Analyze Diet
Equine veterinary journal. Supplement2011; (38); 355-360; doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2010.00255.x

Dietary energy source and physical conditioning affect insulin sensitivity and skeletal muscle glucose metabolism in horses.

Abstract: Starch rich (S) feeds reduce insulin sensitivity in untrained horses when compared to high fat (F) feeds, but insulin sensitivity is not affected when S or F are fed during exercise training. The effects of S vs. F on training-associated alterations in skeletal muscle glucose metabolism are unknown. Objective: To determine the effects of dietary energy source on training-associated changes in insulin sensitivity, skeletal muscle GLUT4 protein and hexokinase (HK) and glycogen synthase (GS) activities in horses. Methods: After a baseline period on an all forage diet (Phase 1), horses were adapted to high starch (S) or high fat (F) diets (n = 7/group) for 6 weeks (Phase 2) and then completed 7 weeks of exercise training (Phase 3) on the same diets. To measure insulin sensitivity (SI), minimal model analysis of a frequently-sampled i.v. glucose tolerance test was performed at the end of each phase. Middle gluteal muscle biopsies to measure GLUT-4 protein content, muscle glycogen and HK and GS activities were taken before and after euglycaemic-hyperinsulinaemic clamps administered after each phase. Data were analysed by repeated measures ANOVA. Results: In S, SI was 36% lower (P < 0.05) after Phase 2 when compared to Phase 1 but was unchanged in F. After Phase 3, SI was increased (P < 0.01) in S and F compared to Phase 2 and did not differ (P > 0.05) between diets. Middle gluteal muscle GLUT-4 protein and post clamp HK activity were increased (P < 0.05) in S after Phase 3, with higher (P < 0.01) GLUT4 in S than in F. GS activities were unchanged in both diets. Conclusions: Adaptation to S resulted in decreased SI mitigated by moderate physical conditioning. Increased GLUT-4 protein content and HK activity in S may have contributed to higher SI after training.
Publication Date: 2011-05-27 PubMed ID: 21059030DOI: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2010.00255.xGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research explores how different dietary energy sources and physical conditioning affect insulin sensitivity and glucose metabolism in horses’ skeletal muscles. The study found that while high-starch feeds reduced insulin sensitivity in untrained horses compared to high-fat feeds, exercise training mitigated this effect.

Objective of the Study

The study aimed to explore how high-starch and high-fat diets impact training-related changes in horses’ insulin sensitivity, skeletal muscle GLUT4 protein, and activities of hexokinase and glycogen synthase enzymes.

Research Methodology

  • The research involved tri-phasic testing on horses.
  • In the first phase, horses were given an all-forage diet, establishing a baseline.
  • In the second phase, horses were divided into two groups. One group was given high-starch food while the other group received high-fat food for six weeks.
  • The third phase included a seven-week exercise training period for both groups while continuing the assigned diets.
  • Tests were conducted at the end of each phase to measure insulin sensitivity using a frequently-sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test.
  • Muscle biopsies were also performed to determine the GLUT-4 protein content and the activity of hexokinase and glycogen synthase in the middle gluteal muscle.

Results and Observations

  • In the high-starch group, insulin sensitivity was 36% lower after phase 2 compared to phase 1 but remained unchanged in the high-fat group.
  • Following the exercise regimen in phase 3, insulin sensitivity increased in both diets compared to phase 2.
  • The research also observed an increased GLUT-4 protein content and hexokinase activity in the high-starch group after phase 3.
  • Glycogen synthase activities remained identical in both high-starch and high-fat groups across all the phases.

Conclusions Drawn

  • The experiment concluded that while the high-starch diet decreased insulin sensitivity, moderate physical training mitigated this effect.
  • Additionally, the increase in GLUT-4 protein content and hexokinase activity was concluded to potentially be a contributing factor towards increased insulin sensitivity post-training.

Cite This Article

APA
Stewart-Hunt L, Pratt-Phillips S, McCutcheon LJ, Geor RJ. (2011). Dietary energy source and physical conditioning affect insulin sensitivity and skeletal muscle glucose metabolism in horses. Equine Vet J Suppl(38), 355-360. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-3306.2010.00255.x

Publication

NlmUniqueID: 9614088
Country: United States
Language: English
Issue: 38
Pages: 355-360

Researcher Affiliations

Stewart-Hunt, L
  • Department of Animal and Poultry Science, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Pratt-Phillips, S
    McCutcheon, L J
      Geor, R J

        MeSH Terms

        • Animal Feed / analysis
        • Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena
        • Animals
        • Diet / veterinary
        • Dietary Carbohydrates / pharmacology
        • Dietary Fats / pharmacology
        • Female
        • Gene Expression Regulation
        • Glucose / metabolism
        • Glucose Transporter Type 4 / genetics
        • Glucose Transporter Type 4 / metabolism
        • Horses / physiology
        • Insulin / metabolism
        • Male
        • Muscle, Skeletal / drug effects
        • Muscle, Skeletal / metabolism
        • Physical Conditioning, Animal / physiology

        Citations

        This article has been cited 6 times.
        1. Yuan C. Molecular mechanisms and therapeutic strategies of gut microbiota modulation in Sarcopenia (Review). Oncol Lett 2025 Mar;29(3):104.
          doi: 10.3892/ol.2024.14850pubmed: 39736924google scholar: lookup
        2. Fresa K, Catandi GD, Whitcomb L, Gonzalez-Castro RA, Chicco AJ, Carnevale EM. Adiposity in mares induces insulin dysregulation and mitochondrial dysfunction which can be mitigated by nutritional intervention. Sci Rep 2024 Jun 18;14(1):13992.
          doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-64628-xpubmed: 38886475google scholar: lookup
        3. Pratt-Phillips S. Effect of Exercise Conditioning on Countering the Effects of Obesity and Insulin Resistance in Horses-A Review. Animals (Basel) 2024 Feb 26;14(5).
          doi: 10.3390/ani14050727pubmed: 38473112google scholar: lookup
        4. Clark BL, Bamford NJ, Stewart AJ, McCue ME, Rendahl A, Bailey SR, Bertin FR, Norton EM. Evaluation of an HMGA2 variant contribution to height and basal insulin concentrations in ponies. J Vet Intern Med 2023 May-Jun;37(3):1186-1192.
          doi: 10.1111/jvim.16723pubmed: 37148171google scholar: lookup
        5. Kinsella HM, Hostnik LD, Snyder HA, Mazur SE, Kamr AM, Burns TA, Mossbarger JC, Toribio RE. Comparison of insulin sensitivity between healthy neonatal foals and horses using minimal model analysis. PLoS One 2022;17(1):e0262584.
          doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262584pubmed: 35030228google scholar: lookup
        6. Ward AB, Stephen K, Argo CM, Harris PA, Watson CA, Neacsu M, Russell W, Grove-White DH, Morrison PK. COVID-19 impacts equine welfare: Policy implications for laminitis and obesity. PLoS One 2021;16(5):e0252340.
          doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252340pubmed: 34048478google scholar: lookup