FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Vet Res Commun / Composition and diversity of 16S rRNA based skin bacterial m...
Veterinary research communications2024; 48(4); 2847-2855; doi: 10.1007/s11259-024-10444-7

Composition and diversity of 16S rRNA based skin bacterial microbiome in healthy horses.

Abstract: Characterization of microbiota structure on the skin of healthy horses is important for further development of modulation strategies to ensure optimal bacterial composition for physiological processes. This requirement is also supported by the relatively high incidence of dermatological diseases in horses and thus the need to manage them therapeutically. The taxonomic analysis of skin samples (n = 30) from five different body parts of clinically healthy Shetlands ponies females (neck, back, abdomen, pastern, muzzle) kept under homogeneous conditions (in open stalls with paddock, feed with dry hay, green grass ad libitum and granulated feed) was performed using amplification of V3-V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene. Results indicate that bacteria associated with healthy equine skin represent 18 phyla, 29 classes and 119 families. The most abundant phyla were Proteobacteria (30.8 ± 9.1%) followed by Actinobacteriota (20.4 ± 7.6%), Firmicutes (19.5 ± 10.1%), Bacteroidota (8.5 ± 5.0%) and Deinococcota (7.2 ± 14.8%). Among 229 genera identified, Corynebacterium (7.4 ± 6.5%) was the most abundant genus in skin sites of horses, followed by Deinococcus (7.1 ± 14.9%) and Macrococcus (5.0 ± 8.2%). Indices for the richness and diversity of species within bacterial populations for five regions of horses skin revealed no significant variations observed for species richness (Chao1, p-value 0.2001) but significant result for species evenness (Shannon, p-value 0.0049) with maximum on the neck and minimum on the back skin site. The clustering was seen across samples from different skin sites but also across samples collected from individual horses.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2024-06-20 PubMed ID: 38900396PubMed Central: PMC11315781DOI: 10.1007/s11259-024-10444-7Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Overview

  • This study analyzed the composition and diversity of bacterial communities on the skin of healthy Shetland ponies using 16S rRNA gene sequencing to better understand their microbiome and inform strategies for managing equine skin health.

Introduction and Importance

  • The skin microbiome plays a vital role in maintaining physiological processes and skin health in horses.
  • Characterizing the microbiota on healthy horse skin helps in developing modulation strategies to maintain or restore an optimal bacterial balance.
  • Understanding the normal bacterial population is crucial because horses often suffer from dermatological diseases that require therapeutic intervention.

Materials and Methods

  • Sample Collection: Skin swab samples (n=30) were collected from five body sites on clinically healthy female Shetland ponies: neck, back, abdomen, pastern, and muzzle.
  • Environmental Conditions: Horses were kept under uniform conditions – open stalls with paddocks, fed dry hay, green grass available freely, plus granulated feed.
  • DNA Sequencing: The V3-V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene was amplified to profile the bacterial communities present on the skin samples.

Results: Taxonomic Composition

  • The study identified bacteria representing 18 phyla, 29 classes, and 119 families, indicating a diverse microbial community.
  • The most abundant bacterial phyla on healthy equine skin were:
    • Proteobacteria (~30.8% ± 9.1%)
    • Actinobacteriota (~20.4% ± 7.6%)
    • Firmicutes (~19.5% ±10.1%)
    • Bacteroidota (~8.5% ± 5.0%)
    • Deinococcota (~7.2% ± 14.8%)
  • At the genus level (229 genera identified), the most abundant were:
    • Corynebacterium (7.4% ± 6.5%)
    • Deinococcus (7.1% ± 14.9%)
    • Macrococcus (5.0% ± 8.2%)

Results: Diversity Indices

  • The study measured species richness and species evenness for bacterial populations on the five skin regions.
  • Species richness (using Chao1 index):
    • No significant differences were found between the different body sites (p = 0.2001).
    • This suggests a similar total number of bacterial species across skin sites.
  • Species evenness (using Shannon index):
    • Significant differences were observed (p = 0.0049) indicating that the relative abundance of species varies between sites.
    • The neck had the highest species evenness, indicating a more balanced microbial community.
    • The back had the lowest species evenness, indicating dominance by fewer species.

Results: Community Clustering

  • Bacterial communities clustered not only by sampling site but also by individual horse, reflecting both site-specific and host-specific microbial signatures.
  • This implies that both the microenvironment of the skin site and individual host factors influence microbiome composition.

