Analyze Diet
Veterinary surgery : VS2006; 35(3); 219-226; doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2006.00140.x

Comparison of arthroscopic approaches and accessible anatomic structures during arthroscopy of the caudal pouches of equine femorotibial joints.

Abstract: To (1) describe a caudal approach to equine medial and lateral femorotibial (FT) joints and (2) illustrate the complex anatomic detail of the caudal compartments of the lateral FT joint. Methods: Prospective experimental study. Methods: Cadaveric equine hindlimbs (n = 36; 26 horses) and 6 horses (11 hind limbs). Methods: Stifles (n = 8) were dissected and 10 FT joints were injected with silicone. Arthroscopic exploration (n = 29) was performed, followed by dissection to determine sites and structures penetrated during entry. Results: A more caudal approach to the caudal pouch of the medial FT improved anatomic observation. A more caudal approach to the caudal pouch of the lateral FT joint occasionally caused damage to the common peroneal nerve; however, after reverting to the previously described approach, damage was avoided. Conclusions: Arthroscopy of the caudal pouch of the medial FT joint was facilitated using a more caudomedial approach, which improved observation of intrasynovial structures, most importantly, the caudal cruciate ligament and caudal horn of the medial meniscus. A more caudal approach to the caudal pouch of the lateral FT joint cannot be safely performed without risk to the common peroneal nerve and therefore the standard caudal approach is described in detail. Conclusions: A caudomedial arthroscopic approach allows improved surgical assessment of meniscal or caudal cruciate ligament injury. Care should be exercised when exploring the caudal pouch of the lateral FT joint because the common peroneal nerve is variably located and could easily be damaged during arthroscope or instrument insertion, especially if the limb is minimally flexed.
Publication Date: 2006-04-26 PubMed ID: 16635000DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2006.00140.xGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Comparative Study
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research paper discusses a new approach to arthroscopy of equine femorotibial joints and its effects on viewing critical internal structures. However, the research cautions against this approach with the lateral femorotibial joint due to potential nerve damage.

Objective and Methods

  • The research aims to describe a new posterior approach to arthroscopy on equine femorotibial (FT) joints and its implications on viewing the intricate details of the caudal compartments of the medial and lateral FT joint.
  • The study used equine hindlimbs (36 cadaveric limbs from 26 horses and 11 hind limbs from 6 live horses) to conduct this investigation. They dissected 8 stifles and injected 10 FT joints with silicone.
  • Arthroscopic exploration of 29 hindlimbs was performed following which a dissecting procedure was employed to determine the structures and sites affected by the entry.

Results and Conclusions

  • Results showed that implementing a more caudal or posterior approach to the caudal pouch of the medial FT led to improved anatomical observation. This approach facilitated easy viewing of the caudal cruciate ligament and the caudal horn of the medial meniscus which are crucial internal structures in horses.
  • However, while using a more posterior method with the caudal pouch of the lateral FT joint, there were instances of damage to the common peroneal nerve. This was circumvented when the researchers returned to the previously established method, which avoided any damage.
  • The study concludes that the alternative caudomedial arthroscopic approach can significantly improve surgical assessment of injuries to the meniscus or the caudal cruciate ligament. Nevertheless, this method comes with an inherent risk when applied to the lateral FT joint due to the variable location of the common peroneal nerve and potential for damage, especially if the limb is minimally flexed or bent.

Cite This Article

APA
Watts AE, Nixon AJ. (2006). Comparison of arthroscopic approaches and accessible anatomic structures during arthroscopy of the caudal pouches of equine femorotibial joints. Vet Surg, 35(3), 219-226. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-950X.2006.00140.x

Publication

ISSN: 0161-3499
NlmUniqueID: 8113214
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 35
Issue: 3
Pages: 219-226

Researcher Affiliations

Watts, Ashlee E
  • Cornell University, Veterinary Medical Center, College of Veterinary Medicine, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
Nixon, Alan J

    MeSH Terms

    • Animals
    • Arthroscopy / methods
    • Arthroscopy / veterinary
    • Hindlimb / anatomy & histology
    • Hindlimb / surgery
    • Horses / anatomy & histology
    • Horses / surgery
    • Models, Anatomic
    • Stifle / anatomy & histology
    • Stifle / surgery

    Citations

    This article has been cited 3 times.
    1. Bolz NM, Sánchez-Andrade JS, Torgerson PR, Bischofberger AS. Diagnostic Performance of Multi-Detector Computed Tomography Arthrography and 3-Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Diagnose Experimentally Created Articular Cartilage Lesions in Equine Cadaver Stifles.. Animals (Basel) 2023 Jul 14;13(14).
      doi: 10.3390/ani13142304pubmed: 37508081google scholar: lookup
    2. Aßmann AD, Ohlerth S, Suárez Sánchez-Andráde J, Torgerson PR, Bischofberger AS. Ex vivo comparison of 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging and multidetector computed tomography arthrography to identify artificial soft tissue lesions in equine stifles.. Vet Surg 2022 May;51(4):648-657.
      doi: 10.1111/vsu.13798pubmed: 35289943google scholar: lookup
    3. Nichols S, Anderson DE. Determination of the normal arthroscopic anatomy of the femoropatellar and cranial femorotibial joints of cattle.. Can Vet J 2014 Mar;55(3):232-9.
      pubmed: 24587506