FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Animals (Basel) / Different Approach to Horses-The Use of Equid Remains in the...
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI2020; 10(12); 2294; doi: 10.3390/ani10122294

Different Approach to Horses-The Use of Equid Remains in the Early Middle Ages on the Example of Ostrów Tumski in Wroclaw.

Abstract: The following article concerns the functional use of horse bones in the early Middle Ages (mainly in the period from the mid of the 10th to the 12th/13th century). The authors try to explain how such remains were used and how common it was. It is also discussed whether the special role of the horse in medieval societies somehow restricted its post-mortem usage, or perhaps there was no difference between the skeletal remains of horses and other species in this regard. For this purpose, statistical calculations on the use of the bones of various mammals were made. Only the remains of the species determined during the archaeozoological analysis were taken into account. The specific use of individual parts of a horse skeleton was also noted. In addition, the analysis also encompasses all other types of horse remains that could be used by humans (hide, hair, etc.). The consumption of horse meat was discussed separately: on the basis of the preserved traces, an attempt was made to determine whether it had happened, and if so, how popular it had been. Overall, such comprehensive analysis aims to show the various roles of the horse. It was not only a mount, but also a beast of burden, a source of food and raw material as well. The main purpose of this study is to describe the role of horses in human medieval societies of Ostrów Tumski on the basis of accessible equid remains. The highlighting of the human-horse relationship in the past allows us to understand the importance and value of the horse both as a life companion and the source of food or leather and bone tools.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2020-12-04 PubMed ID: 33291605PubMed Central: PMC7761946DOI: 10.3390/ani10122294Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research paper explores the various functional uses of horse remains during the early Middle Ages, with a focus on a specific region (Ostrów Tumski in Wroclaw). It provides an extensive analysis of the role of horses in human medieval societies, including understanding horse consumption and its significance and value in these societies.

Approach and Methodology

  • The initial approach taken by the authors was to investigate horse remains from the Middle Ages, specifically from the 10th to the 12th/13th centuries.
  • The study used statistical calculations on the bones of different mammals, excluding non-determinable species. These calculations were performed to estimate the post-mortem use of horse remains compared to other species.
  • The authors also examined the specific uses of different parts of the horse skeleton. The focus was not limited to bones, but also included other types of horse remains such as hide and hair.

Horse Consumption

  • A separate discussion was presented on the consumption of horse meat during the Middle Ages. The authors examined preserved traces to determine if horse meat was eaten and the extent of its popularity.
  • This examination gave insights into the value placed on horses as a food source during this period.

Role of Horses

  • The research demonstrated the multiple roles that horses played in medieval societies. These ranged from being mounts, working as beasts of burden, to providing food and raw materials.
  • The study aimed to paint a comprehensive picture of the significance of horses in human societies of that era, highlighting the human-horse relationship.
  • Examining equid remains from the period provided the basis for better understanding the historical importance and value placed on horses both as life companions and sources of food or material for making leather and bone tools.

Study Significance

  • The study provides a detailed description and analysis of the role of horses in the human societies of the Middle Ages.
  • By examining horse remains and their post-mortem usage, this research allows for a broader understanding of medieval societies, particularly within the region of Ostrów Tumski in Wroclaw.
  • Ultimately, the research seeks to shine light on the complexity of the relationship between humans and horses in the past and provide deeper insights into our shared history.

Cite This Article

APA
Jaworski K, Pankiewicz A, Chrószcz A, Poradowski D. (2020). Different Approach to Horses-The Use of Equid Remains in the Early Middle Ages on the Example of Ostrów Tumski in Wroclaw. Animals (Basel), 10(12), 2294. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10122294

Publication

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI
ISSN: 2076-2615
NlmUniqueID: 101635614
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 10
Issue: 12
PII: 2294

Researcher Affiliations

Jaworski, Krzysztof
  • Institute of Archaeology, University of Wroclaw, Szewska 48, 50-139 Wrocław, Poland.
Pankiewicz, Aleksandra
  • Institute of Archaeology, University of Wroclaw, Szewska 48, 50-139 Wrocław, Poland.
Chrószcz, Aleksander
  • Department of Biostructure and Animal Physiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Kożuchowska 1/3, 51-631 Wrocław, Poland.
Poradowski, Dominik
  • Department of Biostructure and Animal Physiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Kożuchowska 1/3, 51-631 Wrocław, Poland.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

