FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol / Comparative embryogenesis in ungulate domesticated species.
Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution2022; 338(8); 495-504; doi: 10.1002/jez.b.23172

Comparative embryogenesis in ungulate domesticated species.

Abstract: We compared embryogenesis of five species of domesticated even-toed and one odd-toed ungulate and used a phylogenetic framework to contextualize such comparison. Organ systems that occur relatively earlier in embryogenesis generally have more time to develop and therefore are found to be more mature at birth when compared to structures that appear later in development. We hypothesized that the less mature the animals' organs are at birth, the more they are susceptible to artificial selection. The horse had the most mature organs at birth, followed by cattle, reindeer, sheep/goat, and pig. This pattern of maturity could be observed almost during the entire development. Heterochronic shifts among species were observed only after fur starts to develop. Changes in the fur coloration are one of the first observable signs of domestication and the heterochrony of this trait may be related to the effects on neural crest-derived pigment cells by artificial selection. The six ungulate species also differ in the relative duration of their weaning period and the potential extent of its artificial shortening. We put all these traits in the context of their inherited evolutionary characteristics and artificial domestication process. Related to their altriciality, carnivoran domesticates, which also belong to Scrotifera, are less mature at birth than all domesticated ungulates. Although we detected clear character correlations to life history traits, it is impossible based on the present data, to trace specific exaptations to the domestication process. We hypothesize a deep time developmental penetration of adult characters into embryogenesis.
© 2022 The Authors. Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2022-08-01 PubMed ID: 35915572DOI: 10.1002/jez.b.23172Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research studied embryogenesis in different domesticated ungulate species with the findings showing a correlation between the maturity of animals’ organs at birth and their susceptibility to artificial selection. The researchers also considered the implications of these findings for the process of domestication.

Comparison of Embryogenesis in Different Ungulate Species

  • The research compared the embryogenesis of five different species of even-toed ungulates and one species of odd-toed ungulate.
  • These different species exhibited variations in the maturity of their organs at birth. The horse had the most mature organs, followed by the cattle, reindeer, sheep/goat, and pigs.
  • This pattern of maturity was observable throughout almost the entire developmental period.

Impact of Heterochronic Shifts and Artificial Selection

  • Heterochronic shifts among the species were noticed only after the development of the fur coat.
  • Changes to fur coloration, which is one of the first observable signs of domestication, may be influenced by artificial selection, impacting neural crest-derived pigment cells.
  • Artificial selection was hypothesized to generate susceptibility in animals with less mature organs at birth, as they have a longer potential development period.

Comparison of Altriciality and Weaning Period

  • Altriciality, or the state of being born in an undeveloped state, was also compared across the studied species.
  • Carnivoran domesticates, which also belong to Scrotifera, were found to be less mature at birth compared to all domesticated ungulates.
  • The weaning period also varied across the different ungulate species and this could be artificially shortened.

Embryogenesis and Evolutionary Characteristics of Domestication

  • The research placed the traits identified within the context of inherited evolutionary characteristics and the process of domestication.
  • Though correlations were drawn between life history traits and embryogenesis, it was impossible based on the existing data to track specific exaptations to the domestication process.
  • The researchers proposed a hypothesis that adult traits are deeply embedded within embryogenesis.

Cite This Article

APA
Schlindwein X, Werneburg I. (2022). Comparative embryogenesis in ungulate domesticated species. J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol, 338(8), 495-504. https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.b.23172

Publication

Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution
ISSN: 1552-5015
NlmUniqueID: 101168228
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 338
Issue: 8
Pages: 495-504

Researcher Affiliations

Schlindwein, Xenia
  • Fachbereich Geowissenschaften an der Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany.
  • Senckenberg Centre for Human Evolution and Palaeoenvironment an der Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany.
Werneburg, Ingmar
  • Fachbereich Geowissenschaften an der Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany.
  • Senckenberg Centre for Human Evolution and Palaeoenvironment an der Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany.

