FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Reprod Domest Anim / Direct Warming of Vitrified In Vivo Equine Embryos.
Reproduction in domestic animals = Zuchthygiene2025; 60(7); e70092; doi: 10.1111/rda.70092

Direct Warming of Vitrified In Vivo Equine Embryos.

Abstract: Vitrified in vitro-produced embryos can be successfully warmed in isotonic media at room temperature (RT; 22°C). However, this protocol has not been reported for in vivo embryos, which are more challenging to vitrify and warm. Study objectives were to see if vitrified in vivo embryos warmed in RT isotonic medium gave equivalent pregnancy rates to stepwise serial dilution warming, and if embryo size influenced the results. One hundred and seventeen embryos were divided into groups by size (G1:≤ 300 μm, n = 59; G2:> 300-400 μm, n = 33; G3:> 400-500 μm, n = 24) and vitrified using a commercial vitrification kit. Embryos were placed in an equilibration solution for 10 (embryos ≤ 300 μm) or 15 min (embryos > 300 μm) before being moved to a vitrification solution (≤ 90 s) and loaded onto a Cryolock prior to plunging into LN2. Warming was undertaken by placing the tip of the uncapped Cryolock into RT isotonic medium (n = 77; comprised of G1:n = 45; G2:n = 22; G3:n = 10) or by stepwise serial dilution (n = 40) with the initial 1 M sucrose solution at 42°C (G1:n = 14; G2:n = 12; G3:n = 14). Warmed embryos were transferred to Day 6 recipient mares and pregnancy rates compared between warming protocols. Ignoring embryo size, there was no difference in Day 14 pregnancy rates for vitrified embryos warmed in RT isotonic medium versus stepwise serial dilution (70.1%, 54/77 vs. 82.5%, 33/40, respectively). No statistical difference existed in pregnancy rates between warming protocols for G1 or G2 embryos (p = 1.0, p = 0.439, respectively), but for G3 embryos, the stepwise protocol results in significantly more pregnancies (p < 0.001). The largest embryo successfully warmed in RT isotonic medium was 390 μm. Whereas for the stepwise protocol, the largest embryo was 480 μm. Direct warming in RT isotonic medium is a suitable protocol for warming vitrified embryos ≤ 390 μm, although the decline in pregnancies at the upper limit of G2 would suggest that clinically this methodology is suitable for embryos ≤ 360 μm.
© 2025 Wiley‐VCH GmbH. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2025-07-02 PubMed ID: 40598845DOI: 10.1111/rda.70092Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article explores the viability of using room temperature isotonic medium for the warming of vitrified in vivo equine embryos. It particularly assesses the impact of embryo size on the success of these two methods: direct warming in room temperature medium and a traditional stepwise dilution process.

Objective of the Research

  • The main aim of the study was to determine if vitrified in vivo embryos warmed in room temperature (22°C) isotonic medium can produce pregnancy rates equivalent to those seen with the traditional stepwise serial dilution warming process.

Research Methodology

  • The study involved 117 embryos which were grouped by size into three categories: less than or equal to 300 μm (G1), between 300-400 μm (G2), and more than 400-500 μm (G3). The embryos were vitrified using chemicals from a commercial kit.
  • Before being dunked into liquid nitrogen (LN2) they were first placed into an equilibration solution — for a duration of 10 minutes for embryos up to 300 μm or 15 minutes for embryos above this size. Then they were moved to a vitrification solution for 90 seconds or less.
  • The rewarming of the embryos was done either by direct immersion of the uncapped Cryolock (used to hold embryos during cryopreservation) in room temperature isotonic medium or by a series of serial dilutions with an initial 1M sucrose solution at 42°C (the traditional stepwise method).
  • The warmed embryos were then transferred to day 6 recipient mares and the pregnancy rates determined after day 14.

Findings of the Research

  • Overall, the findings showed no significant difference in pregnancy rates between the two warming methods. However, the effectiveness varied with the size of the embryo. The direct warming method was found to be suitable for warming smaller vitrified embryos up to 390 μm.
  • For embryos larger than 400 μm (G3), the stepwise protocol resulted in significantly more pregnancies.
  • While the direct warming procedure seemingly could accommodate embryos up to 390 μm, the researchers suggested that, based on a noted decline in pregnancies at the upper limit of size group G2, the method may actually be clinically applicable for embryos up to 360 μm in size.

