Analyze Diet
Journal of clinical microbiology1991; 29(10); 2228-2233; doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.10.2228-2233.1991

Diagnostic application of polymerase chain reaction for detection of Ehrlichia risticii in equine monocytic ehrlichiosis (Potomac horse fever).

Abstract: Genomic amplification by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was used to identify a unique genomic sequence of Ehrlichia risticii directly in DNA isolated from peripheral-blood buffy coat cells of E. risticii-infected horses (Potomac horse fever) and from infected cell cultures. A specific primer pair, selected from a cloned, species-specific, 1-kb DNA fragment of the E. risticii genome as a template, was used for the amplification of the target DNA of 247 bp. The optimal number of 40 PCR cycles, determined by analyzing an amplification profile obtained with a constant Taq polymerase concentration, was used to achieve maximum amplification of the E. risticii DNA segment. Efficient amplification of target DNA was achieved with specimens processed by either the phenol extraction or rapid lysis method. The specificity of the amplified DNA product was confirmed by the proper size (247 bp) and appropriate restriction enzyme cleavage pattern of the amplified target DNA, as well as by the specific hybridization signal obtained by using a PCR-amplified 185-bp internal DNA probe. A 10(5)- to 10(6)-fold amplification of target DNA, which allowed detection of E. risticii from as few as two to three infected cells in culture and from a very small volume of buffy coat cells from infected horses, was achieved. This PCR amplification procedure was found to be highly specific and sensitive for the detection of E. risticii for the study of Potomac horse fever.
Publication Date: 1991-10-01 PubMed ID: 1939575PubMed Central: PMC270303DOI: 10.1128/jcm.29.10.2228-2233.1991Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research investigates the use of Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) in diagnosing Potomac Horse Fever, a disease caused by the bacterium Ehrlichia risticii, in horses. The PCR techniques were shown to be highly sensitive and specific for detecting the bacterium.

Identification and Amplification of Ehrlichia risticii DNA

  • The researchers used PCR, a molecular biology technique, to identify a specific sequence of Ehrlichia risticii DNA in both infected horses and infected cell cultures.
  • The team selected a specific primer pair from a cloned, 1-kb DNA fragment of the E. risticii genome to amplify the target DNA of 247 base pairs.
  • The amplification was optimized at 40 PCR cycles, which was determined to allow for maximum amplification of the E. risticii DNA segment without degrading the quality of the sample.

Efficiency and Specificity of the PCR Procedure

  • The PCR procedure was found to be efficient in amplifying target DNA regardless of whether the samples were prepared through phenol extraction or a rapid lysis method.
  • The researchers confirmed the specificity of the amplified DNA product by checking its size (247 base pairs) and its restriction enzyme cleavage pattern, matching what was expected for E. risticii DNA.
  • They also used a hybridization signal from a PCR-amplified internal DNA probe to verify the specificity of the amplified product.

Detection Sensitivity and Applications

  • The researchers were able to achieve an amplification of target DNA between 10^5 and 10^6 times, which allowed them to detect E. risticii from as few as two to three infected cells in culture.
  • They were also able to detect the bacterium using a very small volume of buffy coat cells (the component of blood that contains white blood cells and platelets) from infected horses.
  • This discovery suggests that the PCR procedure could be a highly sensitive and specific diagnostic tool for Potomac horse fever, a common and potentially fatal disease in horses.

Cite This Article

APA
Biswas B, Mukherjee D, Mattingly-Napier BL, Dutta SK. (1991). Diagnostic application of polymerase chain reaction for detection of Ehrlichia risticii in equine monocytic ehrlichiosis (Potomac horse fever). J Clin Microbiol, 29(10), 2228-2233. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.29.10.2228-2233.1991

Publication

ISSN: 0095-1137
NlmUniqueID: 7505564
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 29
Issue: 10
Pages: 2228-2233

Researcher Affiliations

Biswas, B
  • Virginia-Maryland Regional College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Maryland, College Park 20742-3711.
Mukherjee, D
    Mattingly-Napier, B L
      Dutta, S K

