FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / BMC Vet Res / Comparison of three different methods for the quantification...
BMC veterinary research2016; 12(1); 196; doi: 10.1186/s12917-016-0828-z

Comparison of three different methods for the quantification of equine insulin.

Abstract: Exact analysis of equine insulin in blood samples is the key element for assessing insulin resistance or insulin dysregulation in horses. However, previous studies indicated marked differences in insulin concentrations obtained from sample analyses with different immunoassays. Most assays used in veterinary medicine are originally designed for use in human diagnostics and are based on antibodies directed against human insulin, although amino acid sequences between equine and human insulin differ. Species-specific assays are being used more frequently and seem to provide advantages compared to human-specific assays. The aim of this study was to compare three immunoassays, one porcine-specific insulin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), advertised to be specific for equine insulin, one porcine-specific insulin radioimmunoassay (RIA) and one human-specific insulin chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA), all three widely used in veterinary laboratories for the analysis of equine insulin. Furthermore, we tested their clinical applicability in assessing insulin resistance and dysregulation by analysis of basal blood and blood samples obtained during a dynamic diagnostic stimulation test (OGT) with elevated insulin concentrations. Results: Insulin values obtained from the ELISA, RIA and CLIA, investigated for analyses of basal blood samples differed significantly between all three assays. Analyses of samples obtained during dynamic diagnostic stimulation testing with consecutively higher insulin concentrations revealed significantly (p < 0.001) lower insulin concentrations supplied by the CLIA compared to the ELISA. However, values measured by ELISA were intermediate and not different to those measured by RIA. Calculated recovery upon dilution, as a marker for assay accuracy in diluted samples, was 98 ± 4 % for ELISA, 160 ± 41 % for RIA and 101 ± 11 % for CLIA. Conclusions: Our results indicate that insulin concentrations of one sample measured by different methods vary greatly and should be interpreted carefully. Consideration of the immunoassay method and reliable assay-specific reference ranges are of particular importance especially in clinical cases where small changes in insulin levels can cause false classification in terms of insulin sensitivity of horses and ponies.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2016-09-09 PubMed ID: 27613127PubMed Central: PMC5016943DOI: 10.1186/s12917-016-0828-zGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research investigates the accuracy of three widely used immunoassays for analyzing equine insulin levels to diagnose insulin resistance and dysregulation. Results indicate considerable variances in insulin concentrations measured by these methods, suggesting the need to carefully interpret findings and consider assay method and reliable assay-specific reference ranges.

Objective

This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of three commonly used immunoassays in determining equine insulin levels in blood samples. Correct analysis of equine insulin concentrations is crucial for diagnosing insulin resistance or dysregulation in horses.

Methods

The three immunoassays evaluated were:

  • A porcine-specific insulin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), marketed as being specific for equine insulin.
  • A porcine-specific insulin radioimmunoassay (RIA).
  • A human-specific insulin chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA).

Each assay’s clinical applicability in assessing insulin resistance and dysregulation was tested through analysis of basal blood and blood samples taken during a dynamic diagnostic stimulation test (OGT) with elevated insulin levels.

Results

Significant differences were noted in insulin values obtained from the analysis of basal blood samples across the three assays. The CLIA method resulted in significantly lower insulin concentrations than ELISA when samples taken during the dynamic diagnostic stimulation testing revealed consecutively higher insulin levels. However, values measured by ELISA were not notably different from those measured by RIA.

In terms of assay accuracy in diluted samples (measured by calculated recovery upon dilution), ELISA showed 98 ± 4 %, RIA 160 ± 41 %, and CLIA 101 ± 11 % accuracy.

Conclusions

The study concluded that the insulin concentrations for a single sample measured by different methods can greatly differ. As such, results should be interpreted carefully, considering the immunoassay method used and reliable assay-specific reference ranges. This careful interpretation becomes especially crucial in clinical cases where minor changes in insulin levels can cause the misclassification of horses and ponies in terms of insulin sensitivity.