Cite This Article

APA
Couto G, Grippo A, Ismer A, Hoogewijs M, Pedro B, Vasconcelos L, Santos G, Wilsher S. (2025). Direct Warming of Vitrified In Vivo Equine Embryos. Reprod Domest Anim, 60(7), e70092. https://doi.org/10.1111/rda.70092

Publication

Reproduction in domestic animals = Zuchthygiene
ISSN: 1439-0531
NlmUniqueID: 9015668
Country: Germany
Language: English
Volume: 60
Issue: 7
Pages: e70092

Researcher Affiliations

Couto, Guilherme
  • Al Wathba Stables, Abu Dhabi, UAE.
Grippo, Agustina
  • Sharjah Equine Hospital, Sharjah, UAE.
Ismer, Ann
  • Sharjah Equine Hospital, Sharjah, UAE.
Hoogewijs, Maarten
  • Sharjah Equine Hospital, Sharjah, UAE.
Pedro, Bussade
  • Sharjah Equine Hospital, Sharjah, UAE.
Vasconcelos, Lucas
  • Al Wathba Stables, Abu Dhabi, UAE.
Santos, Gabriel
  • Al Wathba Stables, Abu Dhabi, UAE.
Wilsher, Sandra
  • Sharjah Equine Hospital, Sharjah, UAE.
  • The Paul Mellon Laboratory, Suffolk, UK.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Vitrification
  • Horses / embryology
  • Female
  • Cryopreservation / veterinary
  • Cryopreservation / methods
  • Pregnancy
  • Pregnancy Rate
  • Embryo Culture Techniques / veterinary
  • Embryo Culture Techniques / methods
  • Embryo Transfer / veterinary
  • Embryo, Mammalian / physiology