MeSH Terms

  • Cattle
  • Animals
  • Sheep
  • Swine
  • Horses
  • Selection, Genetic
  • Phylogeny
  • Domestication
  • Mammals
  • Embryonic Development

References

This article includes 69 references
  1. Acker DA, Curran S, Bersu ET, Ginther OJ. Morphologic stages of the equine embryo proper on days 17 to 40 after ovulation. American Journal of Veterinary Research 62, 1358-1364.
  2. Heye, A. (1944). Amazonasfahrt (Reisebericht). Switzerland: Unionsdruckerei Bern.
  3. Benecke, N. (1994). Der Mensch und seine Haustiere. Die Geschichte einer jahrtausendealten Beziehung. Konrad Theiss-Verlag.
  4. Betteridge KJ, Eaglesome MD, Mitchell D, Flood PF, Beriault R. Development of horse embryos up to 22 days after ovulation-observations on fresh specimens. Journal of Anatomy 135(Aug), 191-209.
  5. Brown-Douglas CG, Huntington PJ, Pagan JD. Chapter 29. Growth of Horses. In A. O. McKinnon, E. L. Squires, W. E. Vaala, & D. D. Varner (Eds.), Equine Reproduction (2nd ed., pp. 280-329).
  6. Burgin CJ, Colella JP, Kahn PL, Upham NS. How many species of mammals are there. Journal of Mammalogy 99(1), 1-14.
    doi: 10.1093/jmammal/gyx147google scholar: lookup
  7. Butler H, Juurlink BHJ. An atlas for staging mammalian and chick embryos. CRC Press.
  8. Cordero GA, Werneburg I. Domestication and the comparative embryology of birds. Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B Molecular and Developmental Evolution in press.
  9. Cottle D. World Sheep and Wool Production. 1 ed., pp. 1-48.
  10. Dugatkin LA. The silver fox domestication experiment. Evolution: Education and Outreach 11(1), 16.
    doi: 10.1186/s12052-018-0090-xgoogle scholar: lookup
  11. Essig M. Lesser Beasts. A Snout-to-Tail History of the Humble Pig. Basic Books.
  12. Evans HE, Sack WO. Prenatal development of domestic and laboratory mammals: Growth curves, external features and selected references. Anatomia, Histologia, Embryologia 2, 11-45.
  13. Ewart JC. Studies on the development of the horse. I. The development during the third week. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 51, 287-329.
  14. Felius M. Cattle breeds: An encyclopedia. Trafalgar Square Publishing.
  15. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39(4), 783-791.
  16. Fitch JB, McGilliard PC, Drumm GM. A study on the birth and gestation of dairy animals. Journal of Dairy Science 7(3), 222-233.
  17. Germain D, Laurin M. Evolution of ossification sequences in salamanders and urodele origins assessed through event-pairing and new methods. Evolution & Development 11(2), 170-190.
  18. Gould S, Vrba E. Exaptation-A missing term in the science of form. Paleobiology 8(1), 4-15.
  19. Harrison BM, Mohn LA. Some stages in the development of the pharynx of the embryo horse. American Journal of Anatomy 50(2), 233-250.
  20. Hayssen V, van Tienhoven A, van Tienhoven A. Asdell's patterns of mammalian reproduction: A compendium of species-specific data. Cornell University Press.
  21. Helsgok K. Reindeer corrals 4700-4200 BC: Myth or reality?. Quaternary international 238, 25-34.
  22. Henry S, Sigurjónsdóttir H, Klapper A, Joubert J, Montier G, Hausberger M. Domestic foal weaning: need for re-thinking breeding practices?. Animals: An Open Access Journal from MDPI 10(2), 361.
  23. Huxley J. Problems of relative growth. Methuen & Co.
  24. Inamura T. The transformation of the community of tsaatan reindeer herders in Mongolia and their relationships with the outside. World. Senri Ethnological Studies 69, 123-152.
  25. Kaelin CB, McGowan KA, Barsh GS. Developmental genetics of color pattern establishment in cats. Nature Communications 12, 5127.
  26. Keibel F. Normentafel zur Entwicklungsgeschichte des Schweines (Sus scrofa domesticus). Verlag von Gustav Fischer.
