Analyze Diet
Veterinary ophthalmology2020; 23(4); 690-695; doi: 10.1111/vop.12778

Effect of attentional focus levels on spontaneous eyeblink rate in horses.

Abstract: Spontaneous eyeblink rate (SEBR) is inversely proportional to the level of attentional focus in humans. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of attentional focus on SEBR in horses. Methods: Twenty client-owned horses (2.5-23 years of age, five mares, 15 geldings) were evaluated. A GoPro HERO5 Session™ video recorder was attached to the halter and directed toward the eyes. Horses were acclimated for two hours before study commencement. Horses were filmed in five scenarios requiring different levels of attention: alone in a stall ("stall"), stall with an observer ("person"), standing in an arena ("stand"), walking in an arena ("walk"), and trotting in arena ("trot"). Each of the five scenarios was filmed for ten minutes. Video recordings were reviewed, and SEBR (incomplete, complete, and total blinks) was measured for both eyes in each scenario. Results: The median (25%,75%) total SEBRs (blinks/min) were as follows: STALL: OD-16.6 (12.4, 24.3), OS-18.8 (11.5, 26.9); PERSON: OD-17.7 (14.6, 24.2), OS-17.4 (13.9, 24.4); STAND: OD-18.7 (15.1, 24.4), OS-19.4 (16.2, 24.7); WALK: OD-40.1 (34.1, 44.8), OS-40.6 (33.8, 44.7); and TROT: OD-39.7 (30.3, 44.6), OS-39.4 (28.6, 45.0). The total SEBRs at walk and trot were significantly greater than SEBR in stationary scenarios. Conclusions: Despite requiring increased levels of attentional focus, activities involving motion caused increased SEBR in horses. We hypothesize the need for additional tear distribution due to tear evaporation (associated with air movement over the corneas) prevailed over the level of attentional focus to increase the SEBR.
Publication Date: 2020-05-21 PubMed ID: 32437053DOI: 10.1111/vop.12778Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research explored how the spontaneous eyeblink rate (SEBR) in horses is affected by different levels of attentional focus. The results indicated that despite an increase in attentional focus during activities with motion, the SEBR was found to be significantly higher compared to stationary scenarios.

Research Methodology

  • The experiment involved twenty client-owned horses, ranging from 2.5 to 23 years old. This group comprised of 5 mares and 15 geldings.
  • An acclimatization period of two hours was allowed for each horse before filming started. Filming was done using a GoPro HERO5 Session™ video recorder attached to the horse’s halter, focused on the eyes.
  • Five different scenarios were filmed to test various levels of attentional focus: a horse alone in a stall, in a stall with an observer, standing in an arena, walking in an arena, and trotting in an arena. Each scenario was recorded for ten minutes.
  • Spontaneous eyeblink rate (SEBR), including incomplete, complete, and total blinks, was counted separately for each eye in different scenarios.

Research Findings

  • The median total spontaneous eyeblink rates (SEBRs) per minute were found to significantly increase when the horses were walking or trotting compared to when they were in stationary positions (alone in a stall, with a person, or standing in an arena).
  • More specifically, the median total SEBRs were around 18 blinks/minute in stationary scenarios and increased to roughly 40 blinks/minute during walking or trotting.

Conclusions

  • Contrary to the behavior observed in humans where SEBR decreases with increased attentional focus, in horses, the SEBR increased during activities involving motion, despite these activities requiring higher attentional focus compared to others.
  • The researchers posited a hypothesis to explain this unexpected finding: the need for additional tear distribution due to tear evaporation when air movement was higher over the corneas (as during trotting or walking) may have overridden the effect of higher attentional focus, therefore increasing the SEBR.
  • The findings of this study provide valuable insights on how horses’ eyes respond to their environment and could potentially inform equine training practices and welfare standards.

Cite This Article

APA
Cherry RL, Adair HS, Chen T, Hendrix DVH, Ward DA. (2020). Effect of attentional focus levels on spontaneous eyeblink rate in horses. Vet Ophthalmol, 23(4), 690-695. https://doi.org/10.1111/vop.12778

Publication

ISSN: 1463-5224
NlmUniqueID: 100887377
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 23
Issue: 4
Pages: 690-695

Researcher Affiliations

Cherry, Rose L
  • Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA.
Adair, Henry S
  • Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA.
Chen, Thomas
  • Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA.
Hendrix, Diane V H
  • Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA.
Ward, Daniel A
  • Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Attention
  • Blinking / physiology
  • Female
  • Horses / physiology
  • Male
  • Movement
  • Tears / physiology
  • Video Recording

