Abstract: The limited fertility of jennies inseminated with frozen donkey semen remains a major challenge for donkey reproduction and conservation, contrasting with the more favorable outcomes observed in mares. Species-specific differences in post-breeding uterine inflammation have been proposed as a key factor underlying this disparity. This study compared the uterine inflammatory response and pregnancy outcomes of jennies and mares inseminated with frozen donkey semen. Twelve jennies and eleven mares were monitored over 48 and 44 estrous cycles, respectively. Artificial insemination (AI) was performed immediately after ovulation (T0) using 1 x 10 frozen-thawed spermatozoa deposited deep into the uterine horn. Endometrial edema (EE), intrauterine fluid (IUF), vascular perfusion, serum progesterone (P4), and acute-phase proteins (APPs) were assessed at T0, T6, T24, T48, T72, and T120. Endometrial cytology was conducted at T0, T6, T24, and T48, while uterine biopsies were obtained at T0, T12, and T48. Pregnancy was diagnosed on Day 14 post-AI. Jennies exhibited consistently lower ultrasonographic edema and intrauterine fluid accumulation than mares, yet developed a markedly stronger and more persistent endometrial inflammatory response. Neutrophil recruitment peaked in both species at 6 h post-AI, but inflammation resolved by 48 h only in mares. In jennies, inflammation persisted and was characterized by pronounced eosinophilic infiltration, a feature absent in mares. No differences were detected between species for APP concentrations or COX-2 expression. P4 concentrations were higher in jennies on Day 5 post-ovulation (13 vs. 6 ng/mL). Pregnancy outcomes differed sharply: mares achieved 54.55% pregnancy, whereas jennies showed 0%. In summary, jennies exhibit an intense and prolonged uterine inflammatory response to frozen donkey semen, distinguished by eosinophilic infiltration and delayed resolution. These species-specific differences likely contribute to the extremely low fertility observed in jennies and highlight the need for targeted reproductive strategies in asinine breeding programs.
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
Overview
This study compares uterine inflammation and pregnancy rates between jennies (female donkeys) and mares (female horses) following insemination with frozen donkey semen.
Findings suggest jennies have a stronger, longer-lasting uterine inflammatory response that may explain their notably lower fertility compared to mares.
Background and Objective
Artificial insemination (AI) using frozen donkey semen is a critical method for donkey reproduction and conservation.
Jennies generally show poor fertility outcomes following AI with frozen semen, unlike mares that tend to have better reproductive success.
The research aims to determine if differences in post-breeding uterine inflammation between species contribute to this disparity.
Endometrial cytology at T0, T6, T24, T48 to analyze cellular inflammatory response.
Uterine biopsies at T0, T12, T48 for histological examination including COX-2 expression.
Pregnancy diagnosis conducted on Day 14 post-AI.
Key Findings
Endometrial Edema and Fluid Accumulation:
Jennies showed consistently lower levels of endometrial edema and intrauterine fluid than mares.
Inflammatory Cell Response:
Both species showed peak neutrophil recruitment at 6 hours post-insemination.
Inflammation resolved within 48 hours in mares.
In jennies, inflammation persisted beyond 48 hours with a distinctive eosinophilic infiltration, which was absent in mares.
Acute-Phase Proteins and COX-2 Expression:
No significant differences found between jennies and mares, suggesting similar systemic inflammatory responses at that level.
Progesterone Levels:
Jennies had significantly higher serum progesterone concentrations on Day 5 post-ovulation (13 ng/mL) compared to mares (6 ng/mL).
Pregnancy Outcomes:
Mares had a pregnancy rate of 54.55%.
Jennies had 0% pregnancy success under the same conditions.
Interpretation and Implications
The strong and prolonged uterine inflammation in jennies, especially marked by eosinophil presence, likely contributes to their poor fertility outcomes after AI with frozen donkey semen.
Lower ultrasonographic markers like edema and fluid in jennies suggest a different pattern of uterine response despite the intense inflammation.
Similarities in acute-phase proteins and COX-2 expression indicate that systemic and some molecular inflammatory pathways are comparable between species.
Higher progesterone in jennies could influence uterine environment and immune responses, possibly exacerbating inflammation or affecting embryo survival.
This species-specific uterine immune response highlights the need for tailored reproductive management and therapeutic interventions in donkeys to improve AI success and conservation efforts.
Conclusion
Jennies and mares respond differently to frozen donkey semen with respect to uterine inflammation and fertility outcomes.
Prolonged and eosinophil-rich inflammation in jennies may create a hostile environment for pregnancy establishment.
Developing targeted strategies to modulate uterine inflammation in jennies could enhance fertility and support preservation of donkey populations.
Cite This Article
APA
Sancler-Silva YFR, Costa LML, Freitas MS, Teixeira CS, Albino MV, García HDM, Fiala-Rechsteiner SMDE, Schultz ÉB, da Fonseca LA, Catalán J.
(2026).
Comparative analysis of uterine inflammation in jennies and mares after insemination with cryopreserved donkey semen.
Theriogenology, 260, 117917.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2026.117917
Departamento de Zootecnia, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, MG, Brazil. Electronic address: yame@ufv.br.
Costa, Lorraine Marcele Lopes
Departamento de Zootecnia, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, MG, Brazil.
Freitas, Marcela Souza
Departamento de Zootecnia, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, MG, Brazil; Departamento de Veterinária, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, MG, Brazil.
Teixeira, Cristian Silva
Departamento de Zootecnia, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, MG, Brazil.
Albino, Matheus Vilela
Departamento de Zootecnia, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, MG, Brazil.
García, Henry David Mogollon
Departamento de Genética, Evolução, Microbiologia e Imunologia, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil; Laboratório de Biologia Computacional e Sistemas, Instituto Pasteur, Universidade de São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Fiala-Rechsteiner, Sandra Mara da Encarnação
Historep, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, RS, Brazil.
Schultz, Érica Beatriz
Departamento de Zootecnia, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, MG, Brazil.
da Fonseca, Leandro Abreu
Departamento de Veterinária, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, MG, Brazil.
Catalán, Jaime
Biotechnology of Animal and Human Reproduction (TechnoSperm), Institute of Food and Agricultural Technology, University of Girona, Girona, Spain; Unit of Cell Biology, Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Girona, Girona, Spain.
MeSH Terms
Animals
Female
Equidae / physiology
Insemination, Artificial / veterinary
Insemination, Artificial / adverse effects
Pregnancy
Semen Preservation / veterinary
Semen Preservation / adverse effects
Cryopreservation / veterinary
Inflammation / veterinary
Inflammation / pathology
Inflammation / etiology
Male
Uterus / pathology
Horses
Uterine Diseases / veterinary
Uterine Diseases / etiology
Uterine Diseases / pathology
Conflict of Interest Statement
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. All co-authors have seen and agree with the contents of the manuscript, and there are no conflicts of interest to report.