Analyze Diet
Equine veterinary journal1999; 31(1); 53-60; doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1999.tb03791.x

Differences in second-intention wound healing between horses and ponies: macroscopic aspects.

Abstract: Second-intention healing of deep wounds was studied in 5 horses and 5 ponies. Standardised wounds were created on the distal limbs and hind quarters. Wounds on the metatarsi extended onto the metatarsal bone; the depth of the wounds in the femoral biceps muscle was 18 mm. The wound margins were marked by tattoos. Photographs were taken at weekly intervals to determine the wound area. The relative contribution of contraction and epithelialisation to wound closure was quantified by means of the tattoos. Swelling of the limbs was measured; and regularity and aspect of the granulation tissue were semi-quantitatively scored. Second-intention wound healing occurred significantly faster in ponies than in horses, and muscle wounds healed significantly faster than metatarsal wounds. These marked differences reflected the greater contribution of contraction to wound healing. Moreover, demarcation was seen earlier and a healthy granulation bed developed more rapidly in ponies, whereas in horses the granulation tissue remained irregular and purulent for longer. Healing of the metatarsal wounds of horses differed markedly from that of all other wounds: these wounds increased to almost twice their original size in the first 2 weeks, exuberant granulation tissue was persistent, epithelialisation started later, and contraction played a minor role in wound closure. Limb swelling was greater in horses than in ponies. Periosteal new bone formation was more extensive, and was active over a longer period in the metatarsal bones of horses than of ponies. From this study it is concluded that second-intention healing of deep wounds occurs faster in ponies than in horses. This difference can be largely attributed to a more pronounced and faster wound contraction in ponies than in horses. Therefore, attempts to improve second-intention wound healing in clinical practice should be directed at stimulation of wound contraction.
Publication Date: 1999-02-10 PubMed ID: 9952330DOI: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1999.tb03791.xGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Comparative Study
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The study investigates the differences in healing of deep wounds in horses and ponies. The findings indicate a notably faster second-intention wound repair process in ponies than in horses, largely due to a more significant and quicker wound contraction in ponies.

Research Methodology

  • The study followed the second-intention healing of deep wounds in 5 horses and 5 ponies.
  • Standardized wounds were created on both animals’ distal limbs and hindquarters. Wounds on the metatarsi extended to the metatarsal bone and the depth of the wounds in the femoral biceps muscle was around 18 mm.
  • The wounds’ boundaries were identified with tattoos, and photographs were taken at weekly intervals to monitor the wound area.
  • The amount that contraction and epithelialization contributed to wound closure was quantified using the tattoos.

Key Findings

  • Wound healing occurred significantly faster in ponies than in horses, and the muscle wounds healed quicker than the metatarsal wounds.
  • This difference was largely due to the higher contribution of contraction to the wound healing process.
  • Ponies’ wounds also showed signs of demarcation earlier than horses’ wounds and a healthier granulation bed developed faster in ponies.
  • On the other hand, in horses, the granulation tissue remained irregular and purulent for a longer time.
  • Specially, the metatarsal wounds in horses differed greatly from all other wounds as they increased to nearly double their original size in the first two weeks. Also, these wounds exhibited persistent exuberant granulation tissue, delayed start of epithelialization and less significant role of contraction in wound closure.
  • Additionally, swelling in the limbs was found to be higher in the horses than in the ponies.
  • Periosteal new bone formation was more extensive and active in the metatarsal bones of the horses, in comparison to the ponies.

Conclusion

  • The study concludes that second-intention wound healing happens faster in ponies than in horses due to a more pronounced and quicker wound contraction in ponies.
  • This finding provides a valuable insight for the veterinary practice suggesting that stimulating wound contraction could potentially improve the effectiveness of second-intention wound healing treatments.

Cite This Article

APA
Wilmink JM, Stolk PW, van Weeren PR, Barneveld A. (1999). Differences in second-intention wound healing between horses and ponies: macroscopic aspects. Equine Vet J, 31(1), 53-60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-3306.1999.tb03791.x

Publication

ISSN: 0425-1644
NlmUniqueID: 0173320
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 31
Issue: 1
Pages: 53-60

Researcher Affiliations

Wilmink, J M
  • Department of General and Large Animal Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Stolk, P W
    van Weeren, P R
      Barneveld, A

        MeSH Terms

        • Animals
        • Bone Regeneration
        • Exudates and Transudates / metabolism
        • Granulation Tissue / growth & development
        • Horses / injuries
        • Horses / physiology
        • Male
        • Metatarsal Bones / injuries
        • Metatarsal Bones / physiology
        • Metatarsus / diagnostic imaging
        • Metatarsus / injuries
        • Metatarsus / physiology
        • Muscle, Skeletal / injuries
        • Muscle, Skeletal / physiology
        • Radiography
        • Tattooing / veterinary
        • Wound Healing

