Veterinary ophthalmology2015; 18(5); 416-421; doi: 10.1111/vop.12250

Detection of equine herpesvirus in horses with idiopathic keratoconjunctivitis and comparison of three sampling techniques.

Abstract: To determine the role of equine herpesvirus (EHV) in idiopathic keratoconjunctivitis in horses and to determine whether sample collection method affects detection of EHV DNA by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). Methods: Twelve horses with idiopathic keratoconjunctivitis and six horses without signs of ophthalmic disease. Methods: Conjunctival swabs, corneal scrapings, and conjunctival biopsies were collected from 18 horses: 12 clinical cases with idiopathic keratoconjunctivitis and six euthanized controls. In horses with both eyes involved, the samples were taken from the eye judged to be more severely affected. Samples were tested with qPCR for EHV-1, EHV-2, EHV-4, and EHV-5 DNA. Quantity of EHV DNA and viral replicative activity were compared between the two populations and among the different sampling techniques; relative sensitivities of the sampling techniques were determined. Results: Prevalence of EHV DNA as assessed by qPCR did not differ significantly between control horses and those with idiopathic keratoconjunctivitis. Sampling by conjunctival swab was more likely to yield viral DNA as assessed by qPCR than was conjunctival biopsy. EHV-1 and EHV-4 DNA were not detected in either normal or IKC-affected horses; EHV-2 DNA was detected in two of 12 affected horses but not in normal horses. EHV-5 DNA was commonly found in ophthalmically normal horses and horses with idiopathic keratoconjunctivitis. Conclusions: Because EHV-5 DNA was commonly found in control horses and in horses with idiopathic keratoconjunctivitis, qPCR was not useful for the etiological diagnosis of equine keratoconjunctivitis. Conjunctival swabs were significantly better at obtaining viral DNA samples than conjunctival biopsy in horses in which EHV-5 DNA was found.
Publication Date: 2015-01-16 PubMed ID: 25594353DOI: 10.1111/vop.12250Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Comparative Study
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research investigated the role of equine herpesvirus (EHV) in idiopathic keratoconjunctivitis in horses. The study also examined how different sample collection methods affect the detection of EHV DNA through quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). The findings suggested that the presence of EHV DNA did not significantly differ between control and diseased horses. Also, conjunctival swabs were more effective at retrieving viral DNA than conjunctival biopsies.

Aim and Methodology of Study

  • This study aimed to understand the relationship between Equine Herpesvirus (EHV) and idiopathic keratoconjunctivitis in horses. It also investigated whether the method of sample collection had an impact on the detection of EHV DNA using a technique known as a quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR).
  • To compare marker levels, samples were collected from 12 clinical cases with idiopathic keratoconjunctivitis and six control horses that had been euthanized.
  • Sampling methods included taking conjunctival swabs, corneal scrapings, and conjunctival biopsies from the horses. For horses that had both eyes affected, samples were taken from the eye judged to be more severely affected.
  • The samples underwent qPCR testing to detect DNA from different strains of EHV, specifically EHV-1, EHV-2, EHV-4, and EHV-5.

Results of the Study

  • The study results revealed that the prevalence of EHV DNA did not significantly differ between horses with idiopathic keratoconjunctivitis and the control horses, as assessed by the qPCR technique.
  • The research found that the conjunctival swab method was significantly more successful in obtaining viral DNA samples than the conjunctival biopsy. This could have implications for veterinary practices when samples are needed for diagnostic testing.
  • The EHV-1 and EHV-4 DNA strains weren’t detected in either normal or affected horses. EHV-2 DNA was found in just two of the 12 horses that had the eye disease, but not in healthy horses. EHV-5 DNA was present in both normal horses and those suffering from idiopathic keratoconjunctivitis.

Conclusions of the Study

  • The research concluded that because EHV-5 DNA was regularly found in both affect and unaffected horses, qPCR testing wasn’t a useful tool for the etiological diagnosis of equine keratoconjunctivitis.
  • The study results also highlight the efficacy of the conjunctival swab sampling method, which was found to be significantly more successful in yielding viral DNA samples than conjunctival biopsy. This insight could influence veterinary practices in the collection of samples for diagnostic testing.

Cite This Article

APA
Hollingsworth SR, Pusterla N, Kass PH, Good KL, Brault SA, Maggs DJ. (2015). Detection of equine herpesvirus in horses with idiopathic keratoconjunctivitis and comparison of three sampling techniques. Vet Ophthalmol, 18(5), 416-421. https://doi.org/10.1111/vop.12250

Publication

ISSN: 1463-5224
NlmUniqueID: 100887377
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 18
Issue: 5
Pages: 416-421

Researcher Affiliations

Hollingsworth, Steven R
  • Department of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, University of California, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
Pusterla, Nicola
  • Department of Medicine and Epidemiology, University of California, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
Kass, Philip H
  • Department of Population Health and Reproduction, University of California, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
Good, Kathryn L
  • Department of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, University of California, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
Brault, Stephanie A
  • Department of Medicine and Epidemiology, University of California, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
Maggs, David J
  • Department of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, University of California, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Female
  • Herpesviridae Infections / diagnosis
  • Herpesviridae Infections / veterinary
  • Herpesviridae Infections / virology
  • Herpesvirus 1, Equid
  • Herpesvirus 3, Equid
  • Herpesvirus 4, Equid
  • Horse Diseases / diagnosis
  • Horse Diseases / virology
  • Horses
  • Keratoconjunctivitis, Infectious / diagnosis
  • Keratoconjunctivitis, Infectious / virology
  • Male
  • Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction / veterinary
  • Rhadinovirus
  • Specimen Handling / veterinary
  • Varicellovirus
  • Viral Load / veterinary

Citations

This article has been cited 2 times.
  1. Stasiak K, Dunowska M, Rola J. Kinetics of the Equid Herpesvirus 2 and 5 Infections among Mares and Foals from Three Polish National Studs.. Viruses 2022 Mar 29;14(4).
    doi: 10.3390/v14040713pubmed: 35458443google scholar: lookup
  2. Stasiak K, Dunowska M, Rola J. Prevalence and sequence analysis of equid herpesviruses from the respiratory tract of Polish horses.. Virol J 2018 Jul 11;15(1):106.
    doi: 10.1186/s12985-018-1018-3pubmed: 29996858google scholar: lookup