Analyze Diet
Die Naturwissenschaften2026; 113(4); 79; doi: 10.1007/s00114-026-02113-3

Could snort production reflect comfort in horses kept outdoors? A first study.

Abstract: The welfare of free-roaming, captive wild or domestic animals housed outdoors is often questioned. How subjects perceive climatic conditions is not always well detected as it is highly subjective, depending on species, age and experience. Hence, decisions on housing rely mostly on human anthropomorphic perception. In particular, indicators of comfort and positive emotions remain poorly documented. Acoustic signals, however, offer a promising window into animals' internal states. In the present study, we hypothesized that acoustic signals could be used to identify positive or negative perceptions of environmental conditions in horses. Horses possess a diverse acoustic repertoire and the snort produced by nostril vibration, has been identified as a likely indicator of calm, positive emotions. Over 3 weeks in early spring, acoustic production and time budget were recorded for 20 adult horses living outdoors on pasture. Meteorological conditions and pasture composition were monitored simultaneously. Results showed that snorts were the most frequent acoustic signal and that their production varied considerably across observation sessions. Snort production was highly correlated with temperature: horses produced more snorts and showed more relaxed behaviours when the temperature ranged between 15 and 20 °C. In contrast, lower temperatures around 5-8 °C were associated with more "static" behaviours (reflecting energy conservation) and less snorts. Finally, snorts were more frequent immediately after horses entered a new pasture with higher food diversity than just before leaving, when food diversity had become more restricted. These findings suggest that acoustic production may help identify the subjective perception that animals have from their environment, allowing more individualized and adapted management practices.
Publication Date: 2026-06-30 PubMed ID: 42377502PubMed Central: PMC13320096DOI: 10.1007/s00114-026-02113-3Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Overview

  • This study investigates whether the production of snorts, an acoustic signal in horses, can be an indicator of comfort and positive emotional states in horses kept outdoors.
  • The research explores the relationship between snort frequency, environmental conditions, and horse behavior to assess if snort production reflects the horses’ subjective perception of their environment.

Introduction and Background

  • Welfare concerns are common for free-roaming, captive wild, and domestic animals housed outdoors.
  • Animals’ comfort and emotional states are difficult to measure because perceptions of climatic conditions vary by species, age, and individual experience.
  • Human decisions about animal housing often rely on anthropomorphic bias, lacking objective indicators of animal comfort and positive emotions.
  • Acoustic signals provide a promising method for inferring internal emotional states of animals, as they can reflect mood and perception of the environment.
  • Horses produce a range of acoustic signals; among them, the snort—caused by nostril vibration—has been proposed as a sign of calmness and positive emotional states.

Research Hypothesis

  • The study hypothesizes that the frequency and conditions of snort production by horses correspond to their positive or negative perception of the environment they are in.
  • The researchers aimed to test if snorts correlate with environmental comfort indicators, such as temperature and pasture quality, and with relaxed or energy-conserving behaviors.

Methodology

  • Subjects: 20 adult horses living outdoors on pasture.
  • Duration: Observations conducted over 3 weeks in early spring.
  • Data collected included:
    • Acoustic recordings to capture snorts and other sounds made by horses.
    • Behavioral time budgets, noting relaxed vs. static/energy conservation behaviors.
    • Meteorological conditions, primarily temperature, were monitored.
    • Pasture composition and food diversity to gauge environmental quality.

Key Findings

  • Snorts were the most frequent acoustic signal detected during observations.
  • Snort frequency varied significantly between observation sessions.
  • Temperature was strongly correlated with snort frequency:
    • More snorts and relaxed behaviors occurred at temperatures between 15 and 20 °C.
    • Lower temperatures (around 5–8 °C) were associated with fewer snorts and an increase in static behaviors, which likely indicate energy conservation due to less comfort.
  • Snort production also changed with pasture quality:
    • More snorts were produced immediately after horses entered a new pasture that had higher food diversity.
    • Fewer snorts were observed just before horses left the pasture when food diversity was reduced.

