Analyze Diet
Equine veterinary journal2026; doi: 10.1002/evj.70196

Composition of allogeneic equine orthobiologics and their repeated intra-articular administrations.

Abstract: Orthobiologics such as platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and alpha-2-macroglobulin (A2MG) are increasingly used for equine musculoskeletal injuries. However, their composition and safety with repeated allogeneic intra-articular administration remain poorly investigated. Objective: To characterise orthobiological preparations with or without 1 h incubation at 37°C (PRP, PRP + Inc, A2MG, A2MG + Inc) and evaluate immunological safety following repeated intra-articular administration (autologous and allogeneic) of PRP combined with A2MG + Inc in healthy horses. Methods: In vivo experiments. Methods: This was a two-phase study with biochemical characterisation followed by repeated intra-articular injections in four healthy horses. Blood was processed to produce PRP or A2MG, with or without incubation, and characterised using haematology, biochemistry and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. For immunogenic assessment, healthy horses received three intra-articular injections of combined PRP and A2MG + Inc at 2-week intervals (Days 0, 14 and 28) (allogeneic n = 3, autologous n = 1). Blood and synovial fluid were collected on Days 0, 14, 28 and 42. Blood was analysed for haematology, biochemistry, CD4/CD8 ratio and SAA, while synovial fluid was analysed for leukocyte counts and immunoglobulins. Results: Biochemical characterisation demonstrated effective removal of blood cells from all orthobiologics. PRP-based formulations were enriched in platelets and growth factors, whereas A2MG preparations had higher alpha-2-macroglobulin and lower growth factor levels. Repeated intra-articular administration of PRP and A2MG + Inc caused no clinically relevant changes in systemic or synovial immune cells, lymphocyte subsets, or acute-phase markers, indicating no immunological activation. Conclusions: Small sample sizes, the limited scope of characterised compositions and the use of combined PRP and A2MG + Inc for which only individual components were characterised. Conclusions: PRP may promote repair via growth factors, and A2MG is proposed to modulate immunity and catabolism. Repeated intra-articular injections of PRP with A2MG + Inc caused no systemic or synovial immune response, with no differences between autologous and allogeneic use.
Publication Date: 2026-05-24 PubMed ID: 42178493DOI: 10.1002/evj.70196Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Overview

  • This study characterizes the composition of equine orthobiologic products, specifically platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and alpha-2-macroglobulin (A2MG), and evaluates the immunological safety of repeated intra-articular injections of these products in healthy horses.

Background and Objective

  • Orthobiologics, such as PRP and A2MG, are biological treatments increasingly used to support healing in equine musculoskeletal injuries.
  • The exact composition of these orthobiologics and their safety, especially with repeated allogeneic (from a donor horse) intra-articular (joint) administrations, are not well understood.
  • The study aimed to:
    • Biochemically characterize PRP and A2MG preparations, including effects of incubation at 37°C.
    • Evaluate immunological safety following repeated intra-articular injections of combined PRP and incubated A2MG both autologously (from the same horse) and allogeneically (from another horse) in healthy horses.

Methods

  • The study was performed in two phases:
    1. Biochemical characterization of orthobiologics.
    2. Repeated intra-articular injections and immunological safety evaluation.
  • Blood was taken from horses and processed to produce:
    • Platelet-rich plasma (PRP).
    • Alpha-2-macroglobulin (A2MG), both with and without 1 hour incubation at 37°C (designated PRP, PRP + Inc, A2MG, A2MG + Inc).
  • Characterization techniques included:
    • Haematology analysis for blood cell counts.
    • Biochemical profiling.
    • Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to quantify growth factors and proteins.
  • Four healthy horses were administered three intra-articular injections, two weeks apart (Days 0, 14, and 28):
    • Three horses received allogeneic combined PRP and A2MG + Inc.
    • One horse received autologous combined PRP and A2MG + Inc.
  • Samples collected included blood and synovial fluid on Days 0, 14, 28, and 42.
  • Evaluations included:
    • Haematology and biochemistry of blood for immune cell profiles and systemic markers.
    • Flow cytometry analysis for lymphocyte subsets (CD4/CD8 ratio).
    • Serum amyloid A (SAA) as an acute-phase inflammatory marker.
    • Synovial fluid leukocyte counts and immunoglobulin levels.