This article includes 59 references
  1. Hyland A. The Medieval Warhorse. From Byzantium to the Crusades.. Equus .
  2. Dunlop R, Williams D. Veterinary Medicine.. .
  3. Hyland A. The Horse in the Middle Ages.. .
  4. Baron J. Ritual and cultural changes. Transformations in rituals at the junction of pagan religion and Christianity in early medieval Poland.. In: Gediga B., Grossman A., Piotrowski W., editors. Rytm Przemian Kulturowych w Pradziejach i Średniowieczu. 1st ed. Instytut Archeologii i Etnologii PAN; Biskupin-Wroclaw, Poland: 2012. pp. 449–464.
  5. Chrószcz A, Krupska A, Janeczek M, Pospieszny N, Jaworski K, Pankiewicz A. Animal remains from the archaeological excavation at Gromnik Hill (Rummelsberg) in Poland.. Acta Sci. Pol. 2011;9:19–32.
  6. Chrószcz A, Janeczek M. Wstępna ocena szczątków kostnych ze stanowiska archeologicznego przy ulicy Katedralnej 4 na Ostrowie Tumskim we Wrocławiu.. In: Pankiewicz A., editor. Nowożytny Cmentarz Przy Kościele św. Piotra i Pawła na Ostrowie Tumskim we Wrocławiu (lata 1621–1670) 1st ed. Uniwersytet Wrocławski; Wrocław, Poland: 2012. pp. 205–222.
  7. Chrószcz A, Janeczek M, Poradowski D, Sudoł B. Analiza archeozoologiczna szczątków kostnych z wykopu IIIF przy ulicy św. Idziego, na Ostrowie Tumskim we Wrocławiu.. In: Limisiewicz A., Pankiewicz A., editors. Pago Silensi: Wrocławskie Studia Wczesnośredniowieczne. 1st ed. Uniwersytet Wrocławski; Wrocław, Poland: 2015. pp. 421–468.
  8. Chrószcz A, Janeczek M, Pasicka E. Zwierzęta w średniowiecznym Wrocławiu. Problem struktury konsumpcji mięsa.. In: Piekalski J., Wachowski K., editors. Rytm Rozwoju Miasta na Kulturowym Pograniczu Studium Strefy Nowy Targ We Wrocławiu. 1st ed. Uniwersytet Wrocławski; Wrocław, Poland: 2018. pp. 1083–1112.
  9. Daugnora L, Thomas R. Horse burials from middle Lithuania: A palaeopathological investigation.. In: Davies J., Fabis M., Mainland I., Richards M., Thomas R., editors. Diet and Health in Past Animal Populations: Current Research and Future Directions. Oxbow; Osford, UK: 2005. pp. 67–74.
  10. Stampfli H.R. Die Tierreste von Wasenplatz und Richtstätte.. In Richtstätte und Wasenplatz in Emmenbrücke (16–19. Jahrhundert). Archäologische und historische Untersuchungen zur Geschichte von Strafrechtspflege und Tierhaltung in Luzern. Schweizer Beiträge zur Kulturgeschichte und Archäologie des Mittelalters. In: Manser J., editor. Schweizerische Burgenverein Olten und Freiburg. 1st ed. Walter Verlag; Base, Switzerland: 1992. pp. 157–177.
  11. Bartosiewicz L, Gal E. Shuffling Nags, Lame Ducks: The Archaeology of Animal Disease.. Oxbow Books; Barnsley, UK: 2013.
  12. Lavine M.A, Whitwell K.E, Jeffcott L.B. Abnormal thoracic vertebrae and the evolution of horse husbandry.. Archaeofauna 2005;14:93–109.
  13. Janeczek M, Chrószcz A, Onar V, Henklewski R, Piekalski J, Duma P, Czerski A, Całkosiński I. Anatomical and biomechanical aspects of the horse spine: The interpretation of vertebral fusion in a medival horse from Wroclaw (Poland). Int. J. Osteoarchaeol. 2014;24:623–633.
    doi: 10.1002/oa.2248google scholar: lookup
