Abstract: Veterinary and human pharmacology differ principally in the range of species in which drugs are used and studied. In animals, as in humans, an understanding of the dose-effect relationship can be obtained by linking pharmacokinetic behaviour with pharmacodynamic information. Studies of different classes of drugs support the assumption that the range of therapeutic plasma concentrations in animals is generally the same as in humans. The requirement for species differences in dosage or administration rate (dose/dosage interval) may be attributed to variations in pharmacokinetic behaviour or pharmacodynamic activity, or both. When administering a drug orally, the bioavailability from a dosage form can vary widely. This is particularly the case between ruminant animals (cattle, sheep and goats), horses and carnivorous species (dogs and cats). Species variations in bioavailability can be avoided by parenteral administration. Formulation of parenteral preparations and location of intramuscular injection site can, at least in horses and cattle, influence bioavailability. Comparative pharmacokinetic studies help to explain differences in absorption and disposition processes that may underlie species variations in response to fixed dosages of a drug. Certain marker substances are useful in quantifying the activity of metabolic pathways or efficiency of excretion processes. Prediction of preslaughter withdrawal times in food-producing animals represents an application of pharmacokinetics in the field of drug residues. The drug residue profile can be obtained by combining fixed dose pharmacokinetic studies with measurement of drug concentrations in selected tissues and organs of the body. This approach offers an economical advantage in that fewer animals are required for residue studies. In domestic animals, as in humans, the disposition of most drugs can be interpreted in terms of a 2- (generally) or 3-compartment open model. Species variations in pharmacokinetic behaviour of a drug are usually attributed to differences in the rate of elimination rather than distribution and metabolism of the drug, although the principal metabolic pathway may differ. With certain notable exceptions, the herbivorous species (horses and ruminant animals) metabolise lipid-soluble drugs more rapidly than carnivorous species (dogs and cats). Humans metabolise drugs slowly in comparison with animals. Half-life values reflect this; insufficient data are available to base interspecies comparison on mean residence time. Intrinsic hepatic clearance of phenazone (antipyrine) [microsomal oxidation] in humans is approximately one-seventh of that in domestic animals.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
This research article is about the differences in pharmacokinetics, the study of how drugs move through the body, in various animal species compared to humans and how these differences affect dosage and drug administration methods.
Basic Overview
The research article provides an in-depth study on clinical pharmacokinetics, the branch of pharmacology concerned with the movement of drugs within the body, in animals versus humans.
The key difference between veterinary and human pharmacology lies in the range of species where drugs are used and studied.
Much like in humans, determining the relationship between dosage and effect in animals can be achieved by coupling pharmacokinetics with pharmacodynamic information.
Dosing Differences in Animals vs Humans
The article mentions that the therapeutic plasma concentrations range in animals is generally similar to that in humans.
The need for variances in dosage or the rate of drug administration based on the species can be a result of the disparities in pharmacokinetic behaviour or pharmacodynamic activity, or both.
Administering Drugs Orally vs Parenterally
The bioavailability, or the amount and rate at which a drug is absorbed into the system, of orally administered drugs can greatly vary, especially between ruminant animals (such as cattle, sheep, and goats), horses, and carnivores (like dogs and cats).
By using parenteral (non-oral) administration, species variations in bioavailability can be eliminated.
However, the formulation of parenteral preparations or the location of the injection site, particularly in horses and cattle, can also affect bioavailability.
Comparative Pharmacokinetic Studies and Drug Residues
Comparative pharmacokinetic studies prove useful in providing insights into differences in absorption and disposition processes that may lead to species variations in response to fixed dosages of a drug.
Pharmacokinetics can be used to predict pre-slaughter withdrawal times in food-producing animals, beneficial in the field of drug residues. It offers an economic advantage, as fewer animals are needed for the residue studies.
Species Specific Metabolisation Rates
Species variations in pharmacokinetic behaviour of a drug are often attributed to differences in the rate of elimination rather than the distribution and metabolism of the drug, but some exceptions do exist.
The metabolism rate for lipid-soluble drugs in herbivores (like horses and ruminant animals) is generally faster than that in carnivores (like dogs and cats). Humans, in comparison, metabolise these drugs slowly.
The available data on mean residence time, which is the average time a molecule spends in a system, is insufficient for interspecies comparison.
Huffman EM, Clark CH, Olson JD, Ball L. Serum chloramphenicol concentrations in preruminant calves: a comparison of two formulations dosed orally.. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 1981 Sep;4(3):225-31.
Elsheikh HA, Ali BH, Homeida AM, Hassan T, Hapke HJ. Pharmacokinetics of antipyrine and sulphadimidine (sulfamethazine) in camels, sheep and goats.. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 1991 Sep;14(3):269-75.
Abdullah AS, Baggot JD. Influence of Escherichia coli endotoxin-induced fever on pharmacokinetics of imidocarb in dogs and goats.. Am J Vet Res 1984 Dec;45(12):2645-8.
Tranquilli WJ, Paul AJ, Seward RL. Ivermectin plasma concentrations in collies sensitive to ivermectin-induced toxicosis.. Am J Vet Res 1989 May;50(5):769-70.
Dalvi RR, Nunn VA, Juskevich J. Hepatic cytochrome P-450 dependent drug metabolizing activity in rats, rabbits and several food-producing species.. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 1987 Jun;10(2):164-8.
Adamson PJ, Wilson WD, Baggot JD, Hietala SK, Mihalyi JE. Influence of age on the disposition kinetics of chloramphenicol in equine neonates.. Am J Vet Res 1991 Mar;52(3):426-31.