Conclusions and Implications

  • The skin of healthy horses harbors a diverse bacterial community, dominated by specific phyla and genera.
  • Understanding these communities provides a baseline for comparing diseased or disturbed skin microbiomes in horses.
  • Differences in species evenness across skin sites suggest certain areas may be more vulnerable to microbial imbalance or infection.
  • The findings support the potential for targeted microbiome modulation or therapeutic strategies to promote skin health and prevent dermatological issues in horses.
  • The study emphasizes the importance of considering both anatomical location and individual variation when examining the equine skin microbiome.

Cite This Article

APA
Strompfová V, Štempelová L. (2024). Composition and diversity of 16S rRNA based skin bacterial microbiome in healthy horses. Vet Res Commun, 48(4), 2847-2855. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11259-024-10444-7

Publication

Veterinary research communications
ISSN: 1573-7446
NlmUniqueID: 8100520
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 48
Issue: 4
Pages: 2847-2855

Researcher Affiliations

Strompfová, Viola
  • Centre of Biosciences of the Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Animal Physiology, Šoltésovej 4-6, 040 01, Košice, Slovakia. strompfv@saske.sk.
Štempelová, Lucia
  • Centre of Biosciences of the Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Animal Physiology, Šoltésovej 4-6, 040 01, Košice, Slovakia.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Horses / microbiology
  • RNA, Ribosomal, 16S / genetics
  • Skin / microbiology
  • Microbiota
  • Female
  • Bacteria / classification
  • Bacteria / genetics
  • Bacteria / isolation & purification
  • RNA, Bacterial / analysis
  • RNA, Bacterial / genetics

