FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 10000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E2014; 12; 27; doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-12-27

Comparison of the biopsy and cytobrush techniques for diagnosis of subclinical endometritis in mares.

Abstract: Endometritis is a major cause of infertility in the mare. Therefore, the diagnosis of this disease is very important in veterinary practice. The objective of this study was to compare bacteriological and cytological results obtained from the mare uterus using biopsy (EB) and cytobrush (CB) techniques and relating these findings to the presence of polymorphonuclear cells (PMNs) in endometrial tissue as the gold standard for detection of endometritis. In particular, we tested the hypothesis that endometrial cytology and microbiology data obtained from material collected using the EB and CB techniques are similar, so that the CB technique could preferentially be used to detect subclinical endometritis in clinical practice. Methods: A total of 69 mares suspected of subclinical endometritis because of previous reproductive history and 15 maiden mares were enrolled in this study. Material collected from both EB and CB was smeared on sterile glass slides for cytological examinations and on culture media for microbiological examinations. Bacteriological cultures and cytological samples were classified as negative (no growth or mixed cultures of more than three microorganisms; <2% PMNs) or positive (pure growth of microorganisms; >2% PMNs) for endometritis. Results: Positive growth was observed in 43% of CB samples and in 54% of EB samples (difference not significant). The growth of β-hemolytic streptococci was always connected with positive cytology. This relationship was not observed for growth of E. coli or for non-pathogenic flora. The sensitivity of bacterial growth and cytology from EB was 0.63 and 0.73 respectively. The sensitivities of bacterial growth and cytology from CB were 0.50 and 0.71 respectively. Conclusions: Microbiological and cytological results obtained from CB are similar to those obtained from EB and based on these findings the CB technique may be recommended for collection of materials from the mare's uterus in clinical practice.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2014-04-04 PubMed ID: 24708825PubMed Central: PMC3986439DOI: 10.1186/1477-7827-12-27Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Comparative Study
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research article investigates the effectiveness of two methods, endometrial biopsy (EB) and cytobrush (CB), in diagnosing subclinical endometritis in mares. It concludes that the CB technique is as effective as the EB method and could be used as a primary detection tool for subclinical endometritis in clinical practice.

Research Aims and Objectives

  • The study aims to compare the bacteriological and cytological results obtained from the uterus of mares using biopsy (EB) and cytobrush (CB) techniques.
  • The research specifically tests the hypothesis that data derived from materials collected through the EB and CB techniques are similar and thus, in clinical practice, the CB technique could be preferable to detect subclinical endometritis.

Methodology

  • The researchers enrolled 69 mares suspected of having subclinical endometritis, owing to their reproductive history, and 15 maiden mares for this study.
  • Material was gathered from both EB and CB methods and smeared on sterile glass slides for cytological examinations and on culture media for microbiological examinations.
  • Bacteriological cultures and cytological samples were classified as either negative or positive for endometritis.

Results

  • The study observed a positive growth in 43% of CB samples and in 54% of EB samples (a non-significant difference).
  • The presence of β-hemolytic streptococci was always associated with positive cytology. This association was not noted for growth of E. coli or for non-pathogenic flora.
  • The sensitivity of bacterial growth and cytology from EB was 0.63 and 0.73 respectively.
  • The sensitivity of bacterial growth and cytology from CB were 0.50 and 0.71 respectively.

Conclusions

  • The analysis shows similar microbiological and cytological results from CB and EB techniques.
  • Based on these findings, the study concludes that the CB technique can be utilized in clinical practice for sample collection from the mare’s uterus, as it provides results comparable to the EB technique.