Results – Biochemical Characterization

  • All orthobiologic preparations effectively removed blood cells, limiting contamination.
  • PRP-based formulations were enriched with platelets and contained higher levels of growth factors known to promote tissue repair.
  • A2MG preparations had higher concentrations of alpha-2-macroglobulin, a protein playing roles in immune modulation and catabolism, but had lower growth factor levels compared to PRP.
  • Incubation at 37°C affected the composition but specific details on protein changes were not fully outlined.

Results – Immunological Safety

  • Repeated intra-articular injection of the combined PRP and A2MG + Inc preparations generated no clinically significant systemic or local immune responses in healthy horses.
  • There were no notable changes in:
    • Systemic or synovial immune cell counts.
    • Lymphocyte subset ratios (CD4/CD8), suggesting no lymphocyte activation or skewing.
    • Acute-phase markers such as serum amyloid A (SAA), indicating no inflammation.
    • Synovial fluid immunoglobulin concentrations remained stable.
  • No differences were observed between autologous and allogeneic administration routes.
  • This suggests that repeated allogeneic PRP combined with A2MG + Inc is immunologically safe in healthy horses.

Conclusions and Limitations

  • The study supports the concept that PRP may contribute to tissue repair through the delivery of growth factors.
  • A2MG is proposed to modulate immune responses and breakdown of proteins (catabolism), complementing PRP’s effects.
  • Repeated injections of combined PRP and incubated A2MG do not elicit immune activation or adverse inflammation in joints.
  • Allogeneic administration appears as safe as autologous administration from an immunological perspective in this small sample.
  • Limitations include:
    • Small number of horses studied (only four total, three allogeneic, one autologous), limiting statistical power.
    • Composition characterization was limited and focused on individual components rather than the combined product.
    • Study was conducted only in healthy animals and may not reflect responses in injured or diseased joints.
  • Further studies with larger sample sizes and expanded characterization may better elucidate the safety and efficacy of these orthobiologics.

Cite This Article

APA
Van Reusel Y, Broeckx SY, Carolo A, Patruno M, Steenbrugge J, Saunders J, Gugliandolo E, Spaas JH. (2026). Composition of allogeneic equine orthobiologics and their repeated intra-articular administrations. Equine Vet J. https://doi.org/10.1002/evj.70196

Publication

ISSN: 2042-3306
NlmUniqueID: 0173320
Country: United States
Language: English

Researcher Affiliations

Van Reusel, Yanne
  • INTIBIO, Bree, Belgium.
  • Department of Morphology, Imaging, Orthopedics, Rehabilitation and Nutrition, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium.
  • Laboratory of Biochemistry, Department of Veterinary and Biosciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium.
Broeckx, Sarah Y
  • INTIBIO, Bree, Belgium.
Carolo, Anna
  • Department of Comparative Biomedicine and Food Science BCA, University of Padova, Padua, Italy.
Patruno, Marco
  • Department of Comparative Biomedicine and Food Science BCA, University of Padova, Padua, Italy.
Steenbrugge, Jonas
  • Laboratory of Biochemistry, Department of Veterinary and Biosciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium.
  • Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG)-Veterinary Oncology Network (VON), Ghent, Belgium.
Saunders, Jimmy
  • Department of Morphology, Imaging, Orthopedics, Rehabilitation and Nutrition, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium.
Gugliandolo, Enrico
  • Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Spaas, Jan H
  • INTIBIO, Bree, Belgium.
  • Department of Morphology, Imaging, Orthopedics, Rehabilitation and Nutrition, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium.