  14. Baxter I.L. Species identification of equide from Western European archaeological deposits: Methodologies, techniques and problem.. In: Anderson S., Boyle K., editors. Current and Recent Research in Osteoarchaeology. Oxbow Books; Oxford, UK: 1998. pp. 3–17.
  15. Bendrey R, Thorpe N, Outram A, van Wijngaarden-Bakker L.H. The origins of domestic horses in north-west Europe: New direct dates on the horses of Newgrange, Ireland.. Proc. Prehist. Soc. 2013;79:1–13.
    doi: 10.1017/ppr.2013.3google scholar: lookup
  16. Bendrey R. From wild horses to domestic horses: A European perspective.. World Archaeol. 2012;44:135–157.
    doi: 10.1080/00438243.2012.647571google scholar: lookup
  17. Makowiecki D. Archaeozoology’s contribution to the improvement of historians’ conceptions of subsistence economy and environment in Early Medieval Poland—Selected problems.. Beitrage zur Archäozoologie und Prähistorischen Anthropologie 2006;5:77–82.
  18. Sahnouni M, Rosell J, van der Made J, Vergès JM, Ollé A, Kandi N, Harichane Z, Derradji A, Medig M. The first evidence of cut marks and usewear traces from the Plio-Pleistocene locality of El-Kherba (Ain Hanech), Algeria: implications for early hominin subsistence activities circa 1.8 Ma.. J Hum Evol 2013 Feb;64(2):137-50.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2012.10.007pubmed: 23305779google scholar: lookup
  19. Miller W.I. Of Outlaws, Christians, Horsemeat and Writing: Uniform and Saga Iceland.. Mich. Law Rev. 2016;89:2081–2095.
    doi: 10.2307/1289363google scholar: lookup
  20. Gieysztor A. Mitologia Słowian.. WUW; Warszawa, Poland: 2006.
  21. Pawshe M.D., Badhe S.R., Khedkar C.D., Pawshe R.D., Pundkar A.Y. Horse Meat.. In: Caballero B., Finglas P., Toldrá F., editors. The Encyclopedia of Food and Health. Volume 3. Academic Press; Oxford, UK: 2016. pp. 353–356.
  22. Beech M. A matter of taste? Some evidence for the butchery of horses, dogs and bears et the La Tène Sttlement of Jenišův Újezd.. In: Blažek J., Meduna P., editors. Archeologické Výzkumy v Severozápdnych Čechách v Letech 1983–1992. Ústav Archeologické Památkove Péče Severozápdnych Čech; Most, Czech Republic: 1995. pp. 165–170.
  23. Foster J. A Zooarchaeological Study of Changing Meat Supply and Butchery Practices at Medieval Castles in England.. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Exeter; Exeter, UK: 2016.
  24. Wilson B, Edwards P. Butchery of horse and dog at Witney Palace, Oxfordshire, and the knackering and feeding of meat to hounds during the post-medieval period.. Post-Mediev. Archaeol. 1993;27:43–56.
    doi: 10.1179/pma.1993.004google scholar: lookup
  25. Jaworski K. Wyroby z Kości i Poroża w Kulturze Wczesnośredniowiecznego Ostrowa Tumskiego we Wrocławiu.. 1st ed. Volumen; Wrocław-Warszawa, Poland: 1990. pp. 7–23.
  26. Jaworski K. Wytwórczość i Użytkowanie Wyrobów z Kości i Poroża na Wrocławskim Ostrowie Tumskim w X-XV Wieku. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Wroclaw; Wroclaw, Poland: 1993; pp. 41–270.
  27. Jaworski K. Obróbka surowca kościanego w średniowieczu i czasach nowożytnych w zachodniej części Ostrowa Tumskiego we Wrocławiu. Materiały z posesji przy ul. Katedralnej 4.. Wratislav. Antiq. 2012;17:165–204.
