Analyze Diet
Journal of animal science1980; 50(5); 962-965; doi: 10.2527/jas1980.505962x

Discrimination learning in horses: effects of breed, age and social dominance.

Abstract: The discrimination learning ability of Quarter Horses and Thoroughbreds was compared by means of visual cues in a three-choice test with food as a reward. Quarter Horses learned significantly faster than Thoroughbreds, and learning progressed more rapidly for both breeds in a second discrimination task. Significant negative correlations were observed between age and rate of learning. Quarter Horses tended to be less reactive than Thoroughbreds, but individual emotional reactivity ratings and learning scores were not correlated. No correlation was found between social dominance and learning scores. Learning studies with horses may provide a better understanding of the behavioral traits that influence trainability in this species.
Publication Date: 1980-05-01 PubMed ID: 7390949DOI: 10.2527/jas1980.505962xGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This study explored the differences in learning ability among horses, taking factors such as age, breed, and social dominance into account. The main findings suggest that Quarter Horses learn faster than Thoroughbreds, older horses have slower rates of learning, and no clear association exists between a horse’s social dominance and its learning aptitude.

Research Methods

The research was conducted using visual stimuli and a three-option testing procedure. The horses were given a task which required them to associate a particular visual cue with receiving a food reward.

  • Quarter Horses and Thoroughbreds were the two breeds tested.
  • Various factors like breed, age, and social dominance were examined to understand their impact on the learning ability of these horses.
  • Quarter Horses were generally less reactive than Thoroughbreds. However, the learning scores of the horses were not affected by their emotional reactivity levels.

Key Findings

The study revealed several findings in regards to breed, age, and social dominance influencing the learning ability of horses:

  • The Quarter Horses demonstrated a higher learning speed in comparison to Thoroughbreds.
  • The rate of learning was negatively correlated with age, indicating that younger horses learn more quickly than older ones.
  • Despite these observable differences tied to age and breed, no clear correlation was identified between the social dominance of a horse and its ability to learn. Social dominance, in this study, is most likely related to the horses’ hierarchy or status within their group.

Implications and Conclusion

This is crucial research in understanding the behavioral traits that influence trainability in horses. By understanding which factors impact horse’s ability to learn tasks, trainers can tailor training methods and strategies that are better suited to individual horse’s characteristics and capabilities. Notably, this study may help provide deeper insights into breed-specific approaches to horse training, and how age might factor into training regimens. However, the finding that social dominance does not seem to impact a horse’s learning capacity could challenge some traditional notions in horse training.

Cite This Article

APA
Mader DR, Price EO. (1980). Discrimination learning in horses: effects of breed, age and social dominance. J Anim Sci, 50(5), 962-965. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1980.505962x

Publication

ISSN: 0021-8812
NlmUniqueID: 8003002
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 50
Issue: 5
Pages: 962-965

Researcher Affiliations

Mader, D R
    Price, E O

      MeSH Terms

      • Aging
      • Animals
      • Discrimination Learning
      • Female
      • Horses / physiology
      • Social Dominance

      Citations

      This article has been cited 8 times.
      1. Langbein J, Nawroth C. Editorial: Captive animal behavior: Individual differences in learning and cognition, and implications on animal welfare. Front Vet Sci 2022;9:1102122.
        doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.1102122pubmed: 36532340google scholar: lookup
      2. Krueger K, Esch L, Byrne R. Need or opportunity? A study of innovations in equids. PLoS One 2021;16(9):e0257730.
        doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257730pubmed: 34570831google scholar: lookup
      3. Ragonese G, Baragli P, Mariti C, Gazzano A, Lanatà A, Ferlazzo A, Fazio E, Cravana C. Interspecific two-dimensional visual discrimination of faces in horses (Equus caballus). PLoS One 2021;16(2):e0247310.
        doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247310pubmed: 33606816google scholar: lookup
      4. Esch L, Wöhr C, Erhard M, Krüger K. Horses' (Equus Caballus) Laterality, Stress Hormones, and Task Related Behavior in Innovative Problem-Solving. Animals (Basel) 2019 May 22;9(5).
        doi: 10.3390/ani9050265pubmed: 31121937google scholar: lookup
      5. Zebunke M, Kreiser M, Melzer N, Langbein J, Puppe B. Better, Not Just More-Contrast in Qualitative Aspects of Reward Facilitates Impulse Control in Pigs. Front Psychol 2018;9:2099.
        doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02099pubmed: 30459682google scholar: lookup
      6. Lansade L, Coutureau E, Marchand A, Baranger G, Valenchon M, Calandreau L. Dimensions of temperament modulate cue-controlled behavior: a study on Pavlovian to instrumental transfer in horses (Equus caballus). PLoS One 2013;8(6):e64853.
        doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064853pubmed: 23798994google scholar: lookup
      7. Momozawa Y, Takeuchi Y, Kusunose R, Kikusui T, Mori Y. Association between equine temperament and polymorphisms in dopamine D4 receptor gene. Mamm Genome 2005 Jul;16(7):538-44.
        doi: 10.1007/s00335-005-0021-3pubmed: 16151699google scholar: lookup
      8. Ricci-Bonot C, Brosche K, Baragli P, Nicol C. A systematic review on the effect of individual characteristics and management practices on equine cognition. Anim Cogn 2025 Nov 26;28(1):96.
        doi: 10.1007/s10071-025-02016-2pubmed: 41296132google scholar: lookup