FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / J Vet Intern Med / Differences in isolation rate and antimicrobial susceptibili...
Journal of veterinary internal medicine2020; 34(2); 955-963; doi: 10.1111/jvim.15692

Differences in isolation rate and antimicrobial susceptibility of bacteria isolated from foals with sepsis at admission and after ≥48 hours of hospitalization.

Abstract: Antimicrobial treatment protocols for foals with sepsis that do not improve clinically often are adjusted based on bacteriological and antimicrobial susceptibility testing results from samples collected at hospital admission. Objective: To evaluate whether hospitalization for ≥48 hours affects bacteriological and antimicrobial susceptibility testing results. Methods: Two-hundred sixty-seven foals <30 days of age admitted to a neonatal intensive care unit and diagnosed with sepsis. Methods: Medical records were reviewed retrospectively to identify foals with sepsis and positive bacteriological cultures. Results from samples collected at hospital admission were compared to those collected ≥48 hours after admission. Logistic regression for clustered data and exact logistic regression were used for statistical analysis. Results: Three-hundred fifty-three unique bacterial isolates were obtained from 231 foals at hospital admission and 92 unique bacterial isolates were obtained from 57 foals after ≥48 hours of hospitalization. Relative isolation frequency after ≥48 hours of hospitalization increased for Acinetobacter spp., 0.6% versus 3.3% (odds ratio [OR], 7.63; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.28-45.45); Enterococcus spp., 4.8% versus 19.6% (OR, 5.37; 95% CI, 2.64-10.90); Klebsiella spp., 5.1% versus 10.9% (OR, 2.27; 95% CI, 1.05-4.89); Pseudomonas spp., 3.0% versus 7.6% (OR, 3.49; 95% CI, 3.49-240.50); and Serratia spp., 3.0% versus 5.4% (OR, 20.23; 95% CI, 2.20-186.14). Bacteria isolated after ≥48 hours of hospitalization were less susceptible to all tested antimicrobial drugs, except for imipenem. Conclusions: Decreased antimicrobial susceptibility of bacteria isolated after ≥48 hours of hospitalization provides a rationale for repeated bacteriological culture and susceptibility testing in hospitalized foals with sepsis.
© 2020 The Authors. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of the American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2020-02-05 PubMed ID: 32022351PubMed Central: PMC7096636DOI: 10.1111/jvim.15692Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research aims to examine the changes in bacteriological and antimicrobial susceptibility testing results of foals with sepsis before and after at least 48 hours of hospitalization. It finds an increased frequency of various bacterial infections and decreased susceptibility to most antimicrobial drugs over the course of hospitalization, suggesting the need for repeated testing.

Objective and Methodology

The objective of this study was to investigate if there are differences in the bacteria isolated from septic foals and their susceptibility to antimicrobial drugs at admission versus after 48 hours or more of hospitalization.

  • The study was conducted on 267 foals, all of whom were less than 30 days old and admitted to a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) with a diagnosis of sepsis.
  • This research uses a retrospective review of medical records to identify septic foals with positive bacteriological cultures. As part of the methodology, logistic regression for clustered data and exact logistic regression were used for the statistical analysis.

Results

The results showed distinct changes in bacteriology and antimicrobial susceptibility over the course of hospitalization:

  • At the time of hospital admission, 353 unique bacterial isolates were obtained from 231 foals. After at least 48 hours of hospitalization, a total of 92 unique bacterial isolates were obtained from 57 foals.
  • There was an increased relative isolation frequency for Acinetobacter spp., Enterococcus spp., Klebsiella spp., Pseudomonas spp., and Serratia spp. after 48 hours of hospitalization.
  • Bacteria isolated after 48 hours of hospitalization were found to be less susceptible to all tested antimicrobial drugs, with the exception of Imipenem. This suggests that the bacteria became more resistant to treatment over time.

Conclusion

The decrease in susceptibility of bacteria isolated from septic foals after 48 hours of hospitalization indicates necessary adjustments to antimicrobial treatment protocols. The dramatically altered susceptibility suggests the need for repeated bacteriological culture and susceptibility testing. This can allow clinicians to adjust treatment according to changing bacterial profiles and susceptibilities, potentially improving the effectiveness of care for foals with sepsis.

