FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 10000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Parasites & vectors2023; 16(1); 435; doi: 10.1186/s13071-023-06045-z

Development and evaluation of specific polymerase chain reaction assays for detecting Theileria equi genotypes.

Abstract: Theileria equi causes equine piroplasmosis, an economically significant disease that affects horses and other equids worldwide. Based on 18S ribosomal RNA (18S rRNA sequences), T. equi can be classified into five genotypes: A, B, C, D, and E. These genotypes have implications for disease management and control. However, no conventional polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays are available to differentiate the genotypes of T. equi. To overcome this limitation, we developed and evaluated PCR assays specific for the detection of each T. equi genotype. Methods: A pair of forward and reverse primers, specifically targeting the 18S rRNA sequence of each genotype, was designed. The genotype-specific PCR assays were evaluated for their specificity using plasmids containing inserts of the 18S rRNA sequence of each genotype. Subsequently, the assays were tested on 270 T. equi-positive equine blood DNA samples (92 from donkeys in Sri Lanka and 178 from horses in Paraguay). 18S rRNA sequences derived from the PCR amplicons were analyzed phylogenetically. Results: Each genotype-specific PCR assay accurately targeted the intended genotype, and did not produce any amplicons when 18S rRNA from other T. equi genotypes or genomic DNA of Babesia caballi or uninfected horse blood was used as the template. Previous studies employing PCR sequencing methods identified T. equi genotypes C and D in the Sri Lankan samples, and genotypes A and C in the Paraguayan samples. In contrast, our PCR assay demonstrated exceptional sensitivity by detecting four genotypes (A, C, D, and E) in the Sri Lankan samples and all five genotypes in the Paraguayan samples. All the Sri Lankan samples and 93.3% of the Paraguayan samples tested positive for at least one genotype, further emphasizing the sensitivity of our assays. The PCR assays also had the ability to detect co-infections, where multiple genotypes in various combinations were detected in 90.2% and 22.5% of the Sri Lankan and Paraguayan samples, respectively. Furthermore, the sequences obtained from PCR amplicons clustered in the respective phylogenetic clades for each genotype, validating the specificity of our genotype-specific PCR assays. Conclusions: The genotype-specific PCR assays developed in the present study are reliable tools for the differential detection of T. equi genotypes.
© 2023. The Author(s).
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2023-11-25 PubMed ID: 38007442PubMed Central: PMC10675911DOI: 10.1186/s13071-023-06045-zGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Overview

  • This study developed and validated polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests that can specifically identify different genetic types (genotypes) of the parasite Theileria equi, which causes a disease in horses known as equine piroplasmosis.
  • The new PCR tests are more sensitive and able to detect multiple genotypes in infected animals, improving disease detection and potentially aiding better disease management.

Introduction and Background

  • Theileria equi is a protozoan parasite responsible for equine piroplasmosis, a significant infectious disease affecting horses and other equids worldwide, leading to economic losses.
  • The parasite is classified into five genotypes (A, B, C, D, and E) based on variations in its 18S ribosomal RNA (18S rRNA) gene sequence.
  • Knowing the genotype involved in an infection is important because different genotypes may vary in their pathogenicity, geographic distribution, and response to treatment, which impacts disease control strategies.
  • Prior to this study, standard PCR methods could detect the presence of T. equi but could not differentiate between these genotypes easily.

Research Objectives

  • To design specific PCR assays that can selectively amplify the 18S rRNA sequences unique to each of the five genotypes (A–E) of T. equi.
  • To evaluate the specificity and sensitivity of these genotype-specific PCR assays using known reference materials and field samples.
  • To compare the new PCR assays’ ability to detect genotypes with previous PCR sequencing approaches.

Methods

  • Primer Design: Researchers designed pairs of forward and reverse primers customized to selectively bind to unique sequences within the 18S rRNA gene region for each genotype.
  • Specificity Testing: The PCR assays were tested on plasmids (circular DNA constructs) containing 18S rRNA inserts representing each genotype to confirm that each assay only amplifies its target genotype.
  • Sample Testing: The assays were then applied to 270 blood DNA samples from T. equi-infected equids—92 from donkeys in Sri Lanka and 178 from horses in Paraguay.
  • Phylogenetic Validation: PCR products (amplicons) were sequenced, and the sequences were analyzed phylogenetically to confirm that they clustered with the correct genotype clades, thereby validating assay accuracy.