Cite This Article

APA
Warnken T, Huber K, Feige K. (2016). Comparison of three different methods for the quantification of equine insulin. BMC Vet Res, 12(1), 196. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-016-0828-z

Publication

BMC veterinary research
ISSN: 1746-6148
NlmUniqueID: 101249759
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 12
Issue: 1
Pages: 196
PII: 196

Researcher Affiliations

Warnken, T
  • Department of Physiology, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Bischofsholer Damm 15, 30173, Hannover, Germany. tobias.warnken@tiho-hannover.de.
  • Clinic for Horses, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Bünteweg 9, 30559, Hannover, Germany. tobias.warnken@tiho-hannover.de.
Huber, K
  • Institute of Animal Science, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Hohenheim, Fruwirthstraße 35, 70593, Stuttgart, Germany.
Feige, K
  • Clinic for Horses, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Bünteweg 9, 30559, Hannover, Germany.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay / methods
  • Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay / veterinary
  • Horses / blood
  • Horses / metabolism
  • Insulin / blood
  • Luminescent Measurements / methods
  • Luminescent Measurements / veterinary
  • Radioimmunoassay / methods
  • Radioimmunoassay / veterinary
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Sensitivity and Specificity

References

This article includes 25 references
  1. Schuver A, Frank N, Chameroy KA, Elliott SB. Assessment of insulin and glucose dynamics by using an oral sugar test in horses. J Equine Vet Sci 2014;34:465–470.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2013.09.006google scholar: lookup
  2. Ralston SL. Insulin and glucose regulation.. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 2002 Aug;18(2):295-304, vii.
    doi: 10.1016/S0749-0739(02)00014-7pubmed: 15635909google scholar: lookup
  3. Eiler H, Frank N, Andrews FM, Oliver JW, Fecteau KA. Physiologic assessment of blood glucose homeostasis via combined intravenous glucose and insulin testing in horses.. Am J Vet Res 2005 Sep;66(9):1598-604.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.2005.66.1598pubmed: 16261835google scholar: lookup
  4. Rijnen KE, van der Kolk JH. Determination of reference range values indicative of glucose metabolism and insulin resistance by use of glucose clamp techniques in horses and ponies.. Am J Vet Res 2003 Oct;64(10):1260-4.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.2003.64.1260pubmed: 14596464google scholar: lookup
  5. Frank N, Tadros EM. Insulin dysregulation.. Equine Vet J 2014 Jan;46(1):103-12.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12169pubmed: 24033478google scholar: lookup
  6. Tinworth KD, Wynn PC, Boston RC, Harris PA, Sillence MN, Thevis M, Thomas A, Noble GK. Evaluation of commercially available assays for the measurement of equine insulin.. Domest Anim Endocrinol 2011 Aug;41(2):81-90.
    doi: 10.1016/j.domaniend.2011.05.001pubmed: 21741576google scholar: lookup
  7. Banse HE, McCann J, Yang F, Wagg C, McFarlane D. Comparison of two methods for measurement of equine insulin.. J Vet Diagn Invest 2014 Jul;26(4):527-530.
    doi: 10.1177/1040638714536560pubmed: 24928598google scholar: lookup
  8. Öberg J, Bröjer J, Wattle O, Lilliehöök I. Evaluation of an equine-optimized enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for serum insulin measurement and stability study of equine serum insulin. Comp Clin Path 2011;21:1291–1300.
    doi: 10.1007/s00580-011-1284-6google scholar: lookup
  9. Bröjer JT, Nostell KE, Essén-Gustavsson B, Hedenström UO. Effect of repeated oral administration of glucose and leucine immediately after exercise on plasma insulin concentration and glycogen synthesis in horses.. Am J Vet Res 2012 Jun;73(6):867-74.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.73.6.867pubmed: 22620702google scholar: lookup
