Analyze Diet
Veterinary parasitology1995; 60(1-2); 83-102; doi: 10.1016/0304-4017(94)00766-6

Controlled efficacy study of the bioequivalence of Strongid C and generic pyrantel tartrate in horses.

Abstract: The bioequivalence of Strongid C and generic pyrantel tartrate was determined in a controlled study using 30 horses with naturally acquired endoparasitic infections. Three horses were randomly allocated to each of ten replicates based on quantitative nematode and ascarid egg counts and fecal larvae culture results. Horses within each replicate were randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups. Horses in Treatment Group 1 received only oats; horses in Treatment Group 2 received generic pyrantel tartrate pellets (2.65 mg pyrantel tartrate kg-1) mixed with oats; horses in Treatment Group 3 were fed Strongid C pellets (2.65 mg pyrantel tartrate kg-1) mixed with oats. Horses were treated daily for a 30 day continuous treatment period. At the termination of the study the horses were necropsied and endoparasites recovered, identified, and enumerated. In all instances, no significant difference (P > 0.05) in mean numbers of parasites recovered existed between horses treated with generic pyrantel tartrate and Strongid C. Numbers of gastrointestinal parasites recovered from horses treated with generic pyrantel tartrate or Strongid C were shown to be significantly different (P < 0.05) from numbers of gastrointestinal parasites recovered from non-treated controls for the large strongyles (Strongylus vulgaris, S. edentatus, and Triodontophorus spp.), small strongyles (Cyathostomum spp., Cylicocyclus spp., and Cylicostephanus spp.) and fourth-stage Parascaris equorum. Numbers of adult P. equorum recovered from horses treated with Strongid C were also significantly different (P < 0.05) from those from non-treated controls. Numbers of adult P. equorum recovered from horses treated with generic pyrantel tartrate were not significantly different (P = 0.0761) from those from non-treated controls. The determination of bioequivalence was based upon the 95% confidence interval of the difference between the mean number of parasites recovered from horses treated with generic pyrantel tartrate and the mean number of parasites recovered from horses treated with Strongid C. For all instances in which the numbers of parasites recovered from horses treated with either Strongid C or generic pyrantel tartrate were significantly different from the numbers of parasites recovered from non-treated controls, bioequivalence was demonstrated.
Publication Date: 1995-11-01 PubMed ID: 8644462DOI: 10.1016/0304-4017(94)00766-6Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Clinical Trial
  • Comparative Study
  • Journal Article
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research aimed to study the bioequivalence of Strongid C and generic pyrantel tartrate, two drugs used for the treatment of endoparasitic infections in horses. The study found no significant difference in terms of parasite reduction effectiveness between the two drugs.

Methodology

  • The researchers carried out a controlled study involving 30 horses, which naturally had endoparasitic infections.
  • They divided the horses into ten groups randomly based upon the count of nematode and ascarid eggs, and fecal larvae culture results. Each group comprised three horses.
  • Three treatment protocols were defined. Horses in the first group were given only oats (control group). The second group received generic pyrantel tartrate pellets, while the last group was administered Strongid C pellets. Both treatment groups received pellets at the dose of 2.65 mg pyrantel tartrate per kg mixed with oats – indicating a consistent dosage for fair comparison between the two drugs.
  • The treatment was executed daily for a 30-day period.

Results

  • At the end of the study, they performed necropsies on the horses. They recovered, identified, and enumerated the endoparasites in all horses.
  • They found no significant difference in the mean numbers of parasites between treatment groups receiving generic pyrantel tartrate and Strongid C.
  • However, significant differences were observed in the number of gastrointestinal parasites compared to untreated controls when treated with either of the medications. This demonstrated the effectiveness of both drugs in reducing parasites.
  • The study noted specific reductions in numbers of certain parasites such as large strongyles (Strongylus vulgaris, S. edentatus, and Triodontophorus spp.), small strongyles (Cyathostomum spp., Cylicocyclus spp., and Cylicostephanus spp.), and fourth-stage Parascaris equorum in groups treated with both the drugs.
  • Numbers of adult P. equorum were significantly reduced in horses treated with Strongid C compared to untreated controls, but not in horses treated with the generic pyrantel tartrate.
  • The researchers established bioequivalence between the two based on the 95% confidence interval of the difference in the mean number of parasites recovered from horses treated with generic pyrantel tartrate and Strongid C.

Conclusion

  • The study concluded that both the generic pyrantel tartrate and the brand Strongid C were biologically equivalent in terms of their effectiveness in reducing parasites in horses. This implies that either drug could be used interchangeably for treatment.

Cite This Article

APA
Valdez RA, DiPietro JA, Paul AJ, Lock TF, Hungerford LL, Todd KS. (1995). Controlled efficacy study of the bioequivalence of Strongid C and generic pyrantel tartrate in horses. Vet Parasitol, 60(1-2), 83-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4017(94)00766-6

Publication

ISSN: 0304-4017
NlmUniqueID: 7602745
Country: Netherlands
Language: English
Volume: 60
Issue: 1-2
Pages: 83-102

Researcher Affiliations

Valdez, R A
  • Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, University of Illinois, Urbana 61801, USA.
DiPietro, J A
    Paul, A J
      Lock, T F
        Hungerford, L L
          Todd, K S

            MeSH Terms

            • Animal Husbandry
            • Animals
            • Anthelmintics / pharmacokinetics
            • Anthelmintics / therapeutic use
            • Antiparasitic Agents / pharmacokinetics
            • Antiparasitic Agents / therapeutic use
            • Digestive System / parasitology
            • Digestive System / pathology
            • Horse Diseases
            • Horses
            • Organ Specificity
            • Parasite Egg Count
            • Parasites / classification
            • Parasites / isolation & purification
            • Parasitic Diseases / drug therapy
            • Parasitic Diseases / pathology
            • Parasitic Diseases, Animal
            • Pyrantel Tartrate / pharmacokinetics
            • Pyrantel Tartrate / therapeutic use
            • Therapeutic Equivalency

            Citations

            This article has been cited 1 times.
            1. Lyons ET, Tolliver SC, Rathgeber RA, Collins SS. Parasite field study in central Kentucky on thoroughbred foals (born in 2004) treated with pyrantel tartrate daily and other parasiticides periodically. Parasitol Res 2007 Feb;100(3):473-8.
              doi: 10.1007/s00436-006-0289-6pubmed: 17013652google scholar: lookup