Analyze Diet

[Diarrhoea and oedema in two show horses after feeding a pelleted supplemental feed for horses according to VDLUFA’s perspective of microbial quality classified as safe for use in horses].

Abstract: A new batch of a supplemental feed was fed as pellets (diameter 8 mm) to two Warmblood-type horses. One horse developed watery diarrhoea within two days. Pronounced oedema due to hypalbuminemia was seen about ten days later. The feed was replaced by pellets of identical composition and mixing process, but lower diameter (5 mm). After one week of feeding, oedema regressed and faeces were normally formed. At refeeding the larger sized pellets, the symptoms recurred, but now both horses were affected. After a change to the smaller pellets, the horses recovered soon. Water activity (aw-value) of the larger and the smaller sized pellets was 0.68 and 0.56, respectively. In the larger sized pellets crude fat increased, whereas crude protein and nitrogen-free extracts decreased, giving a hint to microbial activity. Samples of both pellets were examined by VDLUFA methods and the microbial quality was classified in quality step 1. Though the quality parameters complied with recommendations for the product, it contained large numbers of spoilage indicating bacteria. The content of sulfite-reducing clostridia was higher in the 8 mm pellets than in the 5 mm pellets, with 3.3 x 10(2) and 1.1 x 10(2) colony forming units, respectively. The larger sized pellets produced remarkable quantities of gas. Bacillus cereus of non probiotic origin was identified.
Publication Date: 2013-08-02 PubMed ID: 23901590
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Case Reports
  • English Abstract
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research investigates the negative health effects observed in two Warmblood-type show horses after they were fed a batch of supplemental feed pellets. After consumption, the horses developed diarrhoea and oedema which was found to be due to microbial activity in the larger-sized pellets. When replaced with denser, smaller-sized pellets, the symptoms regressed.

Research Method

  • The study began after the horses were fed with pelleted supplemental feed and soon developed signs of illness.
  • The feed was substituted with a similar composition but with a smaller diameter and the horses’ health improved.
  • On reintroducing the larger-sized pellets, the symptoms reoccurred, but this time in both the horses.
  • On reverting to the smaller-sized pellets, the horses quickly recuperated.

Findings and Conclusion

  • The water activity values of the large and smaller-sized pellets differed, with 0.68 and 0.56 respectively, hinting at a variation in their microbial environments.
  • The crude fat in the larger pellets increased along with a decrease in the crude protein and nitrogen-free extract levels, signifying microbial activity.
  • Both the large and the smaller pellet samples were examined following VDLUFA methods. Their microbial quality was classified in quality step 1, indicating that per the standard criteria they were safe for horse consumption.
  • However, despite complying with product recommendations, the batch had high numbers of bacteria indicative of spoilage.
  • The content of sulfite-reducing clostridia was higher in the larger pellets, with approximately 3.3 x 10(2) units, in comparison to 1.1 x 10(2) in the smaller ones.
  • The larger-sized pellets also generated significant amounts of gas and non-probiotic Bacillus cereus were identified, indicating their negative impact on the horses’ health.

Implications

  • The findings underscore the need for punctilious microbial quality tests to ensure horse feed safety. It highlights that conforming to standard quality recommendations may not always eliminate the risk of harmful microbial activity.
  • The study draws attention to the significance of feed pellet size. It suggests that smaller, denser pellets might prove healthier and present a lesser risk of microbial spoilage and negative effects on horse health.

Cite This Article

APA
Büsing K, Mietke-Hofmann H, Dibbert R, Donandt D, Maier T, Zeyner A. (2013). [Diarrhoea and oedema in two show horses after feeding a pelleted supplemental feed for horses according to VDLUFA’s perspective of microbial quality classified as safe for use in horses]. Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr, 126(7-8), 342-349.

Publication

ISSN: 0005-9366
NlmUniqueID: 0003163
Country: Germany
Language: ger
Volume: 126
Issue: 7-8
Pages: 342-349

Researcher Affiliations

Büsing, Kirsten
  • Agrar- und Umweltwissenschaftliche Fakultät, Universität Rostock. kirsten.buesing@uni-rostock.de
Mietke-Hofmann, Henriette
    Dibbert, Regina
      Donandt, Dietz
        Maier, Thomas
          Zeyner, Annette

            MeSH Terms

            • Animal Feed / adverse effects
            • Animal Feed / microbiology
            • Animals
            • Bacillus cereus / isolation & purification
            • Bacillus cereus / pathogenicity
            • Diarrhea / etiology
            • Diarrhea / veterinary
            • Dietary Supplements / adverse effects
            • Dietary Supplements / microbiology
            • Edema / etiology
            • Edema / veterinary
            • Female
            • Food Microbiology
            • Horse Diseases / etiology
            • Horses
            • Particle Size

            Citations

            This article has been cited 1 times.
            1. Xiao Z, Cheng M, Hu X, Xue M, Jiang N, Liu W, Fan Y, Meng Y, Xu C, Zhou Y. Pathological changes of highly pathogenic Bacillus cereus on Pelodiscus sinensis. Vet Q 2023 Dec;43(1):1-10.
              doi: 10.1080/01652176.2023.2287191pubmed: 38010068google scholar: lookup