Analyze Diet
Theriogenology2026; 259; 117911; doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2026.117911

Clinical pregnancy outcomes after transfer of fresh and vitrified-warmed conventional IVF equine embryos.

Abstract: In vitro fertilization (IVF) in horses has emerged as a valuable assisted reproductive technology, yet the impact of embryo cryopreservation on pregnancy outcomes when utilizing this technique remains unclear. This study reports pregnancy outcomes following transfer of conventional equine IVF embryos, with both fresh and vitrified-warmed embryos. Conventional IVF (cIVF) was used to produce 40 embryos, which were transferred to recipient mares, pregnancy diagnosis was performed at 6 days post-transfer followed by embryonic heartbeat detection between day 25 and 30 of gestation. Observed pregnancy rates at 6 days post-transfer were 81% (17/21; 95% CI [58 to 95]) for fresh embryos and 79% (15/19; 95% CI [54 to 94]) for vitrified-warmed embryos. Embryonic heartbeat was detected in 94% (16/17; 95% CI [71 to 100]) and 100% (15/15; 95% CI [78 to 100]) of pregnancies, respectively. Given the retrospective design and limited sample size, findings are presented as descriptive outcomes and do not support inference regarding comparative efficacy. These observations contribute clinical outcome data for cIVF embryo transfer and support the need for larger, prospective studies with controlled recipient management and embryo characterization.
Publication Date: 2026-03-20 PubMed ID: 41865697DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2026.117911Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Overview

  • This study investigated pregnancy outcomes in horses using embryos produced by conventional in vitro fertilization (cIVF), comparing fresh embryos versus those that were vitrified (cryopreserved) and then warmed before transfer.
  • The research assessed early pregnancy rates and embryonic heartbeat detection to evaluate the success of embryo transfer using both fresh and vitrified-warmed embryos.

Background

  • Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) like IVF have become important tools in equine breeding.
  • Conventional IVF involves fertilizing horse eggs with sperm in a laboratory setting to produce embryos outside the mare’s body.
  • Cryopreservation (freezing) of embryos can facilitate flexible timing for embryo transfer and improve management of breeding programs.
  • Vitrification is a rapid freezing technique that prevents ice crystal formation and is commonly used for embryo preservation.
  • However, the impact of vitrification on embryo viability and subsequent pregnancy outcomes in horses is not well established.

Study Objectives

  • To report clinical pregnancy outcomes following transfer of cIVF equine embryos that were either fresh or vitrified and warmed.
  • To compare early pregnancy rates and embryonic viability indicators between these two embryo groups.

Methods

  • A total of 40 equine embryos were produced by conventional IVF.
  • Embryos were either:
    • Transferred fresh into recipient mares, or
    • Vitrified (cryopreserved) then warmed before transfer.
  • Pregnancy diagnosis was conducted 6 days after embryo transfer to determine initial pregnancy establishment.
  • Embryonic heartbeat—a sign of continued development and viability—was checked between days 25 and 30 of gestation.
  • Pregnancy rates and heartbeat detection percentages were recorded along with 95% confidence intervals.

Results

  • Fresh embryo group:
    • Pregnancy rate at 6 days post-transfer: 81% (17 out of 21 recipients; 95% CI: 58% to 95%).
    • Embryonic heartbeat detected in 94% of established pregnancies (16/17; 95% CI: 71% to 100%).
  • Vitrified-warmed embryo group:
    • Pregnancy rate at 6 days post-transfer: 79% (15 out of 19 recipients; 95% CI: 54% to 94%).
    • Embryonic heartbeat detected in 100% of established pregnancies (15/15; 95% CI: 78% to 100%).

Interpretation and Limitations

  • Pregnancy rates for both fresh and vitrified-warmed embryos were similar, suggesting vitrification may not compromise early pregnancy establishment.
  • The high proportion of embryonic heartbeats indicates good embryo viability following both protocols.
  • Results are descriptive due to:
    • Retrospective study design (reviewing past cases rather than planned prospective trial).
    • Relatively small sample size (40 embryos total).
    • Potential variability in recipient mare management and embryo characteristics.
  • Because of these limitations, definitive conclusions about comparative efficacy cannot be drawn from this data alone.

Conclusions and Future Directions

  • This study contributes important clinical data on pregnancy outcomes after transfer of cIVF equine embryos.
  • Findings support the idea that vitrification of conventional IVF embryos is feasible without obvious reduction in early pregnancy success.
  • Emphasizes need for larger, well-controlled prospective studies to:
    • Better evaluate the effectiveness of vitrification in equine IVF embryos.
    • Control for recipient mare management and embryo quality variables.
    • Improve evidence-based recommendations for clinical use of cryopreserved embryos in horses.

Cite This Article

APA
Souza MG, Mota Melo L, Martinez RE, Teague SR, Beck RL. (2026). Clinical pregnancy outcomes after transfer of fresh and vitrified-warmed conventional IVF equine embryos. Theriogenology, 259, 117911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2026.117911

Publication

ISSN: 1879-3231
NlmUniqueID: 0421510
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 259
Pages: 117911
PII: S0093-691X(26)00101-9

Researcher Affiliations

Souza, Marcos G
  • In Foal Inc., Millsap, TX, 76066, USA.
Mota Melo, Leticia
  • Department of Animal Science, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Tarleton State University, Stephenville, TX, 76402, USA.
Martinez, Rafael E
  • Department of Animal Science, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Tarleton State University, Stephenville, TX, 76402, USA. Electronic address: rmartinez@tarleton.edu.
Teague, Sheila R
  • In Foal Inc., Millsap, TX, 76066, USA.
Beck, Rick L
  • In Foal Inc., Millsap, TX, 76066, USA.

Conflict of Interest Statement

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.