  10. Brunner J, Wichert B, Burger D, von Peinen K, Liesegang A. A survey on the feeding of eventing horses during competition.. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl) 2012 Oct;96(5):878-84.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0396.2012.01324.xpubmed: 22809115google scholar: lookup
  11. Frank N, Elliott SB, Brandt LE, Keisler DH. Physical characteristics, blood hormone concentrations, and plasma lipid concentrations in obese horses with insulin resistance.. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2006 May 1;228(9):1383-90.
    doi: 10.2460/javma.228.9.1383pubmed: 16649943google scholar: lookup
  12. Frank N, Geor RJ, Bailey SR, Durham AE, Johnson PJ. Equine metabolic syndrome.. J Vet Intern Med 2010 May-Jun;24(3):467-75.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1939-1676.2010.0503.xpubmed: 20384947google scholar: lookup
  13. Borer-Weir KE, Bailey SR, Menzies-Gow NJ, Harris PA, Elliott J. Evaluation of a commercially available radioimmunoassay and species-specific ELISAs for measurement of high concentrations of insulin in equine serum.. Am J Vet Res 2012 Oct;73(10):1596-602.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.73.10.1596pubmed: 23013186google scholar: lookup
  14. . Guideline on bioanalytical method validation. 2011.
  15. Livesey JH, Hodgkinson SC, Roud HR, Donald RA. Effect of time, temperature and freezing on the stability of immunoreactive LH, FSH, TSH, growth hormone, prolactin and insulin in plasma.. Clin Biochem 1980 Aug;13(4):151-5.
    doi: 10.1016/S0009-9120(80)91040-1pubmed: 6778631google scholar: lookup
  16. Mechanic L, Mendez A, Merrill L, Rogers J, Layton M, Todd D, Varanasi A, O'Brien B, Meyer Iii WA, Zhang M, Schleicher RL, Moye J. Planned variation in preanalytical conditions to evaluate biospecimen stability in the National Children's Study (NCS).. Clin Chem Lab Med 2013 Dec;51(12):2287-94.
    doi: 10.1515/cclm-2013-0454pmc: PMC4100775pubmed: 23924524google scholar: lookup
  17. Reimers TJ, McCann JP, Cowan RG, Concannon PW. Effects of storage, hemolysis, and freezing and thawing on concentrations of thyroxine, cortisol, and insulin in blood samples.. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 1982 Sep;170(4):509-16.
    doi: 10.3181/00379727-170-41466pubmed: 6812063google scholar: lookup
  18. Nostell KE, Essén-Gustavsson B, Bröjer JT. Repeated post-exercise administration with a mixture of leucine and glucose alters the plasma amino acid profile in Standardbred trotters.. Acta Vet Scand 2012 Feb 1;54(1):7.
    doi: 10.1186/1751-0147-54-7pmc: PMC3292998pubmed: 22296999google scholar: lookup
  19. Bröjer J, Lindåse S, Hedenskog J, Alvarsson K, Nostell K. Repeatability of the combined glucose-insulin tolerance test and the effect of a stressor before testing in horses of 2 breeds.. J Vet Intern Med 2013 Nov-Dec;27(6):1543-50.
    doi: 10.1111/jvim.12172pubmed: 24033635google scholar: lookup
  20. Vølund A. Conversion of insulin units to SI units.. Am J Clin Nutr 1993 Nov;58(5):714-5.
    pubmed: 8237884doi: 10.1093/ajcn/58.5.714google scholar: lookup
  21. . Technical Note No: 34–0128. How to compare insulin values between mU/L and μg/L when using Mercodia Insulin ELISAs (Version 1.0). .
  22. Ho EN, Wan TS, Wong AS, Lam KK, Stewart BD. Doping control analysis of insulin and its analogues in equine plasma by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.. J Chromatogr A 2008 Aug 8;1201(2):183-90.
    doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2008.04.060pubmed: 18501368google scholar: lookup
  23. Kuuranne T, Thomas A, Leinonen A, Delahaut P, Bosseloir A, Schänzer W, Thevis M. Insulins in equine urine: qualitative analysis by immunoaffinity purification and liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry for doping control purposes in horse-racing.. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 2008;22(3):355-62.