Salam Abdullah A, Baggot JD. Influence of induced disease states on the disposition kinetics of imidocarb in goats.. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 1986 Jun;9(2):192-7.
Koritz GD, McKiernan BC, Neff-Davis CA, Munsiff IJ. Bioavailability of four slow-release theophylline formulations in the beagle dog.. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 1986 Sep;9(3):293-302.
Mader DR, Conzelman GM Jr, Baggot JD. Effects of ambient temperature on the half-life and dosage regimen of amikacin in the gopher snake.. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1985 Dec 1;187(11):1134-6.
Jacobs DE, Fox MT, Gowling G, Foster J, Pitt SR, Gerrelli D. Field evaluation of the oxfendazole pulse release bolus for the chemoprophylaxis of bovine parasitic gastroenteritis: a comparison with three other control strategies.. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 1987 Mar;10(1):30-6.
Wilson RC, Duran SH, Horton CR Jr, Wright LC. Bioavailability of gentamicin in dogs after intramuscular or subcutaneous injections.. Am J Vet Res 1989 Oct;50(10):1748-50.
Theeuwes F, Bayne W. Dosage form index: an objective criterion for evaluation of controlled-release drug delivery systems.. J Pharm Sci 1977 Oct;66(10):1388-92.
Dorrestein GM, van Gogh H, Rinzema JD. Pharmacokinetic aspects of penicillins, aminoglycosides and chloramphenicol in birds compared to mammals. A review.. Vet Q 1984 Sep;6(4):216-24.
Boxenbaum H. Interspecies scaling, allometry, physiological time, and the ground plan of pharmacokinetics.. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm 1982 Apr;10(2):201-27.
Sams RA, Muir WW, Detra RL, Robinson EP. Comparative pharmacokinetics and anesthetic effects of methohexital, pentobarbital, thiamylal, and thiopental in Greyhound dogs and non-Greyhound, mixed-breed dogs.. Am J Vet Res 1985 Aug;46(8):1677-83.
Waterman AE. The pharmacokinetics of ketamine administered intravenously in calves and the modifying effect of premedication with xylazine hydrochloride.. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 1984 Jun;7(2):125-30.
Vesell ES, Lee CJ, Passananti GT, Shively CA. Relationship between plasma antipyrine half-lives and hepatic microsomal drug metabolism in dogs.. Pharmacology 1973;10(6):317-28.
Neff-Davis CA, Davis LE, Gillette EL. Metronidazole: a method for its determination in biological fluids and its disposition kinetics in the dog.. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 1981 Jun;4(2):121-7.
Gierke KD, Perrier D, Mayersohn M, Marcus FI. Digoxin disposition kinetics in dogs before and during azotemia.. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1978 May;205(2):459-64.
Nouws JF, van Ginneken CA, Hekman P, Ziv G. Comparative plasma ampicillin levels and bioavailability of five parenteral ampicillin formulations in ruminant calves.. Vet Q 1982 Apr;4(2):62-71.
Reuning RH, Sams RA, Notari RE. Role of pharmacokinetics in drug dosage adjustment. I. Pharmacologic effect kinetics and apparent volume of distribution of digoxin.. J Clin Pharmacol New Drugs 1973 Apr;13(4):127-41.
Boxenbaum H. Interspecies variation in liver weight, hepatic blood flow, and antipyrine intrinsic clearance: extrapolation of data to benzodiazepines and phenytoin.. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm 1980 Apr;8(2):165-76.
Pedersoli WM, Ravis WR, Askins DR, Krista LM, Spano JS, Whitesides JF, Tolbert DS. Pharmacokinetics of single doses of gentamicin given intravenously and intramuscularly to turkeys.. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 1989 Jun;12(2):124-32.
Robinson EP, Sams RA, Muir WW. Barbiturate anesthesia in greyhound and mixed-breed dogs: comparative cardiopulmonary effects, anesthetic effects, and recovery rates.. Am J Vet Res 1986 Oct;47(10):2105-12.
Keenaghan JB, Boyes RN. The tissue distribution, metabolism and excretion of lidocaine in rats, guinea pigs, dogs and man.. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1972 Feb;180(2):454-63.
Nielsen P, Rasmussen F. Influence of age on half-life of trimethoprim and sulphadoxine in goats.. Acta Pharmacol Toxicol (Copenh) 1976 Feb;38(2):113-9.
Ibarra-Velarde F, Rojas-Campos T, Vera-Montenegro Y, Flores-Ramos M, Castillo R, Leyva-Gómez G. Field study on the determination of the effective dose of injectable fosfatriclaben prodrug in sheep naturally infected with Fasciola hepatica. Parasitol Res 2022 Jan;121(1):433-440.
Kashuba AD, Dyer JR, Kramer LM, Raasch RH, Eron JJ, Cohen MS. Antiretroviral-drug concentrations in semen: implications for sexual transmission of human immunodeficiency virus type 1. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1999 Aug;43(8):1817-26.
Intorre L, Mengozzi G, Bertini S, Bagliacca M, Luchetti E, Soldani G. The plasma kinetics and tissue distribution of enrofloxacin and its metabolite ciprofloxacin in the Muscovy duck. Vet Res Commun 1997 Feb;21(2):127-36.
Kim I, Yun JH. Comparative Pharmacological and Pharmaceutical Perspectives on Antidiabetic Therapies in Humans, Dogs, and Cats. Pharmaceutics 2025 Aug 23;17(9).
Šturm S, Grabnar I, Škibin A, Pogačnik M, Cerkvenik-Flajs V. Preliminary toxicokinetic study of BPA in lactating dairy sheep after repeated dietary and subcutaneous administration. Sci Rep 2020 Apr 16;10(1):6498.