FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / BMC Genomics / Comparison between SNP array and imputed data to estimate po...
BMC genomics2025; 26(1); 1086; doi: 10.1186/s12864-025-12256-8

Comparison between SNP array and imputed data to estimate population structure and ROH hotspots in horse breeds.

Abstract: Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) arrays are commonly used for studying the genomic structure and diversity of livestock breeds, but whole-genome sequencing (WGS) provides higher-resolution genomic data. Genotype imputation has become a standard practice for increasing the genomic resolution of association studies. This work aimed to extend imputation to biodiversity analyses, comparing SNP array data before and after imputation. A 40 k SNP dataset of 281 horses from 12 breeds (DS) was imputed to sequence-level using a reference panel of 327 sequenced individuals, generating approximately 9 million markers after filtering (DS). Both datasets were used to study genetic variability, population structure and runs of homozygosity (ROH). Results: Genetic indices and relationships showed similar trends for both datasets, with high Pearson correlations and Mantel test values (> 0.8) indicating that the imputed data are a reliable alternative to SNP array data for genetic studies. Multidimensional scaling and admixture analyses highlighted how the genetic proximity between breeds observed for the DS was amplified by the imputation process in cases of those breeds with a few sequences included in the WGS reference panel. ROH investigation showed overlapping homozygosity regions between the two datasets, highlighting the benefits of having more markers for gene and QTL annotation. Of the 141 ROH islands identified in the DS, 79 overlapped perfectly with those found in the imputed data. Validation with the reference panel of 327 sequenced horses revealed a single ROH island on ECA11 shared across all three datasets, containing genes associated with morphology and behavioral traits. Conclusions: High correlations between SNP array and imputed data indicate that imputed genotypes provide a reliable alternative for assessing population structure and genetic diversity in horse breeds. Specifically, imputation can enhance the detection of ROH and the annotation of genes within ROH islands, with the reliability of these results depending on the quality of the reference panel and its representation of the studied breeds, among others.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2025-11-29 PubMed ID: 41318401PubMed Central: PMC12670763DOI: 10.1186/s12864-025-12256-8Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article
  • Comparative Study

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Overview

  • This study compares the use of SNP arrays and imputed whole-genome sequencing (WGS) data to analyze population structure and runs of homozygosity (ROH) hotspots in horse breeds.
  • It evaluates whether imputed data, generated by enhancing lower-resolution SNP array data using a WGS reference panel, can reliably replace SNP array data for genetic diversity and structure studies.

Introduction to Genetic Tools Used

  • SNP arrays: Tools that genotype a fixed number of known single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), typically tens of thousands, useful for genomic diversity and structure analysis but with limited resolution.
  • Whole-genome sequencing (WGS): Provides comprehensive genomic data at single-nucleotide resolution, offering greater detail but at higher cost and complexity.
  • Genotype imputation: A statistical method that predicts unobserved genotypes by leveraging a reference panel of sequenced genomes to increase marker density from SNP arrays to sequence-level, aimed at improving genomic resolution without the full cost of WGS.

Research Objectives

  • To apply genotype imputation for biodiversity analysis in horse populations by increasing SNP array data to sequence-level marker density.
  • To compare key genetic analyses – including measures of genetic variability, population structure, and ROH detection – between the original SNP array data and the imputed high-density data.

Methodology

  • Samples: 281 horses from 12 distinct breeds genotyped by a 40,000 SNP (40k) SNP array dataset.
  • Imputation: Used a reference panel of 327 fully sequenced horses to impute the 40k SNP data, resulting in approximately 9 million high-quality variant markers after filtering.
  • Analyses performed on both datasets:
    • Genetic variability indices
    • Population structure assessments via multidimensional scaling and admixture analyses
    • Runs of homozygosity (ROH) identification and characterization

Key Findings

  • Genetic variability and relationships:
    • Both datasets showed similar trends in genetic indices and pairwise genetic relationships among breeds.
    • High statistical concordance was observed, with Pearson correlation and Mantel test values above 0.8, confirming the reliability of imputed data for genetic studies.
  • Population structure:
    • Multidimensional scaling and admixture analyses showed genetic proximities between breeds.
    • Imputation amplified the observed genetic proximity, especially in breeds that had fewer sequences in the reference panel, indicating an effect of reference panel representation on results.
  • Runs of homozygosity (ROH):
    • There was significant overlap in homozygosity regions identified in both datasets.
    • The imputed dataset, with more markers, allowed improved annotation of genes and quantitative trait loci (QTL) within ROH islands.
    • Out of 141 ROH islands found using the SNP array data, 79 perfectly overlapped ROH islands identified with imputed data.
    • Validation using the reference panel’s sequenced horses discovered a shared ROH island on equine chromosome 11 (ECA11) associated with genes controlling morphology and behavior, present in all three datasets.

Conclusions and Implications

  • Imputed genotypes strongly correlate with SNP array data and thus represent a reliable alternative for assessing population structure and genetic diversity in horses.
  • Imputation enhances detection and characterization of ROH, leading to better insight into genomic regions linked to important traits.
  • The success of imputation-based analyses depends on factors such as the quality and breed representation within the WGS reference panel.
  • This approach can optimize cost-effectiveness by leveraging existing SNP array data for high-resolution genetic analyses without requiring full WGS for all samples.

Cite This Article

APA
Chessari G, Reich P, Criscione A, Falker-Gieske C, Mastrangelo S, Tumino S, Bordonaro S, Marletta D, Tetens J. (2025). Comparison between SNP array and imputed data to estimate population structure and ROH hotspots in horse breeds. BMC Genomics, 26(1), 1086. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-025-12256-8

Publication

BMC genomics
ISSN: 1471-2164
NlmUniqueID: 100965258
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 26
Issue: 1
Pages: 1086
PII: 1086

