Analyze Diet

Current dorsal myelographic column and dural diameter reduction rules do not apply at the cervicothoracic junction in horses.

Abstract: Previously published myelographic studies do not report findings at the junction between the seventh cervical (C7) and first thoracic vertebrae (T1). Modern digital radiographic equipment allows improved visualization of C7-T1. Based on clinical experience, we hypothesized that 50% reduction of the dorsal myelographic column or 20% reduction of the dural diameter, criteria commonly used as a supportive finding for spinal cord compression in the cervical vertebral column, do not apply at C7-T1. A myelographic study was performed on 12 healthy, neurologically normal horses. Our hypothesis was confirmed; using established criteria eight of 12 horses would have been classified as having evidence of spinal cord compression at C7-T1. The dorsal myelographic column reduction at C7-T1 was 48 ± 12%, while the C6-C7 dorsal myelographic column reduction was 33 ± 17% (mean ± standard deviation) (P = 0.010). The dural diameter reduction at C7-T1 (22.0 ± 6.7%) was significantly greater than the dural diameter reduction at C6-C7 (13.2 ± 9.5%) (P = 0.0007). Further measurements and comparisons suggested that the apparent greater reduction of dorsal myelographic column and dural diameter at C7-T1 was due to larger intravertebral measurements at C7 rather than smaller intervertebral values at C7-T1. Based on these findings, alternative criteria should be used at C7-T1 when assessing clinical cases for cervical stenotic myelopathy. Reduction of the dorsal myelographic column by 60% or of the dural diameter by 30% would avoid high numbers of false positive myelographic cases at C7-T1.
Publication Date: 2018-07-11 PubMed ID: 29998490PubMed Central: PMC6218286DOI: 10.1111/vru.12662Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article explores the inapplicability of current rules for measuring dorsal myelographic column and dural diameter reduction at the cervicothoracic junction in horses. This study finds that alternative criteria should be used to better assess possible spinal cord compression in this area.

Understanding the Context and Hypothesis

  • The authors observed that past myelographic studies did not report on the cervicothoracic (C7-T1) junction in horses, an area where they suspected the existing rules for detecting spinal cord compression might fall short.
  • With the use of modern digital radiographic equipment, the researchers proposed a theory that the usual criteria (a 50% reduction in the dorsal myelographic column or a 20% reduction of the dural diameter) used to indicate spinal cord compression might not apply at C7-T1.

Method and Findings

  • The researchers conducted a myelographic study on 12 healthy, neurologically normal horses and found that, according to traditional criteria, 8 out of the 12 horses would appear to have signs of spinal cord compression at C7-T1. This indicated that the current criteria may yield false positive results at this particular junction.
  • They accumulated data on the dorsal myelographic column reduction and the dural diameter reduction at the respective sites and discovered that the reduction at C7-T1 was significantly higher. This finding further supported their theory that current standards might yield a false diagnosis of spinal cord compression in this area.

Interpretation and Conclusion

  • The team concluded that the observed reduction in the dorsal myelographic column and dural diameter at C7-T1 was due to larger intravertebral measurements at C7 as opposed to smaller measurements at C7-T1. These findings again suggested that the current criteria might not be valid for diagnoses in this part of the spine.
  • In light of their findings, they propose a new set of criteria for this region: reduction of the dorsal myelographic column by 60% or the dural diameter by 30%. They suggest these adjustments would avoid a high rate of false positives for spinal cord compression at C7-T1. This change could help better diagnose and treat cervical stenotic myelopathy, a condition characterized by the narrowing of the spinal canal in the neck.

Cite This Article

APA
Estell K, Spriet M, Phillips KL, Aleman M, Finno CJ. (2018). Current dorsal myelographic column and dural diameter reduction rules do not apply at the cervicothoracic junction in horses. Vet Radiol Ultrasound, 59(6), 662-666. https://doi.org/10.1111/vru.12662

Publication

ISSN: 1740-8261
NlmUniqueID: 9209635
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 59
Issue: 6
Pages: 662-666

Researcher Affiliations

Estell, Krista
  • Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, Marion DuPont Scott Equine Medical Center, Leesburg, VA, 20176.
Spriet, Mathieu
  • Department of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616.
Phillips, Kathryn L
  • Department of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616.
Aleman, Monica
  • Department of Medicine and Epidemiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616.
Finno, Carrie J
  • Department of Population Health and Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Cervical Vertebrae / diagnostic imaging
  • Female
  • Horses
  • Male
  • Myelography / methods
  • Myelography / veterinary
  • Neck / diagnostic imaging
  • Spinal Cord Compression / diagnostic imaging
  • Spinal Cord Compression / veterinary
  • Spinal Stenosis / diagnostic imaging
  • Spinal Stenosis / veterinary

