Correct occlusive bladder width for indirect blood pressure measurement in horses.
Abstract: The influence of occlusive bladder width on blood pressure, measured indirectly using a doppler ultrasound technique at the middle coccygeal artery, was studied in 6 anesthetized horses. The relationship was investigated on tails with and without hair, and the optimum bladder width (BW)/tail girth (TG) ratio was determined for systolic pressure (SP) and diastolic pressure (DP), with the data grouped as unclipped tails (TT-1), clipped tails (TT-2), and both unclipped and clipped tails collectively (TTB). The optimum BW/TG ratios for SP and DP were 0.296 and 0.866 for TT-1, 0.376 and 1.156 for TT-2, and 0.339 and 0.983 for TTB, respectively. Despite the differences in optimal BW/TG ratios between TT-1 and TT-2, their regression equations were not significantly (P less than 0.05) different and therefore, data could be considered as TTB. The regression equations for TTB showed that a BW/TG ratio of 0.482 underestimated SP and overestimated DP by approximately 8.8%. In mature Thoroughbreds (mean TG 21.5 cm), this value corresponded to a BW of 10.4 cm. Blood pressure measured directly in the greater metatarsal artery was significantly different from that measured directly in the middle coccygeal artery in individual horses, but when averaged over all horses, there was no significant difference between the 2 sites.
Publication Date: 1982-01-01 PubMed ID: 7091817
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
- Comparative Study
- Journal Article
- Research Support
- Non-U.S. Gov't
Summary
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
This research article investigates how the width of an occlusive bladder can affect the accuracy of indirectly measuring a horse’s blood pressure, using a doppler ultrasound technique at the middle coccygeal (tailbone) artery. The study determines the best ratio between the bladder width and tail girth for accurate systolic and diastolic pressure readings in horses.
Study Participants and Method
- The study involved six horses that were anesthetized for uniformly conducted measurements.
- The blood pressure of the horses was measured indirectly via the middle coccygeal artery using a doppler ultrasound technique with varying occlusive bladder widths.
- The research uncovered the influence of occlusive bladder width on these blood pressure measurements and the ideal bladder width to tail girth ratio.
Bladder Width to Tail Girth Ratio
- The relationship between bladder width (BW) and tail girth (TG) was investigated both on hairy and hairless tails. The data was grouped into three categories:
- Unclipped tails (TT-1)
- Clipped tails (TT-2)
- A collective group of unclipped and clipped tails (TTB)
- The optimal BW/TG ratios were identified to be:
- 0.296 (systolic pressure) and 0.866 (diastolic pressure) for TT-1
- 0.376 (systolic pressure) and 1.156 (diastolic pressure) for TT-2
- 0.339 (systolic pressure) and 0.983 (diastolic pressure) for TTB
- Despite the variations in ratio between TT-1 and TT-2, the correlation did not have significant differences, justifying the classification of the data under TTB.
Effects of BW/TG ratio on Blood Pressure Measurement
- The data revealed that a ratio of 0.482 between bladder width and tail girth would cause an underestimation of systolic pressure (SP) and overestimation of diastolic pressure (DP) by approximately 8.8%.
- In Thoroughbred horses with an average tail girth of 21.5 cm, this ratio would correspond to a bladder width of 10.4 cm.
Comparison of Direct and Indirect Blood Pressure Measurements
- Direct blood pressure measurements from the greater metatarsal artery were significantly different from those measured indirectly in the middle coccygeal artery in individual horses.
- However, when averaged, there was no statistically significant differences between the two measurement methods, demonstrating that the indirect measurement method is generally reliable across populations.
Cite This Article
APA
Parry BW, McCarthy MA, Anderson GA, Gay CC.
(1982).
Correct occlusive bladder width for indirect blood pressure measurement in horses.
Am J Vet Res, 43(1), 50-54.
Publication
Researcher Affiliations
MeSH Terms
- Animals
- Blood Pressure
- Blood Pressure Determination / instrumentation
- Blood Pressure Determination / methods
- Blood Pressure Determination / veterinary
- Female
- Horses / physiology
- Male
- Tail / blood supply
- Ultrasonography
- Urinary Bladder / physiology
Citations
This article has been cited 2 times.- Duke-Novakovski T. Basics of monitoring equipment. Can Vet J 2017 Nov;58(11):1200-1208.
- Heliczer N, Lorello O, Casoni D, Navas de Solis C. Accuracy and Precision of Noninvasive Blood Pressure in Normo-, Hyper-, and Hypotensive Standing and Anesthetized Adult Horses. J Vet Intern Med 2016 May;30(3):866-72.
Use Nutrition Calculator
Check if your horse's diet meets their nutrition requirements with our easy-to-use tool Check your horse's diet with our easy-to-use tool
Talk to a Nutritionist
Discuss your horse's feeding plan with our experts over a free phone consultation Discuss your horse's diet over a phone consultation
Submit Diet Evaluation
Get a customized feeding plan for your horse formulated by our equine nutritionists Get a custom feeding plan formulated by our nutritionists