Grant Funding

  • HBC.2025.0898 / Agentschap Innoveren en Ondernemen
  • INTIBIO

References

This article includes 49 references
  1. Ribitsch I, Oreff GL, Jenner F. Regenerative medicine for equine musculoskeletal diseases.. Animals 2021;11(1):234.
    doi: 10.3390/ani11010234google scholar: lookup
  2. Murray RC, Walters JM, Snart H, Dyson SJ, Parkin TD. Identification of risk factors for lameness in dressage horses.. Vet J 2010;184(1):27–36.
  3. Egenvall A, Bonnett B, Wattle O, Emanuelson U. Veterinary‐care events and costs over a 5‐year follow‐up period for warmblooded riding horses with or without previously recorded locomotor problems in Sweden.. Prev Vet Med 2008;83(2):130–143.
  4. Smyth T, Allen AJ, Carmalt JL. Clinically significant, nontraumatic, degenerative joint disease of the temporomandibular joints in a horse.. Equine Vet Educ 2015;29(2):72–77.
    doi: 10.1111/eve.12382google scholar: lookup
  5. McIlwraith CW, Frisbie DD, Kawcak CE. The horse as a model of naturally occurring osteoarthritis.. Bone Joint Res 2012;1(11):297–309.
  6. Patterson‐Kane JC, Rich T. Achilles tendon injuries in elite athletes: lessons in pathophysiology from their equine counterparts.. ILAR J 2014;55(1):86–99.
    doi: 10.1093/ilar/ilu004google scholar: lookup
  7. Siun G. Preventing Tendon and Ligament Injuries in Horses.. London: London College of Animal Osteopathy; 2023.
  8. Clegg PD. Therapy for osteoarthritis in the horse – how do we know that it works?. Vet J 2006;171(1):9–10.
  9. Bindu S, Mazumder S, Bandyopadhyay U. Non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and organ damage: a current perspective.. Biochem Pharmacol 2020;180:114147.
    doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2020.114147google scholar: lookup
  10. Flood J, Stewart AJ. Non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs and associated toxicities in horses.. Animals 2022;12(21):2939.
    doi: 10.3390/ani12212939google scholar: lookup
  11. van Weeren PR, de Grauw JC. Pain in osteoarthritis.. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 2010;26(3):619–642.
  12. Contino EK. Management and rehabilitation of joint disease in sport horses.. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 2018;34(2):345–358.
  13. Broeckx SY, Seys B, Suls M, Vandenberghe A, Marien T, Adriaensen E. Equine allogeneic chondrogenic induced mesenchymal stem cells are an effective treatment for degenerative joint disease in horses.. Stem Cells Dev 2019;28(6):410–422.
    doi: 10.1089/scd.2018.0061google scholar: lookup
  14. Ortved KF, Alward L, Cowles B, Linardi R, Barot D, Usimaki A. Use of quantitative mass spectrometry‐based proteomics and ELISA to compare the alpha 2 macroglobulin concentration in equine blood‐based products processed by three different orthobiologic devices.. Front Vet Sci 2024;11:1335972.
  15. Sanchez M, Anitua E, Orive G, Mujika I, Andia I. Platelet‐rich therapies in the treatment of orthopaedic sport injuries.. Sports Med 2009;39(5):345–354.
  16. Sundman EA, Cole BJ, Fortier LA. Growth factor and catabolic cytokine concentrations are influenced by the cellular composition of platelet‐rich plasma.. Am J Sports Med 2011;39(10):2135–2140.
    doi: 10.1177/0363546511417792google scholar: lookup
  17. Westwood M, Aplin JD, Collinge IA, Gill A, White A, Gibson JM. Alpha 2‐macroglobulin: a new component in the insulin‐like growth factor/insulin‐like growth factor binding protein‐1 axis.. J Biol Chem 2001;276(45):41668–41674.
    doi: 10.1074/jbc.m102793200google scholar: lookup
  18. . Antigen Processing and Presenting. .