References

This article includes 40 references
  1. Canesin HS, Ortiz I, Rocha Filho AN, Salgado RM, Brom‐de‐Luna JG, Hinrichs K. Effect of Warming Method on Embryo Quality in a Simplified Equine Vitrification System. Theriogenology 2020;151:151–158.
    doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2020.03.012google scholar: lookup
  2. Carnevale EM. Vitrification of Equine Embryos. Veterinary Clinics of North America. Equine Practice 2006;22:831–841.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2006.08.003google scholar: lookup
  3. Carnevale EM, Metcalf ES. Morphology, Developmental Stages and Quality Parameters of In Vitro‐Produced Equine Embryos. Reproduction, Fertility and Development 2019;31:758–1770.
    doi: 10.1071/rd192572019google scholar: lookup
  4. Chan DYI, Xu M, Wu W. Live Birth Resulted From a Direct Thawing of Vitrified Human Blastocyst in a Regular Embryo Culture Medium. medRxiv Preprint 2024.
    doi: 10.1101/2024.03.20.24304140google scholar: lookup
  5. Choi YH, Hinrichs K. Vitrification of In Vitro‐Produced and In Vivo‐Recovered Equine Blastocysts in a Clinical Program. Theriogenology 2017;87:48–54.
    doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2016.08.005google scholar: lookup
  6. Coello A, Campos P, Remohi J, Meseguer M, Cobo A. A Combination of Hydroxypropyl Cellulose and Trelahose as Supplementation for Vitrification of Human Occytes: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 2016;33:413–421.
    doi: 10.1007/s10815‐015‐0633‐9google scholar: lookup
  7. Coffman EA, Pinto CR. A Review of the Use of Prostaglandin F2α for Controlling the Estrous Cycle in Mares. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 2016;40:34–40.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2016.01.008google scholar: lookup
  8. Eldridge‐Panuska WD, di Caracciolo Brienza V, Siedel Jr GE, Squires EL, Carnevale EM. Establishment of Pregnancies After Serial Dilution or Direct Transfer by Vitrified Embryos. Theriogenology 2005;63:1308–1319.
    doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2004.06.015google scholar: lookup
  9. Fahy GM. The Biophysics of Organ Cryopreservation. 1987;265–293.
  10. Fahy GM. Overview of Biological Vitrification. 2016;2nd ed.,1–22.
  11. Fahy GM, Levy DI, Ali SE. Some Emerging Principles Underlying the Physical Properties, Biological Actions, and Utility of Vitrification Solutions. Cryobiology 1987;24:196–213.
    doi: 10.1016/0011‐2240(87)90023‐xgoogle scholar: lookup
  12. Felix MR, Turner RM, Dobbie T, Hinrichs K. Successful In Vitro Fertilization in the Horse: Production of Blastocysts and Birth of Foals After Prolonged Sperm Incubation for Capacitation. Biology of Reproduction 2022;107:1551–1564.
    doi: 10.1093/biolre/ioac172google scholar: lookup
  13. Hinrichs K. In Vitro Production of Equine Embryos: State of the Art. Reproduction in Domestic Animals 2010;45 Suppl 2:3–8.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1439‐0531.2010.01624.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  14. Hinrichs K, Choi YH, Walckenaer BE, Varner DD, Hartman DL. In Vitro‐Produced Equine Embryos: Production of Foals After Transfer, Assessment by Differential Staining, and Effect of Medium Calcium Concentrations During Culture. Theriogenology 2007;68:521–529.
    doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2007.04.046google scholar: lookup
  15. Huhtinen M, Lagneaux D, Koskinen E, Palmer E. The Effect of Sucrose in the Thawing Solution on the Morphology and Mobility of Frozen Equine Embryos. Equine Veterinary Journal 1997;25 Suppl 25:94–97.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042‐3306.1997.tb05110.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  16. Kovacsy S, Ismer A, Hoogewijs M, Funes J, Wilsher S. Successful Vitrification of Equine Embryos > 300 μm Without Puncture or Aspiration. Equine Veterinary Journal 2024;56:815–822.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.14081google scholar: lookup
  17. Kuwayama M, Gandhi G, Kagalwala S, Ramani R. Vitrification: An Overview. 2015;1–15.
    doi: 10.1007/978‐81‐322‐1527‐1_1google scholar: lookup
  18. Lammers J, Reignier A, Loubersac S, Chaillot M, Freour T. Ultra‐Fast Warming Procedure of Vitrified Blastocysts Results in Maintained Embryology and Clinical Outcomes. Reproductive Sciences 2025;32:495–501.
    doi: 10.1007/s43032‐024‐01762‐xgoogle scholar: lookup
  19. Liebermann J. Human Embryo Vitrification. 2017;1568:141–159.
  20. Liebermann J, Hrvojevic K, Hirshfeld‐Cytron J. Fast and Furious: Pregnancy Outcome With One‐Step Rehydration in the Warming Protocol for Human Blastocysts. Reproductive Biomedicine Online 2023;48:103731.
    doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2023.103731google scholar: lookup
  21. Manns JN, Katz S, Whelan J. Validation of a New, Ultra‐Fast Blastocyst Warming Technique Reduces Warming Times to 1 Minute and Yields Similar Survival and Re‐Expansion Compared to Blastocysts Warmed Using a Standard Method. Fertility and Sterility 2021;116:e165.
    doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.07.456google scholar: lookup
  22. Manns JN, Patrick JL, Katz I, Holt T, Katz SL, Taylor TH. Clinical Validation of a New, Ultrafast Warming Protocol, Resulting in Equivalent Implantation Rates and Significant Time Savings Versus Routine Warming Protocol, a Prospective Randomized Control. Fertility and Sterility 2022;118:e7.
    doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.09.227google scholar: lookup
  23. Mazur P, Seki S. Survival of Mouse Oocytes After Being Cooled in a Vitrification Solution to −196°C at 95° to 70,000°C/Min and Warmed at 610° to 118,000°C/Min: A New Paradigm for Cryopreservation by Vitrification. Cryobiology 2011;62:1–7.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2010.10.159google scholar: lookup
  24. McCue PM, DeLuca CA, Ferris RA, Wall JJ. How to Evaluate Equine Embryos. Proceedings of the American Association of Equine Practitioners 2009;55:252–256.
  25. Mori C, Yabuuchi A, Ezoe K. Hydroxypropyl Cellulose as an Option for Supplementation of Cryoprotectant Solutions for Embryo Vitrification in Human Assisted Reproductive Technologies. Reproductive Biomedicine Online 2015;30:613–621.
    doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2015.02.004google scholar: lookup
  26. Papas M, Van den Branden E, Peere S. Vitrification and Direct Warming in Iso‐Osmotic Holding Medium of Equine In Vitro Embryos Supports Competitive Pregnancy Rates. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 2023;125:104671.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2023.104671google scholar: lookup
  27. Rall WF, Fahy GM. Ice‐Free Cryopreservation of Mouse Embryos at −196 Degrees C by Vitrification. Nature 1985;313:573–575.
    doi: 10.1038/313573a0google scholar: lookup
  28. Sanchez R, Blanco M, Weiss J. Influence of Embryonic Size and Manipulation on Pregnancy Rates of Mares After Transfer of Cryopreserved Equine Embryos. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 2017;49:54–59.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2016.10.004google scholar: lookup
  29. Santos MV, Sansinena M, Chirife J, Zaritzky N. Convective Heat Transfer Coefficients of Open and Closed Cryotop Systems Under Different Warming Conditions. Cryobiology 2018;84:20–26.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2018.08.007google scholar: lookup
  30. Seki S, Jin B, Mazur P. Extreme Rapid Warming Yields High Functional Survivals of Vitrified 8‐Cell Mouse Embryos Even When Suspended in a Half‐Strength Vitrification Solution and Cooled at Moderate Rates to −196°C. Cryobiology 2014;68:71–78.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2013.12.001google scholar: lookup
  31. Seki S, Mazur P. Effect of Warming Rate on the Survival of Vitrified Mouse Oocytes and on the Recrystallisation of Intracellular Ice. Biology of Reproduction 2008;79:727–737.
    doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.108.069401google scholar: lookup
  32. Squires EL. Gonadotropin‐Releasing Hormones. 2011;2nd ed.,1820–1824.
  33. Stout TAE. Selection and Management of the Embryo Transfer Donor Mare. Pferdeheilkunde 2003;19:685–688.
  34. Stout TAE. Equine Embryo Transfer: Review of Developing Potential. Equine Veterinary Journal 2006;38:467–478.
    doi: 10.2746/042516406778400529google scholar: lookup
  35. Stout TAE. Cryopreservation of Equine Embryos: Current State‐Of‐The‐Art. Reproduction in Domestic Animals 2012;47 Suppl 3:84–89.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1439‐0531.2012.02030.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  36. Taylor TH, Manns J, Katz I, Patrick J, Whelan J, Katz S. Ultrafast Warming Protocol Demonstrates Similar Outcomes and Significantly Decreases Embryology Workload Compared to Standard Warming Protocols, a Randomized Control Trial With Euploid Blastocysts. Fertility and Sterility 2022;118:e150.
    doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.08.437google scholar: lookup
  37. Tremoleda JL, Stout TAE, Lagutina I. Effects of In Vitro Production on Horse Embryo Morphology, Cytoskeletal Characteristics, and Blastocyst Capsule Formation. Biology of Reproduction 2003;69:1898–1906.
    doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.103.018515google scholar: lookup
  38. Vanderzwalmen P, Zech NH, Ectors F. Vitrification of Oocytes and Embryos: Finally a Recognised Technique, but Still a Source of Concern and Debate. 2016;2nd ed.,23–34.
  39. Wilsher S, Allen WR. An Improved Method for Non‐Surgical Embryo Transfer in the Mare. Equine Veterinary Education 2004;16:39–44.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042‐3292.2004.tb00265.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  40. Wilsher S, Rigali F, Kovacsy S, Allen WR. Successful Vitrification of Manually Punctured Equine Embryos. Equine Veterinary Journal 2021;53:1227–1233.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.13400google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,359 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.