Interpretation and Implications

  • Higher snort rates correspond to temperature ranges and environmental conditions that favor comfort and relaxation in horses.
  • Lower snort rates in colder temperatures and less food-diverse settings suggest discomfort or less positive affective states.
  • Snorts may therefore serve as an acoustic marker of the horses’ subjective experience of comfort and positive emotions.
  • This insight opens up new opportunities to use vocalization monitoring as a non-invasive welfare assessment tool in horses and potentially other species.
  • It supports the development of individualized and adaptive animal management and housing practices based on objective behavioral and acoustic indicators rather than just human perception.

Conclusion

  • The study provides initial evidence that snort production in horses can reflect their comfort and positive emotional perception in an outdoor environment.
  • Further research could refine this approach and extend it to other species and contexts for enhancing animal welfare assessments.

Cite This Article

APA
Hausberger M, Matthieu L, Delbos M, Briseño-Jaramillo M, Wimel L, Henry S, Lemasson A, Lesimple C. (2026). Could snort production reflect comfort in horses kept outdoors? A first study. Naturwissenschaften, 113(4), 79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-026-02113-3

Publication

ISSN: 1432-1904
NlmUniqueID: 0400767
Country: Germany
Language: English
Volume: 113
Issue: 4
PII: 79

Researcher Affiliations

Hausberger, Martine
  • Department of Zoology and Entomology, Rhodes University, Makhanda, South Africa.
  • Centre Intégratif de Neuroscience et Cognition, Université de Paris-Cité, UMR CNRS 8002, Paris, France.
Matthieu, Lucas
  • Centre d'étude en éthologie et cognition, Université de Rennes, Université de Caen-Normandie, UMR CNRS 6552, Paimpont, France.
Delbos, Maëlle
  • Centre d'étude en éthologie et cognition, Université de Rennes, Université de Caen-Normandie, UMR CNRS 6552, Paimpont, France.
Briseño-Jaramillo, Margarita
  • Instituto de Neuroetología, Universidad Veracruzana, Xalapa, Mexico. mar.briseno.jaramillo@gmail.com.
Wimel, Laurence
  • IFCE, Station Expérimentale de Chamberet, Chamberet, France.
Henry, Séverine
  • Centre d'étude en éthologie et cognition, Université de Rennes, Université de Caen-Normandie, UMR CNRS 6552, Paimpont, France.
Lemasson, Alban
  • Centre d'étude en éthologie et cognition, Université de Rennes, Université de Caen-Normandie, UMR CNRS 6552, Paimpont, France.
Lesimple, Clémence
  • Centre d'étude en éthologie et cognition, Université de Rennes, Université de Caen-Normandie, UMR CNRS 6552, Paimpont, France.
  • Ecole Supérieure des Agricultures (ESA), USC URSE - Unité de Recherche sur les Systèmes d'Elevage - Ecole Supérieure des Agricultures, Angers, France.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Horses / physiology
  • Housing, Animal
  • Temperature
  • Animal Welfare
  • Female
  • Animal Husbandry
  • Behavior, Animal / physiology
  • Vocalization, Animal / physiology
  • Thermal Comfort

Conflict of Interest Statement

Declarations. Compliance with ethical standards: The study was carried out in 2016 in accordance with the European Parliament and the European Union Council directive 2010/63/UE relative to the protection of animals used for scientific purposes and complied with the current French laws related to animal experimentation (Decree no. 2013 − 118 of 1 February 2013) and its five implementation orders (JO of 7 February 2013), integrated in the Code rural and the Code of the maritime fishing under no. R. 214 − 87 à R. 214 − 137). Being only observational, our study did not require any further ethical authorization. The private owner of the riding school allowed our research to be conducted on his site. Animal husbandry and care were under the management of the riding school staff. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

