Abstract: Standing surgery, especially dental procedures, are commonly performed in horses. This leads to an increasing demand for reliable sedation protocols. Therefore, it was the purpose of this study to investigate the influence of butorphanol, midazolam or ketamine on romifidine based sedation in horses during cheek tooth removal. Methods: Forty horses presented for tooth extraction were divided in four groups using matched pair randomization. Group R was sedated with romifidine (bolus 0.03 mg/kg, followed by a constant rate infusion (CRI) 0.05 mg/kg/h) and group RB with romifidine (same dose) and butorphanol (0.02 mg/kg; CRI 0.04 mg/kg/h). Group RM received romifidine (same dose) and midazolam (0.02 mg/kg; CRI 0.06 mg/kg/h) whereas group RK was administered romifidine (same dose) and ketamine (0.5 mg/kg; CRI 1.2 mg/kg/h). If sedation was not adequate a top up bolus of romifidine (0.01 mg/kg) was administered. The quality of sedation and the conditions for tooth extraction, the level of ataxia, chewing, head and tongue movement were evaluated by using a scoring system. The investigator was blinded to the applied sedation protocol. Furthermore, serum cortisol concentrations before, during and after the procedure were analyzed to gain more information about the stress level of the horses. Results: Horses in group RM showed significantly less chewing and tongue activity compared to horses sedated with romifidine alone or with butorphanol additionally, but also significantly higher levels of ataxia. The quality of sedation was significantly better if romifidine was administered in combination with ketamine compared to romifidine alone. Furthermore, horses of group RK needed less additional romifidine boli compared to all other groups. Blood cortisol concentrations during surgery in groups RB and RM remained unchanged. Horses of group R showed higher cortisol concentrations during sedation compared to horses of groups RB and RM. Conclusions: Romifidine alone at an initial bolus dose of 0.03 mg/kg followed by a constant rate infusion of 0.05 mg/kg/h was insufficient to obtain an adequate level of sedation and led to increased stress levels, whereas the addition of butorphanol inhibited the stress response. The combination of romifidine with either midazolam or ketamine improved sedation quality and surgical conditions.
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
The research investigates the effects of different drugs — butorphanol, midazolam, or ketamine — when used in combination with romifidine to sedate horses undergoing a common dental procedure, standing cheek tooth removal.
Study Design and Methods
The study involved forty horses undergoing tooth extraction, divided into four groups by a matched pair randomization method.
All groups were sedated with romifidine at specified doses, but each had different additional drugs. Group RB had added butorphanol, RM had added midazolam and RK had added ketamine.
The quality and adequacy of sedation were evaluated using a scoring system assessed for various factors like chewing, head and tongue movement, and ataxia (lack of coordination).
To gauge the stress levels of the horses, serum cortisol concentrations were analyzed before, during, and after the procedure.
Key Findings
Horses in group RM, those sedated with romifidine and midazolam, showed significantly less chewing and tongue activity but had higher levels of ataxia.
The sedation quality was better when romifidine was combined with ketamine, which also reduced the need for additional romifidine.
In groups RB and RM, blood cortisol concentrations, indicative of stress levels, remained unchanged during the surgery as compared to group R (Romifidine alone), which showed higher cortisol concentrations and increased stress levels.
Conclusions of the Study
It was concluded that sedating horses with only romifidine led to insufficient sedation and increased stress levels during tooth extraction procedures.
On the other hand, the addition of butorphanol to romifidine effectively inhibited the stress response in the horses.
The combination of romifidine with either midazolam or ketamine showed an improvement in the sedation quality and the conditions for tooth extraction.
Cite This Article
APA
Müller TM, Hopster K, Bienert-Zeit A, Rohn K, Kästner SBR.
(2017).
Effect of butorphanol, midazolam or ketamine on romifidine based sedation in horses during standing cheek tooth removal.
BMC Vet Res, 13(1), 381.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-017-1299-6
Clinic for Horses, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Bünteweg 9, 30559, Hannover, Germany. theresa.maria@gmx.de.
Hopster, Klaus
Clinic for Horses, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Bünteweg 9, 30559, Hannover, Germany.
Bienert-Zeit, Astrid
Clinic for Horses, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Bünteweg 9, 30559, Hannover, Germany.
Rohn, Karl
Institute for Biometry, Epidemiology and Information Processing, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Bünteweg 9, 30559, Hannover, Germany.
