Analyze Diet

Distal interphalangeal articular cartilage assessment using low-field magnetic resonance imaging.

Abstract: The suitability of low-field magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for assessment of articular cartilage has been questioned, based on insufficient image quality. The purposes of this study were to describe the MR anatomy of the normal distal interphalangeal (DIP) cartilage, and to evaluate the sensitivity and accuracy of low-field MR imaging for identification of cartilage erosions that were created ex vivo. Imaging sequences included sagittal and dorsal multiple-oblique T1-weighted gradient-recalled echo (GRE) and sagittal dual echo sequences. In the thickest regions, normal cartilage appeared as a trilaminar structure on high-resolution T1-weighted GRE sequences. All 8 mm large full-thickness erosions were correctly identified (100% sensitivity and accuracy) using T1-weighted GRE sequences. Sensitivity and accuracy ranged from 80% to 100% and 10% to 80%, respectively, for detecting focal full-thickness erosions and from 35% to 80% and 35% to 60%, respectively, for detecting partial thickness erosions, using T1-weighted GRE sequences. Superficial irregularities were not diagnosed using any sequence. Overall, fewer cartilage alterations were detected with sagittal dual echo sequences than with sagittal T1-weighted GRE sequences. The dorsal multiple-oblique plane was useful to detect linear dorsopalmar erosions. A combination of T1-weighted GRE sequences in two planes has potential for identification of severe DIP cartilage erosion in anesthetized horses using low-field MR imaging.
Publication Date: 2010-05-18 PubMed ID: 20469547DOI: 10.1111/j.1740-8261.2009.01663.xGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article discusses the potential of low-field Magnetic Resonance (MR) imaging for accurately assessing the health of the distal interphalangeal (DIP) cartilage. The study’s results derive from an ex vivo examination of cartilage erosion and the effectiveness of different MR imaging sequences in detecting the erosion.

Background and Aim of Research

  • The primary focus of the study relies on the evaluation of low-field MR imaging’s efficacy for assessing the condition of articular cartilage.
  • Previous studies questioned low-field MR imaging due to subpar image quality, and this investigation aims to challenge these apprehensions.
  • The research was set out to describe the MR anatomy of the standard DIP cartilage and determine the sensitivity and accuracy of this method in identifying cartilage erosions created in a controlled, non-living environment (ex vivo).

Imaging Techniques and Analysis

  • Multiple types of MR sequence techniques were deployed in this study, including sagittal and dorsal multiple-oblique T1-weighted gradient-recalled echo (GRE), and sagittal dual echo sequences.
  • Regions with maximum thickness displayed a trilaminar structure on the high-resolution T1-weighted GRE sequences under normal conditions.

Results

  • All large full-thickness erosions, measured at 8 mm, were correctly identified by the T1-weighted GRE sequences, scoring the method 100% in terms of accuracy and sensitivity.
  • Catching hold of focal full-thickness erosions had sensitivity and accuracy ranges between 80% to 100% and 10% to 80% respectively.
  • Detecting partial thickness erosions had sensitivity and accuracy ranges between 35% to 80% and 35% to 60% respectively, as observed with the T1-weighted GRE sequences.
  • None of the superficial irregularities could be diagnosed irrespective of the sequence used.
  • The sagittal dual echo sequences were less efficient in identifying cartilage alterations compared to sagittal T1-weighted GRE sequences.

Conclusion

  • To identify linear dorsopalmar erosions, the dorsal multiple-oblique plane was useful.
  • The T1-weighted GRE sequences in two planes have the potential to identify severe DIP cartilage erosion in anesthetized horses using low-field MR imaging.
  • Although the test was conducted on horses and not humans, the study sheds light on the improved viability of low-field MR imaging.

Cite This Article

APA
Olive J. (2010). Distal interphalangeal articular cartilage assessment using low-field magnetic resonance imaging. Vet Radiol Ultrasound, 51(3), 259-266. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8261.2009.01663.x

Publication

ISSN: 1058-8183
NlmUniqueID: 9209635
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 51
Issue: 3
Pages: 259-266

Researcher Affiliations

Olive, Julien
  • Diagnostic Imaging Department, VetAgroSup-Veterinary Campus, Université Lyon II, 1 Avenue Bourgelat, 69280 Marcy l'Etoile, France. julien_olive_veto@hotmail.com

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Cartilage, Articular / anatomy & histology
  • Cartilage, Articular / pathology
  • Female
  • Horses / anatomy & histology
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging
  • Male
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Toe Joint / anatomy & histology
  • Toe Joint / pathology

Citations

This article has been cited 3 times.
  1. van Zadelhoff C, Schwarz T, Smith S, Engerand A, Taylor S. Identification of Naturally Occurring Cartilage Damage in the Equine Distal Interphalangeal Joint Using Low-Field Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Magnetic Resonance Arthrography.. Front Vet Sci 2019;6:508.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2019.00508pubmed: 32064268google scholar: lookup
  2. Warnock WR, Marsh CA, Hand DR. Outcome of arthroscopic debridement of cartilage injury in the equine distal interphalangeal joint.. Can Vet J 2019 Jul;60(7):731-736.
    pubmed: 31281190
  3. Evrard L, Audigié F, Bertoni L, Jacquet S, Denoix JM, Busoni V. Low field magnetic resonance imaging of the equine distal interphalangeal joint: Comparison between weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing conditions.. PLoS One 2019;14(1):e0211101.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211101pubmed: 30689659google scholar: lookup