Analyze Diet
Reproduction in domestic animals = Zuchthygiene2026; 61(3); e70192; doi: 10.1111/rda.70192

Does the Reproductive Technique Affect Neonatal Health Parameters in Foals?

Abstract: This retrospective study evaluated whether different reproductive biotechnologies influence neonatal behaviour parameters in foals. Data from 102 foalings in two commercial breeding farms were analysed, including foals conceived by artificial insemination (AI), conventional embryo transfer (ET) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Neonatal parameters recorded were birth weight, time to achieve sternal recumbency, time to stand, time to nurse and time to meconium elimination. Mixed statistical models were applied to assess the influence of reproductive technique, breed, sex and farm. Significant differences (p < 0.05) were observed between farms for time to sternal recumbency and time to nurse, and among breeds for birth height and time to meconium elimination. However, no significant differences (p > 0.05) were detected between sexes or among reproductive techniques for any of the parameters evaluated. Therefore, these results indicate that reproductive techniques, including advanced biotechnologies, such as ICSI, do not adversely affect neonatal health parameters in foals. On the other hand, the present findings highlight the importance of considering environmental and genetic factors, such as farm management and breed, when evaluating neonatal outcomes.
Publication Date: 2026-03-10 PubMed ID: 41804035PubMed Central: PMC12972244DOI: 10.1111/rda.70192Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Overview

  • This study investigated whether different reproductive biotechnologies affect neonatal health and behavior in foals.
  • It compared foals conceived by artificial insemination (AI), embryo transfer (ET), and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) across various health parameters shortly after birth.

Study Design and Objectives

  • This was a retrospective study analyzing data from 102 foalings at two commercial breeding farms.
  • The main objective was to determine if the type of reproductive technology used influenced key neonatal behavior and health parameters in foals.
  • Reproductive techniques compared included:
    • Artificial Insemination (AI)
    • Conventional Embryo Transfer (ET)
    • Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI), an advanced biotechnology

Neonatal Parameters Measured

  • Birth weight
  • Time to achieve sternal recumbency (when the foal lies on its belly with legs tucked under)
  • Time to stand
  • Time to nurse (begin suckling)
  • Time to meconium elimination (first feces passed)

Statistical Analysis and Considered Variables

  • Mixed statistical models were used to analyze the data.
  • Factors considered included:
    • Reproductive technique (AI, ET, ICSI)
    • Breed of foal
    • Sex of foal
    • Farm where foaling occurred

Major Findings

  • Significant differences were found between the two farms in:
    • Time to sternal recumbency
    • Time to nurse
  • Significant differences were found among breeds for:
    • Birth height
    • Time to meconium elimination
  • No significant differences were found between male and female foals for any measured parameter.
  • Importantly, no significant differences were detected between foals conceived through AI, ET, or ICSI for any neonatal health or behavioral parameter.

Interpretation and Conclusions

  • The study indicates that the reproductive technique, even advanced ones like ICSI, does not adversely impact neonatal health parameters in foals.
  • Environmental (farm management) and genetic factors (breed) have a more pronounced effect on neonatal outcomes than the reproductive technology used.
  • This suggests that concerns regarding the neonatal wellbeing of foals conceived by advanced assisted reproductive technologies may be minimal.
  • The findings emphasize the importance of considering farm environment and breed-specific traits when assessing neonatal health and behavior in foals.

Implications for Breeding Practices

  • Breeders can employ advanced reproductive biotechnologies such as ICSI without expecting negative effects on newborn foal vitality and early behavior.
  • Focus on optimizing farm conditions and management practices may yield greater improvements in neonatal health outcomes.
  • Breed-specific requirements and characteristics should be accounted for in neonatal care and monitoring protocols.