Researcher Affiliations

Chessari, Giorgio
  • Department of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Catania, Catania, 95131, Italy. giorgio.chessari@unict.it.
  • Department of Animal Sciences, Georg-August-University Göttingen, Göttingen, 37077, Germany. giorgio.chessari@unict.it.
Reich, Paula
  • Department of Animal Sciences, Georg-August-University Göttingen, Göttingen, 37077, Germany.
  • Center for Integrated Breeding Research (CiBreed), Georg-August- University Göttingen, Göttingen, 37075, Germany.
Criscione, Andrea
  • Department of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Catania, Catania, 95131, Italy.
Falker-Gieske, Clemens
  • Department of Animal Sciences, Georg-August-University Göttingen, Göttingen, 37077, Germany.
  • Center for Integrated Breeding Research (CiBreed), Georg-August- University Göttingen, Göttingen, 37075, Germany.
Mastrangelo, Salvatore
  • Department of Agricultural, Food and Forestry Sciences, University of Palermo, Palermo, 90128, Italy.
Tumino, Serena
  • Department of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Catania, Catania, 95131, Italy.
Bordonaro, Salvatore
  • Department of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Catania, Catania, 95131, Italy.
Marletta, Donata
  • Department of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Catania, Catania, 95131, Italy.
Tetens, Jens
  • Department of Animal Sciences, Georg-August-University Göttingen, Göttingen, 37077, Germany.
  • Center for Integrated Breeding Research (CiBreed), Georg-August- University Göttingen, Göttingen, 37075, Germany.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide
  • Horses / genetics
  • Homozygote
  • Breeding
  • Genotype
  • Genetics, Population
  • Whole Genome Sequencing
  • Genomics / methods

Conflict of Interest Statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Not applicable. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