Kästner, Sabine B R
Clinic for Horses, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Bünteweg 9, 30559, Hannover, Germany.
MeSH Terms
Anesthetics / therapeutic use
Anesthetics, Combined
Animals
Butorphanol / therapeutic use
Conscious Sedation / methods
Conscious Sedation / veterinary
Female
Horses / surgery
Hydrocortisone / blood
Imidazoles / therapeutic use
Ketamine / therapeutic use
Male
Midazolam / therapeutic use
Tooth Extraction / methods
Tooth Extraction / veterinary
Conflict of Interest Statement
ETHICS APPROVAL: The protocol was reviewed and approved by an internal, institutional committee (University of Veterinary Medicine, Hannover). The protocol was also approved by the “Animal Welfare Committee” of the University of Veterinary Medicine, Hannover University. In our case this committee not only decided that the study protocol met all necessary requirements but also concluded that the study design met all requirements of good and common clinical practice regardless of the assignment to a specific group in this study. Therefore, step three, approval by the state committee, the “Ethics Committee for Animal Experiments of Lower Saxony” Germany, was not necessary for this specific study. Before conducting the sedation and dental procedure all owners were informed about this study and gave their consent. CONSENT FOR PUBLICATION: Not applicable. COMPETING INTERESTS: The authors declare that they have no competing interests. PUBLISHER’S NOTE: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
This article includes 38 references
Dixon PM, Dacre I, Dacre K, Tremaine WH, McCann J, Barakzai S. Standing oral extraction of cheek teeth in 100 horses (1998-2003). Equine Vet J 2005;37(2):105–112.
Commiskey S, Fan L-W, Ho IK, Rockhold RW. Butorphanol: effects of a prototypical agonist-antagonist analgesic on kappa-opioid receptors. J Pharmacol Sci 2005;98(2):109–116.
Hopster K, Bienert-Zeit A, Hopster-Iversen C, Kästner S. Einfluss von Ketamin oder midazolam in Kombination mit einer Dauertropfinfusion von Romifidin und Butorphanol auf die Sedierungsqualität während Zahnextraktionen am stehenden Pferd. Pferdeheilkd 2013;29(2):220–227.
Berger J, Heinrichs M, von Dawans B, Way BM, Chen FS. Cortisol modulates men’s affiliative responses to acute social stress. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2016;63:1–9.
Iburg KC. Der Einfluss von Romifidin, Ketamin und Lidocain auf den thermischen nozizeptiven Schwellenwert beim Pferd. Hannover tierärztl. Hochsch. 2014. https://d-nb.info/1046715097/34. Accessed 15 Jan 2017.
Sinclair MD. A review of the physiological effects of alpha2-agonists related to the clinical use of medetomidine in small animal practice. Can Vet J 2003;44(11):885–897.
Kohler I, Armbruster S, Lanz F, Schatzmann U. Analgesic effect of romifidine combined with butorphanol or levomethadone in the horse. A randomized, placebo-controlled experimental study. Tierarztliche Praxis 2004;32(6):345–349.
Leibowitz SF, Jhanwar-Uniyal M, Dvorkin B, Makman MH. Distribution of alpha-adrenergic, beta-adrenergic and dopaminergic receptors in discrete hypothalamic areas of rat. Brain Res 1982;233(1):97–114.
Al-Damluji S, Bouloux P, White A, Besser M. The role of Alpha-2-adrenoceptors in the control of ACTH secretion; interaction with the opioid system. Neuroendocrinology 1990;51(1):76–81.
Engler D, Pham T, Fullerton MJ, Ooi G, Funder JW, Clarke IJ. Studies of the secretion of Corticotropin-releasing factor and arginine vasopressin into the Hypophysial-portal circulation of the conscious sheep. Neuroendocrinology 1989;49(4):367–381.
Figueiredo JP, Muir WW, Smith J, Wolfrom GW. Sedative and analgesic effects of romifidine in horses. Intern J Appl Res Vet Med 2005;3(3):249–258.
Elfenbein JR, Sanchez LC, Robertson SA, Cole CA, Sams R. Effect of detomidine on visceral and somatic nociception and doudenal motility in conscious adult horses. Vet Anaesth Analg 2009;36(2):162–172.
Zhang Y, Li C, Shi J, Gong Y, Zeng T, Lin M, Zhang X. Comparison of dexmedetomidine with midazolam for dental surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2020 Oct 23;99(43):e22288.