Early volumetric changes after vertical augmentation of the atrophic posterior mandible with interpositional block graft versus onlay bone graft: A retrospective radiological study.
Abstract: The aim of this study was to evaluate volumetric and clinical outcomes of atrophic posterior mandibles treated with inlay or onlay bone grafting techniques. Methods: In posterior mandibles, alveolar ridges were treated either with interpositional equine cancellous bone block (inlay group) or with onlay autogenous bone block (onlay group). Bone volumes at baseline and at 4 months after surgery were measured by computed tomography. Results: A total of 20 subjects were enrolled in the present study: 10 in the inlay group and 10 in the onlay group. After surgery, atrophic posterior mandibles showed a mean vertical augmentation height of 6.0 mm in the inlay group and 7.4 mm in the onlay group. No significant differences were recorded between the two groups regarding volume loss of the grafted bone or decrease in vertical bone height of the augmented site (29% and 1.9 mm for the onlay group, and 35% and 1.7 mm for the inlay group) during healing. Two complications (1 wound dehiscence and 1 mandibular fracture) occurred postoperatively in the inlay group; on the other hand, the onlay group had three complications (wound dehiscence). A total of 80 dental implants were placed in augmented areas: 46 in the inlay group with a peri-implant marginal bone loss of 0.8 mm, and 34 in the onlay group with a peri-implant marginal bone loss of 1.3 mm (p = 0.0006). Conclusions: Inlay xenogeneic grafts showed volumetric bone remodeling similar to that recorded for onlay autogenous bone. The success of the autogenous onlay blocks (82.4%) appeared to be lower than that registered for the inlay group (93.8%), but the difference was not significant.
Copyright © 2017 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Publication Date: 2017-01-25 PubMed ID: 28705523DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2017.01.018Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
- Comparative Study
- Journal Article
- Animal Studies
- Bone Marrow
- Clinical Findings
- Clinical Pathology
- Clinical Study
- Complications
- Computed Tomography
- Dental Health
- Equine Health
- Equine Studies
- Mandible
- Post-Operative Period
- Radiology
- Retrospective Study
- Surgery
- Veterinary Medicine
- Veterinary Practice
- Veterinary Procedure
- Veterinary Research
- Veterinary Science
Summary
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
The research aimed to compare the outcomes of two different bone grafting techniques used to augment the height of the posterior mandible, revealing that in both techniques, there were similar bone volume changes and successful dental implant placement, with no significant difference in the success rate.
Research Methods and Participants
- This retrospective study focused on 20 subjects split into two groups. In the inlay group, an interpositional equine cancellous bone block was inserted into the patient’s alveolar ridge, whereas the onlay group received an autogenous bone block placed on their alveolar ridge.
- The bone volumes were measured using computed tomography at baseline (before surgery) and four months after surgery.
Results and Findings
- The research showed an average vertical height increase of 6.0 mm in the inlay group and 7.4 mm in the onlay group after surgery.
- There was no significant difference recorded between the two groups concerning the volume loss of the grafted bone or decrease in vertical bone height at the surgery site during healing.
- Some postoperative complications were noted — two cases including one wound dehiscence and a mandibular fracture in the inlay group, and three cases of wound dehiscence in the onlay group.
- A total of 80 dental implants were successfully placed in the augmented areas. The inlay group received 46 implants with a peri-implant marginal bone loss of 0.8 mm, and the onlay group had 34 implants with a peri-implant marginal bone loss of 1.3 mm.
Conclusions
- The results indicated a similar pattern of volumetric bone remodeling in both the inlay xenogeneic grafts and the onlay autogenous bone groups.
- Although the success rate of implanted autogenous onlay blocks was slightly lower (82.4%) compared to the inlay group (93.8%), the difference was not statistically significant.
Cite This Article
APA
Barone A, Toti P, Menchini-Fabris GB, Felice P, Marchionni S, Covani U.
(2017).
Early volumetric changes after vertical augmentation of the atrophic posterior mandible with interpositional block graft versus onlay bone graft: A retrospective radiological study.
J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 45(9), 1438-1447.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2017.01.018 Publication
Researcher Affiliations
- Unit of Oral Surgery and Implantology, Department of Surgery, University of Geneva, Rue Barthélémy-Menn 19, 1205, Genéve, Switzerland. Electronic address: barosurg@gmail.com.
- Department of Surgical, Medical, Molecular and Critical Area Pathology, University of Pisa, Via Paradisa 2, 56124, Pisa, Italy; Tuscan Dental Institute, Fortis Dental Center, Via Padre Ignazio da Carrara 39, 55042, Forte dei Marmi, Italy.
- Department of Surgical, Medical, Molecular and Critical Area Pathology, University of Pisa, Via Paradisa 2, 56124, Pisa, Italy; Tuscan Dental Institute, Fortis Dental Center, Via Padre Ignazio da Carrara 39, 55042, Forte dei Marmi, Italy.
- Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, Via San Vitale 59, Bologna, Italy.
- Department of Surgical, Medical, Molecular and Critical Area Pathology, University of Pisa, Via Paradisa 2, 56124, Pisa, Italy.
- Department of Surgical, Medical, Molecular and Critical Area Pathology, University of Pisa, Via Paradisa 2, 56124, Pisa, Italy; Tuscan Dental Institute, Fortis Dental Center, Via Padre Ignazio da Carrara 39, 55042, Forte dei Marmi, Italy.
MeSH Terms
- Adult
- Aged
- Alveolar Bone Loss / surgery
- Alveolar Ridge Augmentation / methods
- Animals
- Bone Remodeling
- Bone Transplantation / methods
- Female
- Heterografts
- Horses
- Humans
- Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
- Male
- Mandible / diagnostic imaging
- Mandible / surgery
- Mandibular Diseases / diagnostic imaging
- Mandibular Diseases / surgery
- Middle Aged
- Retrospective Studies
- Smoking
- Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Use Nutrition Calculator
Check if your horse's diet meets their nutrition requirements with our easy-to-use tool Check your horse's diet with our easy-to-use tool
Talk to a Nutritionist
Discuss your horse's feeding plan with our experts over a free phone consultation Discuss your horse's diet over a phone consultation
Submit Diet Evaluation
Get a customized feeding plan for your horse formulated by our equine nutritionists Get a custom feeding plan formulated by our nutritionists