    doi: 10.1002/rcm.3360pubmed: 18181226google scholar: lookup
  24. Conlon JM. Evolution of the insulin molecule: insights into structure-activity and phylogenetic relationships.. Peptides 2001 Jul;22(7):1183-93.
    doi: 10.1016/S0196-9781(01)00423-5pubmed: 11445250google scholar: lookup
  25. Treiber KH, Kronfeld DS, Hess TM, Boston RC, Harris PA. Use of proxies and reference quintiles obtained from minimal model analysis for determination of insulin sensitivity and pancreatic beta-cell responsiveness in horses.. Am J Vet Res 2005 Dec;66(12):2114-21.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.2005.66.2114pubmed: 16379656google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 24 times.
  1. Delarocque J, Feige K, Carslake HB, Durham AE, Fey K, Warnken T. Development of a Web App to Convert Blood Insulin Concentrations among Various Immunoassays Used in Horses.. Animals (Basel) 2023 Aug 24;13(17).
    doi: 10.3390/ani13172704pubmed: 37684968google scholar: lookup
  2. Clark BL, Bamford NJ, Stewart AJ, McCue ME, Rendahl A, Bailey SR, Bertin FR, Norton EM. Evaluation of an HMGA2 variant contribution to height and basal insulin concentrations in ponies.. J Vet Intern Med 2023 May-Jun;37(3):1186-1192.
    doi: 10.1111/jvim.16723pubmed: 37148171google scholar: lookup
  3. Go YY, Hazard NW, Balasuriya UBR, Chapman AM, Fitton NS, Kenéz Á, Andrews FM. Clinical evaluation of the Immulite® 1000 chemiluminescent immunoassay for measurement of equine serum insulin.. Front Vet Sci 2023;10:1018230.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1018230pubmed: 37051514google scholar: lookup
  4. Warnken T, Schaub C, Delarocque J, Frers F, Feige K, Sonntag J, Reiche DB. Palatability, glycemic, and insulinemic responses to various carbohydrate formulations: Alternatives for the diagnosis of insulin dysregulation in horses?. J Vet Intern Med 2023 Jan;37(1):282-291.
    doi: 10.1111/jvim.16614pubmed: 36625459google scholar: lookup
  5. de Laat MA, Warnken T, Delarocque J, Reiche DB, Grob AJ, Feige K, Carslake HB, Durham AE, Sillence MN, Thane KE, Frank N, Brojer J, Lindase S, Sonntag J. Carbohydrate pellets to assess insulin dysregulation in horses.. J Vet Intern Med 2023 Jan;37(1):302-314.
    doi: 10.1111/jvim.16621pubmed: 36583553google scholar: lookup
  6. Berryhill EH, Urbina NS, Marton S, Vernau W, Alonso FH. Validation and method comparison for a point-of-care lateral flow assay measuring equine whole blood insulin concentrations.. J Vet Diagn Invest 2023 Mar;35(2):124-131.
    doi: 10.1177/10406387221142288pubmed: 36482705google scholar: lookup
  7. Williams NJ, Furr M, Navas de Solis C, Campolo A, Davis M, Lacombe VA. Investigating the Relationship Between Cardiac Function and Insulin Sensitivity in Horses: A Pilot Study.. Front Vet Sci 2022;9:899951.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.899951pubmed: 35873691google scholar: lookup
  8. Rosli N, Kwon HJ, Lim J, Yoon YA, Jeong JS. Measurement comparability of insulin assays using conventional immunoassay kits.. J Clin Lab Anal 2022 Jul;36(7):e24521.
    doi: 10.1002/jcla.24521pubmed: 35622611google scholar: lookup
  9. Lange TM, Rotärmel M, Müller D, Mahone GS, Kopisch-Obuch F, Keunecke H, Schmitt AO. Non-linear transformation of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) measurements allows usage of linear models for data analysis.. Virol J 2022 May 18;19(1):85.
    doi: 10.1186/s12985-022-01804-3pubmed: 35585588google scholar: lookup
  10. Kinsella HM, Hostnik LD, Snyder HA, Mazur SE, Kamr AM, Burns TA, Mossbarger JC, Toribio RE. Comparison of insulin sensitivity between healthy neonatal foals and horses using minimal model analysis.. PLoS One 2022;17(1):e0262584.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262584pubmed: 35030228google scholar: lookup
  11. Fuentes-Romero B, Muñoz-Prieto A, Cerón JJ, Martín-Cuervo M, Iglesias-García M, Aguilera-Tejero E, Díez-Castro E. Measurement of Plasma Resistin Concentrations in Horses with Metabolic and Inflammatory Disorders.. Animals (Basel) 2021 Dec 30;12(1).
