Analyze Diet

[Comparative anatomy of the mandible. Functional aspects].

Abstract: The structural morphology of the mandibula is presented and correlated to various types of mastication in several Mammalian species. The latter include: Carnivores (Dog, Cat, Cheetah, Lion); Omnivores (Man, Chimpanzee, Hog); Herbivores (Horse, Ox, Goat, Camel, Rabbit). While the mandibula is studied as a composite unit, a more analytical, segmental approach has been included, and both are illustrated by X-rays. The aspects presented underline the distribution as well as the local modifications of compact bone, and in addition, the arrangement and the development of spongy bone trabeculae. A preliminary classification with respect to structural elements has been suggested from two viewpoints: that of tension, the other of compression. Are also presented those variations linked to diet and alimentary intake, as well as their functional correlates.
Publication Date: 1983-12-01 PubMed ID: 6679450
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Comparative Study
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article compares and discusses the structural features of the mandible, or lower jaw, in different mammalian species, and explores how these features correlate with their dietary habits and types of mastication.

Objective

The primary goal of the research is to observe and compare the structural morphology of the mandible among different mammalian species including carnivores (Dog, Cat, Cheetah, Lion), omnivores (Man, Chimpanzee, Hog), and herbivores (Horse, Ox, Goat, Camel, Rabbit). The study also aims to associate these anatomical features with the animals’ type of mastication, diet, and alimentary intake.

Methodology

  • The researchers examined the mandibles as a whole and then conducted a more detailed, segmented analysis.
  • X-ray images were used to illustrate their observations.
  • The researchers specifically looked into the distribution and local modifications of compact bone, as well as the arrangement and development of spongy bone trabeculae.

Classification Criteria

  • The research proposes a preliminary classification of the mandibles based on two perspectives: tension and compression.
  • Tension refers to the force exerted on the mandible when it is stretched or pulled, while compression refers to the force exerted when the mandible is pressed or squeezed.

Diet and Mastication

  • The study also highlights the variations in the mandible linked to diet and alimentary intake among different species.
  • The functional correlates of these variations, which are the associated factors or characteristics, are also discussed in the paper.

In summary, this study contributes valuable insights into how the structure of the jawbone can vary among different mammalia, and it builds connections between these anatomical differences and each animal’s diet and eating habits.

Cite This Article

APA
Denoix JM. (1983). [Comparative anatomy of the mandible. Functional aspects]. Bull Assoc Anat (Nancy), 67(199), 395-419.

Publication

ISSN: 0376-6160
NlmUniqueID: 7503386
Country: France
Language: fre
Volume: 67
Issue: 199
Pages: 395-419

Researcher Affiliations

Denoix, J M

    MeSH Terms

    • Acinonyx / anatomy & histology
    • Animals
    • Biological Evolution
    • Camelus / anatomy & histology
    • Cats
    • Cattle
    • Dogs
    • Goats / anatomy & histology
    • Horses / anatomy & histology
    • Humans
    • Lions / anatomy & histology
    • Mandible / anatomy & histology
    • Mandible / physiology
    • Pan troglodytes / anatomy & histology
    • Rabbits
    • Species Specificity
    • Swine / anatomy & histology

    Citations

    This article has been cited 0 times.