Results

  • Assay Specificity: Each genotype-specific PCR assay successfully detected only its intended T. equi genotype without amplifying DNA from other genotypes, from Babesia caballi (another equine parasite), or uninfected horse blood.
  • Improved Sensitivity: Compared to prior PCR sequencing approaches, the new assays detected more genotypes within the samples—four genotypes in Sri Lankan samples (A, C, D, E) and all five genotypes in Paraguayan samples.
  • Diverse Genotype Detection: Almost all samples (100% Sri Lankan; 93.3% Paraguayan) tested positive for at least one genotype, demonstrating excellent sensitivity.
  • Co-infection Detection: The assays revealed multiple simultaneous infections with different T. equi genotypes in many samples—90.2% of Sri Lankan and 22.5% of Paraguayan samples showed co-infections with two or more genotypes.
  • Phylogenetic Confirmation: Sequences from PCR products grouped into their respective genotypic clades, confirming the PCR assays’ reliability and specificity in genotype identification.

Conclusions and Implications

  • This study successfully developed a set of PCR assays capable of differentiating T. equi genotypes rapidly and reliably based on 18S rRNA gene sequences.
  • These genotype-specific assays provide superior sensitivity, detecting a broader range of genotypes and mixed infections that previous methods missed.
  • Improved detection of T. equi genotypes supports better epidemiological studies, infection tracking, and potentially informs tailored treatment and control strategies in equine populations.
  • These assays represent valuable diagnostic tools for veterinarians and researchers working to control equine piroplasmosis globally.

Cite This Article

APA
Ahedor B, Otgonsuren D, Zhyldyz A, Guswanto A, Ngigi NMM, Valinotti MFR, Kothalawala H, Kalaichelvan N, Silva SSP, Kothalawala H, Acosta TJ, Sivakumar T, Yokoyama N. (2023). Development and evaluation of specific polymerase chain reaction assays for detecting Theileria equi genotypes. Parasit Vectors, 16(1), 435. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-023-06045-z

Publication

Parasites & vectors
ISSN: 1756-3305
NlmUniqueID: 101462774
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 16
Issue: 1
Pages: 435
PII: 435

Researcher Affiliations

Ahedor, Believe
  • National Research Center for Protozoan Diseases, Obihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Inada-Cho, Obihiro, Hokkaido, 080-8555, Japan.
  • Department of Animal Experimentation, Noguchi Memorial Institute for Medical Research, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.
Otgonsuren, Davaajav
  • National Research Center for Protozoan Diseases, Obihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Inada-Cho, Obihiro, Hokkaido, 080-8555, Japan.
Zhyldyz, Atambekova
  • National Research Center for Protozoan Diseases, Obihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Inada-Cho, Obihiro, Hokkaido, 080-8555, Japan.
Guswanto, Azirwan
  • National Research Center for Protozoan Diseases, Obihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Inada-Cho, Obihiro, Hokkaido, 080-8555, Japan.
Ngigi, Noel Muthoni Mumbi
  • National Research Center for Protozoan Diseases, Obihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Inada-Cho, Obihiro, Hokkaido, 080-8555, Japan.
Valinotti, Maria Fátima Rodríguez
  • Centro de Diagnostico Veterinario, San Lorenzo, Paraguay.
Kothalawala, Hemal
  • Veterinary Research Institute, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka.
Kalaichelvan, Nizanantha
  • Department of Farm Animal Production and Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka.
Silva, Seekkuge Susil Priyantha
  • Department of Animal Production and Health, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka.
Kothalawala, Hemali
  • Department of Animal Production and Health, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka.
Acosta, Tomás Javier
  • Universidad Nacional de Canendiyu, Salto del Guaira, Paraguay.
  • Field Center of Animal Science and Agriculture, Obihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Obihiro, Hokkaido, Japan.
Sivakumar, Thillaiampalam
  • National Research Center for Protozoan Diseases, Obihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Inada-Cho, Obihiro, Hokkaido, 080-8555, Japan.
Yokoyama, Naoaki
  • National Research Center for Protozoan Diseases, Obihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Inada-Cho, Obihiro, Hokkaido, 080-8555, Japan. yokoyama@obihiro.ac.jp.
  • WOAH Reference Laboratory for Equine Piroplasmosis, National Research Center for Protozoan Diseases, Obihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Obihiro, Hokkaido, Japan. yokoyama@obihiro.ac.jp.

