Analyze Diet
Equine veterinary journal. Supplement2011; (38); 482-487; doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2010.00195.x

Comparison of kinematic symmetry index calculations and the effects of straight and circular trotting.

Abstract: When assessing lameness in horses, left to right ratios of kinematic parameters are often used to quantify movement symmetry. Different methods of symmetry related measures have been proposed and inertial sensor data was used to evaluate the application of 3 methods of symmetry calculation during straight and circular trotting. Objective: To compare 3 sensor based methods of symmetry index calculation to assess; tuber coxae vs. sacrum motion, the effects of circular trotting and effect of using whole trials in place of individual stride calculations. Methods: Inertial sensors were attached to the sacrum, left and right tuber coxae (LTC/RTC) of 21 non-lame horses. Straight and circular trotting data were collected. Symmetry indices based on vertical movement were calculated for each stride using 3 previously published methods. Results: Method 2 (Fourier analysis) had significantly higher ratio values than method 1 (displacement amplitude ratio; tuber coxae) and methods 1 (displacement amplitude ratio; sacrum) and 3 (difference between LTC/RTC displacement). The effect of circular trotting within methods was highly variable, but was not significantly different between methods. No significant differences were found between whole trial and individual stride calculations. Method 2 when compared to method 1 underestimates the asymmetry present in a non-uniform way due to the use of squared amplitudes. Methods 2 and 3 become less accurate during circular trotting due to changes in amplitude timing. Conclusions: On the same data substantial differences in symmetry indices are found when using different methods and locations. Further differences exist in accuracy when used on circular data. Interpretation and direct comparison of different symmetry indices should be approached with caution.
Publication Date: 2011-05-27 PubMed ID: 21059049DOI: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2010.00195.xGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research investigates the comparison of three different methods of kinematic symmetry index calculation in horses while they are trotting. These methods are evaluated through straight and circular trotting simulations, determining their effectiveness in assessing movement symmetry.

Objective and Methods

The main aim of the study was to compare three different methods of symmetry calculations, specifically focusing on:

  • The motion of tuber coxae versus sacrum
  • The effects of circular trotting
  • The impact of using entire trialing sessions instead of distinct stride calculations

To conduct the research, the team used inertial sensors which were attached to the sacrum and both the left and right tuber coxae (LTC and RTC) in 21 non-lame horses. The symmetric indices were calculated based on vertical movements for every stride, utilizing three methods that had previously been published.

Results Interpretation

The analysis of the results showed that the Fourier analysis (Method 2) had considerably higher ratio values compared to the other two methods:

  • Displacement amplitude ratio (Method 1) assessing the tuber coxae
  • Displacement amplitude ratio (Method 1) assessing the sacrum
  • Difference between the displacement of the LTC and RTC (Method 3)

The study also considered the effects of circular trotting within these methods, which varied significantly but did not display any significant difference among the methods.

The researchers also discovered that there were no notable differences between whole trial calculations and individual stride calculations.

However, when comparing Method 2 and Method 1, the former tended to underestimate asymmetry, due to the use of squared amplitudes. Furthermore, Methods 2 and 3 were less accurate during circular trotting because of changes in the amplitude timing.

Conclusion

The study concluded that notable differences exist in symmetry indices when applying varied methods and locations on the same dataset. Also, there are discrepancies in terms of accuracy when applied to circular data. As such, the study advises taking caution when interpreting and directly comparing different symmetry indices.

Cite This Article

APA
Walker AM, Wilson AM, Pfau T. (2011). Comparison of kinematic symmetry index calculations and the effects of straight and circular trotting. Equine Vet J Suppl(38), 482-487. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-3306.2010.00195.x

Publication

NlmUniqueID: 9614088
Country: United States
Language: English
Issue: 38
Pages: 482-487

Researcher Affiliations

Walker, A M
  • Structure and Motion Laboratory, Department of Veterinary Basic Sciences, Royal Veterinary College, Hatfield, UK. amwalker@rvc.ac.uk
Wilson, A M
    Pfau, T

      MeSH Terms

      • Animals
      • Biomechanical Phenomena
      • Gait / physiology
      • Horses / physiology
      • Locomotion / physiology
      • Monitoring, Ambulatory
      • Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted
      • Weight-Bearing

      Grant Funding

      • S20242 / Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council

      Citations

      This article has been cited 2 times.
      1. Panos KE, Morgan K, Gately R, Wilkinson J, Uden A, Reed SA. Short Communication: changes in gait after 12 wk of shoeing in previously barefoot horses. J Anim Sci 2023 Jan 3;101.
        doi: 10.1093/jas/skac374pubmed: 36383438google scholar: lookup
      2. Rhodin M, Roepstorff L, French A, Keegan KG, Pfau T, Egenvall A. Head and pelvic movement asymmetry during lungeing in horses with symmetrical movement on the straight. Equine Vet J 2016 May;48(3):315-20.
        doi: 10.1111/evj.12446pubmed: 25808700google scholar: lookup