Cite This Article

APA
Alonso MA, Dos Santos GR, Fonte JS, Marques PC, Pereira DD, Toral FLB, Bordignon V, Junior JB, Squires E, Fernandes CB. (2026). Does the Reproductive Technique Affect Neonatal Health Parameters in Foals? Reprod Domest Anim, 61(3), e70192. https://doi.org/10.1111/rda.70192

Publication

ISSN: 1439-0531
NlmUniqueID: 9015668
Country: Germany
Language: English
Volume: 61
Issue: 3
Pages: e70192
PII: e70192

Researcher Affiliations

Alonso, Maria Augusta
  • Animal Reproduction Department, College of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science - University of São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Dos Santos, Giovana Rodrigues
  • Animal Reproduction Department, College of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science - University of São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Fonte, Juliana Schleich
  • Animal Reproduction Department, College of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science - University of São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • In Vitro Equinos, Mogi Mirim, São Paulo, Brazil.
Marques, Pamella Costa
  • Animal Reproduction Department, College of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science - University of São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • In Vitro Equinos, Mogi Mirim, São Paulo, Brazil.
Pereira, Daniel Dantas
  • Department of Animal Science, Veterinary School - Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Toral, Fabio Luiz Buranelo
  • Department of Animal Science, Veterinary School - Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Bordignon, Vilceu
  • Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, McGill University, Sainte-Anne-de-Bellevue, Quebec, Canada.
Junior, Jose Buratini
  • In Vitro Equinos, Mogi Mirim, São Paulo, Brazil.
Squires, Edward
  • Gluck Equine Research Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.
Fernandes, Claudia Barbosa
  • Animal Reproduction Department, College of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science - University of São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Horses / physiology
  • Animals, Newborn / physiology
  • Female
  • Male
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Insemination, Artificial / veterinary
  • Insemination, Artificial / adverse effects
  • Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic / veterinary
  • Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic / adverse effects
  • Embryo Transfer / veterinary
  • Pregnancy
  • Birth Weight

Grant Funding

  • 2020/10260-3 / Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

This article includes 14 references
  1. Alonso MA, Boakari YL, Riccio AV, Belli CB, Fernandes CB. Perinatal Parameters of Mule and Equine Foals: Similarities and Differences. Journal of Veterinary Behavior 63: 31–35.
  2. Fonte JS, Alonso MA, Maserati Junior MP. Successful Equine in vitro Embryo Production by ICSI – Effect of Season, Mares’ Age, Breed, and Phase of the Estrous Cycle on Embryo Production. Theriogenology 223: 47–52.
    pubmed: 38669841
  3. Haggett E, Scott V. Equine Clinical Medicine, Surgery and Reproduction. 2nd ed. CRC Press.
  4. Halliwell L, Chidlow H. Assessment and Management of the Neonatal Foal. In Practice 45, no. 1: 48–53.
    doi: 10.1002/inpr.256google scholar: lookup
  5. Hinrichs K. Assisted Reproductive Techniques in Mares. Reproduction in Domestic Animals 53: 4–13.
    doi: 10.1111/rda.13259pubmed: 30238661google scholar: lookup
  6. Lanci A, Perina F, Armani S. Could Assisted Peproductive Techniques Affect Equine Fetal Membranes and Neonatal Outcome?. Theriogenology 15: 125–131.
    pubmed: 38052132
  7. Lester GD. Maturity of the Neonatal Foal. Veterinary Clinics of North America. Equine Practice 21, no. 2: 333–355.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2005.04.001pubmed: 16051053google scholar: lookup
  8. Magdesian KG. Neonatology Physical Examination of the Newborn Foal. In Equine Emergencies, 486–521. Elsevier.
  9. Mayhew LG. Neurological and Neuropathological Observations on the Equine Neonate. Equine Veterinary Journal 20: 28–33.
  10. McNaughten J. Initial Assessment of the Postpartum Mare and Foal. .
  11. Oliveira RA, Alonso MA, Fonte JS, Fernandes CB. Equine ICSI: An Update on Semen Perspective. Animal Reproduction 21, no. 4: 1–8.
  12. Squires EL, McCue PM, Vanderwall D. The Current Status of Equine Embryo Transfer. Theriogenology 51, no. 1: 91–104.
    doi: 10.1016/S0093-691X(98)00234-9pubmed: 10729065google scholar: lookup
  13. Viana JH. 2022 Statistics of Embryo Production and Transfer in Domestic Farm Animals. Embryo Technology Newsletter 41, no. 4: 1–19.
  14. Viana JH. 2023 Statistics of Embryo Production and Transfer in Domestic Farm Animals. Embryo Technology Newsletter 40, no. 4: 22–40.

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.