References

This article includes 143 references
  1. Rook AJ, Dumont B, Isselstein J, Osoro K, WallisDeVries MF, Parente G. Matching type of livestock to desired biodiversity outcomes in pastures – a review. Biol Conserv 2004;119:137–50.
    doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2003.11.010google scholar: lookup
  2. Sponenberg DP, Martin A, Couch C, Beranger J. Conservation strategies for local breed biodiversity. Diversity 2019;11:1–14.
    doi: 10.3390/d11100177google scholar: lookup
  3. Bordonaro S, Chessari G, Mastrangelo S, Senczuk G, Chessa S, Castiglioni B. Genome-wide population structure, homozygosity, and heterozygosity patterns of Nero Siciliano pig in the framework of Italian and cosmopolitan breeds. Anim Genet 2023;00:1–15.
    pubmed: 37381662
  4. MacCluer JW, Boyce AJ, Dyke B, Weitkamp LR, Pfennig DW, Parson CJ. Inbreeding and pedigree structure in standardbred horses. J Hered 1983;74:394–9.
    doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a109824google scholar: lookup
  5. Cosgrove EJ, Sadeghi R, Schlamp F, Holl HM, Moradi-Shahrbabak M, Miraei-Ashtiani SR. Genome diversity and the origin of the Arabian horse. Sci Rep 2020;10:9702.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-66232-1pmc: PMC7298027pubmed: 32546689google scholar: lookup
  6. Dini P, Bartels T, Revah I, Claes AN, Stout TAE, Daels P. A retrospective study on semen quality parameters from four different Dutch horse breeds with different levels of inbreeding. Theriogenology 2020;157:18–23.
    doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2020.07.017pubmed: 32768723google scholar: lookup
  7. Metzger J, Rau J, Naccache F, Bas Conn L, Lindgren G, Distl O. Genome data uncover four synergistic key regulators for extremely small body size in horses. BMC Genomics 2018;19:492.
    doi: 10.1186/s12864-018-4877-5pmc: PMC6019228pubmed: 29940849google scholar: lookup
  8. Campana MG, Stock F, Barrett E, Benecke N, Barker GW, Seetah K. Genetic stability in the Icelandic horse breed. Anim Genet 2012;43:447–9.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2011.02266.xpubmed: 22497715google scholar: lookup
  9. Colli L, Milanesi M, Talenti A, Bertolini F, Chen M, Crisa A. Genome-wide SNP profiling of worldwide goat populations reveals strong partitioning of diversity and highlights post-domestication migration routes. Genet Sel Evol 2018;50:58.
    doi: 10.1186/s12711-018-0422-xpmc: PMC6240949pubmed: 30449284google scholar: lookup
  10. Bovo S, Ribani A, Munoz M, Alves E, Araujo JP, Bozzi R. Whole-genome sequencing of European autochthonous and commercial pig breeds allows the detection of signatures of selection for adaptation of genetic resources to different breeding and production systems. Genet Sel Evol 2020;52:1–19.
    doi: 10.1186/s12711-020-00553-7pmc: PMC7318759pubmed: 32591011google scholar: lookup
  11. Franci O, Pugliese C. Italian autochthonous pigs: progress report and research perspectives. Ital J Anim Sci 2007;6:663–71.
    doi: 10.4081/ijas.2007.1s.663google scholar: lookup
  12. Cunningham EP, Dooley JJ, Splan RK, Bradley DG. Microsatellite diversity, pedigree relatedness and the contributions of founder lineages to thoroughbred horses. Anim Genet 2001;32:360–4.
    doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2052.2001.00785.xpubmed: 11736806google scholar: lookup
  13. Mahrous KF, Hassanane M, Abdel Mordy M, Shafey HI, Hassan N. Genetic variations in horse using microsatellite markers. J Genet Eng Biotechnol 2011;9:103–9.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jgeb.2011.11.001google scholar: lookup
  14. Zuccaro A, Bordonaro S, Criscione A, Guastella AM, Perrotta G, Blasi M. Genetic diversity and admixture analysis of Sanfratellano and three other Italian horse breeds assessed by microsatellite markers. Animal 2008;2:991–8.
    doi: 10.1017/S1751731108002255pubmed: 22443698google scholar: lookup
  15. Pereira GL, Chud TCS, Bernardes PA, Venturini GC, Chardulo LAL, Curi RA. Genotype imputation and accuracy evaluation in racing quarter horses genotyped using different commercial SNP panels. J Equine Vet Sci 2017;58:89–96.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2017.07.012google scholar: lookup
  16. Petersen JL, Mickelson JR, Cothran EG, Andersson LS, Axelsson J, Bailey E. Genetic diversity in the modern horse illustrated from genome-wide SNP data. PLoS One 2013;8:e54997.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054997pmc: PMC3559798pubmed: 23383025google scholar: lookup
  17. Santos WB, Schettini GP, Maiorano AM, Bussiman FO, Balieiro JCC, Ferraz GC. Genome-wide scans for signatures of selection in Mangalarga Marchador horses using high-throughput SNP genotyping. BMC Genom 2021;22:737–54.
    doi: 10.1186/s12864-021-08053-8pmc: PMC8515666pubmed: 34645387google scholar: lookup
  18. Fawcett JA, Sato F, Sakamoto T, Iwasaki WM, Tozaki T, Innan H. Genome-wide SNP analysis of Japanese thoroughbred racehorses. PLoS One 2019;14:e0218407.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218407pmc: PMC6655603pubmed: 31339891google scholar: lookup
  19. Zhang C, Ni P, Ahmad HI, Gemingguli M, Baizilaitibei A, Gulibaheti D. Detecting the population structure and scanning for signatures of selection in horses (Equus caballus) from whole-genome sequencing data. Evol Bioinform Online 2018;14:1–9.
    doi: 10.1177/1176934318775106pmc: PMC5990873pubmed: 29899660google scholar: lookup
  20. Metzger J, Tonda R, Beltran S, Águeda L, Gut M, Distl O. Next generation sequencing gives an insight into the characteristics of highly selected breeds versus non-breed horses in the course of domestication. BMC Genom 2014;15:562–75.
    doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-562pmc: PMC4097168pubmed: 24996778google scholar: lookup
  21. Raudsepp T, Finno CJ, Bellone RR, Petersen JL. Ten years of the horse reference genome: insights into equine biology, domestication and population dynamics in the post-genome era. Anim Genet 2019;50:569–97.
    doi: 10.1111/age.12857pmc: PMC6825885pubmed: 31568563google scholar: lookup
  22. Raymond B, Bouwman AC, Schrooten C, Houwing-Duistermaat J, Veerkamp RF. Utility of whole-genome sequence data for across-breed genomic prediction. Genet Sel Evol 2018;50:27.
    doi: 10.1186/s12711-018-0396-8pmc: PMC5960108pubmed: 29776327google scholar: lookup
  23. Cheruiyot EK, Haile-Mariam M, Cocks BG, MacLeod IM, Xiang R, Pryce JE. New loci and neuronal pathways for resilience to heat stress in cattle. Sci Rep 2021;11(1):16619.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-95816-8pmc: PMC8371109pubmed: 34404823google scholar: lookup