  19. Lowe D, Sanvictores T, Zubair M, John S. Serum alkalin phosphatase. Treasure island, FL: StatPearls; 2023.
  20. Busher JT. Serum albumin and globulin. In: Walker HK, Hall WD, Hurst JW, editors. Clinical methods: the history, physical, and laboratory examinations. 3rd ed. Boston, MA: Butterworths; 1990.
  21. Genemaras AA, Ennis H, Bradshaw B, Kaplan L, Huang CC. Effects of anti‐inflammatory agents on expression of early responsive inflammatory and catabolic genes in ex vivo porcine model of acute knee cartilage injury.. Cartilage 2018;9(3):293–303.
    doi: 10.1177/1947603516684589google scholar: lookup
  22. Disser NP, Sugg KB, Talarek JR, Sarver DC, Rourke BJ, Mendias CL. Insulin‐like growth factor 1 signaling in tenocytes is required for adult tendon growth.. FASEB J 2019;33(11):12680–12695.
    doi: 10.1096/fj.201901503rgoogle scholar: lookup
  23. Miescher I, Rieber J, Calcagni M, Buschmann J. In vitro and in vivo effects of IGF‐1 delivery strategies on tendon healing: a review.. Int J Mol Sci 2023;24(3):2370.
    doi: 10.3390/ijms24032370google scholar: lookup
  24. Dahlgren LA, van der Meulen MC, Bertram JE, Starrak GS, Nixon AJ. Insulin‐like growth factor‐I improves cellular and molecular aspects of healing in a collagenase‐induced model of flexor tendinitis.. J Orthop Res 2002;20(5):910–919.
  25. Hansen M, Boesen A, Holm L, Flyvbjerg A, Langberg H, Kjaer M. Local administration of insulin‐like growth factor‐I (IGF‐I) stimulates tendon collagen synthesis in humans.. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2013;23(5):614–619.
  26. Du X, Cai L, Xie J, Zhou X. The role of TGF‐beta3 in cartilage development and osteoarthritis.. Bone Res 2023;11(1):2.
  27. Melzer M, Schubert S, Muller SF, Geyer J, Hagen A, Niebert S. Rho/ROCK inhibition promotes TGF‐beta3‐induced tenogenic differentiation in mesenchymal stromal cells.. Stem Cells Int 2021;2021:8284690.
    doi: 10.1155/2021/8284690google scholar: lookup
  28. Ok SM, Kim JH, Kim JS, Jeong EG, Park YM, Jeon HM. Local injection of growth hormone for temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis.. Yonsei Med J 2020;61(4):331–340.
    doi: 10.3349/ymj.2020.61.4.331google scholar: lookup
  29. Doessing S, Heinemeier KM, Holm L, Mackey AL, Schjerling P, Rennie M. Growth hormone stimulates the collagen synthesis in human tendon and skeletal muscle without affecting myofibrillar protein synthesis.. J Physiol 2010;588(Pt 2):341–351.
  30. Chen Y, Jiang L, Lyu K, Lu J, Long L, Wang X. A promising candidate in tendon healing events‐PDGF‐BB.. Biomolecules 2022;12(10):1518.
    doi: 10.3390/biom12101518google scholar: lookup
  31. Dhillon RS, Schwarz EM, Maloney MD. Platelet‐rich plasma therapy ‐ future or trend?. Arthritis Res Ther 2012;14(4):219.
    doi: 10.1186/ar3914google scholar: lookup
  32. Korntner S, Kunkel N, Lehner C, Gehwolf R, Wagner A, Augat P. A high‐glucose diet affects Achilles tendon healing in rats. Sci Rep 2017;7(1):780.
  33. Li K, Ji X, Seeley R, Lee WC, Shi Y, Song F. Impaired glucose metabolism underlies articular cartilage degeneration in osteoarthritis. FASEB J 2022;36(6):e22377.
    doi: 10.1096/fj.202200485rgoogle scholar: lookup
  34. Akinniyi OO, Beku Sackey AK, Ochube GE, Mshelia PW, Edeh RE. Focus on the epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of insulin dysregulation in horses. Nutr Food Process 2024;7(2):191.
    doi: 10.31579/2637-8914/191google scholar: lookup
  35. Aujla RS, Zubair M, Patel R. Creatine phosphokinase. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls; 2024.
