Analyze Diet

Cross-sectional evaluation of environmental, host, and management factors associated with risk of seropositivity to Ehrlichia risticii in horses of New York state.

Abstract: To locate counties within New York state with a high seroprevalence among the equine population, to determine host, management, and environmental factors that were associated with seropositivity to Ehrlichia risticii, and to determine evidence for arthropod- or helminth-mediated transmission of E risticii to horses. Methods: Cross-sectional study. Methods: A random sample of 3,000 of the 39,000 equine operations in New York state was selected, and 2,587 horses from 511 operations were tested. Methods: Blood samples were collected from horses and tested for seropositivity, using the indirect fluorescent antibody technique. Data on each horse and each farm's management were obtained by personal interview. The significance of each factor on the risk of seropositivity was evaluated, using mixed-effect logistic regression. Results: The seroprevalence among E risticii-nonvaccinated horses was 7.3%. The county-specific seroprevalence ranged from 0 to 27%, with higher-risk counties located at low elevation. Farms at higher risk for having seropositive horses were located predominately at low elevation with no bodies of water nearby. Risk of seropositivity was associated with time spent in a stall or run-in shed, with frequency of application of fly spray, and, depending on duration of residency at the farm, with frequency of deworming with benzimidazole and pyrantel. Standardbreds were 2 to 3 times more likely to have been exposed, compared with Thoroughbreds. Depending on duration of residency at the farm, male and middle-age horses were at higher risk. Up to 32% of the variance for a horse to test seropositive for E risticii on the logit scale was attributable to farm-level random effects, but the nested social group random effect was not significant. Conclusions: Arthropods and helminths may have a role in the transmission of this disease. Several management factors may directly or indirectly modify the risk of exposure to E risticii, allowing for the possibility of additional control measures besides traditional vaccination strategies.
Publication Date: 1996-03-01 PubMed ID: 8669755
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Comparative Study
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Research Support
  • U.S. Gov't
  • Non-P.H.S.

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research studied the prevalence of Ehrlichia risticii infection in horses across different counties in New York state, and identified different environmental, host, and management factors associated with the risk of infection. The study also explored the potential role of arthropods and helminths in the transmission of this disease.

Methodology

  • The research was a cross-sectional study that used a random sample of 3,000 out of the 39,000 equine operations in New York state. 2,587 horses from these 511 operations were tested.
  • Blood samples were collected from these horses and tested for seropositivity, using the indirect fluorescent antibody technique.
  • Personal interviews were conducted to gather data on each horse and the management practices of each farm.
  • Mixed-effect logistic regression was used to evaluate the impact of each factor on the risk of seropositivity.

Results

  • The study found that 7.3% of non-vaccinated horses were seropositive for E risticii.
  • The seroprevalence varied across different counties, with a range from 0 to 27%. Counties with higher risk were typically located at lower elevations.
  • Similarly, farms at higher risk for having seropositive horses were typically located at low elevations, and usually didn’t have bodies of water nearby.
  • Risk of seropositivity was linked with the duration of time a horse spent in a stall or run-in shed, the frequency of applying fly spray, and depending on the duration of residency at the farm, the frequency of deworming with benzimidazole and pyrantel.
  • By breed, Standardbred horses were 2 to 3 times more likely to be exposed to the bacteria than Thoroughbreds.
  • By age and gender, middle-aged and male horses were at greater risk of being seropositive, depending on the length of residency at the farm.

Conclusion

  • The study concluded that arthropods and helminths may possibly play a part in the transmission of E risticii.
  • Management factors were identified that can either directly or indirectly influence the risk of a horse getting exposed to E risticii, which suggests potential control measures that go beyond traditional vaccination strategies.

Cite This Article

APA
Atwill ER, Mohammed HO, Lopez JW, McCulloch CE, Dubovi EJ. (1996). Cross-sectional evaluation of environmental, host, and management factors associated with risk of seropositivity to Ehrlichia risticii in horses of New York state. Am J Vet Res, 57(3), 278-285.

Publication

ISSN: 0002-9645
NlmUniqueID: 0375011
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 57
Issue: 3
Pages: 278-285

Researcher Affiliations

Atwill, E R
  • Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Plant Breeding and Biometry, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
Mohammed, H O
    Lopez, J W
      McCulloch, C E
        Dubovi, E J

          MeSH Terms

          • Age Factors
          • Animal Husbandry
          • Animals
          • Arthropods
          • Cross-Sectional Studies
          • Ehrlichiosis / epidemiology
          • Ehrlichiosis / transmission
          • Ehrlichiosis / veterinary
          • Environment
          • Female
          • Helminths
          • Horse Diseases
          • Horses
          • Immunization
          • Male
          • New York / epidemiology
          • Risk Factors
          • Seasons
          • Sex Characteristics
          • Species Specificity

          Citations

          This article has been cited 0 times.