  24. Xiang R, MacLeod IM, Daetwyler HD, de Jong G, O’Connor E, Schrooten C. Genome-wide fine-mapping identifies pleiotropic and functional variants that predict many traits across global cattle populations. Nat Commun 2021;12:860.
    doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-21001-0pmc: PMC7870883pubmed: 33558518google scholar: lookup
  25. Ye S, Yuan X, Lin X, Gao N, Luo Y, Chen Z. Imputation from SNP chip to sequence: a case study in a Chinese Indigenous chicken population. J Anim Sci Biotechnol 2018;9:30.
    doi: 10.1186/s40104-018-0241-5pmc: PMC5861640pubmed: 29581880google scholar: lookup
  26. van Binsbergen R, Bink MCAM, Calus MPL, van Euwijk FA, Hayes BJ, Hulsegge I. Accuracy of imputation to whole-genome sequence data in Holstein Friesian cattle. Genet Sel Evol 2014;46.
    doi: 10.1186/1297-9686-46-41pmc: PMC4226983pubmed: 25022768google scholar: lookup
  27. Marchini J, Howie B. Genotype imputation for genome-wide association studies. Nat Rev Genet 2010;11:499–511.
    doi: 10.1038/nrg2796pubmed: 20517342google scholar: lookup
  28. Rubinacci S, Delaneau O, Marchini J. Genotype imputation using the positional burrows wheeler transform. PLoS Genet 2020;16:e1009049.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1009049pmc: PMC7704051pubmed: 33196638google scholar: lookup
  29. Li Y, Willer C, Sanna S, Abecasis G. Genotype imputation. Annu Rev Genom Hum Genet 2009;10:387–406.
    doi: 10.1146/annurev.genom.9.081307.164242pmc: PMC2925172pubmed: 19715440google scholar: lookup
  30. Veerkamp RF, Bouwman AC, Schrooten C, Calus MP. Genomic prediction using preselected DNA variants from a GWAS with whole-genome sequence data in Holstein-Friesian cattle. Genet Sel Evol 2016;48:95.
    doi: 10.1186/s12711-016-0274-1pmc: PMC5134274pubmed: 27905878google scholar: lookup
  31. Reich P, Moller S, Stock KF, Nolte W, von Depka Prondzinski M, Reents R. Genomic analyses of withers height and linear conformation traits in German warmblood horses using imputed sequence-level genotypes. Genet Sel Evol 2024;56:45.
    doi: 10.1186/s12711-024-00914-6pmc: PMC11177368pubmed: 38872118google scholar: lookup
  32. Sanchez MP, Govignon-Gion A, Croiseau P, Fritz S, Hoze C, Miranda G. Within-breed and multi-breed GWAS on imputed whole-genome sequence variants reveal candidate mutations affecting milk protein composition in dairy cattle. Genet Sel Evol 2017;49:68.
    doi: 10.1186/s12711-017-0344-zpmc: PMC5604355pubmed: 28923017google scholar: lookup
  33. van den Berg S, Vandenplas J, van Eeuwijk FA, Bouwman AC, Lopes MS, Veerkamp RF. Imputation to whole-genome sequence using multiple pig populations and its use in genome-wide association studies. Genet Sel Evol 2019;51:2.
    doi: 10.1186/s12711-019-0445-ypmc: PMC6346588pubmed: 30678638google scholar: lookup
  34. van Binsbergen R, Calus MP, Bink MC, van Eeuwijk FA, Schrooten C, Veerkamp RF. Genomic prediction using imputed whole-genome sequence data in Holstein Friesian cattle. Genet Sel Evol 2015;47:71.
    doi: 10.1186/s12711-015-0149-xpmc: PMC4574568pubmed: 26381777google scholar: lookup
  35. Brondum RF, Ma P, Lund MS, Su G. Short communication: genotype imputation within and across Nordic cattle breeds. J Dairy Sci 2012;95:6795–800.
    doi: 10.3168/jds.2012-5585pubmed: 22939787google scholar: lookup
  36. Reich P, Falker-Gieske C, Pook T, Tetens J. Development and validation of a horse reference panel for genotype imputation. Genet Sel Evol 2022;54:49.
    doi: 10.1186/s12711-022-00740-8pmc: PMC9252005pubmed: 35787788google scholar: lookup
  37. Frischknecht M, Neuditschko M, Jagannathan V, Drögemüller C, Tetens J, Thaller G. Imputation of sequence level genotypes in the Franches-Montagnes horse breed. Genet Sel Evol 2014;46:1–8.
    doi: 10.1186/s12711-014-0063-7pmc: PMC4180851pubmed: 25927638google scholar: lookup
  38. Calus MP, Bouwman AC, Hickey JM, Veerkamp RF, Mulder HA. Evaluation of measures of correctness of genotype imputation in the context of genomic prediction: a review of livestock applications. Animal 2014;8:1743–53.
    doi: 10.1017/S1751731114001803pubmed: 25045914google scholar: lookup
  39. Jiang Y, Song H, Gao H, Zhang Q, Ding X. Exploring the optimal strategy of imputation from SNP array to whole-genome sequencing data in farm animals. Front Genet 2022;13:963654.
    doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.963654pmc: PMC9459117pubmed: 36092888google scholar: lookup
  40. Hayes BJ, Bowman PJ, Daetwyler HD, Kijas JW, van der Werf JH. Accuracy of genotype imputation in sheep breeds. Anim Genet 2012;43:72–80.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2011.02208.xpubmed: 22221027google scholar: lookup
  41. Gualdrón Duarte JL, Bates RO, Ernst CW, Raney NE, Cantet RJC, Steibel JP. Genotype imputation accuracy in a F2 pig population using high density and low density SNP panels. BMC Genet 2013;14:1–13.
    doi: 10.1186/1471-2156-14-38pmc: PMC3655050pubmed: 23651538google scholar: lookup
  42. Chitneedi PK, Arranz JJ, Suarez-Vega A, Garcia-Gamez E, Gutierrez-Gil B. Estimations of linkage disequilibrium, effective population size and ROH-based inbreeding coefficients in Spanish Churra sheep using imputed high-density SNP genotypes. Anim Genet 2017;48:436–46.
    doi: 10.1111/age.12564pubmed: 28543827google scholar: lookup
  43. Forutan M, Ansari Mahyari S, Baes C, Melzer N, Schenkel FS, Sargolzaei M. Inbreeding and runs of homozygosity before and after genomic selection in North American Holstein cattle. BMC Genomics 2018;19:98.
    doi: 10.1186/s12864-018-4453-zpmc: PMC5787230pubmed: 29374456google scholar: lookup
  44. Bhati M, Kadri NK, Crysnanto D, Pausch H. Assessing genomic diversity and signatures of selection in original Braunvieh cattle using whole-genome sequencing data. BMC Genomics 2020;21:27.
    doi: 10.1186/s12864-020-6446-ypmc: PMC6950892pubmed: 31914939google scholar: lookup
  45. Criscione A, Mastrangelo S, D’Alessandro E, Tumino S, Di Gerlando R, Zumbo A. Genome-wide survey on three local horse populations with a focus on runs of homozygosity pattern. J Anim Breed Genet 2022;139:540–55.
    doi: 10.1111/jbg.12680pmc: PMC9541879pubmed: 35445758google scholar: lookup
  46. Ewels P, Magnusson M, Lundin S, Kaller M. Multiqc: summarize analysis results for multiple tools and samples in a single report. Bioinformatics 2016;32:3047–8.
    doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw354pmc: PMC5039924pubmed: 27312411google scholar: lookup