Cite This Article

APA
Theelen MJP, Wilson WD, Byrne BA, Edman JM, Kass PH, Mughini-Gras L, Magdesian KG. (2020). Differences in isolation rate and antimicrobial susceptibility of bacteria isolated from foals with sepsis at admission and after ≥48 hours of hospitalization. J Vet Intern Med, 34(2), 955-963. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvim.15692

Publication

Journal of veterinary internal medicine
ISSN: 1939-1676
NlmUniqueID: 8708660
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 34
Issue: 2
Pages: 955-963

Researcher Affiliations

Theelen, Mathijs J P
  • Department of Equine Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Department of Infectious Diseases and Immunity, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Wilson, W David
  • Department of Medicine and Epidemiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, California.
Byrne, Barbara A
  • Department of Pathology, Microbiology & Immunology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, California.
Edman, Judy M
  • Department of Medicine and Epidemiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, California.
Kass, Philip H
  • Department of Population Health and Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, California.
Mughini-Gras, Lapo
  • Department of Infectious Diseases and Immunity, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Centre for Infectious Disease Control (CIb), National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Magdesian, K Gary
  • Department of Medicine and Epidemiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, California.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Animals, Newborn
  • Anti-Bacterial Agents / therapeutic use
  • Bacteremia / drug therapy
  • Bacteremia / veterinary
  • Drug Resistance, Bacterial
  • Female
  • Horse Diseases / drug therapy
  • Horse Diseases / microbiology
  • Horses
  • Hospitalization
  • Male
  • Microbial Sensitivity Tests / veterinary
  • Records / veterinary
  • Retrospective Studies

