Comparison of ultrasound-guided vs. ‘blind’ techniques for intra-synovial injections of the shoulder area in horses: scapulohumeral joint, bicipital and infraspinatus bursae.
Abstract: Diagnosis and treatment of pathologies involving synovial structures in the shoulder region are technically difficult. Ultrasound-guided (UG) injection techniques have been shown to be highly accurate, safe and reliable for various structures in human and equine patients. Objective: To develop easy-to-use and reliable UG injection techniques for the infraspinatus bursa (IB), bicipital bursa (BB) and scapulohumeral joint (SHJ) and to compare them with conventional 'blind' methods. Methods: Eight pairs of equine shoulders were positioned on a computed-tomography (CT) table with left and right shoulders randomly assigned to Operator A (UG) and Operator B ('blind'). Contrast medium mixed with methylene blue was injected into the target structures. Time and number of attempts for correct needle placement and ease of injection were recorded. A CT scan of each shoulder was performed after every injection to evaluate the location of contrast material. Once injections and CT scans were completed, anatomic dissections were conducted. Statistical analysis was used to compare UG and 'blind' techniques with significance set at P<0.05. Results: Intra-synovial injections using UG techniques were successful in all 24 synovial structures compared with 14/24 with conventional methods. The median number and range of needle repositioning to obtain accurate needle placement was 1 (1-2) for UG and 2 (1-4) for the 'blind' techniques. The median time and range required for accurate needle placement was 75.5 s (32-210 s) for UG and 43.5 s (11-140) for 'blind' technique. In 31% of all attempts, ease of injection was not indicative of successful intra-synovial administration. Conclusions: Ultrasound-guided injections of IB, BB and SHJ proved to be highly reliable and more accurate than conventional 'blind' techniques. Conclusions: Ultrasound-guided injection techniques may be of great help for equine practitioners in the diagnosis and treatment of pathologies involving synovial structures in the shoulder region. Further work is needed to confirm these results in clinical cases.
© 2012 EVJ Ltd.
Publication Date: 2012-02-15 PubMed ID: 22332644DOI: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2011.00540.xGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
- Journal Article
- Randomized Controlled Trial
- Research Support
- Non-U.S. Gov't
Summary
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
The research investigates the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided injection techniques for treating shoulder-related pathologies in horses. It finds that these techniques prove more accurate, safe, and reliable than conventional ‘blind’ methods, and may be particularly useful for practitioners treating synovial structure pathologies.
Overview of the Study
- The study focused on developing reliable and user-friendly ultrasound-guided (UG) injection techniques for the infraspinatus bursa (IB), bicipital bursa (BB), and the scapulohumeral joint (SHJ).
- The researchers tested these UG techniques and compared them to conventional ‘blind’ methods involving the injection of a contrast medium mixed with methylene blue into the target structures.
- The experiment involved the use of eight pairs of equine shoulders, which were assigned randomly to either one of the two methods – UG or ‘blind’.
- The number of attempts for correct needle placement, the time it took to achieve this, and the ease of injection were all recorded for analysis.
Testing Process
- Post-injection, the shoulders were scanned using computed-tomography (CT) to evaluate the correct placement of the contrast material.
- Once the injections and CT scans were completed, anatomical dissections were conducted to further verify the accuracy of the injections.
- The data was then analyzed statistically, comparing the results from both UG and ‘blind’ techniques.
Key Findings
- The successful injection rates of UG techniques into all 24 synovial structures were found to be higher, compared to 14 out of 24 using conventional or ‘blind’ methods.
- The needle repositioning count and the time required for accurate needle placement were both lower with the UG method than with the ‘blind’ technique.
- Unexpectedly, in 31% of all attempts, the ease of injection did not correlate with the success of intra-synovial administration.
Implications and Future Work
- This study highlights the advantages of using Ultrasound-guided injections for treating pathologies related to synovial structures in horses’ shoulders.
- However, further research is recommended to confirm these results in clinical cases.
Cite This Article
APA
Schneeweiss W, Puggioni A, David F.
(2012).
Comparison of ultrasound-guided vs. ‘blind’ techniques for intra-synovial injections of the shoulder area in horses: scapulohumeral joint, bicipital and infraspinatus bursae.
Equine Vet J, 44(6), 674-678.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-3306.2011.00540.x Publication
Researcher Affiliations
- University Veterinary Hospital, School of Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland. wilfried.schneeweiss@ucd.ie
MeSH Terms
- Animals
- Cadaver
- Contrast Media / administration & dosage
- Female
- Forelimb
- Horses
- Injections, Intra-Articular / methods
- Injections, Intra-Articular / veterinary
- Male
- Methylene Blue
- Ultrasonography / veterinary
Citations
This article has been cited 4 times.Use Nutrition Calculator
Check if your horse's diet meets their nutrition requirements with our easy-to-use tool Check your horse's diet with our easy-to-use tool
Talk to a Nutritionist
Discuss your horse's feeding plan with our experts over a free phone consultation Discuss your horse's diet over a phone consultation
Submit Diet Evaluation
Get a customized feeding plan for your horse formulated by our equine nutritionists Get a custom feeding plan formulated by our nutritionists