Analyze Diet
Journal of veterinary pharmacology and therapeutics2005; 28(1); 45-49; doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2885.2004.00624.x

Clinical efficacy of prophylactic administration of trimethoprim/sulfadiazine in a Streptococcus equi subsp. zooepidemicus infection model in ponies.

Abstract: Tissue chambers, implanted subcutaneously in the neck in six ponies, were inoculated with Streptococcus equi subsp. zooepidemicus in order to determine the clinical efficacy of prophylactic administration of trimethoprim/sulfadiazine (TMP/SDZ) against this infection. The TMP/SDZ treatment consisted of one intravenous (i.v.) injection of 5 mg/kg TMP and 25 mg/kg SDZ and the same dose of TMP/SDZ per os (p.o.), both given 3 h before inoculation. The oral dose was then repeated every 12 h for 5 days. TMP/SDZ concentrations in tissue chamber fluid (TCF) were above 10 times MIC at the moment of inoculation, and they were maintained at this level or higher throughout the duration of treatment. Trimethoprim/sulfadiazine treatment resulted in a marked reduction of viable bacteria in the tissue chamber but did not eliminate the infection, resulting in abscessation from day 19 onwards in all six ponies. This shows that, even when TCF is not yet purulent, TMP/SDZ is unable to eliminate the streptococci. Therefore, TMP/SDZ should not be the antimicrobial treatment of choice in infections in secluded sites in horses.
Publication Date: 2005-02-22 PubMed ID: 15720514DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2885.2004.00624.xGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research explores the effects of a prophylactic drug, trimethoprim/sulfadiazine (TMP/SDZ), on a specific type of bacterial infection in ponies. Although the drug was able to significantly reduce the presence of bacteria, it was unable to fully remove the infection, leading to the conclusion that it may not be the best line of treatment for similar infections in horses.

Research context

  • The research was conducted to assess the prophylactic administration of trimethoprim/sulfadiazine (TMP/SDZ) in a Streptococcus equi subsp. zooepidemicus infection model using ponies.
  • Streptococcus equi subsp. zooepidemicus is a bacterium that can cause various infections in equines, ranging from respiratory disease to wound infections, abortion, and even meningitis.
  • TMP/SDZ are antibacterial drugs commonly used in equine medicine, but their efficacy in treating this specific infection is unproven.

Approach and Methodology

  • The scientists created tissue chambers in the necks of the ponies, which were then infected with Streptococcus equi subsp. zooepidemicus to create a controlled model of the disease.
  • The ponies were treated with TMP/SDZ both intravenously and orally three hours prior to the bacterial inoculation. The oral treatment was repeated every 12 hours for five days.
  • The TMP/SDZ concentrations in the tissue chamber fluid were tracked to ensure they were maintained at a level ten times greater than the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), the lowest concentration of a drug that prevents the growth of a particular bacterium.

Key Findings

  • The use of TMP/SDZ treatment resulted in a significant reduction of viable bacteria in the ponies’ tissue chambers.
  • However, despite the marked bacterial reduction, the treatment was not able to fully eliminate the infection, leading to abscessation (the formation of abscesses) from day 19 onwards in all six ponies.
  • This proves that even when there are high concentrations of TMP/SDZ, the drug is unable to fully eradicate Streptococcus equi subsp. zooepidemicus, particularly when the infection is in a secluded site like the implanted tissue chamber.

Conclusions

  • The research concludes that the use of TMP/SDZ should not be the preferred course of treatment for infections caused by Streptococcus equi subsp. zooepidemicus in secluded sites in horses, given its inability to eliminate the bacteria in the study.
  • Although the drug can reduce the presence of viable bacteria significantly, its inability to eradicate the infection entirely limits its efficiency as a treatment for such conditions.

Cite This Article

APA
Ensink JM, Bosch G, van Duijkeren E. (2005). Clinical efficacy of prophylactic administration of trimethoprim/sulfadiazine in a Streptococcus equi subsp. zooepidemicus infection model in ponies. J Vet Pharmacol Ther, 28(1), 45-49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2885.2004.00624.x

Publication

ISSN: 0140-7783
NlmUniqueID: 7910920
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 28
Issue: 1
Pages: 45-49

Researcher Affiliations

Ensink, J M
  • Department of Equine Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, TD Utrecht, The Netherlands. j.m.ensink@vet.uu.nl
Bosch, G
    van Duijkeren, E

      MeSH Terms

      • Administration, Oral
      • Animals
      • Anti-Bacterial Agents / administration & dosage
      • Anti-Bacterial Agents / pharmacokinetics
      • Anti-Bacterial Agents / pharmacology
      • Antibiotic Prophylaxis
      • Disease Models, Animal
      • Drug Combinations
      • Horse Diseases / drug therapy
      • Horse Diseases / metabolism
      • Horse Diseases / microbiology
      • Horses
      • Injections, Intravenous / veterinary
      • Male
      • Microbial Sensitivity Tests
      • Streptococcal Infections / drug therapy
      • Streptococcal Infections / veterinary
      • Streptococcus equi / drug effects
      • Sulfadiazine / administration & dosage
      • Sulfadiazine / pharmacokinetics
      • Sulfadiazine / pharmacology
      • Trimethoprim / administration & dosage
      • Trimethoprim / pharmacokinetics
      • Trimethoprim / pharmacology

      Citations

      This article has been cited 3 times.
      1. Tyrnenopoulou P, Fthenakis GC. Clinical Aspects of Bacterial Distribution and Antibiotic Resistance in the Reproductive System of Equids. Antibiotics (Basel) 2023 Mar 28;12(4).
        doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12040664pubmed: 37107026google scholar: lookup
      2. Malo A, Cluzel C, Labrecque O, Beauchamp G, Lavoie JP, Leclere M. Evolution of in vitro antimicrobial resistance in an equine hospital over 3 decades. Can Vet J 2016 Jul;57(7):747-51.
        pubmed: 27429463
      3. Clark C, Greenwood S, Boison JO, Chirino-Trejo M, Dowling PM. Bacterial isolates from equine infections in western Canada (1998-2003). Can Vet J 2008 Feb;49(2):153-60.
        pubmed: 18309745