Grant Funding

  • University of California, Davis

Conflict of Interest Statement

Authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

This article includes 33 references
  1. Giguère S, Weber EJ, Sanchez LC. Factors associated with outcome and gradual improvement in survival over time in 1065 equine neonates admitted to an intensive care unit.. Equine Vet J 2017 Jan;49(1):45-50.
    pubmed: 26538009doi: 10.1111/evj.12536google scholar: lookup
  2. Theelen MJ, Wilson WD, Edman JM, Magdesian KG, Kass PH. Temporal trends in prevalence of bacteria isolated from foals with sepsis: 1979-2010.. Equine Vet J 2014 Mar;46(2):169-73.
    pubmed: 23808819doi: 10.1111/evj.12131google scholar: lookup
  3. Russell CM, Axon JE, Blishen A, Begg AP. Blood culture isolates and antimicrobial sensitivities from 427 critically ill neonatal foals.. Aust Vet J 2008 Jul;86(7):266-71.
    pubmed: 18616477doi: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.2008.00311.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  4. Gayle JM, Cohen ND, Chaffin MK. Factors associated with survival in septicemic foals: 65 cases (1988-1995).. J Vet Intern Med 1998 May-Jun;12(3):140-6.
    pubmed: 9595374doi: 10.1111/j.1939-1676.1998.tb02109.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  5. Hytychová T, Bezděková B. Retrospective evaluation of blood culture isolates and sepsis survival rate in foals in the Czech Republic: 50 cases (2011-2013).. J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio) 2015 Sep-Oct;25(5):660-6.
    pubmed: 26220509doi: 10.1111/vec.12348google scholar: lookup
  6. Marsh PS, Palmer JE. Bacterial isolates from blood and their susceptibility patterns in critically ill foals: 543 cases (1991-1998).. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2001 May 15;218(10):1608-10.
    pubmed: 11393374doi: 10.2460/javma.2001.218.1608google scholar: lookup
  7. Raisis AL, Hodgson JL, Hodgson DR. Equine neonatal septicaemia: 24 cases.. Aust Vet J 1996 Apr;73(4):137-40.
    pubmed: 8660228doi: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.1996.tb10006.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  8. Sanchez LC, Giguère S, Lester GD. Factors associated with survival of neonatal foals with bacteremia and racing performance of surviving Thoroughbreds: 423 cases (1982-2007).. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2008 Nov 1;233(9):1446-52.
    pubmed: 18980499doi: 10.2460/javma.233.9.1446google scholar: lookup
  9. Brewer BD, Koterba AM. Bacterial isolates and susceptibility patterns in foals in a neonatal intensive care unit.. Compendium on Continuing Education for the Practising Veterinarian 1990;12:1773‐1780.
  10. Hollis AR, Wilkins PA, Palmer JE, Boston RC. Bacteremia in equine neonatal diarrhea: a retrospective study (1990-2007).. J Vet Intern Med 2008 Sep-Oct;22(5):1203-9.
    pubmed: 18638014doi: 10.1111/j.1939-1676.2008.0152.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  11. Toombs-Ruane LJ, Riley CB, Kendall AT, Hill KE, Benschop J, Rosanowski SM. Antimicrobial susceptibility of bacteria isolated from neonatal foal samples submitted to a New Zealand veterinary pathology laboratory (2004 to 2013).. N Z Vet J 2016 Mar;64(2):107-11.
    pubmed: 26496417doi: 10.1080/00480169.2015.1109006google scholar: lookup
  12. Theelen MJ, Wilson WD, Edman JM, Magdesian KG, Kass PH. Temporal trends in in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of bacteria isolated from foals with sepsis: 1979-2010.. Equine Vet J 2014 Mar;46(2):161-8.
    pubmed: 23808791doi: 10.1111/evj.12130google scholar: lookup
  13. Theelen MJP, Wilson WD, Byrne BA, Edman JM, Kass PH, Magdesian KG. Initial antimicrobial treatment of foals with sepsis: Do our choices make a difference?. Vet J 2019 Jan;243:74-76.
    pubmed: 30606442doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2018.11.012google scholar: lookup
  14. Johns I, Verheyen K, Good L, Rycroft A. Antimicrobial resistance in faecal Escherichia coli isolates from horses treated with antimicrobials: a longitudinal study in hospitalised and non-hospitalised horses.. Vet Microbiol 2012 Oct 12;159(3-4):381-9.
    pubmed: 22565010doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2012.04.010google scholar: lookup
  15. Bryan J, Leonard N, Fanning S, Katz L, Duggan V. Antimicrobial resistance in commensal faecal Escherichia coli of hospitalised horses.. Ir Vet J 2010 Jun 1;63(6):373-9.
    pmc: PMC3113860pubmed: 21851747doi: 10.1186/2046-0481-63-6-373google scholar: lookup
  16. Maddox TW, Williams NJ, Clegg PD, O'Donnell AJ, Dawson S, Pinchbeck GL. Longitudinal study of antimicrobial-resistant commensal Escherichia coli in the faeces of horses in an equine hospital.. Prev Vet Med 2011 Jun 15;100(2):134-45.
    pubmed: 21377225doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2011.02.006google scholar: lookup
  17. Williams A, Christley RM, McKane SA, Roberts VL, Clegg PD, Williams NJ. Antimicrobial resistance changes in enteric Escherichia coli of horses during hospitalisation: resistance profiling of isolates.. Vet J 2013 Jan;195(1):121-6.
    pubmed: 22967926doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2012.08.001google scholar: lookup