  47. McKenna A, Hanna M, Banks E, Sivachenko A, Cibulskis K, Kernytsky A. The genome analysis toolkit: a mapreduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res 2010;20:1297–303.
    doi: 10.1101/gr.107524.110pmc: PMC2928508pubmed: 20644199google scholar: lookup
  48. DePristo MA, Banks E, Poplin R, Garimella KV, Maguire JR, Hartl C. A framework for variation discovery and genotyping using next-generation DNA sequencing data. Nat Genet 2011;43:491–8.
    doi: 10.1038/ng.806pmc: PMC3083463pubmed: 21478889google scholar: lookup
  49. van der Auwera GA, O’Connor BD. Genomics in the cloud: using Docker, GATK, and WDL in Terra. 1st ed. Sebastopol: O’Reilly Media; 2020.
  50. Li H, Durbin R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 2009;25:1754–60.
    doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324pmc: PMC2705234pubmed: 19451168google scholar: lookup
  51. Nicolazzi EL, Caprera A, Nazzicari N, Cozzi P, Strozzi F, Lawley C. SNPchiMp v.3: integrating and standardizing single nucleotide polymorphism data for livestock species. BMC Genomics 2015;16:283.
    doi: 10.1186/s12864-015-1497-1pmc: PMC4399246pubmed: 25881165google scholar: lookup
  52. Browning BL, Tian X, Zhou Y, Browning SR. Fast two-stage phasing of large-scale sequence data. J Hum Genet 2021;108:1880–90.
    doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2021.08.005pmc: PMC8551421pubmed: 34478634google scholar: lookup
  53. Chang CC, Chow CC, Tellier LC, Vattikuti S, Purcell SM, Lee JJ. Second-generation PLINK: rising to the challenge of larger and richer datasets. Gigascience 2015;4:1–16.
    doi: 10.1186/s13742-015-0047-8pmc: PMC4342193pubmed: 25722852google scholar: lookup
  54. Browning BL, Conform-. gt. 2016. https://faculty.washington.edu/browning/conform-gt.html. Accessed 2 April 2023.
  55. Browning BL, Browning SR. A unified approach to genotype imputation and haplotype-phase inference for large data sets of trios and unrelated individuals. J Hum Genet 2009;84:210–23.
    doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2009.01.005pmc: PMC2668004pubmed: 19200528google scholar: lookup
  56. Danecek P, Bonfield JK, Liddle J, Marshall J, Ohan V, Pollard MO. Twelve years of samtools and BCFtools. GigaScience 2021;10:giab008.
    doi: 10.1093/gigascience/giab008pmc: PMC7931819pubmed: 33590861google scholar: lookup
  57. Yin L, Zhang H, Tang Z, Xu J, Yin D, Zhang Z. rMVP: a memory-efficient, visualization-enhanced, and parallel-accelerated tool for genome-wide association study. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics 2021;19:619–28.
    doi: 10.1016/j.gpb.2020.10.007pmc: PMC9040015pubmed: 33662620google scholar: lookup
  58. RCoreTeam. R. A Language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2021.
  59. Freedman D, Pisani R, Purves R. Statistics (international student edition). 4th. New York: WW Norton & Company; 2007.
  60. McCue ME, Bannasch DL, Petersen JL, Gurr J, Bailey E, Binns MM. A high density SNP array for the domestic horse and extant perissodactyla: utility for association mapping, genetic diversity, and phylogeny studies. PLoS Genet 2012;8:e1002451.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002451pmc: PMC3257288pubmed: 22253606google scholar: lookup
  61. McCoy AM, Beeson SK, Splan RK, Lykkjen S, Ralston SL, Mickelson JR. Identification and validation of risk loci for osteochondrosis in standardbreds. BMC Genomics 2016;17:41.
    doi: 10.1186/s12864-016-2385-zpmc: PMC4709891pubmed: 26753841google scholar: lookup
  62. Huson DH, Bryant D. Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies. Mol Biol Evol 2006;23:254–67.
    doi: 10.1093/molbev/msj030pubmed: 16221896google scholar: lookup
  63. Excoffier L, Lischer HE. Arlequin suite ver 3.5: a new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and windows. Mol Ecol Resour 2010;10:564–7.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02847.xpubmed: 21565059google scholar: lookup
  64. Wickham H. An introduction to ggplot: an implementation of the grammar of graphics in R. Statistics 2006;1.
  65. Alexander DH, Novembre J, Lange K. Fast model-based estimation of ancestry in unrelated individuals. Genome Res 2009;19:1655–64.
    doi: 10.1101/gr.094052.109pmc: PMC2752134pubmed: 19648217google scholar: lookup
  66. Milanesi M, Capomaccio S, Vajana E, Bomba L, Garcia JF, Ajmone-Marsan P. BITE: an R package for biodiversity analyses. BioRxiv 2017.
    doi: 10.1101/181610google scholar: lookup
  67. Diniz-Filho JAF, Soares TN, Lima JS, Dobrovolski R, Landeiro VL, de Campos Telles MP. Mantel test in population genetics. Genet Mol Biol 2013;6:13.
    pmc: PMC3873175pubmed: 24385847
  68. Biscarini F, Cozzi P, Gaspa G, Marras G. DetectRUNS: an R package to detect runs of homozygosity and heterozygosity in diploid genomes. CRAN (The comprehensive R archive Network) 2018. https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/108906/.
  69. Kirin M, McQuillan R, Franklin CS, Campbell H, McKeigue PM, Wilson JF. Genomic runs of homozygosity record population history and consanguinity. PLoS One 2010;5:e13996.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013996pmc: PMC2981575pubmed: 21085596google scholar: lookup
  70. Ferenčaković M, Sölkner J, Curik I. Estimating autozygosity from high-throughput information: effects of SNP density and genotyping errors. Genet Sel Evol 2013;45:1–9.
    doi: 10.1186/1297-9686-45-42pmc: PMC4176748pubmed: 24168655google scholar: lookup
  71. Chessari G, Criscione A, Marletta D, Crepaldi P, Portolano B, Manunza A. Characterization of heterozygosity-rich regions in Italian and worldwide goat breeds. Sci Rep 2024;14:1–16.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-49125-xpmc: PMC10762050pubmed: 38168531google scholar: lookup
  72. Gorssen W, Meyermans R, Janssens S, Buys N. A publicly available repository of ROH Islands reveals signatures of selection in different livestock and pet species. Genet Sel Evol 2021;53:1–10.
    doi: 10.1186/s12711-020-00599-7pmc: PMC7784028pubmed: 33397285google scholar: lookup
  73. Cingolani P, Patel VM, Coon M, Nguyen T, Land SJ, Ruden DM. Using as a model for genotoxic chemical mutational studies with a new program, SnpSift. Front Genet 2012;3:35.
    doi: 10.3389/fgene.2012.00035pmc: PMC3304048pubmed: 22435069google scholar: lookup
  74. Hu ZL, Park CA, Reecy JM. Bringing the animal QTLdb and CorrDB into the future: meeting new challenges and providing updated services. Nucleic Acids Res 2022;50:D956–61.
    doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab1116pmc: PMC8728226pubmed: 34850103google scholar: lookup
  75. Fonseca PAS, Suarez-Vega A, Marras G, Canovas A. GALLO: an R package for genomic annotation and integration of multiple data sources in livestock for positional candidate loci. GigaScience 2020;9:1–9.
    doi: 10.1093/gigascience/giaa149pmc: PMC7772745pubmed: 33377911google scholar: lookup
  76. Masharing N, Sodhi M, Chanda D, Singh I, Vivek P, Tiwari M. DdRAD sequencing based genotyping of six Indigenous dairy cattle breeds of India to infer existing genetic diversity and population structure. Sci Rep 2023;13:9379.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-32418-6pmc: PMC10256769pubmed: 37296129google scholar: lookup
  77. Geibel J, Reimer C, Pook T, Weigend S, Weigend A, Simianer H. How imputation can mitigate SNP ascertainment bias. BMC Genomics 2021;22:340.
    doi: 10.1186/s12864-021-07663-6pmc: PMC8114708pubmed: 33980139google scholar: lookup
  78. Ventura RV, Miller SP, Dodds KG, Auvray B, Lee M, Bixley M. Assessing accuracy of imputation using different SNP panel densities in a multi-breed sheep population. Genet Sel Evol 2016;48:71.
    doi: 10.1186/s12711-016-0244-7pmc: PMC5035503pubmed: 27663120google scholar: lookup
  79. Daetwyler HD, Capitan A, Pausch H, Stothard P, van Binsbergen R, Brondum RF. Whole-genome sequencing of 234 bulls facilitates mapping of Monogenic and complex traits in cattle. Nat Genet 2014;46:858–65.
    doi: 10.1038/ng.3034pubmed: 25017103google scholar: lookup
  80. Korkuc P, Arends D, Brockmann GA. Finding the optimal imputation strategy for small cattle populations. Front Genet 2019;10:52.
    doi: 10.3389/fgene.2019.00052pmc: PMC6387911pubmed: 30833959google scholar: lookup
  81. Pook T, Mayer M, Geibel J, Weigend S, Cavero D, Schoen CC. Improving imputation quality in BEAGLE for crop and livestock data. G3 (Bethesda) 2020;10:177–88.
    pmc: PMC6945036pubmed: 31676508
  82. Gilly A, Southam L, Suveges D, Kuchenbaecker K, Moore R, Melloni GEM. Very low-depth whole-genome sequencing in complex trait association studies. Bioinformatics 2019;35:2555–61.
    doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty1032pmc: PMC6662288pubmed: 30576415google scholar: lookup
  83. Nguyen TV, Bolormaa S, Reich CM, Chamberlain AJ, Vander Jagt CJ, Daetwyler HD. Empirical versus estimated accuracy of imputation: optimising filtering thresholds for sequence imputation. Genet Sel Evol 2024;56:72.
    doi: 10.1186/s12711-024-00942-2pmc: PMC11566673pubmed: 39548370google scholar: lookup
  84. Butty AM, Sargolzaei M, Miglior F, Stothard P, Schenkel FS, Gredler-Grandl B. Optimizing selection of the reference population for genotype imputation from array to sequence variants. Front Genet 2019;10:510.
    doi: 10.3389/fgene.2019.00510pmc: PMC6554347pubmed: 31214246google scholar: lookup
  85. Bouwman AC, Veerkamp RF. Consequences of splitting whole-genome sequencing effort over multiple breeds on imputation accuracy. BMC Genet 2014;15:1–9.
    doi: 10.1186/s12863-014-0105-8pmc: PMC4189672pubmed: 25277486google scholar: lookup
  86. Mitt M, Kals M, Parn K, Gabriel SB, Lander ES, Palotie A. Improved imputation accuracy of rare and low-frequency variants using population-specific high-coverage WGS-based imputation reference panel. Eur J Hum Genet 2017;25:869–76.
    doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2017.51pmc: PMC5520064pubmed: 28401899google scholar: lookup
  87. Pausch H, MacLeod IM, Fries R, Emmerling R, Bowman PJ, Daetwyler HD. Evaluation of the accuracy of imputed sequence variant genotypes and their utility for causal variant detection in cattle. Genet Sel Evol 2017;49:24.
    doi: 10.1186/s12711-017-0301-xpmc: PMC5320806pubmed: 28222685google scholar: lookup
  88. Wade CM, Giulotto E, Sigurdsson S, Zoli M, Gnerre S, Imsland F. Genome sequence, comparative analysis, and population genetics of the domestic horse. Science 2009;326:865–7.
    doi: 10.1126/science.1178158pmc: PMC3785132pubmed: 19892987google scholar: lookup
  89. Schaefer RJ, Schubert M, Bailey E, Bannasch DL, Barrey E, Bar-Gal GK. Developing a 670k genotyping array to tag ~ 2 M SNPs across 24 horse breeds. BMC Genom 2017;18:1–18.
    doi: 10.1186/s12864-017-3943-8pmc: PMC5530493pubmed: 28750625google scholar: lookup
  90. Falchi L, Cesarani A, Criscione A, Hidalgo J, Garcia A, Mastrangelo S. Effect of genotyping density on the detection of runs of homozygosity and heterozygosity in cattle. J Anim Sci 2024;102:skae147.
    doi: 10.1093/jas/skae147pmc: PMC11197001pubmed: 38798158google scholar: lookup
  91. Ajmone Marsan P, Boettcher PJ, Colli L, Ginja C, Kantanen J, Lenstra JA. Genomic characterization of animal resources - Practical guide. 3rd ed. Rome: FAO Animal Production and Health Guidelines No. 32; 2023.
  92. Nolte W, Thaller G, Kuehn C. Selection signatures in four German warmblood horse breeds: tracing breeding history in the modern sport horse. PLoS One 2019;14:e0215913.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215913pmc: PMC6483353pubmed: 31022261google scholar: lookup
  93. Greenbaum G, Rubin A, Templeton AR, Rosenberg NA. Network-based hierarchical population structure analysis for large genomic data sets. Genome Res 2019;29:2020–33.
    doi: 10.1101/gr.250092.119pmc: PMC6886512pubmed: 31694865google scholar: lookup
  94. Chassier M, Barrey E, Robert C, Duluard A, Danvy S, Ricard A. Genotype imputation accuracy in multiple equine breeds from medium- to high-density genotypes. J Anim Breed Genet 2018;135:420–31.
    doi: 10.1111/jbg.12358pubmed: 30298946google scholar: lookup
  95. Guastella AM, Zuccaro A, Criscione A, Marletta D, Bordonaro S. Genetic analysis of Sicilian autochthonous horse breeds using nuclear and mitochondrial DNA markers. J Hered 2011;102:753–8.
    doi: 10.1093/jhered/esr091pubmed: 21914666google scholar: lookup
  96. Kang Z, Shi J, Liu T, Zhang Y, Zhang Q, Liu Z. Genome-wide single-nucleotide polymorphism data and mitochondrial hypervariable region 1 nucleotide sequence reveal the origin of the Akhal-Teke horse. Anim Biosci 2023;36:1499–507.
    doi: 10.5713/ab.23.0044pmc: PMC10475378pubmed: 37170508google scholar: lookup
  97. Curik I, Ferenčaković M, Sölkner J. Inbreeding and runs of homozygosity: a possible solution to an old problem. Livest Sci 2014;166:26–34.
    doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2014.05.034google scholar: lookup