Cite This Article

APA
Buczkowska J, Kozdrowski R, Nowak M, Raś A, Staroniewicz Z, Siemieniuch MJ. (2014). Comparison of the biopsy and cytobrush techniques for diagnosis of subclinical endometritis in mares. Reprod Biol Endocrinol, 12, 27. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-12-27

Publication

Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E
ISSN: 1477-7827
NlmUniqueID: 101153627
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 12
Pages: 27

Researcher Affiliations

Buczkowska, Justyna
    Kozdrowski, Roland
    • Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Wrocław, Poland. roland.kozdrowski@up.wroc.pl.
    Nowak, Marcin
      Raś, Andrzej
        Staroniewicz, Zdzisław
          Siemieniuch, Marta J

            MeSH Terms

            • Animals
            • Biopsy / methods
            • Biopsy / standards
            • Cytological Techniques / methods
            • Cytological Techniques / standards
            • Endometritis / pathology
            • Female
            • Horses
            • Uterus / pathology

            References

            This article includes 23 references
            1. Card C. Post-breeding inflammation and endometrial cytology in mares.. Theriogenology 2005;64:580–588.
              doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2005.05.041pubmed: 15978660google scholar: lookup
            2. Defontis M, Vaillancourt D, Grand FX. Comparison of three methods of sampling for endometrial cytology in the mare.. Tierarztl Prax 2011;39:171–175.
              pubmed: 22138802
            3. LeBlanc MM, Causey RC. Clinical and subclinical endometritis in the mare: both threats to fertility.. Reprod Domest Anim 2009;44:10–22.
              pubmed: 19660076
            4. Liu IKM, Troedsson MHT. Diagnosis and treatment of endometritis in the mare: yesterday and today.. Theriogenology 2008;70:415–420.
              doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.05.040pubmed: 18513792google scholar: lookup
            5. Riddle WT, LeBlanc MM, Stromberg AJ. Relationships between uterine culture, cytology and pregnancy rates in a Thoroughbred practice.. Theriogenology 2007;68:395–402.
              doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2007.05.050pubmed: 17583785google scholar: lookup
            6. Cocchia N, Paciello O, Auletta L, Uccello V, Silvestro L, Mallardo K, Paraggio G, Pasolini MP. Comparison of the cytobrush, cottonswab and low-volume uterine flush techniques to evaluate endometrial cytology for diagnosing endometritis in chronically infertile mares.. Theriogenology 2012;77:89–98.
              doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2011.07.020pubmed: 21855980google scholar: lookup
            7. Overbeck W, Witte TS, Heuwieser W. Comparison of three diagnostic methods to identify subclinical endometritis in mares.. Theriogenology 2011;75:1311–1318.
              doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2010.12.002pubmed: 21251703google scholar: lookup
            8. Kenney RM. Cyclic and pathologic changes of the mare endometrium as detected by biopsy, with a note on early embryonic death.. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1978;172:241–262.
              pubmed: 621166
            9. LeBlanc MM. Advances in the diagnosis and treatment of chronic infectious and post-mating-induced endometritis in the mare.. Reprod Domest Anim 2010;45:21–27.
              pubmed: 20591061
            10. Digby NJW. The technique and clinical application of endometrial cytology in mares.. Equine Vet J 1978;10:167–170.
              doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1978.tb02248.xpubmed: 567580google scholar: lookup
