Analyze Diet
Tierarztliche Praxis. Ausgabe G, Grosstiere/Nutztiere2015; 43(5); 278-286; doi: 10.15653/TPG-150234

[Comparison of the findings of rectal examination and ultrasonographic findings in horses with colic].

Abstract: The examination of patients suffering from an acute abdomen routinely comprises both clinical and rectal examinations, and is ever more frequently accompanied by an ultrasonographic abdominal examination. The aim of the study was to compare the findings as defined through rectal examination with the results of the ultrasonographic examination for different forms of colic. Methods: In a retrospective study, the patient records of the Large Animal Clinic of the University of Leipzig from 2012 and 2013 were analysed, and those of horses suffering from colic were included. Diagnoses made through rectal and ultrasonographic examination were grouped and compared with the diagnoses made during colic surgery or pathologic examination, which served as the gold standard. Horses that underwent conservative treatment had a definitive diagnosis assigned only in cases where a pathognostic rectal finding defined the diagnosis. Based on these data, sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values were calculated for both techniques. Results: Ultrasonography was more sensitive than rectal examination in cases of small intestinal occlusion (97.1% vs. 50.7%), torsion of the large colon in the long axis (63.2% vs. 26.3%) and dislocation of the large colon into the nephrosplenic space (90.9% vs. 72.7%). Rectal examination was more sensitive than ultrasonographic examination in cases of other types of dislocation of the large colon (96.5% vs. 8.8%) and of constipations of the large colon (93.6% vs. 29.8%). Conclusions: In cases of severe diseases, including small intestinal occlusions and torsions of the large colon, ultrasonography helps to better identify and more precisely diagnose conditions that in most cases require abdominal surgery than rectal examination. Therefore, under hospital conditions, it is highly advisable to include ultrasonography in the routine examination of the equine acute abdomen. However, this technique does not replace the traditional rectal examination, which is superior in the diagnosis of dislocations and constipations of the large colon as well as diseases of the caecum.
Publication Date: 2015-09-14 PubMed ID: 26365481DOI: 10.15653/TPG-150234Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • English Abstract
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research study compares the effectiveness of rectal examinations and ultrasonographic examinations in diagnosing different forms of colic in horses, concluding that while ultrasonography more accurately identifies severe conditions, the traditional rectal examination remains superior in diagnosing certain issues.

Objective of the Research

  • The researchers aimed to compare and contrast the efficacy of rectal examinations and ultrasonographic examinations in diagnosing different forms of colic in horses. This was assessed by evaluating their sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values.

Methods

  • The patients records from Large Animal Clinic of the University of Leipzig from 2012 and 2013 were used in a retrospective study, focusing specifically on horses diagnosed with colic.
  • Diagnoses made through both rectal and ultrasonographic examination were grouped and compared with diagnoses based on colic surgery or pathologic examination – the latter being considered the gold standard.
  • In cases where the horses underwent conservative treatment, a definitive diagnosis was assigned only if a pathognostic rectal examination could confidently determine the diagnosis.

Results

  • Ultrasonography proved more sensitive than rectal examination in diagnosing small intestinal occlusion, torsion of the large colon in the long axis, and dislocation of the large colon into the nephrosplenic space.
  • Conversely, rectal examination was more sensitive than ultrasonographic examination in diagnosing other types of dislocation of the large colon and constipations of the large colon.

Conclusions

  • In severe cases such as small intestinal occlusions and torsions of the large colon which commonly require abdominal surgery, ultrasonography provided a more accurate and precise diagnosis than rectal examination.
  • However, traditional rectal examination remains indispensable as it is superior in diagnosing dislocations and constipations of the large colon as well as diseases of the caecum.
  • The study concluded that under hospital conditions, including ultrasonography in the routine examination of the equine acute abdomen is highly advisable. Nonetheless, it is not meant to replace the traditional rectal examination.

Cite This Article

APA
Scharner D, Bankert J, Brehm W. (2015). [Comparison of the findings of rectal examination and ultrasonographic findings in horses with colic]. Tierarztl Prax Ausg G Grosstiere Nutztiere, 43(5), 278-286. https://doi.org/10.15653/TPG-150234

Publication

ISSN: 2567-5834
NlmUniqueID: 9715779
Country: Germany
Language: ger
Volume: 43
Issue: 5
Pages: 278-286

Researcher Affiliations

Scharner, D
  • PD Dr. Doreen Scharner, Chirurgische Tierklinik, Veterinärmedizinische Fakultät der Universität Leipzig, An den Tierkliniken 21, 04103 Leipzig, E-Mail: scharner@vetmed.uni-leipzig.de.
Bankert, J
    Brehm, W

      MeSH Terms

      • Abdomen, Acute / veterinary
      • Animals
      • Colic / diagnosis
      • Colic / physiopathology
      • Colic / veterinary
      • Digital Rectal Examination / veterinary
      • Horse Diseases / diagnosis
      • Horse Diseases / physiopathology
      • Horses
      • Retrospective Studies

      Citations

      This article has been cited 0 times.