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

References

This article includes 37 references
  1. Battista JR, Earl AM, Park MJ. Why is Deinococcus radiodurans so resistant to ionizing radiation?. Trends Microbiol 7:362–365.
    doi: 10.1016/S0966-842X(99)01566-8pubmed: 10470044google scholar: lookup
  2. Belkaid Y, Segre JA. Dialogue between skin microbiota and imunity. Science 346:954–959.
    doi: 10.1126/science.1260144pubmed: 25414304google scholar: lookup
  3. Bernard KA, Funke G. Corynebacterium. Bohn Wiley & Sons, Inc. Bergey´s Manual of Systematics of Archae and Bacteria .
    doi: 10.1002/9781118960608.gbm00026google scholar: lookup
  4. Byrd AL, Belkaid Y, Segre JA. The human skin microbiome. Nat Rev Microbiol 16:143–155.
    doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2017.157pubmed: 29332945google scholar: lookup
  5. Callahan BJ, McMurdie PJ, Rosen MJ, Han AW, Johnson AJA, Holmes SP. DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat Methods 13:581–583.
    doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3869pmc: PMC4927377pubmed: 27214047google scholar: lookup
  6. Carroll LM, Pierneef R, Mafuna T, Magwedere K, Matle I. Genus-wide genomic characterization of : insights into evolution, population structure, and functional potential. Front Microbiol 14.
    pmc: PMC10400458pubmed: 37547688doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1181376google scholar: lookup
  7. Chong J, Liu P, Zhou G, Wia J. Using microbiome analyst for comprehensive statistical, functional, and meta-analysis of microbiome data. Nat Protoc 15:799–821.
    doi: 10.1038/s41596-019-0264-1pubmed: 31942082google scholar: lookup
  8. Cosseau C, Romano-Bertrand S, Duplan H, Lucas O, Ingrassia I, Pigasse C, Roques C, Jumas-Bilak E. Proteobacteria from the human skin microbiota: Species-level diversity and hypotheses. One Health 2:33–41.
    doi: 10.1016/j.onehlt.2016.02.002pmc: PMC5441325pubmed: 28616476google scholar: lookup
  9. Costello EK, Lauber CL, Hamady M, Fierer N, Gordon JI, Knight R. Bacterial community variation in human body habitats across space and time. Science 326:1694–1697.
    doi: 10.1126/science.1177486pmc: PMC3602444pubmed: 19892944google scholar: lookup
  10. Cundell AM. Microbial ecology of the human skin. Microb Ecol 76:113–120.
    doi: 10.1007/s00248-016-0789-6pubmed: 27245597google scholar: lookup
  11. Cuscó A, Belanger JM, Gershony L, Islas-Trejo A, Levy K, Medrano JF, Sánchez A, Oberbauer AM, Francino O. Individual signatures and environmental factors shape skin microbiota in healthy dogs. Microbiome 5:139.
    doi: 10.1186/s40168-017-0355-6pmc: PMC5640918pubmed: 29029635google scholar: lookup
  12. Fadrosh DW, Ma B, Gajer P, Sengamalay N, Ott S, Brotman RM, Ravel J. An improved dual-indexing approach for multiplexed 16S rRNA gene sequencing on the Illumina MiSeq platform. Microbiome 2:6.
    doi: 10.1186/2049-2618-2-6pmc: PMC3940169pubmed: 24558975google scholar: lookup
  13. Gallo RL, Nakatsuji T. Microbial symbiosis with the innate immune defense system of the skin. J Invest Dermatol 131:1974–1980.
    doi: 10.1038/jid.2011.182pmc: PMC3174284pubmed: 21697881google scholar: lookup
  14. Grice EA, Segre JA. The skin microbiome. Nat Rev Microbiol 9:244–253.
    doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2537pmc: PMC3535073pubmed: 21407241google scholar: lookup
  15. Grice EA, Kong HH, Renaud G, Young AC, Bouffard GG, Blakesley RW, Wolfsberg TG, Turner ML, Segre JA. A diversity profile of the human skin microbiota. Genome Res 18:1043–1050.
    doi: 10.1101/gr.075549.107pmc: PMC2493393pubmed: 18502944google scholar: lookup
  16. Heffner KA, White SD, Frevert CW, Jakowski R. Corynebacterium folliculitis in a horse. J Am Vet Med Assoc 193:89–90.
    pubmed: 3417537
  17. Iwase T, Uehara Y, Shinji H, Tajima A, Seo H, Takada K, Agata T, Mizunoe Y. Esp inhibits biofilm formation and nasal colonization. Nature 465:346–349.
    doi: 10.1038/nature09074pubmed: 20485435google scholar: lookup
  18. Jenkinson DM, Elder HY, Bovell DL. Equine sweating and anhidrosis Part 1– equine sweating. Vet Dermatol 17:361–392.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3164.2006.00545.xpubmed: 17083570google scholar: lookup
  19. Klindworth A, Pruesse E, Schweer T, Peplies J, Quast C, Horn M, Glockner FO. Evaluation of general 16S ribosomal RNA gene PCR primers for classical and next-generation sequencing-based diversity studies. Nucleic Acids Res 41:e1.
    doi: 10.1093/nar/gks808pmc: PMC3592464pubmed: 22933715google scholar: lookup
  20. Liu B, Ding Z, Xiong J, Heng X, Wang H, Chu W. Gut microbiota and inflammatory cytokine changes in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Biomed Res Inter 1005111.
    pmc: PMC9417757pubmed: 36033581doi: 10.1155/2022/1005111google scholar: lookup
  21. Martin M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet J 17:10–12.