            11. Nielsen JM. Endometritis in the mare: a diagnostic study comparing cultures from swab and biopsy.. Theriogenology 2005;64:510–518.
              doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2005.05.034pubmed: 15978661google scholar: lookup
            12. Nielsen JM, Troedsson MH, Pedersen MR, Lehen-Jensen H. Diagnosis of endometritis in the mare based on bacteriological and cytological examinations of the endometrium. Comparison of results obtained by swabs and biopsies.. J Equine Vet Sci 2010;30:27–30.
            13. Kozdrowski R, Gumienna J, Sikora M, Andrzejewski K, Nowak M. Comparison of the cytology brush and cotton swab in the cytological evaluation of the endometrium in mares with regard to fertility.. J Equine Vet Sci 2013;33:1008–1011.
              doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2013.03.003google scholar: lookup
            14. Bourke M, Mills JN, Barnes AL. Collection of endometrial cells in the mare.. Aust Vet J 1997;75:755–758.
              doi: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.1997.tb12263.xpubmed: 9406638google scholar: lookup
            15. Walter J, Neuberg KP, Failing K, Wehrend A. Cytological diagnosis of endometritis in the mare: investigations of sampling techniques and relation to bacteriological results.. Anim Reprod Sci 2012;132:178–186.
              doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2012.05.012pubmed: 22727031google scholar: lookup
            16. Reiswig JD, Threlfall WR, Rosol TJ. A comparison of endometrial biopsy, culture and cytology during oestrus and dioestrus in the horse.. Equine Vet J 1993;25:240–241.
              doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1993.tb02952.xpubmed: 8508755google scholar: lookup
            17. LeBlanc MM, Magsig J, Stromberg J. Use of a low-volume uterine flush for diagnosing endometritis in chronically infertile mares.. Theriogenology 2007;68:403–412.
              doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2007.04.038pubmed: 17543379google scholar: lookup
            18. Ricketts SW, Barrelet A. A retrospective review of the histopathological features seen in series of 4241 endometrial biopsy samples collected from UK Thoroughbred mares over a 25 year period.. Pferdeheilkunde 1997;13:525–530.
            19. Snider TA, Sepoy C, Holyoak GR. Equine endometrial biopsy reviewed: observation, interpretation and application of histopathologic data.. Theriogenology 2011;75:1567–1581.
              doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2010.12.013pubmed: 21356552google scholar: lookup
            20. Ball BA, Shin SJ, Pattern VH, Lein DH, Woods GL. Use of a low-volume uterine flush for microbiologic and cytologic examination of the mares endometrium.. Theriogenology 1988;29:1269–1283.
              doi: 10.1016/0093-691X(88)90007-6google scholar: lookup
            21. Ricketts SW, Alonso S. Assessment of the breeding prognosis of mares using paired endometrial biopsy techniques.. Equine Vet J 1991;23:185–188.
              doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1991.tb02751.xpubmed: 1884698google scholar: lookup
            22. Albihn A, Båverud V, Magnusson U. Uterine microbiology and antimicrobial susceptibility in isolated bacteria from mares with fertility problems.. Acta Vet Scand 2003;44:121–129.
              doi: 10.1186/1751-0147-44-121pmc: PMC1831563pubmed: 15074625google scholar: lookup
            23. Frontoso R, De Carlo E, Pasolini MP, van der Meulen K, Pagnini U, Iovane G, De Martino L. Retrospective study of bacterial isolates and their antimicrobial susceptibilities in equine uteri during fertility problems.. Res Vet Sci 2008;84:1–6.
              doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2007.02.008pubmed: 17434193google scholar: lookup