MeSH Terms

  • Cattle
  • Horses
  • Animals
  • Theileria / genetics
  • Theileriasis / diagnosis
  • Babesiosis / diagnosis
  • RNA, Ribosomal, 18S / genetics
  • Phylogeny
  • DNA, Protozoan / genetics
  • Horse Diseases / diagnosis
  • Polymerase Chain Reaction
  • Equidae
  • Genotype
  • Cattle Diseases

Grant Funding

  • Open Partnership Joint Project of the JSPS Bilateral Joint Research Projects (PJSBP120229902) / Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
  • 22H02511 / Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
  • 22KK0095 / Japan Society for the Promotion of Science

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

This article includes 42 references
  1. Knowles DP, Kappmeyer LS, Stiller D, Hennager SG, Perryman LE. Antibody to a recombinant merozoite protein epitope identifies horses infected with Babesia equi.. J Clin Microbiol 1992;30:3122–3126.
    doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.12.3122-3126.1992pmc: PMC270599pubmed: 1280648google scholar: lookup
  2. Ueti MW, Palmer GH, Kappmeyer LS, Statdfield M, Scoles GA, Knowles DP. Ability of the vector tick Boophilus microplus to acquire and transmit Babesia equi following feeding on chronically infected horses with low level parasitaemia.. J Clin Microbiol 2005;43:3755–3759.
    doi: 10.1128/JCM.43.8.3755-3759.2005pmc: PMC1233951pubmed: 16081906google scholar: lookup
  3. Uilenberg G. Babesia—a historical overview.. Vet Parasitol 2006;138:3–10.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2006.01.035pubmed: 16513280google scholar: lookup
  4. Heim A, Passos LM, Ribeiro MF, Costa-Junior LM, Bastos CV, Cabral DD. Detection and molecular characterization of Babesia caballi and Theileria equi isolates from endemic areas of Brazil.. Parasitol Res 2007;102:63–68.
    doi: 10.1007/s00436-007-0726-1pubmed: 17828553google scholar: lookup
  5. Zobba R, Ardu M, Niccolini S, Chessa B, Manna L, Cocco R, Pinna Parpaglia ML. Clinical and laboratory findings in equine piroplasmosis.. J Equine Vet Sci 2008;28:301–308.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2008.03.005google scholar: lookup
  6. Rothschild CM. Equine piroplasmosis.. J Equine Vet Sci 2013;33:497–508.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2013.03.189google scholar: lookup
  7. Wise LN, Pelzel-McCluskey AM, Mealey RH, Knowles DP. Equine piroplasmosis.. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 2014;30:677–693.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2014.08.008pubmed: 25300637google scholar: lookup
  8. Friedhoff KT, Tenter AM, Müller I. Haemoparasites of equines: impact on international trade of horses.. Rev Sci Tech 1990;9:1187–1194.
    doi: 10.20506/rst.9.4.535pubmed: 2132711google scholar: lookup
  9. Bhoora R, Franssen L, Oosthuizen MC, Guthrie AJ, Zweygarth E, Penzhorn BL. Sequence heterogeneity in the 18S rRNA gene within Theileria equi and Babesia caballi from horses in South Africa.. Vet Parasitol 2009;159:112–120.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2008.10.004pubmed: 19019541google scholar: lookup
  10. Knowles DP, Kappmeyer LS, Haney D, Herndon DR, Fry LM, Munro JB. Discovery of a novel species, Theileria haneyi n. sp., infective to equids, highlights exceptional genomic diversity within the genus Theileria: implications for apicomplexan parasite surveillance.. Int J Parasitol 2018;48:679–90.
    doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2018.03.010pubmed: 29885436google scholar: lookup
  11. Tirosh-Levy S, Gottlieb Y, Fry LM, Knowles DP, Steinman A. 20 years of equine piroplasmosis research: global distribution, molecular diagnosis, and phylogeny.. Pathogens 2020;9:926.