References

This article includes 53 references
  1. Altmann J. Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. Behaviour 49:227.
    doi: 10.1163/156853974X00534pubmed: 4597405google scholar: lookup
  2. Arnold W, Ruf T, Kuntz R. Seasonal adjustment of energy budget in a large wild mammal, the Przewalski horse () II. Energy expenditure. J Exp Biol 209:4566–4573.
    doi: 10.1242/jeb.02536pubmed: 17079726google scholar: lookup
  3. Arnold W, Ruf T, Reimoser S, Tataruch F, Onderscheka K, Schober F. Nocturnal hypometabolism as an overwintering strategy of red deer (). Am J Physiol 286:R174–R181.
    pubmed: 12969877
  4. Blois-Heulin C, Rochais C, Camus S, Fureix C, Lemasson A, Lunel C, Bezard E, Hausberger M. Animal welfare: could adult play be a false friend?. Anim Behav Cogn 2:156–185.
    doi: 10.12966/abc.05.04.2015google scholar: lookup
  5. Boissy A, Manteuffel G, Jensen MB, Moe RO, Spruijt B, Keeling LJ, Winckler C, Forkman B, Dimitrov I, Langbein J, Bakken M, Veissier I, Aubert A. Assessment of positive emotions in animals to improve their welfare. Physiol Behav 92:375–397.
    doi: 10.1016/J.PHYSBEH.2007.02.003pubmed: 17428510google scholar: lookup
  6. Boyden J. Children's experience of conflict related emergencies: Some implications for relief policy and practice. Disasters 18(3):254–267.
    pubmed: 7953494
  7. Briefer EF. Vocal expression of emotions in mammals: mechanisms of production and evidence. J Zool 288:1–20.
  8. Briefer EF, Maigrot A-L, Mandel R, Freymond SB, Bachmann I, Hillmann E. Segregation of information about emotional arousal and valence in horse whinnies. Sci Rep 4:9989.
    doi: 10.1038/srep09989pmc: PMC4404681pubmed: 25897781google scholar: lookup
  9. Brinkmann L, Gerken M, Hambly C, Speakman JR, Riek A. Saving energy during hard times: energetic adaptations of Shetland pony mares. J Exp Biol 217:4320–4327.
    doi: 10.1242/jeb.111815pubmed: 25359931google scholar: lookup
  10. Contreras-Aguilar MD, Henry S, Coste C, Tecles F, Escribano D, Cerón J, Hausberger M. Changes in saliva analytes correlate with horses’ behavioural reactions to an acute stressor: A pilot study. Animals 9(11):993.
    doi: 10.3390/ani9110993pmc: PMC6912570pubmed: 31752194google scholar: lookup
  11. Cymbaluk N, Christison GI. Effect of diet and climate on growing horses. J Anim Sci 67:48–59.
    doi: 10.2527/jas1989.67148xpubmed: 2925552google scholar: lookup
  12. Dyson S, Berger JM, Ellis AD, Mullard J. Behavioral observations and comparisons of non-lame horses and lame horses before and after resolution of lameness by diagnostic analgesia. J Vet Behav 26:64–70.
  13. Goodwin D, Davidson HPB, Harris P. Foraging enrichment for stabled horses: effects on behaviour and selection. Equine Vet J 34(7):686–691.
    doi: 10.2746/042516402776250450pubmed: 12455839google scholar: lookup
  14. Górecka-Bruzda A, Jaworski Z, Jaworska J, Siemieniuch M. Welfare of free-roaming horses: 70 years of experience with Konik Polski breeding in Poland. Animals 10(6):1094.
    doi: 10.3390/ani10061094pmc: PMC7341202pubmed: 32599935google scholar: lookup
  15. Hartmann E, Bøe KE, Christensen JW, Hyyppä S, Janssen H, Jørgensen G, Ladewig J, Mejdell CM, Norling Y, Rundgren M, Särkijärvi S, Søndergaard E, Keeling LL. A Nordic survey of management practices and owners’ attitudes towards keeping horses in groups. J. Anim. Sci. 93:4564–4574.
    doi: 10.2527/jas.2015-9233pubmed: 26440355google scholar: lookup
  16. Hausberger M. Stall architecture influences horses’ behaviour and the prevalence and type of stereotypies.. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 219:104833.