  18. Horan TC, Andrus M, Dudeck MA. CDC/NHSN surveillance definition of health care-associated infection and criteria for specific types of infections in the acute care setting.. Am J Infect Control 2008 Jun;36(5):309-32.
    pubmed: 18538699doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2008.03.002google scholar: lookup
  19. Vincent JL, Rello J, Marshall J, Silva E, Anzueto A, Martin CD, Moreno R, Lipman J, Gomersall C, Sakr Y, Reinhart K. International study of the prevalence and outcomes of infection in intensive care units.. JAMA 2009 Dec 2;302(21):2323-9.
    pubmed: 19952319doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1754google scholar: lookup
  20. CLSI. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk and Dilution Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria Isolated from Animals, VET01S. 3th ed. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2015.
  21. Williams RL. A note on robust variance estimation for cluster-correlated data.. Biometrics 2000 Jun;56(2):645-6.
    pubmed: 10877330doi: 10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00645.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  22. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regression. 2nd ed. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2000.
  23. WHO. WHO List of Critically Important Antimicrobials (CIA)—3rd Revision. WHO Document Production Services, Geneva, Switzerland; 2011.
  24. Hollenbeck BL, Rice LB. Intrinsic and acquired resistance mechanisms in enterococcus.. Virulence 2012 Aug 15;3(5):421-33.
    pmc: PMC3485979pubmed: 23076243doi: 10.4161/viru.21282google scholar: lookup
  25. Clark NM, Zhanel GG, Lynch JP 3rd. Emergence of antimicrobial resistance among Acinetobacter species: a global threat.. Curr Opin Crit Care 2016 Oct;22(5):491-9.
    pubmed: 27552304doi: 10.1097/mcc.0000000000000337google scholar: lookup
  26. Buhl M, Peter S, Willmann M. Prevalence and risk factors associated with colonization and infection of extensively drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa: a systematic review.. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 2015;13(9):1159-70.
    pubmed: 26153817doi: 10.1586/14787210.2015.1064310google scholar: lookup
  27. Hennequin C, Robin F. Correlation between antimicrobial resistance and virulence in Klebsiella pneumoniae.. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2016 Mar;35(3):333-41.
    pubmed: 26718943doi: 10.1007/s10096-015-2559-7google scholar: lookup
  28. Stock I, Grueger T, Wiedemann B. Natural antibiotic susceptibility of strains of Serratia marcescens and the S. liqiens complex: S. liqiens sensu stricto, S. proteamaculans and S. grimesii.. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2003 Jul;22(1):35-47.
    pubmed: 12842326doi: 10.1016/s0924-8579(02)00163-2google scholar: lookup
  29. Parente TM, Rebouças Ede L, Santos VC, Barbosa FC, Zanin IC. Serratia marcescens resistance profile and its susceptibility to photodynamic antimicrobial chemotherapy.. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther 2016 Jun;14:185-90.
    pubmed: 27085794doi: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2016.04.007google scholar: lookup
  30. Sievert DM, Ricks P, Edwards JR, Schneider A, Patel J, Srinivasan A, Kallen A, Limbago B, Fridkin S. Antimicrobial-resistant pathogens associated with healthcare-associated infections: summary of data reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2009-2010.. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2013 Jan;34(1):1-14.
    pubmed: 23221186doi: 10.1086/668770google scholar: lookup
  31. Endimiani A, Hujer KM, Hujer AM, Bertschy I, Rossano A, Koch C, Gerber V, Francey T, Bonomo RA, Perreten V. Acinetobacter baumannii isolates from pets and horses in Switzerland: molecular characterization and clinical data.. J Antimicrob Chemother 2011 Oct;66(10):2248-54.
    pmc: PMC3172040pubmed: 21733964doi: 10.1093/jac/dkr289google scholar: lookup
  32. Isgren CM, Salem SE, Archer DC, Worsman FC, Townsend NB. Risk factors for surgical site infection following laparotomy: Effect of season and perioperative variables and reporting of bacterial isolates in 287 horses.. Equine Vet J 2017 Jan;49(1):39-44.
    pubmed: 26713622doi: 10.1111/evj.12564google scholar: lookup
  33. Estell KE, Young A, Kozikowski T, Swain EA, Byrne BA, Reilly CM, Kass PH, Aleman M. Pneumonia Caused by Klebsiella spp. in 46 Horses.. J Vet Intern Med 2016 Jan-Feb;30(1):314-21.
    pmc: PMC4913652pubmed: 26492860doi: 10.1111/jvim.13653google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 2 times.
  1. Bookbinder LC, Mani R, Carr EA. Antibiograms of field and hospital acquired equine neonatal bacterial fluid cultures in the Midwestern United States: 149 samples (2007-2018).. J Vet Intern Med 2023 May-Jun;37(3):1193-1200.
    doi: 10.1111/jvim.16671pubmed: 37029453google scholar: lookup
  2. Gomez DE, Wong D, MacNicol J, Dembek K. The fecal bacterial microbiota of healthy and sick newborn foals.. J Vet Intern Med 2023 Jan;37(1):315-322.
    doi: 10.1111/jvim.16596pubmed: 36519210google scholar: lookup
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,357 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.