    doi: 10.3390/pathogens9110926pmc: PMC7695325pubmed: 33171698google scholar: lookup
  12. Ueti MW, Mealey RH, Kappmeyer LS, White SN, Kumpula-McWhirter N, Pelzel AM. Reemergence of the apicomplexan Theileria equi in the United States: elimination of persistent infection and transmission risk.. PLoS ONE 2012;7:44713.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044713pmc: PMC3435266pubmed: 22970295google scholar: lookup
  13. Sears K, Knowles D, Dinkel K, Mshelia PW, Onzere C, Silva M. Imidocarb dipropionate lacks efficacy against Theileria haneyi and fails to consistently clear Theileria equi in horses co-infected with T. haneyi.. Pathogens 2020;9:1035.
    doi: 10.3390/pathogens9121035pmc: PMC7764667pubmed: 33321715google scholar: lookup
  14. Bhoora R, Quan M, Matjila PT, Zweygarth E, Guthrie AJ, Collins NE. Sequence heterogeneity in the equi merozoite antigen gene (ema-1) of Theileria equi and development of an ema-1-specific TaqMan MGBTM assay for the detection of T. equi.. Vet Parasitol 2010;172:33–45.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2010.04.025pubmed: 20493635google scholar: lookup
  15. Knowles DP, Perryman LE, Kappmeyer LS, Hennager SG. Detection of equine antibody to Babesia equi merozoite proteins by a monoclonal antibody-based competitive inhibition enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.. J Clin Microbiol 1991;29:2056–2058.
    doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.9.2056-2058.1991pmc: PMC270260pubmed: 1774334google scholar: lookup
  16. Kappmeyer LS, Perryman LE, Hines SA, Baszler TV, Katz JB, Hennager SG. Detection of equine antibodies to Babesia caballi by recombinant B. caballi rhoptry-associated protein 1 in a competitive-inhibition enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.. J Clin Microbiol 1999;37:2285–90.
    doi: 10.1128/JCM.37.7.2285-2290.1999pmc: PMC85139pubmed: 10364599google scholar: lookup
  17. Madden PA, Holbrook AA. Equine piroplasmosis: indirect fluorescent antibody test for Babesia caballi.. Am J Vet Res 1968;29:117–123.
    pubmed: 4865734
  18. World Organization for Animal Halth (WOAH)—terrestrial manual. 2021. https://www.woah.org/en/disease/equine-piroplasmosis/. Accessed 27 May 2023.
  19. Manna G, Cersini A, Nardini R, Bartolom’e Del Pino LE, Antognetti V, Zini M. Genetic diversity of Theileria equi and Babesia caballi infecting horses of central-southern Italy and preliminary results of its correlation with clinical and serological status.. Ticks Tick Borne Dis 2018;9:1212–20.
    doi: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2018.05.005pubmed: 29752142google scholar: lookup
  20. Tirosh-Levy S, Mazuz ML, Savitsky I, Pinkas D, Gottlieb Y, Steinman A. A serological and molecular prevalence of Babesia caballi in apparently healthy horses in Israel.. Pathogens 2021;10:445.
    doi: 10.3390/pathogens10040445pmc: PMC8068206pubmed: 33917822google scholar: lookup
  21. Kim CM, Blanco LB, Alhassan A, Iseki H, Yokoyama N, Xuan X. Diagnostic real-time PCR assay for the quantitative detection of Theileria equi from equine blood samples.. Vet Parasitol 2008;151:158–163.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2007.10.023pubmed: 18077095google scholar: lookup
  22. Coultous RM, McDonald M, Raftery AG, Shiels BR, Sutton DGM, Weir W. Analysis of Theileria equi diversity in The Gambia using a novel genotyping method.. Transbound Emerg Dis 2020;67:1213–1221.
    doi: 10.1111/tbed.13454pubmed: 31845493google scholar: lookup
  23. Bhoora RV, Collins NE, Schnittger L, Troskie C, Marumo R, Labuschagne K. Molecular genotyping and epidemiology of equine piroplasmids in South Africa.. Ticks Tick Borne Dis 2020;11:101358.