  17. Hausberger M, Lesimple C, Henry S. Detecting welfare in a non-verbal species: Social/cultural biases and difficulties in horse welfare assessment.. Animals 11:2249.
    doi: 10.3390/ani11082249pmc: PMC8388525pubmed: 34438708google scholar: lookup
  18. Hausberger M, Stomp M, Sankey C, Brajon S, Lunel C, Henry S. Mutual interactions between cognition and welfare: the horse as an animal model.. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 107:540–559.
  19. Hillman PE. Thermoregulatory physiology. Chapter 2.. In: DeShazer, James A. (Ed.), Livestock Energetics and Thermal Environmental Management. The American Society of agricultural and biological engineers, pp. 23–48 ISBN 1-892769-74-3.
  20. Ingólfsdóttir HB, Sigurdjónsdóttir H. The benefits of high rank in the winter time – a study of the Icelandic horse.. Appl Anim Behav Sci 114(3–4):485–491.
  21. Jenikejew J, Chaignon B, Linn S, Scheumann M. Proximity-based vocal networks reveal social relationships in the Southernwhite rhinoceros.. Sci. Rep. 10:15104.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-72052-0pmc: PMC7492360pubmed: 32934303google scholar: lookup
  22. Jenikejew J, Huelsewig M, Riedner D, Stomp M, Lemasson A, Hausberger M, Azogu-Sepe I, Böye M, Scheumann M. Learning from playbacks : testing the communicative function of Snort and Pant calls in the Southern white rhinoceros.. Journal of Zoological and Botanical Gardens 6(4):51.
    doi: 10.3390/jzbg6040051google scholar: lookup
  23. Kerguélen M, Plonka F. Les Festuca de la flore de France (Corse comprise) (Fescues of the flora of France, including Corsica).. Bulletin de la Société Botanique du Centre-Ouest 10:1–368.
  24. Kiley-Worthington M. The tail movements of ungulates, canids and felids with particular reference to their causation and function as displays.. Behaviour 56:69–114.
    doi: 10.1163/156853976X00307google scholar: lookup
  25. König von Borstel U, Glißman C. Alternatives to conventional evaluation of rideability in horse performance tests: suitability of rein tension and behavioural parameters.. PLoS One 9:e87285.
  26. Krueger K, Esch L, Farmer K, Marr I. Basic Needs in Horses? —A Literature Review.. 2021, 11, 1798.
    pmc: PMC8235049pubmed: 34208615
  27. Langlois B. Inter-breed variation in the horse with regard to cold adaption: a review.. Livest Prod Sci 40:1–7.
  28. Lesimple C, Reverchon-Billot L, Galloux P, Stomp M, Boichot L, Coste C, Henry S, Hausberger M. Free movement: a key for welfare improvement in sport horses?. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 225:104972.
  29. Linn SN, Boeer M, Scheumann M. First insights into the vocal repertoire of infant and juvenile southern white rhinoceros.. PLoS One 13:e0192166.
  30. MacCormack JAD, Bruce JM. The horse in winter – shelter and feeding.. Farm Building Progress 105:10–13.
  31. McBride GE, Christopherson RJ, Sauer W. Metabolic rate and plasma thyroid hormone concentration of mature horses in response to changes in ambient temperature. Can J Anim Sci 65:375–382.
    doi: 10.4141/cjas85-043google scholar: lookup
  32. McDonnell M, Poulin A. Equid play ethogram. Appl Anim Behav Sci 78:263–290.
  33. Mejdell CM, Bøe KE, Jørgensen GHM. Caring for the horse in a cold climate. Reviewing principles for thermoregulation and horse preferences. Appl Anim Behav Sci 231:105071.
  34. Mejdell CM, Buvik T, Jørgensen GHM, Bøe KE. Horses can learn to use symbols to communicate their preferences. Appl Anim Behav Sci 184:66–83.