Grant Funding

  • 2018.01 / Companion Animal Fund

References

This article includes 21 references
  1. Karson CN. Spontaneous eye-blink rates and dopaminergic systems. Brain 1983;106(3):643-653.
  2. Doughty MJ. Consideration of three types of spontaneous eyeblink activity in normal humans: during reading and video display terminal use, in primary gaze and while in conversation. Optom Vis Sci 2001;78(10):712-725.
  3. Chermahini SA, Hommel B. The (b)link between creativity and dopamine: spontaneous eye blink rates predict and dissociate divergent and convergent thinking. Cognition 2010;115(3):458-465.
  4. Cardona G, García C, Serés C, Vilaseca M, Gispets J. Blink rate, blink amplitude, and tear film integrity during dynamic visual display terminal tasks. Curr Eye Res 2011;36(3):190-197.
  5. Al-Abdulmunem M. Relation between tear breakup time and spontaneous blink rate. Int Contact Lens Clin 1999;26(5):117-120.
  6. Hirota M, Uozato H, Kawamorita T, Shibata Y, Yamamoto S. Effect of incomplete blinking on tear film stability. Optom Vis Sci 2013;90(7):650-657.
  7. Jongkees BJ, Colzato LS. Spontaneous eye blink rate as predictor of dopamine-related cognitive function-A review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2016;71:58-82.
  8. Hua JPY, Kerns JG. Differentiating positive schizotypy and mania risk scales and their associations with spontaneous eye blink rate. Psychiatry Res 2018;264:58-66.
  9. Dang LC, Samanez-Larkin GR, Castrellon JJ. Spontaneous eye blink rate (EBR) is uncorrelated with dopamine D2 receptor availability and unmodulated by dopamine agonism in healthy adults. eNeuro 2017;4(5):1-11.
  10. Freudenthaler N, Neuf H, Kadner G, Schlote T. Characteristics of spontaneous eyeblink activity during video display terminal use in healthy volunteers. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2003;241(11):914-920.
  11. Kojima M, Shioiri T, Hosoki T, Sakai M, Bando T, Someya T. Blink rate variability in patients with panic disorder: new trial using audiovisual stimulation. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2002;56(5):545-549.
  12. Kirsty R, Andrew H, Meriel MC, Catherine H. Cognitive differences in horses performing locomotor versus oral stereotypic behaviour. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2015;168:37-44.
  13. Best L, Alexiades V, Hendrix DVH, Chen T, Ward DA. Blink patterns and kinematics of eyelid motion in ophthalmologically normal horses. Am J Vet Res 2018;79(6):650-657.
  14. Bentivoglio AR, Bressman SB, Cassetta E, Carretta D, Tonali P, Albanese A. Analysis of blink rate patterns in normal subjects. Mov Disord 1997;12(6):1028-1034.
  15. Wu Z, Begley CG, Situ P, Simpson T, Liu H. The effects of mild ocular surface stimulation and concentration on spontaneous blink parameters. Curr Eye Res 2014;39(1):9-20.
  16. Yan S, Tran CC, Wei Y, Habiyaremye JL. Driver's mental workload prediction model based on physiological indices. Int J Occup Saf Ergon 2019;25(3):476-484.
  17. Reissland N, Froggatt S, Reames E, Girkin J. Effects of maternal anxiety and depression on fetal neuro-development. J Affect Disord 2018;241:469-474.
  18. Giannakakis G, Pediaditis M, Manousos D. Stress and anxiety detection using facial cues from videos. Biomed Signal Process Control 2017;31:89-101.
  19. Sforza C, Rango M, Galante D, Bresolin N, Ferrario VF. Spontaneous blinking in healthy persons: an optoelectronic study of eyelid motion. Ophthal Physiol Opt 2008;28(4):345-353.
  20. Tsubota K, Hata S, Okusawa Y, Egami F, Ohtsuki T, Nakamori K. Quantitative videographic analysis of blinking in normal subjects and patients with dry eye. Arch Ophthalmol 1996;114(6):715-720.
  21. Fureix C, Jego P, Henry S, Lansade L, Hausberger M. Towards an ethological animal model of depression? A study on horses. PLoS One 2012;7(6):e39280.

Citations

This article has been cited 1 times.
  1. Tomberg C, Petagna M, de Selliers de Moranville LA. Spontaneous eye blinks in horses (Equus caballus) are modulated by attention. Sci Rep 2024 Aug 20;14(1):19336.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-70141-ypubmed: 39164361google scholar: lookup