    doi: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2019.101358pubmed: 31870636google scholar: lookup
  24. Ahedor B, Kothalawala H, Kanagaratnam R, Vimalakumar SC, Otgonsuren D, Tuvshintulga B. First detection of Theileria equi in free-roaming donkeys (Equus africanus asinus) in Sri Lanka.. Infect Genet Evol 2022;99:105244.
    doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2022.105244pubmed: 35149223google scholar: lookup
  25. Chen K, Hu Z, Yang G, Guo W, Qi T, Liu D. Development of a duplex real-time PCR assay for simultaneous detection and differentiation of Theileria equi and Babesia caballi.. Transbound Emerg Dis 2022;69:1338–1349.
    doi: 10.1111/tbed.14464pubmed: 35089645google scholar: lookup
  26. Chandler DP, Fredrickson JK, Brockman FJ. Effect of PCR template concentration on the composition and distribution of total community 16S rDNA clone libraries.. Mol Ecol 1997;6:475–482.
    doi: 10.1046/j.1365-294X.1997.00205.xpubmed: 9161015google scholar: lookup
  27. Vestheim H, Jarman SN. Blocking primers to enhance PCR amplification of rare sequences in mixed samples: a case study on prey DNA in Antarctic krill stomachs.. Front Zool 2008;5:12.
    doi: 10.1186/1742-9994-5-12pmc: PMC2517594pubmed: 18638418google scholar: lookup
  28. Yokoyama N, Ueno A, Mizuno D, Kuboki N, Khukhuu A, Igarashi I. Genotypic diversity of Theileria orientalis detected from cattle grazing in Kumamoto and Okinawa prefectures of Japan.. J Vet Med Sci 2011;73:305–312.
    doi: 10.1292/jvms.10-0263pubmed: 20978366google scholar: lookup
  29. Liyanagunawardena N, Sivakumar T, Kothalawala H, Silva SS, Battsetseg B, Lan DT. Type-specific PCR assays for Babesia bovis msa-1 genotypes in Asia: revisiting the genetic diversity in Sri Lanka, Mongolia, and Vietnam.. Infect Genet Evol 2016;37:64–69.
    doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2015.10.029pubmed: 26520797google scholar: lookup
  30. Corpet F. Multiple sequence alignment with hierarchical clustering.. Nucleic Acids Res 1988;16:10881–10890.
    doi: 10.1093/nar/16.22.10881pmc: PMC338945pubmed: 2849754google scholar: lookup
  31. Leaché AD, Oaks JR. The utility of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data in phylogenetics.. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 2017;48:69–84.
    doi: 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110316-022645google scholar: lookup
  32. Avarzed A, Igarashi I, De Waal DT, Kawai S, Oomori Y, Inoue N. Monoclonal antibody against Babesia equi: characterization and potential application of antigen for serodiagnosis.. J Clin Microbiol 1998;36:1835–1839.
    doi: 10.1128/JCM.36.7.1835-1839.1998pmc: PMC104937pubmed: 9650921google scholar: lookup
  33. Matjila PT, Leisewitz AL, Oosthuizen MC, Jongejan F, Penzhorn BL. Detection of a Theileria species in dogs in South Africa.. Vet Parasitol 2008;157:34–40.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2008.06.025pubmed: 18687528google scholar: lookup
  34. Oosthuizen MC, Zweygarth E, Collins NE, Troskie M, Penzhorn BL. Identification of a novel Babesia sp. from a sable antelope (Hippotragus niger Harris, 1838). J Clin Microbiol 2008;46:2247–51.
    doi: 10.1128/JCM.00167-08pmc: PMC2446884pubmed: 18508943google scholar: lookup
  35. Ahedor B, Sivakumar T, Valinotti MFR, Otgonsuren D, Yokoyama N, Acosta TJ. PCR detection of Theileria equi and Babesia caballi in apparently healthy horses in Paraguay.. Vet Parasitol Reg Stud Reports 2023;39:100835.
    pubmed: 36878622
  36. Katoh K, Rozewicki J, Yamada KD. MAFFT online service: multiple sequence alignment, interactive sequence choice and visualization.. Brief Bioinform 2019;20:1160–1166.