Grant Funding

  • 1K01OD015134 / National Institutes of Health
  • L40 TR001136 / NCATS NIH HHS
  • L40 TR001136 / National Institutes of Health
  • Center for Equine Health, University of California Davis
  • K01 OD015134 / NIH HHS

References

This article includes 8 references
  1. Papageorges M, Gavin PR, Sande RD, Barbee DD, Grant BD. Radiographic and Myelographic Examination of the Cervical Vertebral Column in 306 Ataxic Horses. Vet Radiology 1987;28:53–59.
  2. van Biervliet J, Scrivani PV, Divers TJ, Erb HN, de Lahunta A, Nixon A. Evaluation of decision criteria for detection of spinal cord compression based on cervical myelography in horses: 38 cases (1981-2001).. Equine Vet J 2004 Jan;36(1):14-20.
    pubmed: 14756366doi: 10.2746/0425164044864642google scholar: lookup
  3. Mayhew IG, deLahunta A, Whitlock RH, Krook L, Tasker JB. Spinal cord disease in the horse.. Cornell Vet 1978 Jan;68 Suppl 6:1-207.
    pubmed: 618720
  4. Nyland TG, Blythe LL, Pool RR, Helphrey MG, O'Brien TR. Metrizamide myelography in the horse: clinical, radiographic, and pathologic changes.. Am J Vet Res 1980 Feb;41(2):204-11.
    pubmed: 7369592
  5. Nixon AJ, Stashak TS, Ingram JT. Diagnosis of cervical vertebral malformation in the horse. P Annu Conv Am Equin 1982;28:253–266.
  6. Levine JM, Adam E, MacKay RJ, Walker MA, Frederick JD, Cohen ND. Confirmed and presumptive cervical vertebral compressive myelopathy in older horses: a retrospective study (1992-2004).. J Vet Intern Med 2007 Jul-Aug;21(4):812-9.
  7. Levine JM, Scrivani PV, Divers TJ, Furr M, Mayhew IJ, Reed S, Levine GJ, Foreman JH, Boudreau C, Credille BC, Tennent-Brown B, Cohen ND. Multicenter case-control study of signalment, diagnostic features, and outcome associated with cervical vertebral malformation-malarticulation in horses.. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2010 Oct 1;237(7):812-22.
    pubmed: 20919847doi: 10.2460/javma.237.7.812google scholar: lookup
  8. Finno CJ, Higgins RJ, Aleman M, Ofri R, Hollingsworth SR, Bannasch DL, Reilly CM, Madigan JE. Equine degenerative myeloencephalopathy in Lusitano horses.. J Vet Intern Med 2011 Nov-Dec;25(6):1439-46.

Citations

This article has been cited 4 times.
  1. Gough SL, Anderson JDC, Dixon JJ. Computed tomographic cervical myelography in horses: Technique and findings in 51 clinical cases. J Vet Intern Med 2020 Sep;34(5):2142-2151.
    doi: 10.1111/jvim.15848pubmed: 32705729google scholar: lookup
  2. Hellige M, Schröder C, Seehusen F, Cavalleri JM, Rohn K, Stadler P, Geburek F. Computed tomographic myelography of the cranial cervical spine in Warmblood horses with no spinal pathology-Inter- and intravertebral ratios and distribution of contrast columns in neutral and flexed cervical spine. Equine Vet J 2025 Sep;57(5):1375-1386.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.14552pubmed: 40551666google scholar: lookup
  3. England D, Newsom L, White C, McKenzie E. Retrospective radiographic myelogram measurements and long-term outcomes in horses undergoing cervical interbody fusion surgery: 22 cases. PLoS One 2025;20(5):e0323083.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323083pubmed: 40333898google scholar: lookup
  4. Journée SL, Journée HL, Bergmann W, Chantziaras I, Vanderperren K, Raes E, Reed SM, de Bruijn CM, Berends HI, Delesalle CJG. Evaluation of the diagnostic value of transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) to assess neuronal functional integrity in horses. Front Neurosci 2024;18:1342803.
    doi: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1342803pubmed: 38665290google scholar: lookup