  35. Mejdell CM, Jørgensen GHM, Buvik T, Torp T, Bøe KE. The effect of weather conditions on the preference in horses for wearing blankets. Appl Anim Behav Sci 212:52–57.
  36. Morgan K. Thermoneutral zone and critical temperatures of horses. J Therm Biol 23:59–61.
  37. Panksepp J, Burgdorf J. “Laughing” rats and the evolutionary antecedents of human joy?. Physiol Behav 79:533–547.
    doi: 10.1016/S0031-9384(03)00159-8pubmed: 12954448google scholar: lookup
  38. Peters G. Purring and similar vocalizations in mammals. Mamm Rev 32:245–271.
  39. Policht R, Tomasova K, Holeckova D, Frynta D. The vocal repertoire in northern white rhinoceros as recorded in the last surviving herd. Bioacoustics 18:69–96.
  40. Raspa F, Tarantola M, Bergero D, Nery J, Visconti A, Mastrazzo CM. Time-budget of horses reared for meat production: Influence of stocking density on behavioural activities and subsequent welfare. Animals (Basel) 10(8):1334.
    pmc: PMC7460472pubmed: 32752257
  41. Rochais C, Fureix C, Lesimple C, Hausberger M. Lower attention to daily environment: a novel cue for detecting chronic horses’ back pain?. Sci Rep 6:20117.
    doi: 10.1038/srep20117pmc: PMC4731760pubmed: 26823123google scholar: lookup
  42. Scopa C, Palagi E, Sighieri C, Baragli P. Physiological outcomes of calming behaviors support the resilience hypothesis in horses. Sci Rep 8:17501.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-35561-7pmc: PMC6269543pubmed: 30504840google scholar: lookup
  43. Seyfarth R, Cheney D. Meaning and emotion in animal vocalizations. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1000:32–55.
    doi: 10.1196/annals.1280.004pubmed: 14766619google scholar: lookup
  44. Sjaastad ØV, Sand O, Hove K. Regulation of body temperature. in Physiology of Domestic Animals, 3rd edition. , Oslo.
  45. Snoeks MG, Moons CPH, Ödberg FO, Aviron M, Geers R. Behavior of horses on pasture in relation to weather and shelter – a field study in a temperate climate. J Vet Behav Clin Appl Res 10:561–568.
  46. Stomp M, Leroux M, Cellier M, Henry S, Hausberger M, Lemasson A. Snort acoustic structure codes for positive emotions in horses.. Sci Nat 105(9–10):57.
    doi: 10.1007/s00114-018-1582-9pubmed: 30291452google scholar: lookup
  47. Stomp M, Leroux M, Cellier M, Henry S, Lemasson A, Hausberger M. An unexpected acoustic indicator of positive emotions in horses.. PLoS One 13(7):e0197898.
  48. Stomp M, Masson A, Henry S, Hausberger M, Lesimple C. Could snorts inform us on how horses perceive riding?. Behav Process 172:104041.
    doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2020.104041pubmed: 31923434google scholar: lookup
  49. Tutin TG, Heywood VH, Burges NA, Valentine DH, Walters SM, Webb DA. Flora Europaea.. Cambridge University Press, pp 1–5.
  50. van den Berg M, Brown WY, Lee C, Hinch GN. Browse-related behaviors of pastured horses in Australia: A survey.. Journal of Veterinary Behavior 10(1):48–53.
  51. Walker RH, King AJ, McNutt JW, Jordan NR. Sneeze to leave: African wild dogs (Lycaon pictus) use variable quorum thresholds facilitated by sneezes in collective decisions.. Proc R Soc B 284:20170347.
    doi: 10.1098/rspb.2017.0347pmc: PMC5597819pubmed: 28878054google scholar: lookup
  52. Waring GH. The behavioral traits and adaptations of domestic and wild horses, including ponies.. Horse behavior. Noyes Publication/William Andrew Pub, Park Ridge.
  53. Yeon SC. Acoustic communication in the domestic horse ().. J Vet Behav Clin Appl Res 7:179–185.

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.