  98. Peripolli E, Munari DP, Silva M, Lima ALF, Irgang R, Baldi F. Runs of homozygosity: current knowledge and applications in livestock. Anim Genet 2017;48:255–71.
    doi: 10.1111/age.12526pubmed: 27910110google scholar: lookup
  99. Ceballos FC, Joshi PK, Clark DW, Ramsay M, Wilson JF. Runs of homozygosity: windows into population history and trait architecture. Nat Rev Genet 2018;19:220–34.
    doi: 10.1038/nrg.2017.109pubmed: 29335644google scholar: lookup
  100. Pemberton TJ, Absher D, Feldman MW, Myers RM, Rosenberg NA, Li JZ. Genomic patterns of homozygosity in worldwide human populations. J Hum Genet 2012;91:275–92.
    doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2012.06.014pmc: PMC3415543pubmed: 22883143google scholar: lookup
  101. Grilz-Seger G, Mesarič M, Cotman M, Neuditschko M, Druml T, Brem G. Runs of homozygosity and population history of three horse breeds with small population size. J Equine Vet Sci 2018;71:27–34.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2018.09.004google scholar: lookup
  102. Purcell S, Neale B, Todd-Brown K, Thomas L, Ferreira MA, Bender D. PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am J Hum Genet 2007;81:559–75.
    doi: 10.1086/519795pmc: PMC1950838pubmed: 17701901google scholar: lookup
  103. Marras G, Gaspa G, Sorbolini S, Dimauro C, Ajmone-Marsan P, Valentini A. Analysis of runs of homozygosity and their relationship with inbreeding in five cattle breeds farmed in Italy. Anim Genet 2015;46:110–21.
    doi: 10.1111/age.12259pubmed: 25530322google scholar: lookup
  104. Santos WB, Pimenta Schettini G, Fonseca MG, Pereira GL, Loyola Chardulo LA, Rodrigues Machado Neto O. Fine-scale Estimation of inbreeding rates, runs of homozygosity and genome-wide heterozygosity levels in the Mangalarga Marchador horse breed. J Anim Breed Genet 2021;138:161–73.
    doi: 10.1111/jbg.12508pubmed: 32949478google scholar: lookup
  105. Mulim HA, Brito LF, Pinto LFB, Ferraz JBS, Grigoletto L, Silva MR. Characterization of runs of homozygosity, heterozygosity-enriched regions, and population structure in cattle populations selected for different breeding goals. BMC Genomics 2022;23:209.
    doi: 10.1186/s12864-022-08384-0pmc: PMC8925140pubmed: 35291953google scholar: lookup
  106. Gmel AI, Mikko S, Ricard A, Velie BD, Gerber V, Hamilton NA. Using high-density SNP data to unravel the origin of the Franches-Montagnes horse breed. Genet Sel Evol 2024;56:53.
    doi: 10.1186/s12711-024-00922-6pmc: PMC11238448pubmed: 38987703google scholar: lookup
  107. Purfield DC, Berry DP, McParland S, Bradley DG. Runs of homozygosity and population history in cattle. BMC Genet 2012;13:1–11.
    doi: 10.1186/1471-2156-13-70pmc: PMC3502433pubmed: 22888858google scholar: lookup
  108. Metzger J, Karwath M, Tonda R, Beltran S, Agueda L, Gut M. Runs of homozygosity reveal signatures of positive selection for reproduction traits in breed and non-breed horses. BMC Genomics 2015;16:764.
    doi: 10.1186/s12864-015-1977-3pmc: PMC4600213pubmed: 26452642google scholar: lookup
  109. Metzger J, Pfahler S, Distl O. Variant detection and runs of homozygosity in next generation sequencing data elucidate the genetic background of Lundehund syndrome. BMC Genomics 2016;17:535.
    doi: 10.1186/s12864-016-2844-6pmc: PMC4971756pubmed: 27485430google scholar: lookup
  110. Jensen A, Lillie M, Bergstrom K, Larsson P, Hoglund J. Whole genome sequencing reveals high differentiation, low levels of genetic diversity and short runs of homozygosity among Swedish wels catfish. Heredity (Edinb) 2021;127:79–91.
    doi: 10.1038/s41437-021-00438-5pmc: PMC8249479pubmed: 33963302google scholar: lookup
  111. Fang Y, Hao X, Xu Z, Sun H, Zhao Q, Cao R. Genome-wide detection of runs of homozygosity in Laiwu pigs revealed by sequencing data. Front Genet 2021;12:629966.
    doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.629966pmc: PMC8116706pubmed: 33995477google scholar: lookup
  112. McQuillan R, Leutenegger AL, Abdel-Rahman R, Franklin CS, Pericic M, Barac-Lauc L. Runs of homozygosity in European populations. Am J Hum Genet 2008;83(3):359–72.
    doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2008.08.007pmc: PMC2556426pubmed: 18760389google scholar: lookup
  113. Howrigan DP, Simonson MA, Keller MC. Detecting autozygosity through runs of homozygosity: a comparison of three autozygosity detection algorithms. BMC Genom 2011;12:460–75.
    doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-12-460pmc: PMC3188534pubmed: 21943305google scholar: lookup
  114. Szmatoła T, Gurgul A, Jasielczuk I, Fu W, Ropka-Molik K. A detailed characteristics of bias associated with long runs of homozygosity identification based on medium density SNP microarrays. J Genomics 2020;8:43–8.
    doi: 10.7150/jgen.39147pmc: PMC7171384pubmed: 32328205google scholar: lookup
  115. Druml T, Neuditschko M, Grilz-Seger G, Horna M, Ricard A, Mesaric M. Population networks associated with runs of homozygosity reveal new insights into the breeding history of the Haflinger horse. J Hered 2018;109:384–92.
    doi: 10.1093/jhered/esx114pubmed: 29294044google scholar: lookup
  116. Ablondi M, Viklund A, Lindgren G, Eriksson S, Mikko S. Signatures of selection in the genome of Swedish warmblood horses selected for sport performance. BMC Genomics 2019;20:717.
    doi: 10.1186/s12864-019-6079-1pmc: PMC6751828pubmed: 31533613google scholar: lookup
  117. Zhang Q, Guldbrandtsen B, Bosse M, Lund MS, Sahana G. Runs of homozygosity and distribution of functional variants in the cattle genome. BMC Genomics 2015;16:542.
    doi: 10.1186/s12864-015-1715-xpmc: PMC4508970pubmed: 26198692google scholar: lookup
  118. Nothnagel M, Lu TT, Kayser M, Krawczak M. Genomic and geographic distribution of SNP-defined runs of homozygosity in Europeans. Hum Mol Genet 2010;19:2927–35.
    doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddq198pubmed: 20462934google scholar: lookup
  119. Colpitts J, McLoughlin PD, Poissant J. Runs of homozygosity in Sable Island feral horses reveal the genomic consequences of inbreeding and divergence from domestic breeds. BMC Genomics 2022;23:501.
    doi: 10.1186/s12864-022-08729-9pmc: PMC9275264pubmed: 35820826google scholar: lookup
  120. Grilz-Seger G, Neuditschko M, Ricard A, Velie B, Lindgren G, Mesaric M. Genome-wide homozygosity patterns and evidence for selection in a set of European and near Eastern horse breeds. Genes (Basel) 2019;10.
    doi: 10.3390/genes10070491pmc: PMC6679042pubmed: 31261764google scholar: lookup