    doi: 10.3390/ani12010077pubmed: 35011183google scholar: lookup
  12. Dunkel B, Knowles EJ, Chang YM, Menzies-Gow NJ. Influence of endocrine disease on l-lactate concentrations in blood of ponies.. J Vet Intern Med 2021 May;35(3):1582-1588.
    doi: 10.1111/jvim.16079pubmed: 34043845google scholar: lookup
  13. Lindåse S, Nostell K, Bergsten P, Forslund A, Bröjer J. Evaluation of fasting plasma insulin and proxy measurements to assess insulin sensitivity in horses.. BMC Vet Res 2021 Feb 15;17(1):78.
    doi: 10.1186/s12917-021-02781-5pubmed: 33588833google scholar: lookup
  14. Delarocque J, Reiche DB, Meier AD, Warnken T, Feige K, Sillence MN. Metabolic profile distinguishes laminitis-susceptible and -resistant ponies before and after feeding a high sugar diet.. BMC Vet Res 2021 Jan 28;17(1):56.
    doi: 10.1186/s12917-021-02763-7pubmed: 33509165google scholar: lookup
  15. Sourg HAA, Ahmed ABM, Elhakeem RF, Lutfi MF. Indicators of metabolic syndrome in normotensive normoglycemic asthmatic patients.. J Clin Transl Res 2020 Jul 16;6(1):27-35.
    pubmed: 33330745
  16. Delarocque J, Frers F, Huber K, Feige K, Warnken T. Weight loss is linearly associated with a reduction of the insulin response to an oral glucose test in Icelandic horses.. BMC Vet Res 2020 May 24;16(1):151.
    doi: 10.1186/s12917-020-02356-wpubmed: 32448298google scholar: lookup
  17. Kritchevsky JE, Muir GS, Leschke DHZ, Hodgson JK, Hess EK, Bertin FR. Blood glucose and insulin concentrations after alpha-2-agonists administration in horses with and without insulin dysregulation.. J Vet Intern Med 2020 Mar;34(2):902-908.
    doi: 10.1111/jvim.15747pubmed: 32100334google scholar: lookup
  18. Leschke DH, Muir GS, Hodgson JK, Coyle M, Horn R, Bertin FR. Immunoreactive insulin stability in horses at risk of insulin dysregulation.. J Vet Intern Med 2019 Nov;33(6):2746-2751.
    doi: 10.1111/jvim.15629pubmed: 31617618google scholar: lookup
  19. de Laat MA, Reiche DB, Sillence MN, McGree JM. Incidence and risk factors for recurrence of endocrinopathic laminitis in horses.. J Vet Intern Med 2019 May;33(3):1473-1482.
    doi: 10.1111/jvim.15497pubmed: 30972832google scholar: lookup
  20. Meier A, de Laat M, Reiche D, Fitzgerald D, Sillence M. The efficacy and safety of velagliflozin over 16 weeks as a treatment for insulin dysregulation in ponies.. BMC Vet Res 2019 Feb 26;15(1):65.
    doi: 10.1186/s12917-019-1811-2pubmed: 30808423google scholar: lookup
  21. Durham AE, Frank N, McGowan CM, Menzies-Gow NJ, Roelfsema E, Vervuert I, Feige K, Fey K. ECEIM consensus statement on equine metabolic syndrome.. J Vet Intern Med 2019 Mar;33(2):335-349.
    doi: 10.1111/jvim.15423pubmed: 30724412google scholar: lookup
  22. Glucs ZE, Smith DR, Tubbs CW, Jones Scherbinski J, Welch A, Burnett J, Clark M, Eng C, Finkelstein ME. Glucocorticoid measurement in plasma, urates, and feathers from California condors (Gymnogyps californianus) in response to a human-induced stressor.. PLoS One 2018;13(10):e0205565.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205565pubmed: 30352070google scholar: lookup
  23. Kenéz Á, Warnken T, Feige K, Huber K. Lower plasma trans-4-hydroxyproline and methionine sulfoxide levels are associated with insulin dysregulation in horses.. BMC Vet Res 2018 May 2;14(1):146.
    doi: 10.1186/s12917-018-1479-zpubmed: 29716602google scholar: lookup
  24. Warnken T, Delarocque J, Schumacher S, Huber K, Feige K. Retrospective analysis of insulin responses to standard dosed oral glucose tests (OGTs) via naso-gastric tubing towards definition of an objective cut-off value.. Acta Vet Scand 2018 Jan 19;60(1):4.
    doi: 10.1186/s13028-018-0358-8pubmed: 29351765google scholar: lookup
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,344 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.