  28. Jaworski K. Wczesnośredniowieczne wyroby z kości i poroża w centralnej części wrocławskiego Ostrowa Tumskiego w świetle badań wykopu IIIF i sąsiednich.. In: Limisiewicz A., Pankiewicz A., editors. Pago Silensi: Wrocławskie Studia Wczesnośredniowieczne. 1st ed. Uniwersytet Wrocławski; Wrocław, Poland: 2015. pp. 229–259.
  29. Chrzanowska W. Szczątki kostne zwierząt z wczesnośredniowiecznego stanowiska we Wrocławiu na Ostrowie Tumskim.. Archeozoologia 1986;11:19–43.
  30. Romanow M. Szczątki kostnie zwierząt z ulicy Kapitulnej 4 we Wrocławiu.. Śląskie Sprawozdania Archeologiczne 2005;47:207–216.
  31. Myczkowski K. Ogólne wyniki badań szczątków kostnych i skorup zwierzęcych z wczesnego średniowiecza, wydobytych na Ostrowie Tumskim we Wrocławiu w latach 1950–1957.. Przegląd Archeologiczny 1960;12:150–171.
  32. Konczewska M, Radek T. Przedmioty skórzane z Ostrowa Tumskiego we Wrocławiu.. In: Limisiewicz A., Pankiewicz A., editors. Pago Silensi: Wrocławskie Studia Wczesnośredniowieczne. 1st ed. Uniwersytet Wrocławski; Wrocław, Poland: 2015. pp. 404–409.
  33. Kavánová B. Knochen- und Geweihindustrie in Mikulčice.. In: Daim F., Poláček L., editors. Studien zum Burgwall von Mikulčice, Band 1. Archeologický Ústav AV ČR; Brno, Czech Republic: 1995. p. 259276.
  34. Norska-Gulkowa M. Wyroby z kości i rogu z wczesnośredniowiecznego grodu-miasta na Ostrówku w Opolu.. Opolski Rocznik Muzealny 1985;8:221–308.
  35. Jaworski K. Wytwórczość rogownicza we Wrocławiu przed i po XIII-wiecznym przełomie.. In: Wachowski K., editor. Kultura Średniowiecznego Śląska i Czech: “Rewolucja”, wieku, XIII. Uniwersytet Wrocławski; Wrocław, Poland: 1998. pp. 73–86.
  36. Thurber B.A. Skates Made of Bone: A History.. 1st ed. McFarland & Company; Jefferson, NC, USA: 2020. p. 3655.
  37. Cyngot D. Ewolucja łyżew—Od form kościanych do żelaznych. Materiały Zachodniopomorskie. Nowa Seria 2017;13:191–224.
  38. Wywrot-Wyszkowska B, Bone A. Artefacts H.. In: Wolin. The Old Town II. Studies on Finds. Rębkowski M., editor. Instytut Archeologii i Etnologii PAN; Szczecin, Poland: 2019. pp. 137–190.
  39. Zamelska-Monczak K. Przedmioty z kości i poroża oraz z metali.. In: Zamelska-Monczak K., editor. Santok Strażnica i Klucz Królestwa Polskiego. Wyniki Badań z lat 1958–1965. Instytut Archeologii i Etnologii PAN; Warszawa, Poland: 2019. pp. 191–224.
  40. Lasota-Moskalewska A. Zwierzęta Udomowione w Dziejach Ludzkości.. 1st ed. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego; Warszawa, Poland: 2005. pp. 197–211.
  41. Makowiecki D. Wyroby z kości i poroża w ujęciu zoologicznym.. In: Cnotliwy E., editor. Przedmioty z Poroża i Kości z Janowa Pomorskiego. Instytut Archeologii i Etnologii PAN; Elbląg, Poland: 2013. pp. 182–206. Muzeum Archeologiczno-Historyczne.
  42. König H.E., Liebich H.G. Anatomia Zwierząt Domowych. Kolorowy Atlas i Podręcznik.. Galaktyka; Łódź, Poland: 2010.
  43. Lentz J. Nie Wyrzucaj Odpadków.. Towarzystwo Wydawnicze “Bluszcz”; Warszawa, Poland: 1929. pp. 8–37.
  44. Chrószcz A, Janeczek M, Pasicka E, Klećkowska-Nawrot J. Height at the withers estimation in the horses based on the internal dimension of cranial cavity.. Folia Morphol (Warsz) 2014 May;73(2):143-8.