            Citations

            This article has been cited 13 times.
            1. Zhang X, Gao Y, Mai Z, Li Y, Wang J, Zhao X, Zhang Y. Untargeted Metabolomic Analysis Reveals Plasma Differences between Mares with Endometritis and Healthy Ones. Animals (Basel) 2024 Jun 29;14(13).
              doi: 10.3390/ani14131933pubmed: 38998045google scholar: lookup
            2. Prete CD, Nocera FP, Piegari G, Palumbo V, Martino L, Cocchia N, Paciello O, Montano C, Pasolini MP. Use of cytobrush for bacteriological and cytological diagnosis of endometritis in mares. Vet World 2024 Feb;17(2):398-406.
              doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2024.398-406pubmed: 38595673google scholar: lookup
            3. Mouncey R, Arango-Sabogal JC, Rathbone P, Scott CJ, de Mestre AM. Prevalence of Microbial Isolates Cultured from Endometrial Swab Samples Collected from United Kingdom Thoroughbred Mares from 2014 to 2020. Vet Sci 2024 Feb 9;11(2).
              doi: 10.3390/vetsci11020082pubmed: 38393100google scholar: lookup
            4. Li H, Yuan C, Wang H, Cui L, Liu K, Guo L, Li J, Dong J. The Effect of Selenium on Endometrial Repair in Goats with Endometritis at High Cortisol Levels. Biol Trace Elem Res 2024 Jun;202(6):2564-2576.
              doi: 10.1007/s12011-023-03866-ypubmed: 37814171google scholar: lookup
            5. Tukia E, Hallman I, Penttilä M, Hänninen S, Kareskoski M. RNA in situ hybridization of Escherichia coli in equine endometrial biopsies. Front Vet Sci 2023;10:1186051.
              doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1186051pubmed: 37360403google scholar: lookup
            6. Köhne M, Hofbauer L, Böttcher D, Tönissen A, Hegger A, Görgens A, Ulrich R, Sieme H. Comparison of systemic trimethoprim-sulfadimethoxine treatment and intrauterine ozone application as possible therapies for bacterial endometritis in equine practice. Front Vet Sci 2023;10:1102149.
              doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1102149pubmed: 36777673google scholar: lookup
            7. Díaz-Bertrana ML, Deleuze S, Pitti Rios L, Yeste M, Morales Fariña I, Rivera Del Alamo MM. Microbial Prevalence and Antimicrobial Sensitivity in Equine Endometritis in Field Conditions. Animals (Basel) 2021 May 20;11(5).
              doi: 10.3390/ani11051476pubmed: 34065566google scholar: lookup
            8. Weber KS, Wagener K, Blanco M, Bauersachs S, Bollwein H. A comparative analysis of the intrauterine transcriptome in fertile and subfertile mares using cytobrush sampling. BMC Genomics 2021 May 22;22(1):377.
              doi: 10.1186/s12864-021-07701-3pubmed: 34022808google scholar: lookup
            9. Martí A, Serrano A, Pastor J, Rigau T, Petkevičiuté U, Calvo MÀ, Arosemena EL, Yuste A, Prandi D, Aguilar A, Rivera Del Alamo MM. Endometrial Status in Queens Evaluated by Histopathology Findings and Two Cytological Techniques: Low-Volume Uterine Lavage and Uterine Swabbing. Animals (Basel) 2021 Jan 5;11(1).
              doi: 10.3390/ani11010088pubmed: 33466439google scholar: lookup
            10. Quartuccio M, Cristarella S, Medica P, Fazio E, Mazzullo G, Rifici C, Liotta L, Satué K. Endometrial Cytology During the Different Phases of the Estrous Cycle in Jennies: New Evidences. Animals (Basel) 2020 Jun 19;10(6).
              doi: 10.3390/ani10061062pubmed: 32575538google scholar: lookup
            11. Shao C, Wang H, Wang X, Jiang S, Sun J, Song H, Li J. Characterization of inflammatory responses by cervical cytology, cytokine expression and ultrastructure changes in a goat subclinical endometritis model. J Vet Med Sci 2017 Jan 24;79(1):197-205.
              doi: 10.1292/jvms.16-0096pubmed: 27746413google scholar: lookup
            12. Sikora M, Król J, Nowak M, Stefaniak T, Aubertsson G, Kozdrowski R. The usefulness of uterine lavage and acute phase protein levels as a diagnostic tool for subclinical endometritis in Icelandic mares. Acta Vet Scand 2016 Sep 7;58(1):50.
              doi: 10.1186/s13028-016-0233-4pubmed: 27604098google scholar: lookup
            13. Siemieniuch MJ, Szóstek AZ, Gajos K, Kozdrowski R, Nowak M, Okuda K. Type of Inflammation Differentially Affects Expression of Interleukin 1β and 6, Tumor Necrosis Factor-α and Toll-Like Receptors in Subclinical Endometritis in Mares. PLoS One 2016;11(5):e0154934.
              doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154934pubmed: 27152525google scholar: lookup
            Subscribe to our newsletter
            Join 99,780 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.