        MeSH Terms

        • Animals
        • Base Sequence
        • Cells, Cultured
        • DNA Probes
        • DNA, Bacterial / genetics
        • Ehrlichia / genetics
        • Ehrlichia / isolation & purification
        • Horse Diseases / diagnosis
        • Horse Diseases / microbiology
        • Horses
        • Humans
        • Molecular Sequence Data
        • Monocytes / microbiology
        • Polymerase Chain Reaction / methods
        • Polymerase Chain Reaction / statistics & numerical data
        • Rickettsiaceae Infections / diagnosis
        • Rickettsiaceae Infections / microbiology
        • Rickettsiaceae Infections / veterinary
        • Sensitivity and Specificity

        References

        This article includes 14 references
        1. Dutta SK, Myrup AC, Rice RM, Robl MG, Hammond RC. Experimental reproduction of Potomac horse fever in horses with a newly isolated Ehrlichia organism.. J Clin Microbiol 1985 Aug;22(2):265-9.
          pubmed: 4031040doi: 10.1128/jcm.22.2.265-269.1985google scholar: lookup
        2. Ristic M, Holland CJ, Dawson JE, Sessions J, Palmer J. Diagnosis of equine monocytic ehrlichiosis (Potomac horse fever) by indirect immunofluorescence.. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1986 Jul 1;189(1):39-46.
          pubmed: 3525479
        3. Pretzman CI, Rikihisa Y, Ralph D, Gordon JC, Bech-Nielsen S. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for Potomac horse fever disease.. J Clin Microbiol 1987 Jan;25(1):31-6.
          pubmed: 3539995doi: 10.1128/jcm.25.1.31-36.1987google scholar: lookup
        4. Dutta SK, Rice RM, Hughes TD, Savage PK, Myrup AC. Detection of serum antibodies against Ehrlichia risticii in Potomac horse fever by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 1987 Jan;14(1):85-92.
          pubmed: 3824902doi: 10.1016/0165-2427(87)90077-8google scholar: lookup
        5. Saiki RK, Gelfand DH, Stoffel S, Scharf SJ, Higuchi R, Horn GT, Mullis KB, Erlich HA. Primer-directed enzymatic amplification of DNA with a thermostable DNA polymerase.. Science 1988 Jan 29;239(4839):487-91.
          pubmed: 2448875doi: 10.1126/science.2448875google scholar: lookup
        6. Dutta SK, Penney BE, Myrup AC, Robl MG, Rice RM. Disease features in horses with induced equine monocytic ehrlichiosis (Potomac horse fever).. Am J Vet Res 1988 Oct;49(10):1747-51.
          pubmed: 3189992
        7. Rikihisa Y, Perry BD. Causative ehrlichial organisms in Potomac horse fever.. Infect Immun 1985 Sep;49(3):513-7.
          pubmed: 4030092doi: 10.1128/iai.49.3.513-517.1985google scholar: lookup
        8. Dawson JE, Abeygunawardena I, Holland CJ, Buese MM, Ristic M. Susceptibility of cats to infection with Ehrlichia risticii, causative agent of equine monocytic ehrlichiosis.. Am J Vet Res 1988 Dec;49(12):2096-100.
          pubmed: 3071194
        9. Olchowy TW, Ames TR, Molitor TW. Serodiagnosis of equine monocytic ehrlichiosis in selected groups of horses in Minnesota.. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1990 Jun 15;196(12):1967-70.
          pubmed: 2195001
        10. Thaker SR, Dutta SK, Adhya SL, Mattingly-Napier BL. Molecular cloning of Ehrlichia risticii and development of a gene probe for the diagnosis of Potomac horse fever.. J Clin Microbiol 1990 Sep;28(9):1963-7.
        11. Dutta SK, Shankarappa B, Thaker SR, Mattingly-Napier BL. DNA restriction endonuclease cleavage pattern and protein antigen profile of Ehrlichia risticii.. Vet Microbiol 1990 Oct;25(1):29-38.
          pubmed: 2247934doi: 10.1016/0378-1135(90)90090-igoogle scholar: lookup
        12. Sanger F, Nicklen S, Coulson AR. DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors.. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1977 Dec;74(12):5463-7.
          pubmed: 271968doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.12.5463google scholar: lookup
        13. Holland CJ, Ristic M, Cole AI, Johnson P, Baker G, Goetz T. Isolation, experimental transmission, and characterization of causative agent of Potomac horse fever.. Science 1985 Feb 1;227(4686):522-4.
          pubmed: 3880925doi: 10.1126/science.3880925google scholar: lookup
        14. Shankarappa B, Dutta SK, Sanusi J, Mattingly BL. Monoclonal antibody-mediated, immunodiagnostic competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for equine monocytic ehrlichiosis.. J Clin Microbiol 1989 Jan;27(1):24-8.
          pubmed: 2643624doi: 10.1128/jcm.27.1.24-28.1989google scholar: lookup

