Analyze Diet
Journal of medical microbiology2011; 60(Pt 8); 1188-1192; doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.030908-0

Clostridium difficile in horses in Australia–a preliminary study.

Abstract: During a 24 month period from 2007 to 2009, 174 faecal specimens from horses in Australia (predominantly from Western Australia) were tested for Clostridium difficile. C. difficile was isolated from 14 (23 %) of 62 diarrhoeal animals (including 10 foals) and from none of 112 healthy adult horses. These isolates were toxin profiled by PCR for toxin A, toxin B and binary toxin, and ribotyped. Ten of the equine isolates were A(+)B(+)CDT(-). Other toxin profiles detected were A(-)B(-)CDT(+) (one isolate), A(+)B(+)CDT(+) (two isolates) and A(-)B(-)CDT(-) (three isolates). There were six different ribotypes detected in the horses, ribotype 012 being the most common with six isolates. Two horses (one adult and one foal) had two strains of C. difficile isolated on different days. These strains had the same toxin profile but different ribotypes. None of the equine isolates was ribotype 078, which is A(+)B(+)CDT(+) and a significant cause of animal disease overseas. All isolates were susceptible to metronidazole and vancomycin. These results suggest that the epidemiology of C. difficile in horses in Australia is currently similar to that in other parts of the world, but requires further surveillance to monitor changes.
Publication Date: 2011-03-24 PubMed ID: 21436371DOI: 10.1099/jmm.0.030908-0Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research conducted from 2007 to 2009 investigates the presence of Clostridium difficile, a bacterium often associated with diarrhea and colitis, in horses in Australia. The study found that it was isolated from 23% of horses with diarrhea but none of the healthy adult horses. The bacteria found were analyzed for different toxin profiles and varied ribotypes, all of which were susceptible to common antibiotics.

Investigation Method and Findings

  • Over 24 months, 174 horse fecal samples were collected and examined for the presence of Clostridium difficile bacteria. The majority of these samples were obtained from horses in Western Australia.
  • The bacteria were found in 23% of the samples from horses that exhibited symptoms of diarrhea, and these included samples from 10 young horses (foals). Significantly, no C. difficile bacteria were identified in any of the samples from healthy adult horses.
  • The bacterial strains detected were profiled for the presence of three toxins – A, B, and the binary toxin, which is associated with increased virulence.

Toxin Profiling and Ribotyping

  • The majority of the equine isolates were found to be producing toxins A and B, but not the binary toxin (A(+)B(+)CDT(-)).
  • Other toxin profiles detected included A(-)B(-)CDT(+) (one isolate), A(+)B(+)CDT(+) (two isolates), and A(-)B(-)CDT(-) three isolates – these classifications define the specific toxin-producing capabilities of the bacteria.
  • Ribotyping, a process that categorizes bacteria based on variations in their ribosomal RNA, identified six different ribotypes within the C. difficile isolates. Ribotype 012 was the most common variant.
  • Interestingly, two horses (one adult and one foal) were found to harbour two different strains of C. difficile at different time points, characterized by the same toxin profile but different ribotypes.

Significance and Future Directions

  • Notably, no isolates were identified as ribotype 078, known to be a significant cause of animal disease overseas. This indicates a potential geographic variation in the types of C. difficile affecting horses.
  • All of the isolated C. difficile bacteria were found to be <a href="/metronidazole-for-horses/” title=”Metronidazole (Flagyl®) for Horses: Pharmacology, Clinical Uses & Side Effects”>susceptible to metronidazole and vancomycin – two types of antibiotics commonly used to treat C. difficile infections.
  • The team concluded that the current epidemiology of C. difficile in Australian horses is consistent with other parts of the world. However, they highlight the importance of ongoing surveillance to monitor potential changes in this pattern over time.

Cite This Article

APA
Thean S, Elliott B, Riley TV. (2011). Clostridium difficile in horses in Australia–a preliminary study. J Med Microbiol, 60(Pt 8), 1188-1192. https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.030908-0

Publication

ISSN: 1473-5644
NlmUniqueID: 0224131
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 60
Issue: Pt 8
Pages: 1188-1192

Researcher Affiliations

Thean, Sara
  • Division of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, PathWest Laboratory Medicine, Nedlands 6009, Western Australia, Australia.
Elliott, Briony
  • Microbiology and Immunology, University of Western Australia, Nedlands 6009, Western Australia, Australia.
Riley, Thomas V
  • Microbiology and Immunology, University of Western Australia, Nedlands 6009, Western Australia, Australia.
  • Division of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, PathWest Laboratory Medicine, Nedlands 6009, Western Australia, Australia.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Anti-Bacterial Agents / pharmacology
  • Australia / epidemiology
  • Clostridioides difficile / classification
  • Clostridioides difficile / drug effects
  • Clostridioides difficile / isolation & purification
  • Clostridium Infections / epidemiology
  • Clostridium Infections / microbiology
  • Clostridium Infections / veterinary
  • Diarrhea / epidemiology
  • Diarrhea / microbiology
  • Diarrhea / veterinary
  • Drug Resistance, Bacterial
  • Horse Diseases / epidemiology
  • Horse Diseases / microbiology
  • Horses
  • Prevalence
  • Ribotyping