  27. Keibel F. Die Entwicklung der äußeren Körperform der Wirbeltierembryonen, insbesondere der menschlichen Embryonen aus den ersten 2 Monaten. In: Handbuch der vergleichenden und experimentellen Entwicklungslehre der Wirbeltiere. O. Hertwig (Vol. 1/2, pp. 1-174). Verlag von Gustav Fischer.
  28. Krölling O. Die form- und organentwicklung des hausrindes (Bos Taurus L.) im ersten embryonalmonat. Zeitschrift für Anatomie und Entwicklungsgeschichte 72, 1-54.
  29. Larson G, Fuller DQ. The evolution of animal domestication. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 45(1), 115-136.
    doi: 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110512-135813google scholar: lookup
  30. Linnell J, Andersen R. Timing and synchrony of birth in a hider species, the roe deer Capreolus capreolus. Journal of Zoology 244, 497-504.
    doi: 10.1017/s0952836998004038google scholar: lookup
  31. Ludwig A, Pruvost M, Reissmann M, Benecke N, Brockmann GA, Castaños P, Cieslak M, Lippold S, Llorente L, Malaspinas AS, Slatkin M, Hofreiter M. Coat color variation at the beginning of horse domestication. Science 324(5926), 485.
  32. Maddison WP, Maddison DR. Mesquite: a modular system for evolutionary analysis. Version 3.4. http://mesquiteproject.org.
  33. Manakhov AD, Andreeva TV, Trapezov OV, Kolchanov NA, Rogaev EI. Genome analysis identifies the mutant genes for common industrial silverblue and hedlund White coat colours in American mink. Scientific Reports 9, 4581.
  34. Mehnert E. Kainogenesis als Ausdruck differenter phylogenetischer Energien. G. Fischer.
  35. Mehnert E. Biomechanik erschlossen aus dem principe der organogenese. G. Fischer.
  36. Michl E. Beitrag zur entwicklungsgeschichte von Bos Taurus L.. Anatomischer Anzeiger 53(8/9), 193-215.
  37. Montero-Lopez C. Sacrifice and feasting among the classic maya elite, and the importance of white-tailed deer: Is there a regional pattern?. Journal of Historical and European Studies 2, 53.
  38. Nesbitt RM, Peasnall BL, Rosenberg M, Redding RW. Hallan çemi, pig husbandry, and post-pleistocene adaptations along the Taurus-Zagros arc (Turkey). Paléorient 24/1, 25-41.
  39. Núñez-León D, Cordero GA, Schlindwein X, Jensen P, Stoeckli E, Sánchez-Villagra MR, Werneburg I. Shifts in growth, but not differentiation, foreshadow the formation of exaggerated forms under chicken domestication. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 288(20210392), 1-10.
  40. Platt DE, Haber M, Dagher-Kharrat MB, Douaihy B, Khazen G, Ashrafian Bonab M, Salloum A, Mouzaya F, Luiselli D, Tyler-Smith C, Renfrew C, Matisoo-Smith E, Zalloua PA. Mapping Post-Glacial expansions: The peopling of southwest Asia. Scientific Reports 7(1), 40338.
    doi: 10.1038/srep40338google scholar: lookup
  41. Portmann A. Biologische Fragmente zu einer Lehre vom Menschen. Schwebe-Verlag.
  42. Portmann A. Zoologie und das neue Bild des Menschen. Rowohlt.
  43. Retzius G. Zur Kentniss der Entwicklungsgeschichte des Rennthieres und des Rehes. Biologische Untersuchungen 9(9), 109-117.
  44. Rüsse I. Frühgravidität, Implanation und Plazentation. In I. Rüsse & F. Sinowatz (Eds.), Lehrbuch der Embryologie der Haustiere, Verlag Paul Parey.
  45. Rüsse I. Gesicht und Körperform. Lehrbuch der Embryologie der Haustiere. In I. Rüsse & F. Sinowatz (Eds.), Lehrbuch der Embryologie der Haustiere, Verlag Paul Parey.
  46. Rüsse I, Sinowatz F. Lehrbuch der Embryologie der Haustiere. Verlag Paul Parey.
  47. Sakurai T. Normentafel zur Entwicklungsgeschichte des Rehes (Cervus capreolus). In F. ranz Keibel (Ed.), Normentafeln zur Entwicklungsgeschichte der Wirbeltiere (Vol. 6, p. 1). Hustav Fischer Verlag.
  48. Sánchez-Villagra MR, Geiger M, Schneider RA. The taming of the neural crest: A developmental perspective on the origins of morphological covariation in domesticated mammals. Royal Society Open Science 3, 160107.
    doi: 10.1098/rsos.160107google scholar: lookup