  36. Andrae J, Gallini R, Betsholtz C. Role of platelet‐derived growth factors in physiology and medicine. Genes Dev 2008;22(10):1276–1312.
    doi: 10.1101/gad.1653708google scholar: lookup
  37. Friedlaender GE, Lin S, Solchaga LA, Snel LB, Lynch SE. The role of recombinant human platelet‐derived growth factor‐BB (rhPDGF‐BB) in orthopaedic bone repair and regeneration. Curr Pharm des 2013;19(19):3384–3390.
  38. Calich AL, Domiciano DS, Fuller R. Osteoarthritis: can anti‐cytokine therapy play a role in treatment?. Clin Rheumatol 2010;29(5):451–455.
    doi: 10.1007/s10067-009-1352-3google scholar: lookup
  39. Kimmerling KA, Furman BD, Mangiapani DS, Moverman MA, Sinclair SM, Huebner JL. Sustained intra‐articular delivery of IL‐1RA from a thermally‐responsive elastin‐like polypeptide as a therapy for post‐traumatic arthritis. Eur Cell Mater 2015;29:124–139; discussion 39–40.
    doi: 10.22203/ecm.v029a10google scholar: lookup
  40. Furman BD, Mangiapani DS, Zeitler E, Bailey KN, Horne PH, Huebner JL. Targeting pro‐inflammatory cytokines following joint injury: acute intra‐articular inhibition of interleukin‐1 following knee injury prevents post‐traumatic arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther 2014;16(3):R134.
    doi: 10.1186/ar4591google scholar: lookup
  41. Matsukawa T, Sakai T, Yonezawa T, Hiraiwa H, Hamada T, Nakashima M. MicroRNA‐125b regulates the expression of aggrecanase‐1 (ADAMTS‐4) in human osteoarthritic chondrocytes. Arthritis Res Ther 2013;15(1):R28.
    doi: 10.1186/ar4164google scholar: lookup
  42. Miyaki S, Sato T, Inoue A, Otsuki S, Ito Y, Yokoyama S. MicroRNA‐140 plays dual roles in both cartilage development and homeostasis. Genes Dev 2010;24(11):1173–1185.
    doi: 10.1101/gad.1915510google scholar: lookup
  43. Jones SW, Watkins G, Le Good N, Roberts S, Murphy CL, Brockbank SM. The identification of differentially expressed microRNA in osteoarthritic tissue that modulate the production of TNF‐alpha and MMP13. Osteoarthr Cartil 2009;17(4):464–472.
  44. Mehta S, Akhtar S, Porter RM, Onnerfjord P, Bajpayee AG. Interleukin‐1 receptor antagonist (IL‐1Ra) is more effective in suppressing cytokine‐induced catabolism in cartilage‐synovium co‐culture than in cartilage monoculture. Arthritis Res Ther 2019;21(1):238.
    doi: 10.1186/s13075-019-2003-ygoogle scholar: lookup
  45. Nixon AJ, Grol MW, Lang HM, Ruan MZC, Stone A, Begum L. Disease‐modifying osteoarthritis treatment with interleukin‐1 receptor antagonist gene therapy in small and large animal models. Arthritis Rheumatol 2018;70(11):1757–1768.
    doi: 10.1002/art.40668google scholar: lookup
  46. Carmona JU, Lopez C. Effects of temperature and time on the denaturation of transforming growth factor beta‐1 and cytokines from bovine platelet‐rich gel supernatants. Gels 2024;10(9):583.
    doi: 10.3390/gels10090583google scholar: lookup
  47. Rehman AA, Ahsan H, Khan FH. Alpha‐2‐macroglobulin: a physiological guardian. J Cell Physiol 2013;228(8):1665–1675.
    doi: 10.1002/jcp.24266google scholar: lookup
  48. Francoz D, Desrochers A, Latouche JS. Effect of repeated arthrocentesis and single joint lavage on cytologic evaluation of synovial fluid in 5 young calves. Can J Vet Res 2007;71(2):129–134.
  49. van den Boom R, van de Lest CH, Bull S, Brama RA, van Weeren PR, Barneveld A. Influence of repeated arthrocentesis and exercise on synovial fluid concentrations of nitric oxide, prostaglandin E2 and glycosaminoglycans in healthy equine joints. Equine Vet J 2005;37(3):250–256.
    doi: 10.2746/0425164054530740google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.