Citations

This article has been cited 16 times.
  1. Hain-Saunders NMR, Knight DR, Harvey A, Bruce M, Hampson BA, Riley TV. Clostridioides difficile in feral horse populations in Australia. Appl Environ Microbiol 2025 May 21;91(5):e0211424.
    doi: 10.1128/aem.02114-24pubmed: 40172204google scholar: lookup
  2. Kabir A, Lamichhane B, Habib T, Adams A, El-Sheikh Ali H, Slovis NM, Troedsson MHT, Helmy YA. Antimicrobial Resistance in Equines: A Growing Threat to Horse Health and Beyond-A Comprehensive Review. Antibiotics (Basel) 2024 Jul 29;13(8).
    doi: 10.3390/antibiotics13080713pubmed: 39200013google scholar: lookup
  3. Hain-Saunders NMR, Knight DR, Bruce M, Byrne D, Riley TV. Genomic Analysis of Clostridioides difficile Recovered from Horses in Western Australia. Microorganisms 2023 Jul 3;11(7).
  4. Gomez DE, Leclere M, Arroyo LG, Li L, John E, Afonso T, Payette F, Darby S. Acute diarrhea in horses: A multicenter Canadian retrospective study (2015 to 2019). Can Vet J 2022 Oct;63(10):1033-1042.
    pubmed: 36185796
  5. Uzal FA, Navarro MA, Asin J, Henderson EE. Clostridial Diseases of Horses: A Review. Vaccines (Basel) 2022 Feb 17;10(2).
    doi: 10.3390/vaccines10020318pubmed: 35214776google scholar: lookup
  6. Hain-Saunders NMR, Knight DR, Bruce M, Riley TV. Clostridioides difficile infection and One Health: an equine perspective. Environ Microbiol 2022 Mar;24(3):985-997.
    doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.15898pubmed: 35001483google scholar: lookup
  7. Uzal FA, Arroyo LG, Navarro MA, Gomez DE, Asín J, Henderson E. Bacterial and viral enterocolitis in horses: a review. J Vet Diagn Invest 2022 May;34(3):354-375.
    doi: 10.1177/10406387211057469pubmed: 34763560google scholar: lookup
  8. Weese JS, Slovis N, Rousseau J. Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile in neonatal foals and mares at a referral hospital. J Vet Intern Med 2021 Mar;35(2):1140-1146.
    doi: 10.1111/jvim.16094pubmed: 33656757google scholar: lookup
  9. Hernandez BG, Vinithakumari AA, Sponseller B, Tangudu C, Mooyottu S. Prevalence, Colonization, Epidemiology, and Public Health Significance of Clostridioides difficile in Companion Animals. Front Vet Sci 2020;7:512551.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.512551pubmed: 33062657google scholar: lookup
  10. Archambault M, Rubin JE. Antimicrobial Resistance in Clostridium and Brachyspira spp. and Other Anaerobes. Microbiol Spectr 2020 Jan;8(1).
  11. Weese JS. Clostridium (Clostridioides) difficile in animals. J Vet Diagn Invest 2020 Mar;32(2):213-221.
    doi: 10.1177/1040638719899081pubmed: 31904312google scholar: lookup
  12. Keen PL, Patrick DM. Tracking Change: A Look at the Ecological Footprint of Antibiotics and Antimicrobial Resistance. Antibiotics (Basel) 2013 Mar 27;2(2):191-205.
    doi: 10.3390/antibiotics2020191pubmed: 27029298google scholar: lookup
  13. Rodriguez C, Taminiau B, Brévers B, Avesani V, Van Broeck J, Leroux A, Gallot M, Bruwier A, Amory H, Delmée M, Daube G. Faecal microbiota characterisation of horses using 16 rdna barcoded pyrosequencing, and carriage rate of clostridium difficile at hospital admission. BMC Microbiol 2015 Sep 16;15:181.
    doi: 10.1186/s12866-015-0514-5pubmed: 26377067google scholar: lookup
  14. Knight DR, Elliott B, Chang BJ, Perkins TT, Riley TV. Diversity and Evolution in the Genome of Clostridium difficile. Clin Microbiol Rev 2015 Jul;28(3):721-41.
    doi: 10.1128/CMR.00127-14pubmed: 26085550google scholar: lookup
  15. Knight DR, Thean S, Putsathit P, Fenwick S, Riley TV. Cross-sectional study reveals high prevalence of Clostridium difficile non-PCR ribotype 078 strains in Australian veal calves at slaughter. Appl Environ Microbiol 2013 Apr;79(8):2630-5.
    doi: 10.1128/AEM.03951-12pubmed: 23396338google scholar: lookup
  16. Stiles BG, Wigelsworth DJ, Popoff MR, Barth H. Clostridial binary toxins: iota and C2 family portraits. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2011;1:11.
    doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2011.00011pubmed: 22919577google scholar: lookup