    doi: 10.5603/FM.2014.0021pubmed: 24902091google scholar: lookup
  45. Wyrost P, Chrzanowska W, Molenda O. Pferdeknochenreste aus den Frühmittelalterlichen Siedlungen Schlesiens.. Archaeozoology Agricultural Academy; Szczecin, Poland: 1979. pp. 439–459.
  46. Makowiecki D. Zwierzęta Średniowiecznego i Nowożytnego Poznania Oraz Okolic: Podstawy Archeozoologiczne.. 1st ed. Bogucki Wydawnictwo Naukowe; Poznań, Poland: 2016. pp. 128, 140–142.
  47. Osypińska M. Gospodarka zwierzętami we wczesnośredniowiecznym Santoku. Studium archeozoologiczne.. In: Zamelska-Monczak K., editor. Santok Strażnica i Klucz Królestwa Polskiego. Wyniki Badań z lat 1958–1965. Instytut Archeologii i Etnologii PAN; Warszawa, Poland: 2019. pp. 325–346.
  48. Chrzanowska W, Krupska A. Pferdeknochen aus dem frühmittelalterlichen Burgwall von Mikulčice Exkurs: Archäozoologische Analyse der Pferdebestattungen aus Mikulčice und Břeclav—Pohansko.. In: Poláček L., editor. Studien zum Burgwall von Mikulčice. Band 5. Archeologický Ústav AV ČR; Brno, Czech Republic: 2003. pp. 151–214.
  49. Kaźmierczyk J. Podkowy na Śląsku w X-XIV w. Studia z Dziejów Kultury Materialnej.. 1st ed. Ossolineum; Wrocław, Poland: 1978. pp. 153–162.
  50. Samsonowicz A. Wytwórczość Skórzana w Polsce Wczesnofeudalnej.. 1st ed. Ossolineum; Wrocław, Poland: 1982. pp. 53–112.
  51. Radek T. Analiza submikroskopowa surowca skórzanego ze średniowiecznego Kołobrzegu.. Archeologia Kołobrzegu 1997;2:207–220.
  52. Kowalska A.B. Wytwórczość Skórzana We Wczesnośredniowiecznym Szczecinie.. Instytut Archeologii i Etnologii PAN; Szczecin, Poland: 2010. pp. 36–121.
  53. Lasota-Moskalewska A. Postawy Archeozoologii. Szczątki Ssaków.. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN; Warszawa, Poland: 1997.
  54. Bazarsad B, Yves D, Dorj E. A Study of the Diameter Distribution and Tensile Property of Horse Tail Hair.. J. Nat. Fibers 2008;4:1–11.
  55. Kaźmierczyk J, Kramarek J, Lasota C. Badania na Ostrowie Tumskim we Wrocławiu w 1978 roku.. Sil. Antiq. 1980;22:71–158.
  56. Kaźmierczyk J. Ku Początkom Wrocławia. Cz. 2. Warsztat Budowlany i Kultura Mieszkalna Ostrowa Tumskiego od Połowy XI do Połowy XIII Wieku.. 1st ed. Volumen; Wrocław, Poland: 1993. pp. 166–167.
  57. Kaźmierczyk J, Kramarek J, Lasota C. Badania na Ostrowie Tumskim we Wrocławiu w 1978 roku.. Sil. Antiq. 1978;20:123–167.
  58. Sztych D. Zastosowanie środków leczniczych pochodzenia zwierzęcego w medycynie ludowej.. Życie Weterynaryjne 2013;88:126–132.
  59. Schulz A. Essen und Trinken im Mittelalter (1000–1300). Literarische, Kunsthistorische und Archäologische Qellen.. 1st ed. De Gruyter; Berlin, Germany: 2011. pp. 422–423.

Citations

This article has been cited 1 times.
  1. Gudea A, Martonos C, Cosma C, Stan F. Morphological Characteristics of a Horse Discovered in an Avar-Period Grave from Sâncraiu de Mureș (Alba County, Romania). Animals (Basel) 2022 Feb 15;12(4).
    doi: 10.3390/ani12040478pubmed: 35203187google scholar: lookup
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,357 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.