    doi: 10.1093/bib/bbx108pmc: PMC6781576pubmed: 28968734google scholar: lookup
  37. Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. MEGA X: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms.. Mol Biol and Evol 2018;35:1547–1549.
    doi: 10.1093/molbev/msy096pmc: PMC5967553pubmed: 29722887google scholar: lookup
  38. Tamura K, Nei M. Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of mitochondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzees.. Mol Biol Evol 1993;10:512–526.
    pubmed: 8336541
  39. Alhassan A, Pumidonming W, Okamura M, Hirata H, Battsetseg B, Fujisaki K. Development of a single-round and multiplex PCR method for the simultaneous detection of Babesia caballi and Babesia equi in horse blood.. Vet Parasitol 2005;129:43–49.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2004.12.018pubmed: 15817201google scholar: lookup
  40. Woolhouse ME, Thumbi SM, Jennings A, Chase-Topping M, Callaby R, Kiara H. Co-infections determine patterns of mortality in a population exposed to parasite infection.. Sci Adv 2015;1:e1400026.
    doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1400026pmc: PMC4643819pubmed: 26601143google scholar: lookup
  41. Onyiche TE, Suganuma K, Igarashi I, Yokoyama N, Xuan X, Thekisoe O. A Review on equine piroplasmosis: epidemiology, vector ecology, risk factors, host immunity, diagnosis and control.. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2019;16:1736.
    doi: 10.3390/ijerph16101736pmc: PMC6572709pubmed: 31100920google scholar: lookup
  42. Scoles GA, Ueti MW. Vector ecology of equine piroplasmosis.. Annu Rev Entomol 2015;60:561–580.
    doi: 10.1146/annurev-ento-010814-021110pubmed: 25564746google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 5 times.
  1. Balaro MFA, Cordeiro MD, Magalhães IFB, Pereira JC, de Azevedo Baêta B, Guterres A, da Silva CB, da Cunha NC. Tick-borne pathogens in meat sheep from Brazil: first report of Theileria ovis in sheep in latin America. Parasitol Res 2026 Mar 2;125(1).
    doi: 10.1007/s00436-025-08587-wpubmed: 41770286google scholar: lookup
  2. Qin S, Kulabieke T, Mizhamuhan D, Zhang M, Jin M, Abula G, Pi M, Wang H, Zhang Y, Guo Q. Molecular Prevalence and Genotypic Diversity of Theileria equi in Xinjiang, China, Based on Three Genes. Vet Sci 2025 Dec 25;13(1).
    doi: 10.3390/vetsci13010027pubmed: 41600683google scholar: lookup
  3. Soliman AM, Elhawary NM, Helmy NM, El-Seify MA, Amer MM, Mohamed S, Memon FU, Rashid MHO, Gadelhaq SM. Molecular detection and genotyping of Theileria equi infection within the equine population in Giza, Egypt, using real-time PCR as compared with conventional detection methods. Iran J Vet Res 2025;26(2):145-151.
    doi: 10.22099/ijvr.2025.51028.7553pubmed: 41170307google scholar: lookup
  4. Fernandes TA, Paulino PG, Dos Santos Juliano D, Rabello CA, de Oliveira NVB, de Souza Santana M, Peckle M, Massard CL, da Costa Angelo I, Jacob JCF, Santos HA. Epidemiology and genetic diversity of Theileria equi and Babesia caballi in draft horses in the Distrito Federal, Brazil. Trop Anim Health Prod 2025 Feb 19;57(2):72.
    doi: 10.1007/s11250-025-04321-xpubmed: 39969660google scholar: lookup
  5. Mendoza FJ, Pérez-Écija A, Kappmeyer LS, Suarez CE, Bastos RG. New insights in the diagnosis and treatment of equine piroplasmosis: pitfalls, idiosyncrasies, and myths. Front Vet Sci 2024;11:1459989.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1459989pubmed: 39205808google scholar: lookup
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 100,129 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.