  49. Sánchez-Villagra MR. The process of animal domestication. Princeton University Press.
  50. Schlindwein X, Yaryhin O, Werneburg I. Discrete embryonic character variation uncovers hidden ecological adaptations in lacertid lizards. Development Growth and Regeneration 64(3), 178-191.
  51. Schnorr B, Kressin M. Embryologie der Haustiere. Stuttgart. Enke Verlag.
  52. Segura V, Sánchez-Villagra MR. Human-canid relationship in the Americas: An examination of canid biological attributes and domestication. Mammalian Biology 101, 387-406.
    doi: 10.1007/s42991-021-00129-ygoogle scholar: lookup
  53. Sivachelvan MN, Ali MG, Chibuzo GA. Foetal age estimation in sheep and goats. Small Ruminant Research 19(1), 69-76.
    doi: 10.1016/0921-4488(95)00709-1google scholar: lookup
  54. Smith NS, Sowls KL. Fetal development of the collared peccary. Journal of Mammalogy 56(3), 6199-6625.
  55. Stegeman LC. The European Wild Boar in the Cherokee National Forest, Tennessee. Journal of Mammalogy 19(3), 279-290.
    doi: 10.2307/1374565google scholar: lookup
  56. Teasdale MD, Bradley DG. The Origins of Cattle. .
  57. Theiler K. The House Mouse, Atlas of Embryonic Development. Springer.
  58. Tsukaguchi R. Zur Entwicklungsgeschichte der Ziege (Capra hircus). Beiträge zur Entwicklung der Wiederkäuer. Anatomische Hefte 46, 413-492.
  59. Vitums A. Developmental transformations of the aortic arches in the equine embryos with special attention to the formation of the definitive arch of the aorta and the common branchiocephalic trunk. Zeitschrift für Anatomie und Entwicklungsgeschichte 128, 263-270.
  60. Watts T, Conley W. Reproductive potential and theoretical rates of increase for feral goat populations. The Journal of Wildlife Management 48, 814-822.
  61. Weinberg P. On the status and biology of the wild goat in Daghestan (RUSSIA). Journal of Mountain Ecology 6, 31-40.
  62. Werneburg I. A standard system to study vertebrate embryos. PLoS ONE 4(6), e5887.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005887google scholar: lookup
  63. Werneburg I, Geiger M. Ontogeny of domestic dogs and the developmental foundations of carnivoran domestication. Journal of Mammalian Evolution 24(3), 323-343.
    doi: 10.1007/s10914-016-9346-9google scholar: lookup
  64. Werneburg I, Laurin M, Koyabu D, Sánchez-Villagra M. Evolution of organogenesis and the origin of altriciality in mammals. Evolution and Development 18, 229-244.
    doi: 10.1111/ede.12194google scholar: lookup
  65. Werneburg I, Polachowski K, Hutchinson M. Bony skull development in the Argus monitor (Squamata, Varanidae, Varanus panoptes) with comments on developmental timing and adult anatomy. Zoology 118, 118-280.
  66. Werneburg I, Spiekman SNF. 4. Mammalian embryology and organogenesis. In Z. Frank & A. Robert (Eds.), Mammalian Evolution, Diversity and Systematics (pp. 59-116). De Gruyter.
  67. Werneburg I, Tzika AC, Hautier L, Asher RJ, Milinkovitch MC, Sánchez-Villagra MR. Development and embryonic staging in non-model organisms: The case of an afrotherian mammal. Journal of Anatomy 222, 2-18.
  68. Zeder MA. The domestication of animals. Journal of Anthropological Research 68(2), 161-190.
  69. Zhao B, Chen Y, Yan X, Hao Y, Zhu J, Weng Q, Wu X. Gene expression profiling analysis reveals fur development in rex rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus). Genome 60(12), 1060-1067.

Citations

This article has been cited 1 times.
  1. Nojiri T, Werneburg I, Tu VT, Fukui D, Takechi M, Iseki S, Furutera T, Koyabu D. Timing of organogenesis underscores the evolution of neonatal life histories and powered flight in bats.. Proc Biol Sci 2023 Jan 11;290(1990):20221928.
    doi: 10.1098/rspb.2022.1928pubmed: 36629110google scholar: lookup
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,357 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.