Comparison of tensile strength and early healing of acute repeat celiotomy through a ventral median or a right ventral paramedian approach.
Abstract: To compare tensile strength, failure location, and histologic features after acute repeat celiotomy through a ventral median (RVM) or a right ventral paramedian (RVP) celiotomy in horses. Methods: Ex vivo experimental study. Methods: Adult horses (N = 18). Methods: Twelve adult horses had original ventral median (OVM) celiotomy. Repeat celiotomy was performed 72 hours postoperatively through the original ventral median (RVM, N = 6) or a RVP (N = 6) celiotomy. Celiotomies were scored daily for edema, drainage, and dehiscence. Fourteen days after repeat celiotomy, horses were euthanatized and abdominal wall containing celiotomy(ies) were collected for biomechanical and histological evaluation. The abdominal wall of control horses (N = 6; no celiotomy) was collected for biomechanical testing. Vital sign variables, incisional edema, and histologic scores were compared using a Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Incisional fibrotic depth and tensile strength per unit length (N/cm) was compared using repeated measures ANOVA. Results: RVM and RVP horses had significantly less tensile strength compared to control horses, but no differences were observed between RVM and RVP horses. No differences in healing, inflammation, infection, or necrosis of repeat celiotomies was observed, but RVP horses accumulated more fibrin and hemorrhage within the incision. RVP horses had significantly greater incisional edema scores, but incisional drainage was more frequent in RVM horses. Conclusions: Acute repeat celiotomy through a RVM incision results in similar incisional healing and tensile strength compared with repeat celiotomy through a RVP incision.
© Copyright 2014 by The American College of Veterinary Surgeons.
Publication Date: 2014-01-27 PubMed ID: 24467765DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2014.12139.xGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
- Journal Article
- Randomized Controlled Trial
- Research Support
- Non-U.S. Gov't
Summary
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
This study compares the tensile strength and healing process of acute repeat abdominal surgery (celiotomy) performed through a ventral median (middle) or a right ventral side approach on horses. The findings suggest both surgical approaches result in similar levels of wound healing and strength.
Research Methodology
- The researchers conducted an experimental study ex vivo (outside a living organism) on 18 adult horses.
- 12 of these horses initially underwent a ventral median celiotomy. A repeat celiotomy was performed 72 hours later either through the original ventral median or the right ventral paramedian incision.
- The celiotomies were scored daily for swelling (edema), fluid leakage (drainage), and wound separation (dehiscence).
- After 14 days post the second surgery, the animals were euthanized and their abdominal wall tissue, containing the celiotomy incisions, were collected for biomechanical and histological evaluation.
- The abdominal wall of the control horses, which did not undergo any surgery, was also collected for biomechanical testing.
Data Analysis and Results
- Various variables, including vital signs, incisional edema, and histologic scores, were compared using a Wilcoxon signed-rank test, which is used for comparing paired populations.
- Incisional fibrotic depth (thickness of fibrous tissue in the incision) and tensile strength (ability to withstand pulling force) were compared using repeated measures ANOVA, a statistical test often used in clinical trials.
- The horses with the ventral median and right ventral paramedian repeat celiotomies had significantly less tensile strength than the control group, which hadn’t undergone any surgery.
- However, there was no observed difference between the tensile strengths of the two surgical approaches.
- Similarly, the healing process, inflammation, infection rates, and tissue death (necrosis) of the repeat celiotomies were comparable for the two incision methods.
- However, the right ventral paramedian group had higher fibrin and hemorrhage within the incision and showed more swelling (edema).
Conclusion
- Overall, this research concludes that an acute repeat celiotomy (abdominal surgery) in horses, whether performed through a traditional ventral median incision or a right ventral side approach, results in similar wound healing and tensile strength of the tissue.
Cite This Article
APA
Boone LH, Epstein K, Cremer J, Rogers A, Foutz T, Quandt J, Howerth E, Mueller PO.
(2014).
Comparison of tensile strength and early healing of acute repeat celiotomy through a ventral median or a right ventral paramedian approach.
Vet Surg, 43(6), 741-749.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-950X.2014.12139.x Publication
Researcher Affiliations
- Department of Large Animal Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia; Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia.
MeSH Terms
- Abdominal Wound Closure Techniques / instrumentation
- Abdominal Wound Closure Techniques / veterinary
- Animals
- Biomechanical Phenomena
- Colic / surgery
- Colic / veterinary
- Female
- Horse Diseases / surgery
- Horses
- Male
- Sutures / veterinary
- Tensile Strength
- Wound Healing
Use Nutrition Calculator
Check if your horse's diet meets their nutrition requirements with our easy-to-use tool Check your horse's diet with our easy-to-use tool
Talk to a Nutritionist
Discuss your horse's feeding plan with our experts over a free phone consultation Discuss your horse's diet over a phone consultation
Submit Diet Evaluation
Get a customized feeding plan for your horse formulated by our equine nutritionists Get a custom feeding plan formulated by our nutritionists