  121. Nazari F, Seyedabadi HR, Noshary A, Emamjomeh-Kashan N, Banabazi MH. A genome-wide scan for signatures of selection in Kurdish horse breed. J Equine Vet Sci 2022;113:103916.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2022.103916pubmed: 35218903google scholar: lookup
  122. Ablondi M, Dadousis C, Vasini M, Eriksson S, Mikko S, Sabbioni A. Genetic diversity and signatures of selection in a native Italian horse breed based on SNP data. Anim (Basel) 2020;10.
    doi: 10.3390/ani10061005pmc: PMC7341496pubmed: 32521830google scholar: lookup
  123. Pearson JC, Lemons D, McGinnis W. Modulating hox gene functions during animal body patterning. Nat Rev Genet 2005;6:893–904.
    doi: 10.1038/nrg1726pubmed: 16341070google scholar: lookup
  124. Iimura T, Denans N, Pourquie O. Establishment of hox vertebral identities in the embryonic spine precursors. Curr Top Dev Biol 2009;88:201–34.
    doi: 10.1016/S0070-2153(09)88007-1pmc: PMC3523337pubmed: 19651306google scholar: lookup
  125. Rogowski K, van Dijk J, Magiera MM, Bosc C, Deloulme JC, Bosson A. A family of protein-deglutamylating enzymes associated with neurodegeneration. Cell 2010;143:564–78.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.10.014pubmed: 21074048google scholar: lookup
  126. Zhong Y, Yan W, Ruan J, Fang M, Yu C, Du S. XBP1 variant 1 promotes mitosis of cancer cells involving upregulation of the polyglutamylase TTLL6. Hum Mol Genet 2022;31:2639–54.
    doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddac010pmc: PMC9396943pubmed: 35333353google scholar: lookup
  127. Jacquet BV, Salinas-Mondragon R, Liang H, Therit B, Buie JD, Dykstra M. FoxJ1-dependent gene expression is required for differentiation of radial glia into ependymal cells and a subset of astrocytes in the postnatal brain. Development 2009;136:4021–31.
    doi: 10.1242/dev.041129pmc: PMC3118431pubmed: 19906869google scholar: lookup
  128. Gu J, Orr N, Park SD, Katz LM, Sulimova G, MacHugh DE. A genome scan for positive selection in thoroughbred horses. PLoS One 2009;4:e5767.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005767pmc: PMC2685479pubmed: 19503617google scholar: lookup
  129. Szmatoła T, Gurgul A, Jasielczuk I, Oclon E, Ropka-Molik K, Stefaniuk-Szmukier M. Assessment and distribution of runs of homozygosity in horse breeds representing different utility types. Anim (Basel) 2022;12.
    doi: 10.3390/ani12233293pmc: PMC9736150pubmed: 36496815google scholar: lookup
  130. Zhou Y, Connor EE, Bickhart DM, Li C, Baldwin RL, Schroeder SG. Comparative whole genome DNA methylation profiling of cattle sperm and somatic tissues reveals striking hypomethylated patterns in sperm. GigaScience 2018;7.
    doi: 10.1093/gigascience/giy039pmc: PMC5928411pubmed: 29635292google scholar: lookup
  131. Özbek M, Hitit M, Kaya A, Jousan FD, Memili E. Sperm functional genome associated with bull fertility. Front Vet Sci 2021;8:610888.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.610888pmc: PMC8262648pubmed: 34250055google scholar: lookup
  132. El Nagar AG, Salem MMI, Amin AMS, Khalil MH, Ashour AF, Hegazy MM. A single-step genome-wide association study for semen traits of Egyptian Buffalo bulls. Anim (Basel) 2023;13.
    doi: 10.3390/ani13243758pmc: PMC10740893pubmed: 38136796google scholar: lookup
  133. Mei C, Junjvlieke Z, Raza SHA, Wang H, Cheng G, Zhao C. Copy number variation detection in Chinese Indigenous cattle by whole genome sequencing. Genomics 2020;112:831–36.
    doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2019.05.023pubmed: 31145994google scholar: lookup
  134. Han H, McGivney BA, Farries G, Katz LM, MacHugh DE, Randhawa IAS. Selection in Australian thoroughbred horses acts on a locus associated with early two-year old speed. PLoS ONE 2020;15:e0227212.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227212pmc: PMC7015314pubmed: 32049967google scholar: lookup
  135. Sun X, Wang Y, Loor JJ, Bucktrout R, Shu X, Jia H. High expression of cell death-inducing DFFA-like effector a (CIDEA) promotes milk fat content in dairy cows with clinical ketosis. J Dairy Sci 2019;102:1682–92.
    doi: 10.3168/jds.2018-15439pubmed: 30594378google scholar: lookup
  136. Gummesson A, Jernas M, Svensson PA, Larsson I, Glad CA, Schele E. Relations of adipose tissue CIDEA gene expression to basal metabolic rate, energy restriction, and obesity: population-based and dietary intervention studies. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2007;92:4759–65.
    doi: 10.1210/jc.2007-1136pubmed: 17895319google scholar: lookup
  137. Dahlman I, Kaaman M, Jiao H, Kere J, Laakso M, Arner P. The CIDEA gene V115F polymorphism is associated with obesity in Swedish subjects. Diabetes 2005;54:3032–4.
    doi: 10.2337/diabetes.54.10.3032pubmed: 16186410google scholar: lookup
  138. An ZX, Shi LG, Hou GY, Zhou HL, Xun WJ. Genetic diversity and selection signatures in Hainan black goats revealed by whole-genome sequencing data. Animal 2024;18:101147.
    doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101147pubmed: 38843669google scholar: lookup
  139. Bussiman FO, Aparecida dos Santos B, Abreu Silva BdC, Mamani GCM, Grigoletto L, Pereira GL. Genome-wide association study: Understanding the genetic basis of the gait type in Brazilian Mangalarga Marchador horses, a preliminary study. Livest Sci 2020;231.
    doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2019.103867google scholar: lookup
  140. Patterson L, Staiger EA, Brooks SA. is associated with gait type in Mangalarga Marchador horses, but does not control gait ability. Anim Genet 2015;46:213–5.
    doi: 10.1111/age.12273pubmed: 25690906google scholar: lookup
  141. Moazemi I, Mohammadabadi MR, Mostafavi A, Esmailizadeh AK, Babenko OI, Bushtruk MV. Polymorphism of DMRT3 gene and its association with body measurements in horse breeds. Russ J Genet 2020;56:1232–40.
    doi: 10.1134/S1022795420100087google scholar: lookup
  142. Jäderkvist K, Holm N, Imsland F, Árnason T, Andersson L, Andersson LS. The importance of the DMRT3 ‘Gait keeper’ mutation on riding traits and gaits in standardbred and Icelandic horses. Livest Sci 2015;176:33–9.
    doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2015.03.025google scholar: lookup
  143. Andersson LS, Larhammar M, Memic F, Wootz H, Schwochow D, Rubin CJ. Mutations in DMRT3 affect locomotion in horses and spinal circuit function in mice. Nature 2012;488:642–6.
    doi: 10.1038/nature11399pmc: PMC3523687pubmed: 22932389google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,048 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.