        Citations

        This article has been cited 17 times.
        1. Weaver A. Macroscopic Markers of Dolphin Healing at Sea Linked to Immunity. Animals (Basel) 2026 Jan 19;16(2).
          doi: 10.3390/ani16020305pubmed: 41594494google scholar: lookup
        2. Partusch L, Rutland CS, Martens A, Du Cheyne C, De Spiegelaere W, Michler JK. Collagen composition in equine exuberant granulation tissue reflects tissue immaturity. PLoS One 2025;20(11):e0335179.
          doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0335179pubmed: 41196884google scholar: lookup
        3. Vicetti Miguel RD, Liu M, Campion GJ, Cherpes TL. Hypothesis: Ephrin-Eph Signaling Pathways Provide Novel Targets for Accelerated Re-Epithelialization of Cutaneous Wounds. Bioessays 2026 Jan;48(1):e70088.
          doi: 10.1002/bies.70088pubmed: 41195956google scholar: lookup
        4. Helal IE, Al-Abbadi HA, El-Daharawy MH, Ahmed MF. Enhancement of chronic wound healing with maltodextrin/ascorbic acid gel: a clinical evaluation of distal limb wounds in horses. J Anim Sci Technol 2022 Sep;64(5):997-1007.
          doi: 10.5187/jast.2022.e52pubmed: 36287738google scholar: lookup
        5. Su CY, Hughes MW, Liu TY, Chuong CM, Wang HV, Yang WC. Defining Wound Healing Progression in Cetacean Skin: Characteristics of Full-Thickness Wound Healing in Fraser's Dolphins (Lagenodelphis hosei). Animals (Basel) 2022 Feb 22;12(5).
          doi: 10.3390/ani12050537pubmed: 35268108google scholar: lookup
        6. Mund SJK, MacPhee DJ, Campbell J, Honaramooz A, Wobeser B, Barber SM. Macroscopic, Histologic, and Immunomodulatory Response of Limb Wounds Following Intravenous Allogeneic Cord Blood-Derived Multipotent Mesenchymal Stromal Cell Therapy in Horses. Cells 2021 Nov 1;10(11).
          doi: 10.3390/cells10112972pubmed: 34831196google scholar: lookup
        7. Jørgensen E, Bjarnsholt T, Jacobsen S. Biofilm and Equine Limb Wounds. Animals (Basel) 2021 Sep 27;11(10).
          doi: 10.3390/ani11102825pubmed: 34679846google scholar: lookup
        8. Tuomola K, Mäki-Kihniä N, Valros A, Mykkänen A, Kujala-Wirth M. Bit-Related Lesions in Event Horses After a Cross-Country Test. Front Vet Sci 2021;8:651160.
          doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.651160pubmed: 33869325google scholar: lookup
        9. Wilmink JM, Ladefoged S, Jongbloets A, Vernooij JCM. The evaluation of the effect of probiotics on the healing of equine distal limb wounds. PLoS One 2020;15(7):e0236761.
          doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236761pubmed: 32726347google scholar: lookup
        10. Lawless SP, Cohen ND, Lawhon SD, Chamoun-Emanuelli AM, Wu J, Rivera-Vélez A, Weeks BR, Whitfield-Cargile CM. Effect of gallium maltolate on a model of chronic, infected equine distal limb wounds. PLoS One 2020;15(6):e0235006.
          doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235006pubmed: 32559258google scholar: lookup
        11. Mund SJK, Kawamura E, Awang-Junaidi AH, Campbell J, Wobeser B, MacPhee DJ, Honaramooz A, Barber S. Homing and Engraftment of Intravenously Administered Equine Cord Blood-Derived Multipotent Mesenchymal Stromal Cells to Surgically Created Cutaneous Wound in Horses: A Pilot Project. Cells 2020 May 8;9(5).
          doi: 10.3390/cells9051162pubmed: 32397125google scholar: lookup
        12. Jørgensen E, Bay L, Skovgaard LT, Bjarnsholt T, Jacobsen S. An Equine Wound Model to Study Effects of Bacterial Aggregates on Wound Healing. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle) 2019 Oct 1;8(10):487-498.
          doi: 10.1089/wound.2018.0901pubmed: 31456906google scholar: lookup
        13. de Souza MV, Silva MB, Pinto Jde O, Lima MB, Crepaldi J, Lopes GF, dos Santos HB, Ribeiro RI, Thomé RG. Immunohistochemical Expression of Collagens in the Skin of Horses Treated with Leukocyte-Poor Platelet-Rich Plasma. Biomed Res Int 2015;2015:893485.
          doi: 10.1155/2015/893485pubmed: 26236743google scholar: lookup
        14. Tracey AK, Alcott CJ, Schleining JA, Safayi S, Zaback PC, Hostetter JM, Reinertson EL. The effects of topical oxygen therapy on equine distal limb dermal wound healing. Can Vet J 2014 Dec;55(12):1146-52.
          pubmed: 25477541
        15. Spaas JH, Broeckx S, Van de Walle GR, Polettini M. The effects of equine peripheral blood stem cells on cutaneous wound healing: a clinical evaluation in four horses. Clin Exp Dermatol 2013 Apr;38(3):280-4.
          doi: 10.1111/ced.12068pubmed: 23517358google scholar: lookup
        16. Tóth T, Broström H, Båverud V, Emanuelson U, Bagge E, Karlsson T, Bergvall K. Evaluation of LHP® (1% hydrogen peroxide) cream versus petrolatum and untreated controls in open wounds in healthy horses: a randomized, blinded control study. Acta Vet Scand 2011 Jun 30;53(1):45.
          doi: 10.1186/1751-0147-53-45pubmed: 21718487google scholar: lookup
        17. Dubuc V, Lepault E, Theoret CL. Endothelial cell hypertrophy is associated with microvascular occlusion in horse wounds. Can J Vet Res 2006 Jul;70(3):206-10.
          pubmed: 16850943