Analyze Diet
Acta anatomica1988; 132(2); 120-123;

Comparative scanning electron-microscopic study of the lingual papillae in two species of domestic mammals (Equus caballus and Bos taurus). II. Mechanical papillae.

Abstract: The mechanical papillae of the horse and cow were studied by scanning electron microscopy in order to determine their morphostructural characteristics and the differences between the two species. The horse has only thin, small and interlaced filiform papillae, while the cow shows robust and more ordered filiform papillae. Furthermore, the cow tongue presents conical and lenticular papillae surrounded by a papillary groove. A characteristic distribution of stratified scales and channeled tracts is observed in conical and lenticular papillae but not in the filiform papillae. The morphostructural features of each papilla are analyzed and compared in each species and their possible significance is discussed.
Publication Date: 1988-01-01 PubMed ID: 3414356
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Comparative Study
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research focuses on discerning the physical structure and characteristics of the so-called ‘mechanical papillae’ present on the tongues of two domestic animal species, horses (Equus caballus) and cows (Bos taurus), studied under a scanning electron microscope.

Study Methodology and Key Findings

  • The study used scanning electron microscopy to reveal and analyze the physical structure and features of the mechanical papillae found on the tongues of horses and cows.
  • Mechanical papillae are tiny, tactile protrusions on the tongue’s surface involved in the physical manipulation and sensation of food.
  • The researchers found that horses have thin, small, and interlaced filiform papillae (the most common type of mammalian papillae).
  • Cows, on the other hand, were found to have more robust and orderly filiform papillae.

A Comparative Look

  • Interestingly, the cow’s tongue was found to possess additional papillae types, namely conical and lenticular papillae, surrounded by a groove. These types of papillae are not present in the horse’s tongue.
  • Morphostructural differences were also seen in the conical and lenticular papillae compared to the filiform ones, with the former featuring a distinctive distribution of stratified scales and channeled tracts.

Interpretation and Significance

  • The research provides an in-depth comparison and analysis of the anatomical differences between the tongues of cows and horses. These differences are likely to have evolved to best facilitate the animals’ differing dietary needs and feeding behaviors.
  • The variation in papillae structure is indicative of these species’ unique needs in terms of food processing; for example, the cows’ more complex and robust papillae configuration possibly aids in processing a grass-based diet.

Cite This Article

APA
de Paz Cabello P, Chamorro CA, Sandoval J, Fernandez M. (1988). Comparative scanning electron-microscopic study of the lingual papillae in two species of domestic mammals (Equus caballus and Bos taurus). II. Mechanical papillae. Acta Anat (Basel), 132(2), 120-123.

Publication

ISSN: 0001-5180
NlmUniqueID: 0370272
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 132
Issue: 2
Pages: 120-123

Researcher Affiliations

de Paz Cabello, P
  • Departamento de Biología Celular y Anatomía, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de León, España.
Chamorro, C A
    Sandoval, J
      Fernandez, M

        MeSH Terms

        • Animals
        • Cattle / anatomy & histology
        • Horses / anatomy & histology
        • Microscopy, Electron, Scanning
        • Tongue / ultrastructure

        Citations

        This article has been cited 5 times.
        1. Goździewska-Harłajczuk K, Hamouzová P, Klećkowska-Nawrot J, Barszcz K, Čížek P. Microstructure of the Surface of the Tongue and Histochemical Study of the Lingual Glands of the Lowland Tapir (Tapirus terrestris Linnaeus, 1758) (Perissodactyla: Tapiridae). Animals (Basel) 2020 Dec 4;10(12).
          doi: 10.3390/ani10122297pubmed: 33291801google scholar: lookup
        2. Veríssimo CJ, D'Agostino SM, Pessoa FF, de Toledo LM, Santos IK. Length and density of filiform tongue papillae: differences between tick-susceptible and resistant cattle may affect tick loads. Parasit Vectors 2015 Nov 16;8:594.
          doi: 10.1186/s13071-015-1196-4pubmed: 26573922google scholar: lookup
        3. Pastor JF, Barbosa M, De Paz FJ. Morphological study of the lingual papillae of the giant panda (Ailuropoda melanoleuca) by scanning electron microscopy. J Anat 2008 Feb;212(2):99-105.
        4. Agungpriyono S, Yamada J, Kitamura N, Nisa C, Sigit K, Yamamoto Y. Morphology of the dorsal lingual papillae in the lesser mouse deer, Tragulus javanicus. J Anat 1995 Dec;187 ( Pt 3)(Pt 3):635-40.
          pubmed: 8586562
        5. Čížek P, Goździewska-Harłajczuk K, Hamouzová P, Klećkowska-Nawrot J, Kvapil P. Lingual Ultrastructural and Histochemical Study in the Patagonian Mara (Rodentia: Caviidae, Dolichotis patagonum) in Relation to Other Hystricomorphs. Animals (Basel) 2023 Dec 18;13(24).
          doi: 10.3390/ani13243889pubmed: 38136926google scholar: lookup