: lookup
        4. Lemonnier LC, Thorin C, Meurice A, Dubus A, Touzot-Jourde G, Couroucé A, Leroux AA. Comparison of Flunixin Meglumine, Meloxicam and Ketoprofen on Mild Visceral Post-Operative Pain in Horses. Animals (Basel) 2022 Feb 21;12(4).
          doi: 10.3390/ani12040526pubmed: 35203234google scholar: lookup
        5. Lanci A, Benedetti B, Freccero F, Castagnetti C, Mariella J, van Loon JPAM, Padalino B. Development of a Composite Pain Scale in Foals: A Pilot Study. Animals (Basel) 2022 Feb 11;12(4).
          doi: 10.3390/ani12040439pubmed: 35203146google scholar: lookup
        6. Andersen PH, Broomé S, Rashid M, Lundblad J, Ask K, Li Z, Hernlund E, Rhodin M, Kjellström H. Towards Machine Recognition of Facial Expressions of Pain in Horses. Animals (Basel) 2021 Jun 1;11(6).
          doi: 10.3390/ani11061643pubmed: 34206077google scholar: lookup
        7. de Oliveira MGC, de Paula VV, Mouta AN, Lima IO, de Macêdo LB, Nunes TL, Trindade PHE, Luna SPL. Validation of the Donkey Pain Scale (DOPS) for Assessing Postoperative Pain in Donkeys. Front Vet Sci 2021;8:671330.
          doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.671330pubmed: 34179164google scholar: lookup
        8. Trindade PHE, Taffarel MO, Luna SPL. Spontaneous Behaviors of Post-Orchiectomy Pain in Horses Regardless of the Effects of Time of Day, Anesthesia, and Analgesia. Animals (Basel) 2021 May 31;11(6).
          doi: 10.3390/ani11061629pubmed: 34072875google scholar: lookup
        9. Torcivia C, McDonnell S. Equine Discomfort Ethogram. Animals (Basel) 2021 Feb 23;11(2).
          doi: 10.3390/ani11020580pubmed: 33672338google scholar: lookup
        10. Rashid M, Silventoinen A, Gleerup KB, Andersen PH. Equine Facial Action Coding System for determination of pain-related facial responses in videos of horses. PLoS One 2020;15(11):e0231608.
          doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231608pubmed: 33141852google scholar: lookup
        11. Ribitsch I, Baptista PM, Lange-Consiglio A, Melotti L, Patruno M, Jenner F, Schnabl-Feichter E, Dutton LC, Connolly DJ, van Steenbeek FG, Dudhia J, Penning LC. Large Animal Models in Regenerative Medicine and Tissue Engineering: To Do or Not to Do. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2020;8:972.
          doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00972pubmed: 32903631google scholar: lookup
        12. Gehlen H, Jaburg N, Merle R, Winter J. Can Endocrine Dysfunction Be Reliably Tested in Aged Horses That Are Experiencing Pain?. Animals (Basel) 2020 Aug 14;10(8).
          doi: 10.3390/ani10081426pubmed: 32824027google scholar: lookup
        13. de Oliveira MGC, Luna SPL, Nunes TL, Firmino PR, de Lima AGA, Ferreira J, Trindade PHE, Júnior RAB, de Paula VV. Post-operative pain behaviour associated with surgical castration in donkeys (Equus asinus). Equine Vet J 2021 Mar;53(2):261-266.
          doi: 10.1111/evj.13306pubmed: 32525236google scholar: lookup
        14. van Dierendonck MC, Burden FA, Rickards K, van Loon JPAM. Monitoring Acute Pain in Donkeys with the Equine Utrecht University Scale for Donkeys Composite Pain Assessment (EQUUS-DONKEY-COMPASS) and the Equine Utrecht University Scale for Donkey Facial Assessment of Pain (EQUUS-DONKEY-FAP). Animals (Basel) 2020 Feb 22;10(2).
          doi: 10.3390/ani10020354pubmed: 32098391google scholar: lookup
        15. Sénèque E, Lesimple C, Morisset S, Hausberger M. Could posture reflect welfare state? A study using geometric morphometrics in riding school horses. PLoS One 2019;14(2):e0211852.
          doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211852pubmed: 30721258google scholar: lookup
        16. Giovannini AEJ, van den Borne BHP, Wall SK, Wellnitz O, Bruckmaier RM, Spadavecchia C. Experimentally induced subclinical mastitis: are lipopolysaccharide and lipoteichoic acid eliciting similar pain responses?. Acta Vet Scand 2017 Jun 14;59(1):40.
          doi: 10.1186/s13028-017-0306-zpubmed: 28615028google scholar: lookup
        17. Taffarel MO, Luna SP, de Oliveira FA, Cardoso GS, Alonso Jde M, Pantoja JC, Brondani JT, Love E, Taylor P, White K, Murrell JC. Refinement and partial validation of the UNESP-Botucatu multidimensional composite pain scale for assessing postoperative pain in horses. BMC Vet Res 2015 Apr 1;11:83.
          doi: 10.1186/s12917-015-0395-8pubmed: 25888751google scholar: lookup
        18. de Oliveira FA, Luna SP, do Amaral JB, Rodrigues KA, Sant'Anna AC, Daolio M, Brondani JT. Validation of the UNESP-Botucatu unidimensional composite pain scale for assessing postoperative pain in cattle. BMC Vet Res 2014 Sep 6;10:200.
          doi: 10.1186/s12917-014-0200-0pubmed: 25192598google scholar: lookup
        19. Gleerup KB, Forkman B, Lindegaard C, Andersen PH. An equine pain face. Vet Anaesth Analg 2015 Jan;42(1):103-14.
          doi: 10.1111/vaa.12212pubmed: 25082060google scholar: lookup
        20. Dalla Costa E, Minero M, Lebelt D, Stucke D, Canali E, Leach MC. Development of the Horse Grimace Scale (HGS) as a pain assessment tool in horses undergoing routine castration. PLoS One 2014;9(3):e92281.
          doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092281pubmed: 24647606google scholar: lookup
        21. Spahija N, Lutvikadić I, Ćoso A, Maksimović A. Current attitudes and self-rated abilities of Bosnia and Herzegovina veterinarians toward pain recognition and quantification in domestic animals. Anim Welf 2023;32:e50.
          doi: 10.1017/awf.2023.46pubmed: 38487441google scholar: lookup
        22. Howard DL, Lancaster B, de Grauw J. Development and Preliminary Validation of an Equine Brief Pain Inventory for Owner Assessment of Chronic Pain Due to Osteoarthritis in Horses. Animals (Basel) 2024 Jan 5;14(2).
          doi: 10.3390/ani14020181pubmed: 38254349google scholar: lookup
        23. Gutiérrez Bautista ÁJ, Söbbeler FJ, Koch R, Viscasillas J, Kästner S. Assessment of an Ultrasound-Guided Rectus Sheath Block in Foals: A Cadaveric Study. Animals (Basel) 2023 Nov 21;13(23).
          doi: 10.3390/ani13233600pubmed: 38066951google scholar: lookup
        24. Citarella G, Heitzmann V, Ranninger E, Bettschart-Wolfensberger R. Analgesic Efficacy of Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug Therapy in Horses with Abdominal Pain: A Systematic Review. Animals (Basel) 2023 Nov 8;13(22).
          doi: 10.3390/ani13223447pubmed: 38003065google scholar: lookup
        Subscribe to our newsletter
        Join 99,928 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.