  22. Meisel JS, Sfyroera G, Bartow-Mckenney C, Gimblet C, Bugayev J, Horwinski J, Kim B, Brestoff JR, Tyldsley AS, Zheng Q, Hodkinson BP, Artis D, Grice EA. Commensal microbiota modulate gene expression in the skin. Microbiome 6:20.
    doi: 10.1186/s40168-018-0404-9pmc: PMC5789709pubmed: 29378633google scholar: lookup
  23. O’Shaughnessy-Hunter LC, Yu A, Rousseau JD, Foster RA, Weese JS. Longitudinal study of the cutaneous microbiota of healthy horses. Vet Dermatol 32:467-e128.
    doi: 10.1111/vde.12983pubmed: 34165828google scholar: lookup
  24. Oh J, Byrd AL, Deming C, Conlan S, Comparative Sequencing Program NISC, Kong HH, Segre JA. Biogeography and individuality shape function in the human skin metagenome. Nature 514:59–64.
    doi: 10.1038/nature13786pmc: PMC4185404pubmed: 25279917google scholar: lookup
  25. Oh J, Byrd AL, Park M, NISC Comparative Sequencing Program, Kong HH, Segre JA. Temporal stability of the human skin microbiome. Cell 165:854–866.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.04.008pmc: PMC4860256pubmed: 27153496google scholar: lookup
  26. Panzuti P, Rocafort Ferrer G, Mosca M, Pin D. Equine pastern vasculitis in a horse associated with multidrug-resistant isolate. Vet Dermatol 31:247-e55.
    doi: 10.1111/vde.12830pubmed: 31930603google scholar: lookup
  27. Percival SL, Emanuel C, Cutting KF, Williams DW. Microbiology of the skin and the role of biofilms in infection. Int Wound J 9:14–32.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2011.00836.xpmc: PMC7950481pubmed: 21973162google scholar: lookup
  28. Ross AA, Hoffmann AR, Neufeld JD. The skin microbiome of vertebrates. Microbiome 7:79.
    doi: 10.1186/s40168-019-0694-6pmc: PMC6533770pubmed: 31122279google scholar: lookup
  29. Sandri M, Dal Monego S, Conte G, Sgorlon S, Stefanon B. Raw meat based diet influences faecal microbiome and end products of fermentation in healthy dogs. BMC Vet Res 13:65.
    doi: 10.1186/s12917-017-0981-zpmc: PMC5331737pubmed: 28245817google scholar: lookup
  30. Schmitz S, Suchodolski J. Understanding the canine intestinal microbiota and its modification by pro-, pre- and synbiotics - what is the evidence?. Vet Med Sci 2:71–94.
    doi: 10.1002/vms3.17pmc: PMC5645859pubmed: 29067182google scholar: lookup
  31. Scott DW, Miller WH. Equine Dermatology, 2nd edn. preface x, Maryland Heights.
  32. Sfriso R, Egert M, Gempeler M, Voegeli R, Campiche R. Revealing the secret life of skin - with the microbiome you never walk alone. Int J Cosmetic Sci 42:116–126.
    doi: 10.1111/ics.12594pmc: PMC7155096pubmed: 31743445google scholar: lookup
  33. Talukdar AH, Calhoun ML, Stinson AW. Microscopic anatomy of the skin of the horse. Am J Vet Res 33:2365–2398.
    pubmed: 4641194
  34. Tian ZG, Pu HL, Cai DD, Luo GM, Zhao LL, Li K, Zou J, Zhao X, Yu M, Wu YY, Yang TK, Guo P, Hu XL. Characterization of the bacterial microbiota in different gut and oral compartments of splendid japalure (Japalura sensu lato). BMC Vet Res 18:205.
    doi: 10.1186/s12917-022-03300-wpmc: PMC9137078pubmed: 35624481google scholar: lookup
  35. Ursell LK, Clemente JC, Rideout JR, Gevers D, Caporaso JG, Knight R. The interpersonal and intrapersonal diversity of human-associated microbiota in key body sites. J Allergy Clin Immunol 129:1204–1208.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2012.03.010pmc: PMC3342686pubmed: 22541361google scholar: lookup
  36. Wang Y, Yu Q, Zhou R, Feng T, Hilal MG, Li H. Nationality and body location alter human skin microbiome. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 105:5241–5256.
    doi: 10.1007/s00253-021-11387-8pubmed: 34125277google scholar: lookup
  37. Zhu Y, Yu X, Cheng G. Human skin bacterial microbiota homeostasis: A delicate balance between health and disease. mLife 2:107–120.
    doi: 10.1002/mlf2.12064pmc: PMC10989898pubmed: 38817619google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 4 times.
  1. Li F, Jiang D, Wang Q, Chang O, Yin J, Yu M, Pan H. Host-Microbiota-Parasite Interactions in Grass Carp: Insights from Ichthyophthirius multifiliis Infection.. Microorganisms 2025 Apr 10;13(4).
    doi: 10.3390/microorganisms13040872pubmed: 40284708google scholar: lookup
  2. Matinpour M, Zettner N, Neumann K, Bäumer L, Burkovski A. Analysis of the Culturable Skin Microbiome of Horses from Southern Germany.. Microorganisms 2025 Mar 8;13(3).
    doi: 10.3390/microorganisms13030623pubmed: 40142516google scholar: lookup
  3. Marsella R. Skin Barrier in Normal and Allergic Horses: What Do We Know?. Vet Sci 2025 Jan 24;12(2).
    doi: 10.3390/vetsci12020091pubmed: 40005851google scholar: lookup
  4. Gerlicz W, Sypka M, Jodłowska I, Białkowska AM. Isolation, Selection, and Identification of Keratinolytic Bacteria for Green Management of Keratin Waste.. Molecules 2024 Jul 18;29(14).
    doi: 10.3390/molecules29143380pubmed: 39064958google scholar: lookup
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,005 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.