        Citations

        This article has been cited 11 times.
        1. Uzal FA, Arroyo LG, Navarro MA, Gomez DE, Asín J, Henderson E. Bacterial and viral enterocolitis in horses: a review. J Vet Diagn Invest 2022 May;34(3):354-375.
          doi: 10.1177/10406387211057469pubmed: 34763560google scholar: lookup
        2. Baird JD, Arroyo LG. Historical aspects of Potomac horse fever in Ontario (1924-2010). Can Vet J 2013 Jun;54(6):565-72.
          pubmed: 24155447
        3. Biswas B, Vemulapalli R, Dutta SK. Molecular basis for antigenic variation of a protective strain-specific antigen of Ehrlichia risticii. Infect Immun 1998 Aug;66(8):3682-8.
        4. Massung RF, Slater K, Owens JH, Nicholson WL, Mather TN, Solberg VB, Olson JG. Nested PCR assay for detection of granulocytic ehrlichiae. J Clin Microbiol 1998 Apr;36(4):1090-5.
        5. Dutta SK, Vemulapalli R, Biswas B. Association of deficiency in antibody response to vaccine and heterogeneity of Ehrlichia risticii strains with Potomac horse fever vaccine failure in horses. J Clin Microbiol 1998 Feb;36(2):506-12.
          doi: 10.1128/JCM.36.2.506-512.1998pubmed: 9466767google scholar: lookup
        6. Chang WL, Pan MJ. Specific amplification of Ehrlichia platys DNA from blood specimens by two-step PCR. J Clin Microbiol 1996 Dec;34(12):3142-6.
        7. Vemulapalli R, Biswas B, Dutta SK. Pathogenic, immunologic, and molecular differences between two Ehrlichia risticii strains. J Clin Microbiol 1995 Nov;33(11):2987-93.
        8. Pfeffer M, Wiedmann M, Batt CA. Applications of DNA amplification techniques in veterinary diagnostics. Vet Res Commun 1995;19(5):375-407.
          doi: 10.1007/BF01839319pubmed: 8560754google scholar: lookup
        9. Kakoma I, Hansen RD, Anderson BE, Hanley TA, Sims KG, Liu L, Bellamy C, Long MT, Baek BK. Cultural, molecular, and immunological characterization of the etiologic agent for atypical canine ehrlichiosis. J Clin Microbiol 1994 Jan;32(1):170-5.
          doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.1.170-175.1994pubmed: 8126175google scholar: lookup
        10. Iqbal Z, Chaichanasiriwithaya W, Rikihisa Y. Comparison of PCR with other tests for early diagnosis of canine ehrlichiosis. J Clin Microbiol 1994 Jul;32(7):1658-62.
        11. Biswas B, Vemulapalli R, Dutta SK. Detection of Ehrlichia risticii from feces of infected horses by immunomagnetic separation and PCR. J Clin Microbiol 1994 Sep;32(9):2147-51.